2. OVERVIEW
• Definition – Basis-Normative data
• Prevalence
• Etiology
• Screening
• Abnormal screen follow up
• Management of dyslipidemia
– Nonpharmacologic
– Pharmacologic –(Monitoring on Statins/ second line
agents)
3. Dyslipidemias are disorders of lipoprotein
metabolism that result in
• High TC/ LDL-C /non-HDL-C/TG)
• Low HDL-C
4. DEFINITION
• Normative values —
• Values vary by age sex , growth, ethnicity
• Relatively stable from 2-18 years
• Puberty-TC and LDL-C levels decrease with
increasing age before rising in the late teenage
years
5.
6. Prevalence
• 20 % (age 6 to 19 years) have adverse levels of
one or more lipid value
• Elevated TG(10.2) >TC (7.1) > LDL-C (6.4)/
Non-HDL-C(6.4)
• Prevalence in normal weight, overweight and
obese were 14, 22, and 43 % respectively
.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of
abnormal lipid levels among youths - United States, 1999-2006
7. Indian data
.
• Grossly lacking in pediatric population
• Studies limited to high risk populations(
Kawasaki / FH
• Very few school based studies
• Ethical issues in conducting these
epidemiological studies for normative data
10. Indian data
The study was conducted to assess the incidence and type of lipid disorders in children
whose parents had premature coronary artery disease.
Group A- Lipid profile of 250 children (of parents who had premature coronary artery
disease (age <55 years), was compared with age matched healthy controls (Group B),
whose parents had no evidence of coronary artery disease.
Mean TC, LDL and triglycerides TG were significantly higher in Group A
The absolute values of lipids, TC and LDL in Group A children were within the normal
range for age.
Abnormal high density lipoprotein (HDL) level and elevated triglyceride levels were
present in 25% and 22.5%, respectively in the children of this group.
11. ETIOLOGY
Monogenic conditions ( single gene defect)
• Familial hypercholesterolemia, familial defective
apolipoprotein B or PCSK9, and familial
hypertriglyceridemia , Familial combined
Secondary dyslipidemia
Obesity, NS/ DM 2 / Drugs (eg, alcohol,isotretinoin)
Idiopathic, related to polygenic defects
13. SCREENING
Rationale
• Short-term trials in high-risk populations and
studies demonstrating links between pediatric
dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis
• In the high-risk subset of children with severe
dyslipidemia due to FH, treatment reduces the
risk of cardiovascular events.
• Pediatric lipid disorders often track into
adulthood (50%)
14. SCREENING
Why Universal screening ?
Family history is an insensitive predictor
– Identifying and treating the greatest number of
individuals with FH, a group at highest risk
– Selective screening based on family history alone
misses a considerable number (30 to 60 percent)
of children with dyslipidemia
Universal Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in
Children. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015.
17. SCREENING
Choice of screening test
• Full fasting lipid profile or non-fasting lipid levels
(non-HDL-C is calculated - more practical
screening test for pediatric patients).
• If an initial non-fasting screen is abnormal, a
follow-up fasting lipid profile should be obtained.
• At least two fasting profiles should be used to
guide clinical decision making, including
pharmacologic therapy.
Bogalusa heart study and PDAY
Study
26. MANAGEMENT
Pharmacologic therapy
• Typically with statins
• Generally warranted in children ≥10 years old
who fail to reach the targeted LDL-c goal with
lifestyle counseling by six months.
However, also dependent upon
• The severity of dyslipidemia
• Other comorbid conditions (eg, diabetes CKD);
• Family history of premature CVD
27. MANAGEMENT
Children <10 years old
Pharmacotherapy should not be
used in children <10 years of
age unless one or more of the
following are present:
• High-risk CVD condition
• LDL-C levels >400 mg/dL which
suggest homozygous or severe
heterozygous FH
• TG >500 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L),
which may suggest primary
genetic hypertriglyceridemia
Children >10 years old
• Pharmacotherapy of older
children with dyslipidemia is
generally initiated when
lifestyle changes fail to
achieve target levels after
six months;
28.
29. • Myopathy, new-onset type 2 DM, hepatic enzyme
elevation.
• More likely at higher doses and in patients taking
other medications (particularly cyclosporine,
azole antifungal, and foods (eg, grapefruit)
• Adolescent females- counseled about the
possibility of drug teratogenicity and appropriate
contraceptive
• Use of statins by breastfeeding mothers is
discouraged
MONITORING ON STATINS
32. If maximal tolerated dose of Statin is not
successful in achieving the LDL-C goal
• Cholesterol absorption inhibitors -Ezetimibe
• Fibric acid derivatives –, Gemfibrozil,
Fenofibrateare used primarily for treating
severe hypertriglyceridemia
• Bile acid sequestrants – Bile acid sequestrants
are not as effective as statins in lowering LDL-
C and have adverse side effects that result in
poor compliance
SECOND LINE AGENTS
33. PCSK9 inhibitors –Evolocumab and Alirocumab)
-human monoclonal antibodies that bind to
(PCSK9), a protein that plays a key role in
regulating plasma LDL cholesterol levels.
In Europe, evolocumab is approved in
adolescents (≥12 years old) with homozygous
FH
SECOND LINE AGENTS
34. • Mipomersen -inhibits production of
apolipoprotein B. It is used chiefly in patients
with FH- once weekly subcutaneous injection.
• Lomitapide -used chiefly in patients with
homozygous FH or in adults with very severe
heterozygous FH
– orally
SECOND LINE AGENTS
Lipid levels are relatively stable from two years of age until adolescence. During puberty, total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels decrease with increasing age before rising in the late teenage years
Normal lipid and lipoprotein values in children vary by age and sex Normative values are derived from population-based data from the Lipid Research Clinical Prevalence Study, which obtained fasting lipoprotein profiles from 15,626 children (age range, 0 to 19 years) between 1972 and 1976and from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, -7000 children from 1988 to 1994
In consensus with AAP /AHA/ACC
Study done in siblings of patients which might not be feasible in todays scenario
Study done in siblings of patients which might not be feasible in todays scenario
4 mutations in FH- Receptor defects of LDL
Endorsed by AAP/AHA/NHLBI
The widespread use of statin therapy in adults has lowered the rate of clinical cardiovascular events, which may explain why family history of premature CVD is less predictive
Family history of premature CVD is generally defined as heart attack, treated angina, interventions for coronary artery disease, sudden cardiac death, or ischemic stroke in a male parent or sibling before 55 years of age or a female parent or sibling before 65 years of age.
TG levels are influenced by recent food intake and should be measured in the fasting state when possible.
Differences in measurements of TC and HDL-C between the fasting or nonfasting state are small and clinically insignificant
PDAY –Pathologic determinants of atheroscelorosis in young
without any risk factors --twice during childhood and late adolescence.
9 and 11 years and the second between age 17 and 21 years.
At age 12 to 16 years, screening is not recommended for children without CVD risk factors because
Repeated testing is required because there is considerable intraindividual variability.
Bogalusa study-- children with LDL-C levels between 160 and 189 mg/dL -demonstrated an average decrease in LDL-C by 21 mg/dL) at the next examination, and among those with levels ≥190 mg/dL mmol/L), the average decrease was 34 mg/dL
Confirmatory testing consists of 2 fasting lipid profiles obtained 2 weeks to 3 months apart
ie, if the patient had a fasting lipid profile performed as the initial screen, a second fasting lipid profile is obtained 2 weeks to 3 months later; if the patient's initial screen was performed using nonfasting non-HDL-C, 2 separate fasting lipid profiles should be performed).
Average the 2 results.
Risk factors for premature CVD, as defined by the NHLBI expert panel are: high-risk conditions and comorbidities (including type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, hypertension requiring drug therapy [ie, blood pressure ≥99th percentile + 5 mmHg], current cigarette smoker, BMI ≥97th percentile, heart transplant recipient, and Kawasaki disease with current coronary aneurysms); moderate-risk conditions and comorbidities
Targeted values of LDL-C and depend on the presence of associated risk factors. Generally, the minimal value is <130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L). The optimal value is <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L). In high risk patients (eg, children with diabetes mellitus or chronic renal insufficiency), target values of <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) are use
When initiating therapy, it is important to discuss with the patient and family the potential but unproven benefits of statin therapy in childhood to reduce CVD risk versus the unknown long-term risks of these medications therapies
Providers should be aware that oral contraceptive pills can increase lipid levels
Drugs that impact the cytochrome P450 system
Toxicity from statin therapy includes elevated liver enzymes (≥3 times the upper limit of normal), and myopathy (ie, elevated CK [≥10 times the upper limit of normal] or suggestive symptoms such as weakness, asthenia, and/or muscle cramps).
Targeted values of LDL-C and depend on the presence of associated risk factors. Generally, the minimal value is <130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L). The optimal value is <110 mg/dL (2.84 mmol/L). In high-risk patients (eg, children with diabetes mellitus or chronic renal insufficiency), target values of <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) are used