2007 CSAP Results Weld Re-8 School District Fort Lupton, Colorado

2007 CSAP READING Results

2007 CSAP WRITING Results

2007 CSAP MATH Results

2005-2007 Elementary Math Results

2006-07 Advanced Scores in MATH

2007 CSAP SCIENCE Results

2007 CSAP Results

Butler: 2006-2007 CSAP Results % P/A 65% 63% Grade 5 57% 49% Grade 4 47% 47% Grade 3 2007 2006 READING 48% 54% Grade 5 44% 32% Grade 4 38% 35% Grade 3 2007 2006 WRITING 65% 62% Grade 5 68% 47% Grade 4 51% 49% Grade 3 2007 2006 MATH 39% 22% Grade 5 2007 2006 SCIENCE

2007 Butler CSAP Highlights Grade 3 P/A scores up in Writing/Math 17% Advanced in Math Grade 4 P/A scores up in Reading/Writing/Math 27% Advanced in Math Grade 5 P/A scores up in Reading/Math 35% Advanced in Math cohort data, purpose of SIP, grade level mtgs

Grade 3 P/A scores up in Writing/Math

17% Advanced in Math

Grade 4 P/A scores up in Reading/Writing/Math

27% Advanced in Math

Grade 5 P/A scores up in Reading/Math

35% Advanced in Math

cohort data, purpose of SIP, grade level mtgs

Twombly: 2006-2007 CSAP Results % P/A 53% 35% Grade 5 34% 53% Grade 4 58% 36% Grade 3 2007 2006 READING 39% 30% Grade 5 14% 35% Grade 4 41% 20% Grade 3 2007 2006 WRITING 47% 28% Grade 5 43% 42% Grade 4 57% 38% Grade 3 2007 2006 MATH 22% 16% Grade 5 2007 2006 SCIENCE

2007 Twombly CSAP Highlights Grade 3 P/A in reading increased by 22% from 2006 to 2007 P/A in math increased by 19% P/A in writing increased by 21% ELL increased by 23% in writing Grade 4 Cohort increased P/A in math by 5% from 2006 to 2007 Cohort decreased unsatisfactory scores in math by 6% Cohort increased ELL P/A scores in math by 12% Cohort increased ELL P/A scores in Reading by 8% Grade 5 FRL in reading increased by 12% P/A in reading increased by 32% for ELL P/A in math increased by 19% Cohort increased ELL P/A scores in math by 20% Cohort increased FRL P/A scores in writing by 10%

Grade 3

P/A in reading increased by 22% from 2006 to 2007

P/A in math increased by 19%

P/A in writing increased by 21%

ELL increased by 23% in writing

Grade 4

Cohort increased P/A in math by 5% from 2006 to 2007

Cohort decreased unsatisfactory scores in math by 6%

Cohort increased ELL P/A scores in math by 12%

Cohort increased ELL P/A scores in Reading by 8%

Grade 5

FRL in reading increased by 12%

P/A in reading increased by 32% for ELL

P/A in math increased by 19%

Cohort increased ELL P/A scores in math by 20%

Cohort increased FRL P/A scores in writing by 10%

Middle School: 2006-2007 CSAP Results % P/A 48% 48% Grade 8 49% 41% Grade 7 41% 45% Grade 6 2007 2006 READING 32% 27% Grade 8 38% 36% Grade 7 38% 42% Grade 6 2007 2006 WRITING 25% 14% Grade 8 21% 24% Grade 7 44% 30% Grade 6 2007 2006 MATH 39% 33% Grade 8 2007 2006 SCIENCE

2007 Middle School CSAP Highlights CONTENT Highlights Math  increased at 6th & 8th grades Writing  increased at 7th & 8th grades Science  increase at 8th Reading  increase at 7th

CONTENT Highlights

Math  increased at 6th & 8th grades

Writing  increased at 7th & 8th grades

Science  increase at 8th

Reading  increase at 7th

2007 Middle School CSAP Highlights GRADE LEVEL (Apples to Oranges) Data Highlights 6th grade Math 8% increase 30%  38% 7th grade Reading 8 % increase 41%  49% 7th grade Writing 2% increase 36%  38% 8th grade Writing 5% increase 27%  32% 8th grade Math 11% increase 14%  25%* 8th grade Science 6% increase 33%  39% Highest 8th grade math percentage in last 5 years! Girls outscored Boys in all areas (Reading, Writing, Math, and Science) expect for 6th grade Math

GRADE LEVEL (Apples to Oranges) Data Highlights

6th grade Math 8% increase 30%  38%

7th grade Reading 8 % increase 41%  49%

7th grade Writing 2% increase 36%  38%

8th grade Writing 5% increase 27%  32%

8th grade Math 11% increase 14%  25%*

8th grade Science 6% increase 33%  39%

Highest 8th grade math percentage in last 5 years!

Girls outscored Boys in all areas (Reading, Writing, Math, and Science) expect for 6th grade Math

2007 Middle School CSAP Highlights CO-HORT (Apples to Apples) Data Highlights 6th grade 7th grade Reading 4% increase 45%  49% 8th grade Reading 7% increase 41%  48% 8th grade Math 1% increase 24%  25% Advanced Students 6th grade 7th grade Writing 1% increase 2%  3% 8th grade Reading 1% increase 3%  4% 8th grade Writing 2% increase 5%  7%

CO-HORT (Apples to Apples) Data Highlights

6th grade

7th grade Reading 4% increase 45%  49%

8th grade Reading 7% increase 41%  48%

8th grade Math 1% increase 24%  25%

Advanced Students

6th grade

7th grade Writing 1% increase 2%  3%

8th grade Reading 1% increase 3%  4%

8th grade Writing 2% increase 5%  7%

2007 Middle School CSAP Highlights Unsatisfactory Students 6th grade 7th grade Reading 3% decrease 21%  17% 7th grade Writing 3% decrease 8%  5% 8th grade Writing 2% decrease 12%  10% 8th grade Math 4% decrease 44%  40% CLOSING THE GAP Data Highlights White/Hispanic Achievement Gap - Smallest difference between White/Hispanic Students in 7th grade Reading (28% points), 7th grade Writing (25% points), and 7th grade Math (20% points)

Unsatisfactory Students

6th grade

7th grade Reading 3% decrease 21%  17%

7th grade Writing 3% decrease 8%  5%

8th grade Writing 2% decrease 12%  10%

8th grade Math 4% decrease 44%  40%

CLOSING THE GAP Data Highlights

White/Hispanic Achievement Gap - Smallest difference between White/Hispanic Students in 7th grade Reading (28% points), 7th grade Writing (25% points), and 7th grade Math (20% points)

2007 Middle School CSAP Highlights ELL Students - District 7th grade Reading (40%) Highest 7th grade Writing (32%) Highest 6th grade Writing (27%) 2nd highest Latino/Hispanic Students – District 7th grade Writing (30%) 2nd Highest (5th 34% Highest) 7th grade Reading (41%) 3rd Highest (5th - 49% Highest, 10th - 46% 2nd Highest) 6th grade Writing (28%) 3rd Highest (5th – 34% Highest, 7th – 30% 2nd Highest) FRL Students – District 7th grade Writing (36%) Highest 7th grade Reading (44%) 2nd Highest (5th 49% Highest) 6th grade Writing (26%) 3rd Highest (7th 36% Highest, 5th 31% 2nd Highest)

ELL Students - District

7th grade Reading (40%) Highest

7th grade Writing (32%) Highest

6th grade Writing (27%) 2nd highest

Latino/Hispanic Students – District

7th grade Writing (30%) 2nd Highest (5th 34% Highest)

7th grade Reading (41%) 3rd Highest (5th - 49% Highest, 10th - 46% 2nd Highest)

6th grade Writing (28%) 3rd Highest (5th – 34% Highest, 7th – 30% 2nd Highest)

FRL Students – District

7th grade Writing (36%) Highest

7th grade Reading (44%) 2nd Highest (5th 49% Highest)

6th grade Writing (26%) 3rd Highest (7th 36% Highest, 5th 31% 2nd Highest)

Quest: 2006-2007 CSAP Results % P/A 89% Grades 3-6 89% Grades 3-5 2007 2006 READING 82% Grades 3-6 83% Grades 3-5 2007 2006 WRITING 87% Grades 3-6 84% Grades 3-5 2007 2006 MATH

2007 Quest CSAP Highlights Reading – Comprehension, Non-Fiction, Using a Variety of Materials Writing – Improvement across all areas, need to work on Expository Writing Math – Good overall improvement Advanced increases – Reading 2% - 11.5%, Writing 7% - 28.6%, Math 28.6% - 39.7%

Reading – Comprehension, Non-Fiction, Using a Variety of Materials

Writing – Improvement across all areas, need to work on Expository Writing

Math – Good overall improvement

Advanced increases – Reading 2% - 11.5%, Writing 7% - 28.6%, Math 28.6% - 39.7%

High School: 2006-2007 CSAP Results % P/A 55% 52% Grade 10 49% 38% Grade 9 2007 2006 READING 26% 32% Grade 10 28% 26% Grade 9 2007 2006 WRITING 7% 13% Grade 10 15% 13% Grade 9 2007 2006 MATH 23% 34% Grade 10 2007 2006 SCIENCE

2007 High School CSAP Highlights Grade 9 Highlights: 1. Composite in reading improved eleven percentage points (38 to 49) 2. Unsatisfactory scores in reading decreased from 21% to 14% (we are now only six percentage points from the state average) 3. Unsatisfactory scores in writing are one percentage point LOWER than the state average Grade 10 Highlights: 1. Improvement in reading composite scores from grade 9 to grade 10 improved seventeen percentage points 2. Unsatisfactory scores in reading decreased from 20% to 13% (only five percentage points from the state average) 3. Unsatisfactory scores in writing are one percentage point from the state average

Grade 9 Highlights:

1. Composite in reading improved eleven percentage points

(38 to 49)

2. Unsatisfactory scores in reading decreased from 21% to 14%

(we are now only six percentage points from the state

average)

3. Unsatisfactory scores in writing are one percentage point

LOWER than the state average

Grade 10 Highlights:

1. Improvement in reading composite scores from grade 9 to

grade 10 improved seventeen percentage points

2. Unsatisfactory scores in reading decreased from 20% to

13% (only five percentage points from the state

average)

3. Unsatisfactory scores in writing are one percentage point

from the state average

2007 ACT Results Weld Re-8 Compared to State

ACT Scores 2004-2007 Comparison

Plan for Improved Student Achievement 2007-2008 Stay focused on The Strategic Plan & Goals Goal 1: Improve achievement & close the gap. Goal 2: Accelerate English language acquisition. Goal 3: Set high expectations for all. Goal 4: Increase community involvement. Goal 5: Improve staff retention. Goal 6: Attract and retain students.

Stay focused on The Strategic Plan & Goals

Goal 1: Improve achievement & close the gap.

Goal 2: Accelerate English language acquisition.

Goal 3: Set high expectations for all.

Goal 4: Increase community involvement.

Goal 5: Improve staff retention.

Goal 6: Attract and retain students.

A Community United for Student Success… College Ready!