Prium Brussels 0809 Managing Finance

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Prium Brussels 0809 Managing Finance - Presentation Transcript

    1. PRIUM site visit september 9-10, 2008 Managing finance & optimizing efficiency Nic Van Craen, director finance
    2. previous
      • Presentation about new funding model and its impact on the organisation as seen from the finance department
    3. agenda
      • Function of finance department
      • Some keynumbers: annual accounts & budgetsources
      • Introduction to the New government financing model
      • Transition period by unchanged policy
      • As-is situation between 2003-2006
      • 2007: introduction of the new model and impact on university policy
      • To-be 2008-2013
        • Introduction of an Allocation model
        • Use of combined integrated data = BI, need for ERP
        • Chaning role of central administration
      • Risks
    4. Finance department
      • Global Mission: improvement of revenues, efficiënt & effectiveness costallocation en –centers
      • tools:
        • Financial administration: central, legal, operations
        • Financial management: policy
        • Budgeting & forecasting: framework & steering of university policy and its administration/execution
      • How? responsabilities, 5yr and yearly plan in accordance to strategic plan of university , link between academic policy and financial policy
      • External driver: new governement financing model
    5. Annual accounts (k €)
    6. Introduction of a new financing model
      • First draft of model in 2004
      • Decree of 14/03/08
      • Impact starting on Budget 2008
      • Milestone 2013 – major change in financing ( no more historical compensation)
      • Academisation 2013
    7. Institutional funding model
    8. Transition period
    9. As-is situation between 2003-2006:
      • “ frozen” governement funding since 2000, fractional indexation
        • + : fixed, certain and time to prepare
        • - : increase of expenses > index of funding
        • internal budgeting reform
        • preparing change in funding
      • adapted Budgeting proces: zero based if relevant, central policy on the use of local reserves, projection on 5j-bases
      • Budgeting as steering-instrument in university policy instead of post-factum material
      • introduction of active electronic financial administration: use of web-application for ordering, management, reporting & budgeting starting at cost centre level
        • Imposed to realise a closely defined procedure
        • Need for reallocation of staff in finance department
        • Awareness of the cost centre responsables
    10. 2007: introduction of the new model
      • Impact on university policy
      • changing role of finance-department from exclusively executing to expertise and consultancy
      • supported bij automated systems and BI
      • not only in this case but as a general organisational impact
    11. To-be 2008-2013
      • Introduction of a (new) allocation model
        • Characteristics:
          • Governement Funding model = benchmark
          • Knowledge on the cost/funding of activities
          • Solidarity on university-level
          • Key to goalsetting on faculty/course and university level
          • Solide, rewarding goal-achievement
        • Goals:
          • autonomy & responsability on faculty-level in accordance to the university-strategy
          • Rewarding/sanctioning
          • Translation of university strategy by internal drivers
        • Conditions:
          • Business intelligence
          • University management
          • Professionalism of central administration
    12. Central administration = overhead!
      • Contradiction?
      • Increasinge importance of (central) administration while need to maximum output on academic level
      • External conditions, justifying & legislation:
        • Need of Expertise and consulting from central to individual level
        • Automisation: raptools, campusmanagement, webapplications, avoid double input
      • Need of:
        • Strong resolute central administration
        • Internal audit
        • Full cost model (introduced by FP7; impact to total university, f.e. timesheeting)
      • Risks:
        • Resolute central administration  individual academic goals
        • overkill in administration also at academic staff level,
        • dependancy on systems
        • Cost of decision-making
        • Automisation seems like transeferring work from central to individual level
      • Threats:
        • Change in mandate whilst staff isn’t prepared to new situation
    13. Any questions?
      •  : nvcraen @ vub.ac.be
      •  : +32 2 629 20 96
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Youth AgoraYouth Agora Nominate

    custom

    335 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Managing finance & optimizing efficiency, by Nic Va more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 335
      • 334 on SlideShare
      • 1 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 2
    Most viewed embeds
    • 1 views on http://prium.unica-network.eu

    more

    All embeds
    • 1 views on http://prium.unica-network.eu

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories