SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
www.ajms.com 10
RESEARCH ARTICLE
On Extension Theorems in Ordinary Differential Systems of Equations
1
Eziokwu Chigozie Emmanuel, 2
Nnubia Chizoba Agatha, 3
Okereke Ngozi Roseline, 4
Aboaja Onyinyechi
1,3,4
Department of Mathematics, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, 2
Nnamdi Azikiwe
University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
Received: 15-05-2022; Revised: 10-06-2022; Accepted: 12-07-2022
ABSTRACT
Given the differential system x′ = f (t, x); f: J × M → Rn
, we establish the Peano’s theorem on existence of
the solution plus Picard Lindelof theorem on uniqueness of the solution. Using the two, we then worked
on the extendibility of the solutions whose local existence is ensured by the above in a domain of open
connected set producing the following results; If D is a domain of R × Rn
and F: D → Rn
is continuous
and suppose that (t0
, x0
) is a point D and if the system has a solution x(t) defined on a finite interval (a, b)
with t ∈ (a, b) and x(t0
) = x0
, then whenever f is bounded and D, the limits
x a x t
t a
+
→
( )= +
lim ( )
x b x t
t b
−
→
( )= −
lim ( )
Exists as finite vectors and if the point (a, x(a+
)),(b, x(b-
)) is in D then x(t) is extendable to the point t = a
(t = b). In addition to this are other results as could be seen in major sections of this work.
Key words: Differential systems, Continuous maps, Existence and uniqueness of solutions, Extension of solutions
Address for correspondence:
Eziokwu, Chigozie Emmanuel
Email: okereemm@yahoo.com
INTRODUCTION
Presented in this section is a system of the form
x′= f (t, x)(1.1)
Where f: J × M → Rn
is continuous
Here, J is an interval of R and M is a subset of
Rn
. Furthermore, presented here are the basic
theorems on existence and uniqueness conditions
for solution of any given differential system
particularly those of the type in (1)
Theorem 1.1 (The Peano’s Theorem on
Existence of Solutions)
Let (t0
, x0
) be a given point in R × Rn
. Let
J = {t0
–a, t0
+a}, D = {x ∈ Rn
: |x–x0
| ≤ b}, where
a, b are two positive constants in (1.1). Assume
the following: F: J × D→Rn
is continuous with
|F (t, u) | ≤ L,(t, u) ∈ J × D, where L is a positive
constant. Then, there exists a solution x(t) of (1.1)
with the following property: x(t) is defined and
satisfied (1.1) on S={t ∈ J:| t–t0
| ≤ α} with α = min
{α, b⁄L}. Moreover x (t0
) = x0
and |x(t)-x0
|≤ b for
all t ∈{t0
–α, t0
+ α}. For proof see [1].
Theorem 1.2 (Picard’s Lindelof Theorem on
Uniqueness]
Consider system (1.1) under the assumptions of
theorem (1.1). Let F: J × D → Rn
satisfy
|F(t, x1
)–F(t, x0
)| ≤ K|x1
-x0
|
For every (t, x1
), (t, x2
) ∈ J × D, where K is a positive
constant, then there exists a unique solution x (t)
satisfying the conclusion of theorem (1.1). The
proof is in [1]
Theorem 1.3[1-3]
Let F: (a × b) × D → Rn
be continuous, where
D = {u ∈ Rn
; | u–x0
| ≤ r}, x0
a fixed point Rn
and r,
a positive constant.
ISSN 2581-3463
Emmanuel, et al.: Extension theorems in ordinary differential systems
AJMS/Jul-Sep-2022/Vol 6/Issue 3 11
Let {|F (t, u) –F (t, u0
| ≤ I (t) |u1
–u0
|}
|F (t, u)| ≤ m (t) For every t ∈ (a, b), u, u0
, u1
∈ D,
Where I, m: [a, b] → R+
are continuous and
integrable in the improper sense on (a, b) choose
the number b ∋ a1
 b1
 b so that
L I t dt m t dt r
a
b
a
b
= ( )  ( ) ≤
+ +
∫ ∫
1
1 1
,
Then, the integral equation has unique solution
x (t) on the interval [a, b]. This solution satisfies
x(a+
) = x0
and the system (1.1) on the interval [a, b]
EXTENSION
This section presents the study of extendibility
or continuation of the solutions whose local
existence is ensured by theorem (1.1) and (1.2). In
what follows, a domain is an open connected set
and we have the following definition.
Definition 2.1[4-6]
Asolution x (t), t ∈ [a, b], a b+ ∞ of system (1.1)
is said to be extendable (continuable) to t = b if
there exists another solution x (t) t ∈ [a, c], c ≥ b,
of the system (1.1) such that x (t) = x (t), t ∈ [a, b].
Asolution x (t), t ∈ [a, b], (a b+ ∞) of the system
(1.1) is said to be extendable (continuable) to
t = c, a  b  + ∞ if it is extendable (continuable)
to t = b and whenever we assume that x(t) is a
solution on [a, d] for any d ∈ [b, c] we can show
that x (t) is extendable (continuable) to t = d. Such
a solution is extendable (continuable) t = c forany
c  b. Extension to the left can be defined in a
similar manner.
Theorem 2.1[7-9]
Suppose that D is a domain of R × Rn
and F: D → Rn
is continuous. Let (t0
, x0
) be a point in D and assume
that the system (1.1) has a solution x (t) defined on
a finite interval (a, b) with t ∈ (a, b) and x(t0
) = x0
.
Then, if F is bounded on D, the limits
		
x a x t
x b x t
t a
t b
+
→
−
→
( )=
( )=





+
−
lim ( )
lim ( ) (2.1)
Exists as finite vectors. If the point (a, x (a+
)),
(b, x(b-
)) is in D, then x(t) is extendable to the
point t = a (t = b).
Proof: To show that the first limit (2.1) exists, we
first note that
x t x F s x s ds t a b
x
x
( ) = + ( )
( ) ∈
∫
0
0
, , ( , ) *
Now, let |F (t, x)| L for (t, x) ∈ D D
Where L is a positive constant
Then if t1
, t2
∈ [c, b] we obtain
x t x t F s x s ds L t t
t
1 2 1 2
1
2
( )− ≤ ( )
( ) ≤ −
∫
( ) ,
Thus, x (t1
)–x(t2
) converges to zero as t1
, t2
converges to the point t = a from the right.
Applying the continuity condition for functions,
we obtain our assertion.
Similarly, the second limit follow same argument
let us assume now that the point (b, x(b-
)) belongs
to D and consider the function
x t t a b
x b t b
x t
( ) ∈
( ) =





=
−
, ( , )
,
( )
This function is a solution of (1.1) on (a, b] In fact
(*) implies
x t x F s x s ds t a b
o
c
( ) = ( )
( ) ∈
∫
0 , , [ , ]
This in turn implies the existence of the left hand
derivative x ’(b) of x (t) as t = b
Thus, we have
x b F b x b
’
,
( ) = ( )
( )
Which completes the proof for t = b. A similar
argument holds for t = a
Remark 2.1
It should be noted that the point (a, x (a’)) is not
in D, but F (c, x (a’)) can be defined so that F is
continuous at (a, x (a’)) then x (t) is extendable to
(a, x (a’)). A similar situation exists at (b, x (b-
)).
The following extension theorem is needed for the
proof of theorem 2.3
Theorem 2.2
Let F: [a, b] × Rn
→Rn
be continuous and such that
‖F (t, x)‖ ≤ L for all (t, x) ∈ [a, b] × R
Emmanuel, et al.: Extension theorems in ordinary differential systems
AJMS/Jul-Sep-2022/Vol 6/Issue 3 12
Where L is a positive constant. Then every solution
x (t) of (1.1) is extendable to the point t = b.
Proof: Let x(t) be a solution of (1.1) passing
through the point (t0
, x0
) ∈ [a, b]×Rn
. Assume that
x (t) is defined on the interval (t0
, c) where c is
same point with c ≤ b. Then, as in the proof of
theorem 2.1 above, x(c-
) exists and x (t) is
extendable to the point t = c. If c = b, the proof is
complete. If c  b, then Peano’s theorem applied
on [c, b]× D with D a sufficiently large closed ball
with center at x(c-
) ensures the existence of a
solution such that x (t),t ∈ [c, b] such that x
(c) = x(c-
)
Thus, the function
( )
( )
( )
0
, [ , ]
, [ , ]
x t t t c
x t
x t t c b
 ∈

=

∈


Is the required extension of x (t).
Remark 2.2 [8-10]
The next theorem assures that the boundedness of
every solution through a certain point in a certain
sense and hence implies extendibility.
Theorem 2.3
Let F: [a, b] × M → Rn
be continuous, where
M is closed ball S = {u ∈ R: |u| ≤ r},r  0 (or R’).
Assume that (t0
, x0
) ∈ [a, b] × M is given and that
every solution x (t) of (1.1) passing through (t0
, x0
)
satisfies |x (t)|  ⋋ as long as it exists to the right
of t0
. Here 0  ⋋  r (or 0  ⋋  ∞). Then every
solution x (t) of (1.1) with x (t0
) = x0
is extendable
to the point t = b.
Proof: We give the proof for M = S.
If M=R’ the same proof holds and it is even easier.
Let x (t) be a solution of (1.1) with x(t0
) = x0
and
assume that x (t) is defined on [t0
, c] with c  b.
Since F is continuous on [a, b] × S⋋ where
S u u
n
= ∈ ≤
{ : }
 
There exists L  0 such that
‖F (t, x) ‖ ≤ L for all (t, x) ∈ [a, b] × S.
Now, consider the function
F t x t x a b S
x
F t
x
x
t a b
F t x
, , , [ , ]
, , ,
,
( ) ( )∈ ×





 ∈
 

( ) =






 
It is easy to see that F is continuous and such that
‖F (t, x)‖ ≤ L on [a, b] × Rn
. Consequently, theorem
2.2 above implies that every solution of the system
x′= F(t, x)(2.1)
Is extendable to t = b.
Naturally, x(t) is a solution of (2.1) defined on
[t, c] because F⋋=F for ‖x‖≤⋋.
Therefore, there exists a solution x (t), t ∈ [t0
, b]
of (2.1) such that x (t) = (t), t ∈ [t0
, c]. Assume that
there exists t ∈ [c, b] such that ‖x (t)‖ = ⋋. Then,
for some t ∈ [c, t], ‖x (t) ‖ = ⋋ and ‖x (t) ‖ ⋋ for
all t ∈ [t0
, t2
]. Obviously x (t) satisfies that system
(2.1) on [t0
, t2
].
This is a contradiction to our assumption. Thus
‖x (t)‖  ⋋ for all t ∈ [t0
, b] which implies that x (t)
is extendable to the point t = b.
MAIN RESULTS
Here, we discuss the existence of solutions on R+
by the approach of extension of solutions on R to
R+. This we achieve more easily by the following
theorems.
Theorem 3.1
Let x (t), t ∈ (t0
, t1
), t1
 t0
≥ 0 be an extendable to
the right solution of the system (1.1). Then, there
exists a non-extendable to the right solution of
(1.1) which extends x(t) to the right (which is + ∞).
Theorem 3.2
Let x (t), t ∈ (t0
, T), (0 ≤ t0
 T  + ∞) be a non-
extendable to the right solution of (1.1). Then
lim ( )
t T
x t
→ −
= +∞
Theorem 3.3
LetV:R+
×Rn
→RbeaLyapunovfunctionsatisfying
V t u t u t u n
, , ,( , )
( )≤ ( ) ∈ ×
+
  (3.1)
and V(t, u)→ + ∞ as u → R
Uniformly with respect to t lying in any compact set.
Here, Y: R+
×R is continuous and such that for
every (t0
, u0
) ∈ R+
×R, the problem
Emmanuel, et al.: Extension theorems in ordinary differential systems
AJMS/Jul-Sep-2022/Vol 6/Issue 3 13
U = Y (t, u) + ϵ, u (t0
) = u0
+ϵ (3.2)
Has a maximal solution defined on (t0v
,+∞). Then,
every solution of (1.1) is extendable to +∞.
Proof: Let (t0
, T) be the maximal interval of
existence of solution x(t) of (1.1) and assume that
T + ∞. Let y(t) be the maximal solution of (3.1)
with y(t0
) = V(t0
, x(t0
)). Then, since
	
Du (t) ≤ Y(t, v (t)),t ∈ (t0
, t1
+α)∖S: s–a
countable set (3.3)
We have
V(t, x (t)) ≤ Y (t), t ∈ [t0
, T](3.4)
On the other hand, since x(t) is non-extendable to
the right solution and we have
lim ( )
t r
x t
→
= +∞
This implies that V (t) converges to + ∞ as t → T
but (3.4) implies that
Lim Sup V(t, x (r)) ≤ Y(T)
As t →T thus T=+∞
Corollary 3.4
Assume that there exists α  0 such that
‖F (t, u)‖≤ Y ∈ R, ‖u‖  α
Where Y: R+
×R+
→R+
is such that for every (t0
, u0
)
∈ R+
the problem (3.2) has a maximal solution
defined on (t0
, ∞). Then, every solution of (1.1) is
extendable to +∞
Proof: Here, it suffices to take V(t, u) = u and obtain
V t x t
x t hF t x t x t
h
h
 , lim
,
( )
( )=
( )+ ( )
( )− ( )
→0
≤ ( )
( ) ≤ ( )
( )
F t x t Y t V t x t
, ( , ,
Provided that ‖x (t) ‖  α.
Now, let x (t), t ∈ (t0
, T) be a solution non
continuable to the right solution of (1.1) such that
R + ∞. Then, for t sufficiently close to T from left,
we have ‖x (t) ‖  α. However, if Y: R+
×R →R be
continuous and (t0
, x0
) ∈ R+
×R α ∈ (0,+ ∞) be the
maximal solution of (3.2) in the interval (t0
,t0
+ α),
let V:(t0
, t0
+ α)→ R be continuous and such that
u(t0
) ≤ u0
and DU (t) ≤ Y(t, u (t)),t ∈ (t0
,t0
+ α)S
and S is a countable set then
u (t) ≤ s (t), t ∈ (t0
,t0
+ α)
This implies that every solution x (t) of (1.1) is
extendable and hence the proof.
REFERENCES
1. KartsatosAG.Advanced Ordinary Differential Equations.
Tampa, Florida: Marine Publishing Co. Inc.; 1971.
2. Chidume CE. Foundations of Mathematical Analysis.
Trieste Italy: The Abdus Salam Ictp; 2006.
3. Chidume CE. An Introduction to Metric Space. Trieste,
Italy: International Centre for Theoretical Physics; 2007.
4. Monkes JR. Topology. 2nd
ed. New Delhi, India:
Prentice Hall of India; 2007.
5. Royden HL. Real Analysis. 3rd
ed. New Delhi, India:
Prentice Hall of India; 2008.
6. Rudrin W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis. 3rd
ed.
New York: McGraw Hill Book Company; 1976.
7. Davis SW. Topology the Walter Rudin Students Series in
Advanced Mathematics. New York; McGraw Hill; 2006.
8. Krantz SG. Real Analysis and Foundations. 2nd
ed.
London: Chapman and Hall CRC Press; 2008.
9. Strounberg K.An Introduction to Classical RealAnalysis.
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Inc.; 1981.
10. Vatsa BA. Principles of Mathematical Analysis.
New Delhi, India: CRS Publishers and Distributors;
2004.

More Related Content

Similar to Extension theorems for differential equation systems

Digital text book
Digital text bookDigital text book
Digital text bookshareenapr5
 
somenath_fixedpoint_dasguptaIMF17-20-2013
somenath_fixedpoint_dasguptaIMF17-20-2013somenath_fixedpoint_dasguptaIMF17-20-2013
somenath_fixedpoint_dasguptaIMF17-20-2013Somenath Bandyopadhyay
 
Existance Theory for First Order Nonlinear Random Dfferential Equartion
Existance Theory for First Order Nonlinear Random Dfferential EquartionExistance Theory for First Order Nonlinear Random Dfferential Equartion
Existance Theory for First Order Nonlinear Random Dfferential Equartioninventionjournals
 
Existence of Extremal Solutions of Second Order Initial Value Problems
Existence of Extremal Solutions of Second Order Initial Value ProblemsExistence of Extremal Solutions of Second Order Initial Value Problems
Existence of Extremal Solutions of Second Order Initial Value Problemsijtsrd
 
The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...
The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...
The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...Alexander Decker
 
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach SpaceOn Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach SpaceBRNSS Publication Hub
 
Existence Theory for Second Order Nonlinear Functional Random Differential Eq...
Existence Theory for Second Order Nonlinear Functional Random Differential Eq...Existence Theory for Second Order Nonlinear Functional Random Differential Eq...
Existence Theory for Second Order Nonlinear Functional Random Differential Eq...IOSR Journals
 
Fixed points of contractive and Geraghty contraction mappings under the influ...
Fixed points of contractive and Geraghty contraction mappings under the influ...Fixed points of contractive and Geraghty contraction mappings under the influ...
Fixed points of contractive and Geraghty contraction mappings under the influ...IJERA Editor
 
Coincidence points for mappings under generalized contraction
Coincidence points for mappings under generalized contractionCoincidence points for mappings under generalized contraction
Coincidence points for mappings under generalized contractionAlexander Decker
 
Approximation Methods Of Solutions For Equilibrium Problem In Hilbert Spaces
Approximation Methods Of Solutions For Equilibrium Problem In Hilbert SpacesApproximation Methods Of Solutions For Equilibrium Problem In Hilbert Spaces
Approximation Methods Of Solutions For Equilibrium Problem In Hilbert SpacesLisa Garcia
 
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spacesA common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spacesAlexander Decker
 
NONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SMALL PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE SCALES
NONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SMALL PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE SCALESNONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SMALL PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE SCALES
NONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SMALL PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE SCALESTahia ZERIZER
 
On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...
On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...
On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...BRNSS Publication Hub
 
research paper publication
research paper publicationresearch paper publication
research paper publicationsamuu45sam
 

Similar to Extension theorems for differential equation systems (20)

05_AJMS_300_21.pdf
05_AJMS_300_21.pdf05_AJMS_300_21.pdf
05_AJMS_300_21.pdf
 
Digital text book
Digital text bookDigital text book
Digital text book
 
Shareena p r
Shareena p r Shareena p r
Shareena p r
 
Shareena p r
Shareena p r Shareena p r
Shareena p r
 
somenath_fixedpoint_dasguptaIMF17-20-2013
somenath_fixedpoint_dasguptaIMF17-20-2013somenath_fixedpoint_dasguptaIMF17-20-2013
somenath_fixedpoint_dasguptaIMF17-20-2013
 
01_AJMS_277_20_20210128_V1.pdf
01_AJMS_277_20_20210128_V1.pdf01_AJMS_277_20_20210128_V1.pdf
01_AJMS_277_20_20210128_V1.pdf
 
Existance Theory for First Order Nonlinear Random Dfferential Equartion
Existance Theory for First Order Nonlinear Random Dfferential EquartionExistance Theory for First Order Nonlinear Random Dfferential Equartion
Existance Theory for First Order Nonlinear Random Dfferential Equartion
 
Existence of Extremal Solutions of Second Order Initial Value Problems
Existence of Extremal Solutions of Second Order Initial Value ProblemsExistence of Extremal Solutions of Second Order Initial Value Problems
Existence of Extremal Solutions of Second Order Initial Value Problems
 
The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...
The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...
The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...
 
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach SpaceOn Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
On Generalized Classical Fréchet Derivatives in the Real Banach Space
 
Existence Theory for Second Order Nonlinear Functional Random Differential Eq...
Existence Theory for Second Order Nonlinear Functional Random Differential Eq...Existence Theory for Second Order Nonlinear Functional Random Differential Eq...
Existence Theory for Second Order Nonlinear Functional Random Differential Eq...
 
Fixed points of contractive and Geraghty contraction mappings under the influ...
Fixed points of contractive and Geraghty contraction mappings under the influ...Fixed points of contractive and Geraghty contraction mappings under the influ...
Fixed points of contractive and Geraghty contraction mappings under the influ...
 
Coincidence points for mappings under generalized contraction
Coincidence points for mappings under generalized contractionCoincidence points for mappings under generalized contraction
Coincidence points for mappings under generalized contraction
 
Approximation Methods Of Solutions For Equilibrium Problem In Hilbert Spaces
Approximation Methods Of Solutions For Equilibrium Problem In Hilbert SpacesApproximation Methods Of Solutions For Equilibrium Problem In Hilbert Spaces
Approximation Methods Of Solutions For Equilibrium Problem In Hilbert Spaces
 
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spacesA common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
 
NONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SMALL PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE SCALES
NONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SMALL PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE SCALESNONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SMALL PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE SCALES
NONLINEAR DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS WITH SMALL PARAMETERS OF MULTIPLE SCALES
 
02_AJMS_186_19_RA.pdf
02_AJMS_186_19_RA.pdf02_AJMS_186_19_RA.pdf
02_AJMS_186_19_RA.pdf
 
02_AJMS_186_19_RA.pdf
02_AJMS_186_19_RA.pdf02_AJMS_186_19_RA.pdf
02_AJMS_186_19_RA.pdf
 
On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...
On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...
On Application of the Fixed-Point Theorem to the Solution of Ordinary Differe...
 
research paper publication
research paper publicationresearch paper publication
research paper publication
 

More from BRNSS Publication Hub

ALPHA LOGARITHM TRANSFORMED SEMI LOGISTIC DISTRIBUTION USING MAXIMUM LIKELIH...
ALPHA LOGARITHM TRANSFORMED SEMI LOGISTIC  DISTRIBUTION USING MAXIMUM LIKELIH...ALPHA LOGARITHM TRANSFORMED SEMI LOGISTIC  DISTRIBUTION USING MAXIMUM LIKELIH...
ALPHA LOGARITHM TRANSFORMED SEMI LOGISTIC DISTRIBUTION USING MAXIMUM LIKELIH...BRNSS Publication Hub
 
AN ASSESSMENT ON THE SPLIT AND NON-SPLIT DOMINATION NUMBER OF TENEMENT GRAPHS
AN ASSESSMENT ON THE SPLIT AND NON-SPLIT DOMINATION  NUMBER OF TENEMENT GRAPHSAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SPLIT AND NON-SPLIT DOMINATION  NUMBER OF TENEMENT GRAPHS
AN ASSESSMENT ON THE SPLIT AND NON-SPLIT DOMINATION NUMBER OF TENEMENT GRAPHSBRNSS Publication Hub
 
TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR SETS AND TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR FUNCTIONS
TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR SETS AND TRANSCENDENTAL  CANTOR FUNCTIONSTRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR SETS AND TRANSCENDENTAL  CANTOR FUNCTIONS
TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR SETS AND TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR FUNCTIONSBRNSS Publication Hub
 
SYMMETRIC BILINEAR CRYPTOGRAPHY ON ELLIPTIC CURVE AND LIE ALGEBRA
SYMMETRIC BILINEAR CRYPTOGRAPHY ON ELLIPTIC CURVE  AND LIE ALGEBRASYMMETRIC BILINEAR CRYPTOGRAPHY ON ELLIPTIC CURVE  AND LIE ALGEBRA
SYMMETRIC BILINEAR CRYPTOGRAPHY ON ELLIPTIC CURVE AND LIE ALGEBRABRNSS Publication Hub
 
SUITABILITY OF COINTEGRATION TESTS ON DATA STRUCTURE OF DIFFERENT ORDERS
SUITABILITY OF COINTEGRATION TESTS ON DATA STRUCTURE  OF DIFFERENT ORDERSSUITABILITY OF COINTEGRATION TESTS ON DATA STRUCTURE  OF DIFFERENT ORDERS
SUITABILITY OF COINTEGRATION TESTS ON DATA STRUCTURE OF DIFFERENT ORDERSBRNSS Publication Hub
 
Artificial Intelligence: A Manifested Leap in Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Artificial Intelligence: A Manifested Leap in Psychiatric RehabilitationArtificial Intelligence: A Manifested Leap in Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Artificial Intelligence: A Manifested Leap in Psychiatric RehabilitationBRNSS Publication Hub
 
A Review on Polyherbal Formulations and Herbal Medicine for Management of Ul...
A Review on Polyherbal Formulations and Herbal Medicine for Management of  Ul...A Review on Polyherbal Formulations and Herbal Medicine for Management of  Ul...
A Review on Polyherbal Formulations and Herbal Medicine for Management of Ul...BRNSS Publication Hub
 
Current Trends in Treatments and Targets of Neglected Tropical Disease
Current Trends in Treatments and Targets of Neglected Tropical DiseaseCurrent Trends in Treatments and Targets of Neglected Tropical Disease
Current Trends in Treatments and Targets of Neglected Tropical DiseaseBRNSS Publication Hub
 
Evaluation of Cordia Dichotoma gum as A Potent Excipient for the Formulation ...
Evaluation of Cordia Dichotoma gum as A Potent Excipient for the Formulation ...Evaluation of Cordia Dichotoma gum as A Potent Excipient for the Formulation ...
Evaluation of Cordia Dichotoma gum as A Potent Excipient for the Formulation ...BRNSS Publication Hub
 
Assessment of Medication Adherence Pattern for Patients with Chronic Diseases...
Assessment of Medication Adherence Pattern for Patients with Chronic Diseases...Assessment of Medication Adherence Pattern for Patients with Chronic Diseases...
Assessment of Medication Adherence Pattern for Patients with Chronic Diseases...BRNSS Publication Hub
 

More from BRNSS Publication Hub (20)

ALPHA LOGARITHM TRANSFORMED SEMI LOGISTIC DISTRIBUTION USING MAXIMUM LIKELIH...
ALPHA LOGARITHM TRANSFORMED SEMI LOGISTIC  DISTRIBUTION USING MAXIMUM LIKELIH...ALPHA LOGARITHM TRANSFORMED SEMI LOGISTIC  DISTRIBUTION USING MAXIMUM LIKELIH...
ALPHA LOGARITHM TRANSFORMED SEMI LOGISTIC DISTRIBUTION USING MAXIMUM LIKELIH...
 
AN ASSESSMENT ON THE SPLIT AND NON-SPLIT DOMINATION NUMBER OF TENEMENT GRAPHS
AN ASSESSMENT ON THE SPLIT AND NON-SPLIT DOMINATION  NUMBER OF TENEMENT GRAPHSAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SPLIT AND NON-SPLIT DOMINATION  NUMBER OF TENEMENT GRAPHS
AN ASSESSMENT ON THE SPLIT AND NON-SPLIT DOMINATION NUMBER OF TENEMENT GRAPHS
 
TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR SETS AND TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR FUNCTIONS
TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR SETS AND TRANSCENDENTAL  CANTOR FUNCTIONSTRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR SETS AND TRANSCENDENTAL  CANTOR FUNCTIONS
TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR SETS AND TRANSCENDENTAL CANTOR FUNCTIONS
 
SYMMETRIC BILINEAR CRYPTOGRAPHY ON ELLIPTIC CURVE AND LIE ALGEBRA
SYMMETRIC BILINEAR CRYPTOGRAPHY ON ELLIPTIC CURVE  AND LIE ALGEBRASYMMETRIC BILINEAR CRYPTOGRAPHY ON ELLIPTIC CURVE  AND LIE ALGEBRA
SYMMETRIC BILINEAR CRYPTOGRAPHY ON ELLIPTIC CURVE AND LIE ALGEBRA
 
SUITABILITY OF COINTEGRATION TESTS ON DATA STRUCTURE OF DIFFERENT ORDERS
SUITABILITY OF COINTEGRATION TESTS ON DATA STRUCTURE  OF DIFFERENT ORDERSSUITABILITY OF COINTEGRATION TESTS ON DATA STRUCTURE  OF DIFFERENT ORDERS
SUITABILITY OF COINTEGRATION TESTS ON DATA STRUCTURE OF DIFFERENT ORDERS
 
Artificial Intelligence: A Manifested Leap in Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Artificial Intelligence: A Manifested Leap in Psychiatric RehabilitationArtificial Intelligence: A Manifested Leap in Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Artificial Intelligence: A Manifested Leap in Psychiatric Rehabilitation
 
A Review on Polyherbal Formulations and Herbal Medicine for Management of Ul...
A Review on Polyherbal Formulations and Herbal Medicine for Management of  Ul...A Review on Polyherbal Formulations and Herbal Medicine for Management of  Ul...
A Review on Polyherbal Formulations and Herbal Medicine for Management of Ul...
 
Current Trends in Treatments and Targets of Neglected Tropical Disease
Current Trends in Treatments and Targets of Neglected Tropical DiseaseCurrent Trends in Treatments and Targets of Neglected Tropical Disease
Current Trends in Treatments and Targets of Neglected Tropical Disease
 
Evaluation of Cordia Dichotoma gum as A Potent Excipient for the Formulation ...
Evaluation of Cordia Dichotoma gum as A Potent Excipient for the Formulation ...Evaluation of Cordia Dichotoma gum as A Potent Excipient for the Formulation ...
Evaluation of Cordia Dichotoma gum as A Potent Excipient for the Formulation ...
 
Assessment of Medication Adherence Pattern for Patients with Chronic Diseases...
Assessment of Medication Adherence Pattern for Patients with Chronic Diseases...Assessment of Medication Adherence Pattern for Patients with Chronic Diseases...
Assessment of Medication Adherence Pattern for Patients with Chronic Diseases...
 
AJMS_491_23.pdf
AJMS_491_23.pdfAJMS_491_23.pdf
AJMS_491_23.pdf
 
AJMS_490_23.pdf
AJMS_490_23.pdfAJMS_490_23.pdf
AJMS_490_23.pdf
 
AJMS_487_23.pdf
AJMS_487_23.pdfAJMS_487_23.pdf
AJMS_487_23.pdf
 
AJMS_482_23.pdf
AJMS_482_23.pdfAJMS_482_23.pdf
AJMS_482_23.pdf
 
AJMS_481_23.pdf
AJMS_481_23.pdfAJMS_481_23.pdf
AJMS_481_23.pdf
 
AJMS_480_23.pdf
AJMS_480_23.pdfAJMS_480_23.pdf
AJMS_480_23.pdf
 
AJMS_477_23.pdf
AJMS_477_23.pdfAJMS_477_23.pdf
AJMS_477_23.pdf
 
AJMS_476_23.pdf
AJMS_476_23.pdfAJMS_476_23.pdf
AJMS_476_23.pdf
 
AJMS_467_23.pdf
AJMS_467_23.pdfAJMS_467_23.pdf
AJMS_467_23.pdf
 
IJPBA_2061_23_20230715_V1.pdf
IJPBA_2061_23_20230715_V1.pdfIJPBA_2061_23_20230715_V1.pdf
IJPBA_2061_23_20230715_V1.pdf
 

Recently uploaded

BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsKarinaGenton
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Science lesson Moon for 4th quarter lesson
Science lesson Moon for 4th quarter lessonScience lesson Moon for 4th quarter lesson
Science lesson Moon for 4th quarter lessonJericReyAuditor
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,Virag Sontakke
 
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of IndiaPainted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of IndiaVirag Sontakke
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application ) Sakshi Ghasle
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptxHistory Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptxsocialsciencegdgrohi
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Celine George
 

Recently uploaded (20)

BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
Science lesson Moon for 4th quarter lesson
Science lesson Moon for 4th quarter lessonScience lesson Moon for 4th quarter lesson
Science lesson Moon for 4th quarter lesson
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
भारत-रोम व्यापार.pptx, Indo-Roman Trade,
 
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of IndiaPainted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
Painted Grey Ware.pptx, PGW Culture of India
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptxHistory Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
 

Extension theorems for differential equation systems

  • 1. www.ajms.com 10 RESEARCH ARTICLE On Extension Theorems in Ordinary Differential Systems of Equations 1 Eziokwu Chigozie Emmanuel, 2 Nnubia Chizoba Agatha, 3 Okereke Ngozi Roseline, 4 Aboaja Onyinyechi 1,3,4 Department of Mathematics, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, 2 Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria Received: 15-05-2022; Revised: 10-06-2022; Accepted: 12-07-2022 ABSTRACT Given the differential system x′ = f (t, x); f: J × M → Rn , we establish the Peano’s theorem on existence of the solution plus Picard Lindelof theorem on uniqueness of the solution. Using the two, we then worked on the extendibility of the solutions whose local existence is ensured by the above in a domain of open connected set producing the following results; If D is a domain of R × Rn and F: D → Rn is continuous and suppose that (t0 , x0 ) is a point D and if the system has a solution x(t) defined on a finite interval (a, b) with t ∈ (a, b) and x(t0 ) = x0 , then whenever f is bounded and D, the limits x a x t t a + → ( )= + lim ( ) x b x t t b − → ( )= − lim ( ) Exists as finite vectors and if the point (a, x(a+ )),(b, x(b- )) is in D then x(t) is extendable to the point t = a (t = b). In addition to this are other results as could be seen in major sections of this work. Key words: Differential systems, Continuous maps, Existence and uniqueness of solutions, Extension of solutions Address for correspondence: Eziokwu, Chigozie Emmanuel Email: okereemm@yahoo.com INTRODUCTION Presented in this section is a system of the form x′= f (t, x)(1.1) Where f: J × M → Rn is continuous Here, J is an interval of R and M is a subset of Rn . Furthermore, presented here are the basic theorems on existence and uniqueness conditions for solution of any given differential system particularly those of the type in (1) Theorem 1.1 (The Peano’s Theorem on Existence of Solutions) Let (t0 , x0 ) be a given point in R × Rn . Let J = {t0 –a, t0 +a}, D = {x ∈ Rn : |x–x0 | ≤ b}, where a, b are two positive constants in (1.1). Assume the following: F: J × D→Rn is continuous with |F (t, u) | ≤ L,(t, u) ∈ J × D, where L is a positive constant. Then, there exists a solution x(t) of (1.1) with the following property: x(t) is defined and satisfied (1.1) on S={t ∈ J:| t–t0 | ≤ α} with α = min {α, b⁄L}. Moreover x (t0 ) = x0 and |x(t)-x0 |≤ b for all t ∈{t0 –α, t0 + α}. For proof see [1]. Theorem 1.2 (Picard’s Lindelof Theorem on Uniqueness] Consider system (1.1) under the assumptions of theorem (1.1). Let F: J × D → Rn satisfy |F(t, x1 )–F(t, x0 )| ≤ K|x1 -x0 | For every (t, x1 ), (t, x2 ) ∈ J × D, where K is a positive constant, then there exists a unique solution x (t) satisfying the conclusion of theorem (1.1). The proof is in [1] Theorem 1.3[1-3] Let F: (a × b) × D → Rn be continuous, where D = {u ∈ Rn ; | u–x0 | ≤ r}, x0 a fixed point Rn and r, a positive constant. ISSN 2581-3463
  • 2. Emmanuel, et al.: Extension theorems in ordinary differential systems AJMS/Jul-Sep-2022/Vol 6/Issue 3 11 Let {|F (t, u) –F (t, u0 | ≤ I (t) |u1 –u0 |} |F (t, u)| ≤ m (t) For every t ∈ (a, b), u, u0 , u1 ∈ D, Where I, m: [a, b] → R+ are continuous and integrable in the improper sense on (a, b) choose the number b ∋ a1 b1 b so that L I t dt m t dt r a b a b = ( ) ( ) ≤ + + ∫ ∫ 1 1 1 , Then, the integral equation has unique solution x (t) on the interval [a, b]. This solution satisfies x(a+ ) = x0 and the system (1.1) on the interval [a, b] EXTENSION This section presents the study of extendibility or continuation of the solutions whose local existence is ensured by theorem (1.1) and (1.2). In what follows, a domain is an open connected set and we have the following definition. Definition 2.1[4-6] Asolution x (t), t ∈ [a, b], a b+ ∞ of system (1.1) is said to be extendable (continuable) to t = b if there exists another solution x (t) t ∈ [a, c], c ≥ b, of the system (1.1) such that x (t) = x (t), t ∈ [a, b]. Asolution x (t), t ∈ [a, b], (a b+ ∞) of the system (1.1) is said to be extendable (continuable) to t = c, a b + ∞ if it is extendable (continuable) to t = b and whenever we assume that x(t) is a solution on [a, d] for any d ∈ [b, c] we can show that x (t) is extendable (continuable) to t = d. Such a solution is extendable (continuable) t = c forany c b. Extension to the left can be defined in a similar manner. Theorem 2.1[7-9] Suppose that D is a domain of R × Rn and F: D → Rn is continuous. Let (t0 , x0 ) be a point in D and assume that the system (1.1) has a solution x (t) defined on a finite interval (a, b) with t ∈ (a, b) and x(t0 ) = x0 . Then, if F is bounded on D, the limits x a x t x b x t t a t b + → − → ( )= ( )=      + − lim ( ) lim ( ) (2.1) Exists as finite vectors. If the point (a, x (a+ )), (b, x(b- )) is in D, then x(t) is extendable to the point t = a (t = b). Proof: To show that the first limit (2.1) exists, we first note that x t x F s x s ds t a b x x ( ) = + ( ) ( ) ∈ ∫ 0 0 , , ( , ) * Now, let |F (t, x)| L for (t, x) ∈ D D Where L is a positive constant Then if t1 , t2 ∈ [c, b] we obtain x t x t F s x s ds L t t t 1 2 1 2 1 2 ( )− ≤ ( ) ( ) ≤ − ∫ ( ) , Thus, x (t1 )–x(t2 ) converges to zero as t1 , t2 converges to the point t = a from the right. Applying the continuity condition for functions, we obtain our assertion. Similarly, the second limit follow same argument let us assume now that the point (b, x(b- )) belongs to D and consider the function x t t a b x b t b x t ( ) ∈ ( ) =      = − , ( , ) , ( ) This function is a solution of (1.1) on (a, b] In fact (*) implies x t x F s x s ds t a b o c ( ) = ( ) ( ) ∈ ∫ 0 , , [ , ] This in turn implies the existence of the left hand derivative x ’(b) of x (t) as t = b Thus, we have x b F b x b ’ , ( ) = ( ) ( ) Which completes the proof for t = b. A similar argument holds for t = a Remark 2.1 It should be noted that the point (a, x (a’)) is not in D, but F (c, x (a’)) can be defined so that F is continuous at (a, x (a’)) then x (t) is extendable to (a, x (a’)). A similar situation exists at (b, x (b- )). The following extension theorem is needed for the proof of theorem 2.3 Theorem 2.2 Let F: [a, b] × Rn →Rn be continuous and such that ‖F (t, x)‖ ≤ L for all (t, x) ∈ [a, b] × R
  • 3. Emmanuel, et al.: Extension theorems in ordinary differential systems AJMS/Jul-Sep-2022/Vol 6/Issue 3 12 Where L is a positive constant. Then every solution x (t) of (1.1) is extendable to the point t = b. Proof: Let x(t) be a solution of (1.1) passing through the point (t0 , x0 ) ∈ [a, b]×Rn . Assume that x (t) is defined on the interval (t0 , c) where c is same point with c ≤ b. Then, as in the proof of theorem 2.1 above, x(c- ) exists and x (t) is extendable to the point t = c. If c = b, the proof is complete. If c b, then Peano’s theorem applied on [c, b]× D with D a sufficiently large closed ball with center at x(c- ) ensures the existence of a solution such that x (t),t ∈ [c, b] such that x (c) = x(c- ) Thus, the function ( ) ( ) ( ) 0 , [ , ] , [ , ] x t t t c x t x t t c b  ∈  =  ∈   Is the required extension of x (t). Remark 2.2 [8-10] The next theorem assures that the boundedness of every solution through a certain point in a certain sense and hence implies extendibility. Theorem 2.3 Let F: [a, b] × M → Rn be continuous, where M is closed ball S = {u ∈ R: |u| ≤ r},r 0 (or R’). Assume that (t0 , x0 ) ∈ [a, b] × M is given and that every solution x (t) of (1.1) passing through (t0 , x0 ) satisfies |x (t)| ⋋ as long as it exists to the right of t0 . Here 0 ⋋ r (or 0 ⋋ ∞). Then every solution x (t) of (1.1) with x (t0 ) = x0 is extendable to the point t = b. Proof: We give the proof for M = S. If M=R’ the same proof holds and it is even easier. Let x (t) be a solution of (1.1) with x(t0 ) = x0 and assume that x (t) is defined on [t0 , c] with c b. Since F is continuous on [a, b] × S⋋ where S u u n = ∈ ≤ { : }   There exists L 0 such that ‖F (t, x) ‖ ≤ L for all (t, x) ∈ [a, b] × S. Now, consider the function F t x t x a b S x F t x x t a b F t x , , , [ , ] , , , , ( ) ( )∈ ×       ∈    ( ) =         It is easy to see that F is continuous and such that ‖F (t, x)‖ ≤ L on [a, b] × Rn . Consequently, theorem 2.2 above implies that every solution of the system x′= F(t, x)(2.1) Is extendable to t = b. Naturally, x(t) is a solution of (2.1) defined on [t, c] because F⋋=F for ‖x‖≤⋋. Therefore, there exists a solution x (t), t ∈ [t0 , b] of (2.1) such that x (t) = (t), t ∈ [t0 , c]. Assume that there exists t ∈ [c, b] such that ‖x (t)‖ = ⋋. Then, for some t ∈ [c, t], ‖x (t) ‖ = ⋋ and ‖x (t) ‖ ⋋ for all t ∈ [t0 , t2 ]. Obviously x (t) satisfies that system (2.1) on [t0 , t2 ]. This is a contradiction to our assumption. Thus ‖x (t)‖ ⋋ for all t ∈ [t0 , b] which implies that x (t) is extendable to the point t = b. MAIN RESULTS Here, we discuss the existence of solutions on R+ by the approach of extension of solutions on R to R+. This we achieve more easily by the following theorems. Theorem 3.1 Let x (t), t ∈ (t0 , t1 ), t1 t0 ≥ 0 be an extendable to the right solution of the system (1.1). Then, there exists a non-extendable to the right solution of (1.1) which extends x(t) to the right (which is + ∞). Theorem 3.2 Let x (t), t ∈ (t0 , T), (0 ≤ t0 T + ∞) be a non- extendable to the right solution of (1.1). Then lim ( ) t T x t → − = +∞ Theorem 3.3 LetV:R+ ×Rn →RbeaLyapunovfunctionsatisfying V t u t u t u n , , ,( , ) ( )≤ ( ) ∈ × +   (3.1) and V(t, u)→ + ∞ as u → R Uniformly with respect to t lying in any compact set. Here, Y: R+ ×R is continuous and such that for every (t0 , u0 ) ∈ R+ ×R, the problem
  • 4. Emmanuel, et al.: Extension theorems in ordinary differential systems AJMS/Jul-Sep-2022/Vol 6/Issue 3 13 U = Y (t, u) + ϵ, u (t0 ) = u0 +ϵ (3.2) Has a maximal solution defined on (t0v ,+∞). Then, every solution of (1.1) is extendable to +∞. Proof: Let (t0 , T) be the maximal interval of existence of solution x(t) of (1.1) and assume that T + ∞. Let y(t) be the maximal solution of (3.1) with y(t0 ) = V(t0 , x(t0 )). Then, since Du (t) ≤ Y(t, v (t)),t ∈ (t0 , t1 +α)∖S: s–a countable set (3.3) We have V(t, x (t)) ≤ Y (t), t ∈ [t0 , T](3.4) On the other hand, since x(t) is non-extendable to the right solution and we have lim ( ) t r x t → = +∞ This implies that V (t) converges to + ∞ as t → T but (3.4) implies that Lim Sup V(t, x (r)) ≤ Y(T) As t →T thus T=+∞ Corollary 3.4 Assume that there exists α 0 such that ‖F (t, u)‖≤ Y ∈ R, ‖u‖ α Where Y: R+ ×R+ →R+ is such that for every (t0 , u0 ) ∈ R+ the problem (3.2) has a maximal solution defined on (t0 , ∞). Then, every solution of (1.1) is extendable to +∞ Proof: Here, it suffices to take V(t, u) = u and obtain V t x t x t hF t x t x t h h  , lim , ( ) ( )= ( )+ ( ) ( )− ( ) →0 ≤ ( ) ( ) ≤ ( ) ( ) F t x t Y t V t x t , ( , , Provided that ‖x (t) ‖ α. Now, let x (t), t ∈ (t0 , T) be a solution non continuable to the right solution of (1.1) such that R + ∞. Then, for t sufficiently close to T from left, we have ‖x (t) ‖ α. However, if Y: R+ ×R →R be continuous and (t0 , x0 ) ∈ R+ ×R α ∈ (0,+ ∞) be the maximal solution of (3.2) in the interval (t0 ,t0 + α), let V:(t0 , t0 + α)→ R be continuous and such that u(t0 ) ≤ u0 and DU (t) ≤ Y(t, u (t)),t ∈ (t0 ,t0 + α)S and S is a countable set then u (t) ≤ s (t), t ∈ (t0 ,t0 + α) This implies that every solution x (t) of (1.1) is extendable and hence the proof. REFERENCES 1. KartsatosAG.Advanced Ordinary Differential Equations. Tampa, Florida: Marine Publishing Co. Inc.; 1971. 2. Chidume CE. Foundations of Mathematical Analysis. Trieste Italy: The Abdus Salam Ictp; 2006. 3. Chidume CE. An Introduction to Metric Space. Trieste, Italy: International Centre for Theoretical Physics; 2007. 4. Monkes JR. Topology. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India; 2007. 5. Royden HL. Real Analysis. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall of India; 2008. 6. Rudrin W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company; 1976. 7. Davis SW. Topology the Walter Rudin Students Series in Advanced Mathematics. New York; McGraw Hill; 2006. 8. Krantz SG. Real Analysis and Foundations. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall CRC Press; 2008. 9. Strounberg K.An Introduction to Classical RealAnalysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Inc.; 1981. 10. Vatsa BA. Principles of Mathematical Analysis. New Delhi, India: CRS Publishers and Distributors; 2004.