2009 MCAS Results

1,242 views

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,242
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
78
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

2009 MCAS Results

  1. 1. 2009 MCAS Results Wellesley Public Schools
  2. 2. Grade 10 Proficient and Advanced (%) 95 97 2009 91 94 2008 94 95 2007 90 93 92 84 Math 93 93 92 91 ELA 2006 2005 2004 2003
  3. 3. Grade 10 MCAS 4 19 77 Chemistry 1 1 % Failing 3 3 % Needs Improvement 95 Math 97 ELA % Proficient and Advanced 2009
  4. 4. ELA Grade 6, 7, and 8 Proficient and Advanced (%) 96 92 92 2009 96 94 86 2008 95 96 95 2007 97 Not Administered Grade 8 ELA 92 90 92 93 Grade 7 ELA 96 Not Administered Grade 6 ELA 2006 2005 2004 2003
  5. 5. ELA Grade 6, 7, and 8 96 92 92 % Advanced and Proficient 2 2 Grade 8 ELA Grade 7 ELA Grade 6 ELA 2009 2 6 1 6 % Warning % Needs Improvement
  6. 6. Math Grade 6, 7, and 8 Proficient and Advanced (%) 73 66 79 2009 82 74 76 2008 75 79 86 2007 67 76 80 75 Grade 8 Math 73 Not Administered Grade 7 Math 83 81 81 85 Grade 6 Math 2006 2005 2004 2003
  7. 7. Math Grade 6, 7, and 8 % Warning % Needs Improvement % Advanced and Proficient 2009 7 20 73 Grade 8 Math 9 25 66 Grade 7 Math 3 19 79 Grade 6 Math
  8. 8. NCLB and Adequate Yearly Progress <ul><li>Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a measure of the extent to which a student group demonstrates proficiency in English language arts and mathematics. </li></ul><ul><li>AYP Reports are issued each year and show the progress schools and districts are making toward the goal of having all students reach proficiency by the year 2014. </li></ul><ul><li>AYP measures student performance against specific expectations each year. To receive an affirmative AYP determination, schools and districts must meet a student participation requirement, an additional attendance or graduation requirement, and either the State's performance target or the group's own improvement target. </li></ul>
  9. 9. Grade 8 Science and Technology % Advanced and Proficient 44 2009 58 2008 39 2007 58 65 57 62 2006 2005 2004 2003
  10. 10. Grade 8 Science and Technology % Warning % Needs Improvement % Advanced and Proficient 2009 9 47 44
  11. 11. ELA Grade 3, 4, and 5 Proficient and Advanced (%) Not Administered 89 83 76 2009 86 81 79 2008 85 83 86 2007 89 Grade 5 ELA 75 73 85 82 Grade 4 ELA 82 81 87 83 Grade 3 Reading 2006 2005 2004 2003
  12. 12. ELA Grade 3, 4, and 5 % Warning % Needs Improvement % Advanced and Proficient 2008 1 10 89 Grade 5 ELA 3 14 83 Grade 4 ELA 5 19 76 Grade 3 ELA
  13. 13. Math Grade 3, 4, and 5 Proficient and Advanced (%) 80 67 70 2009 72 77 74 2008 74 67 81 2007 73 Not Administered Grade 5 Math 59 68 72 68 Grade 4 Math 69 Not Administered Grade 3 Math 2006 2005 2004 2003
  14. 14. Math Grade 3, 4, and 5 % Warning % Needs Improvement % Advanced and Proficient 2008 4 16 80 Grade 5 Math 6 28 67 Grade 4 Math 5 19 70 Grade 3 Math
  15. 15. Grade 5 Science and Technology % Advanced and Proficient 58 2009 72 2008 70 2007 64 69 69 66 2006 2005 2004 2003
  16. 16. Grade 5 Science and Technology % Warning % Needs Improvement % Advanced and Proficient 2009 4 38 58
  17. 17. District Comparisons
  18. 18. Growth Model <ul><li>Calculated for students in grades 4 - 8 who have two or more consecutive years of MCAS results in ELA and math and students in grade 10 with MCAS results from grade 8. </li></ul><ul><li>Typical growth is between the 40th and 60th percentile. </li></ul>
  19. 19. Sample Growth Model Data N/A 0 3 94 Grade 7 ELA 2008 37 64 Student Growth Percentile % Warning % Needs Improvement % Advanced and Proficient 2 3 96 Grade 8 ELA 3 14 83 Grade 4 ELA
  20. 20. District Growth Summary All Grades Math 54% All Grades ELA 55% Grade 10 Math 56% Grade 10 ELA 56% Grade 8 Math 50% Grade 8 ELA 37% Grade 7 Math 43.5% Grade 7 ELA 64% Grade 6 Math 58% Grade 6 ELA 53% Grade 5 Math 54% Grade 5 ELA 57% Grade 4 Math 61% Grade 4 ELA 64%
  21. 21. School Based Efforts • Academic Support Classes for Math • Educational Proficiency Plans • Individualized Support • On-going Attention to Curriculum Development and Instruction • Professional Development

×