Going out for dinner in Mumbai during an extended stay, or planning for a long road-trip across the wild west of Rajasthan, the first thing one looks at is Maps, that informs the relative distance, estimated time and congestion areas of different routes for the drive. Zendrive built state-of-the-art technologies on its huge cache of driving data from smartphones and OBD, to add a significant dimension to the route mapping of Google, that is safety risk of the route. Essentially the technology is built on millions of drivers zipping through the route or segments thereof. Automobile Insurance expands in UBI- where it has been established that tracking a driver’s behavior behind the wheels (like Hard Brake, Speeding etc) can predict significant differences between their chances of collisions. Looking at the same event data from the road perspective, aggregating the relative event density on road stretches also predict the relative chances of collision on that segment. We have used map matching using GIS techniques, parametric density estimation and rare event modeling using quasi-Poisson GLM to analyze our data, build the models and finally implement the scoring system across the GIS route maps. Key learnings : Relation between dangerous driving events and collisions Route risk as an aggregate of all the drivers (or sample thereof) and their driving risk. The route you take for commute may determine your auto insurance. Outline : Usage Based Insurance : relation between collision rates and dangerous driving. Driving events : aggressive acceleration, hard brake, speeding, phone use, aggressive turns Poisson GLM modeling to predict collision rates using driving data Events on a road segment : map-matching using GIS techniques to split trips along road stretches, and aggregate such events along the spatio-temporal dimension across all drivers. Route risk of the road segment and any route comprising such segments. Driving risk along such routes and corresponding collision risks using transfer of the GLM model. Assignment of risks to drivers on their daily route of commute, to be used in UBI.
www.analyticsindiasummit.com
Indian Call Girls in Abu Dhabi O5286O24O8 Call Girls in Abu Dhabi By Independ...
"Route risks using driving data on road segments" By Jayanta Kumar Pal Staff Data Scientist at Zendrive at Cypher 2018
1. Route Risks Using Driving Data on Road Segments
Dr. Jayanta Kumar Pal, Staff Data Scientist, Zendrive
27 September 2018
2. Outline
1. Introduction : Automobile Collision
and Its Global Impact
2. Which Roads are Riskier?
3. Collision Risk and Dangerous Events
4. Events on a Road Segment and the Route
Risk Assignment
5. Impact and Directions: How to Reduce
Collision Loss
2
4. Collisions are
Increasing Globally
● 60% of crashes attributed to driver
factors. Rest are roadway and vehicle
factors.
● 54 mn sustained injuries, 1.4 mn died
worldwide (2013).
○ Africa (240 deaths per mn)
○ Europe (100 deaths per mn)
● BI and PD both on the rise.
Automobile Collision and Its Global Impact
4
6. Make Roads Safer with
Data and Analytics
● Analysis:
Identify unsafe driving patterns
● Coaching:
Help drivers improve behavior
● Take Action:
Zendrive joined Vision Zero, a
national USDOT initiative
Zendrive Mission:
6
7. Identify Risky Routes with
two types of Data
● 150+ billion miles of driving data
collected via our mobile SDK (50+
million installs)
● Street maps with GIS locations for
road, rail track, intersections etc.
Zendrive Mission:
7
9. Which are the Risky Roads?
1. Road types (Highway / motorway / trunk /
residential).
2. Speed limits based on congestion / pedestrian
access / sensitivity (school, hospital).
3. Road conditions (smooth / potholes), weather
conditions (snow / rain).
4. More wheels on the road => more collisions.
5. Risk measured in collisions per mn miles.
9
10. Road Risk Hotspots
● Heat map of collisions identify :
○ Traffic intersections / lights / stop signs,
○ Highway entry-exit ramps,
○ Expressways with low visibility,
○ Construction zones.
● Spots where collisions are deadlier :
○ Pedestrian zones,
○ School and hospital areas,
○ High density residential zones etc.
Which Roads are Riskier?
10
11. Using Zendrive Data to
Assess the Risk
● Zendrive has 50 - 100/hour samples for every mile
in US
● Collisions are very rare events (< 5%)
● Fortunately, we have a dense sample of dangerous
events on all roads to build a predictive model.
Which Roads are Riskier?
11
14. Zendrive Score and Collision
Risk
● Function of all such events (along with
their frequency and severity)
● Negative relation between our Zendrive
Score and collision propensity.
Collision Risk and Dangerous Events
14
15. ● Collision risk propensity built with collection of
events on these roads.
● Low score => Higher chances of collisions (Risky
traffic hotspots).
Roads with More Events Lead to
Higher Collision Risk
Collision Risk and Dangerous Events
15
17. Route Risk
Assessment
While starting a trip from Los Angeles to Las Vegas,
Google maps tells us which is the best route in terms
of distance and estimated time.
17
18. Data Aggregation
● Substantial sample of drivers at any time on
any road.
● GIS segments and map-matching used to mine
through all trips on those stretches from GPS
trails.
● Trip broken into such segments along with its
events.
Road Segment and Route Risk Assessment
18
19. Road Segment Safety Score
● For every road segment, we collect a set of trip
segments and its events.
● Scoring framework gives the safety score of such a
route.
● Lower the score => less safe, and more dangerous.
● This road segments are likely to have higher collision
rates per miles driven as well.
80
90
100
68
80
Road Segment and Route Risk Assessment
19
20. Route Safety Risk
● Safety of the route = aggregate the
safety score of such segments.
● Within every route, we have individual
scores of road segments.
● This is such a map using a three color
palette, for roads going from
San Francisco to its neighbor cities like
San Jose, Fremont, etc.
Road Segment and Route Risk Assessment
20
22. Possible Impacts of the Analysis
● Data-crunched spatio-temporal risk
map of US (and global) roads.
● Huge impact envisaged.
● Risk map provides collision
propensity of the routes ahead.
How to Reduce Collision Loss
22
23. Temporal
Road Safety
23
● Road safety varies over time.
● Both diurnal and seasonal.
○ Winter snow
○ Late PM or early AM
● Our time-slot-by-time-slot
(usually 15 mins of length)
scoring is useful.
24. Commuter Study
● Commuters in the Bay Area
● Study identified risk spots, high risk
time intervals
● US-101 is safer than I-280 (counter-
intuitive).
● Lunch time was perceived to be high
risk compared to the peak commute
time.
● https://www.zendrive.com/commute/
How to Reduce Collision Loss
24
25. Policymaker Recommendation
● Participation in the road safety
policies of urban, state and federal
level groups.
● Active measures are recommended,
like reduce lane passings, widen the
lanes, introduce medians etc for
highways identified.
● Intersections outlined to the city
traffic overseers, so that measures
like longer light durations,
introduction of stop signs, outlawing
certain turns are taken.
How to Reduce Collision Loss
25
Collisions are increasing everywhere…
Collisions account for huge human and property losses all over the world.
In 2013, 54 million people sustained injuries on road, resulting in 1.4 million deaths.
Africa has the highest per capita deaths (240 per million), Europe has the lowest (100 per million).
~ 60% of crashes can be attributed to driver factors. Rest are roadway and vehicle factors.
Bodily injury (BI) and Property Damage (PD) both are on the rise worldwide.
Why - Make roads safer with data and analytics
How - Save money, save lives
What - Mobile driver analytics platform
Zendrive has developed state-of-the-art technology to monitor driver behavior through mobile sensor data merged with GIS information.
Driving on roads include many dangerous events, such as hard brakes and phone use, that lead to higher probability of collision.
Drivers who have more such events per mile, or have history of severe such events, tend to have a higher propensity of collision.
Similarly, roads with higher frequency of such events are riskier than other roads.
Real time collision detection enables swift assistance from family or caregivers, reducing time for intervention.
Our stated objective is to make roads safer. Part of it is done by making drivers aware of their dangerous driving, and encouraging them to forego such habits.
But another crucial part is to educate everyone about the safety risks of routes, and recommending the authority to take appropriate actions.
Vision Zero is an initiative by USDOT, launched in Nov 2016, that Zendrive participate in.
Cities have already taken that pledge, (outlined here), and Zendrive route risk is likely to play a huge role in it.
Our stated objective is to make roads safer. Part of it is done by making drivers aware of their dangerous driving, and encouraging them to forego such habits.
But another crucial part is to educate everyone about the safety risks of routes, and recommending the authority to take appropriate actions.
Vision Zero is an initiative by USDOT, launched in Nov 2016, that Zendrive participate in.
Cities have already taken that pledge, (outlined here), and Zendrive route risk is likely to play a huge role in it.
Project introduction
Zendrive’s data pervades across all roads, all time, to the extent of having x samples in every mile at any 15-minute period (in US).
However, this is only a small fraction (< 5%) of all cars on the road, and a small sample of all collisions on these roads.
Collisions being very rare events, such a sample is inadequate to assess the risk of all road segments.
Fortunately, we have a sufficiently dense sample of dangerous events on all roads to build a predictive model.
Zendrive score is a function of all such events (along with their frequency and severity)
We validate the negative relation between our Zendrive Score and collision propensity (plot shown here)
Since collisions are reported as count per million miles, we aggregate drivers in score ranges, and compare their collision rate.
The decreasing line clearly establishes the efficacy of the score as a predictor of collision.
The model for collision risk propensity of a road is, therefore, built using the collection of events happening on these roads.
We built scores for the road segments in the same way they are computed for drivers.
Roads with lower score have higher chances of collisions, identifying risky traffic hotspots in the process.
We corroborate the small set of collisions to check if they mostly happen on such traffic hotspots.
Our target is to assign a safety score to these options, so that the user can choose to avoid the route which has a higher chance of collisions.
Collisions occur many times due to the fault of other drivers, represented by a random driver who is sharing the same road at that time.
Route is made up of short road segments, each one potentially having different safety risk.
The time component of road safety is considered under the scope of this framework as well.
Road risk assignment has a highly variant time-of-day and seasonal component.
Same road in winter snow has a much higher collision propensity than in mild summer.
Similarly, late PM or early AM driving are significantly different compared to the daytime driving.
Our time-slot-by-time-slot (usually 15 mins of length) captures this variation and proposes route accordingly.