Learning Through Social Networking Sites: The Critical Role of the Teacher

  • 165 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
165
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Learning through social networking sites – the critical role of the teacher Noelene Callaghana * and Matt Bowerb a NSW Department of Education, Glenwood, Australia; b Macquarie University, Ryde, Australia (Received 6 October 2011; final version received 7 December 2011) This comparative case study examined factors affecting behaviour and learning in social networking sites (SNS). The behaviour and learning of two classes completing identical SNS based modules of work was observed and compared. All student contributions to the SNS were analysed, with the cognitive process dimension of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy used to measure the type of think- ing that students demonstrated. Key findings include the trade off between social and learning contributions, the potential of SNSs to enhance motivation and dig- ital literacy development, and the critical role of the teaching in influencing the behaviour and learning that transpired. Effective teacher implementation in the SNS was associated with positive teacher–student relationships, establishing a ‘learning’ rather than ‘social’ attitude towards the SNS, and the online presence that the teacher exerted. Keywords: social networking sites; SNS; e-learning; technology; Web 2.0; online spaces; Australian secondary schools; engagement; Ning Introduction Social networking sites (SNSs) are no longer defined as simply a communicational tool that ‘allows one to make new friends, renew or maintain old acquaintances and establish romantic relationships’ (Beckenham, 2008, p. 2). SNSs are sophisticated web-based services that allow individuals to construct a profile, form social networks, and view and traverse information with others (Boyd & Ellison, 2007). Hence, SNSs are in fact a very complex place where individuals are required to utilize a number of IT and social skills to form a virtual representation of themselves and interact effec- tively with others. They can be used by a large range of age groups (over the age of 13 years), and can productively connect a diverse group of students whilst creating multiliteracies and developing cognitive capabilities (Healy, 2007). Some research has found that SNSs are the most popular form of communica- tion amongst teenagers with ‘95% of SNS users being teenagers aged between 16 and 19 years’ (Ellison, 2008, p. 81). Thus there is a possibility to draw upon the popularity of SNSs to engage school students and utilising the online skills that students already possess. *Corresponding author. Email: noelene.callaghan1@det.nsw.edu.au Educational Media International Vol. 49, No. 1, March 2012, 1–17 ISSN 0952-3987 print/ISSN 1469-5790 online Ó 2012 International Council for Educational Media http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.662621 http://www.tandfonline.com
  • 2. In an educational context, SNSs may bring both opportunities and limitations to the classroom. SNSs create new opportunity for self-directed learning, supporting all levels of cognitive abilities, peer-based learning and the development of new media literacy, yet the role of the teacher in helping students to accomplish these objectives is a somewhat open question. Background literature Boyd and Ellison (2007) emphasise that SNSs are part of a larger suite of Internet technologies that collectively fall under the category of Web 2.0 tools, along with blogs and wikis. In their normal context, affordances associated with SNSs include the ability to facilitate: • Connectivity and social rapport. • Collaborative information discovery and sharing. • Content creation. • Knowledge and information aggregation. • Content modification (Burden & Atkinson, 2008). Overall, Web 2.0 tools encompass a variety of meanings that include an increased emphasis on user generated content, data and content sharing and collaborative effort (Albion, 2008a). In SNSs this is achieved by their capabilities to create online groups that enable users to ‘Chat’ in addition to search for and critique information as well as post and withdraw data, audio and video files (Sale & Sinis, 2008). Currently Facebook is the world’s most used social networking site with over 750 million global users (Alexa, 2011; Facebook, 2011). It is reported that female teenager’s access and use SNSs more frequently than do male teenagers (Ellison, 2008). Ellison (2008) also found that SNS users aged between 18- and 24-years-old spend an estimated ‘6–10 hours a week online’ (p. 91). More recently, it was reported that of Australian Facebook users (of all ages), one of every five minutes is spent on SNSs (comStore, 2011). Thus, it can be speculated that teenagers may spend more time online than completing homework or study. Many researchers attempt to elucidate why today’s students flock to these sites. Some, such as Boyd (2008a), suggest that it provides teenagers with opportunities to create a desired profile of themselves that perhaps is not normally associated with them in person. Many others such as DeSchryver et al. (2008a), Shaheen (2008) and Vie (2008) have found that SNSs provide teenagers a ‘sense of worth’. This implies that teenagers can create a personal profile that may not best represent them in real life, but presents them as a unique and ‘cool’ individual online and therefore, others should befriend them. It is noted that some teenagers who are unpopular at school and as a result possess very low self-esteem are thriving online due to their ‘better pre- sented’ profile and ‘coolness online’ (Boyd, 2008a, p. 129). Additionally, SNSs pro- vide teenagers with a voice that is ‘heard’ by others as well as providing them with the opportunity to be ‘innovative’, where in traditional cases this may be difficult for a teenager to do (Ellison, 2006). Additionally, Boyd (2008b) states that many teenag- ers have turned to these tools to simply replace traditional ways of keeping a journal or telephoning a friend. This is perhaps due to teenagers thriving on their immediate access to the world and such behaviour is indicative of their culture’s fundamental right to the free flow of information and expression of opinions (Leung, 2003). 2 N. Callaghan and M. Bower
  • 3. International reports such as The Horizon Project have paid particular attention to how SNSs have enhanced student engagement in the classroom through their ‘relevance to teaching, learning, and creative inquiry’ (Johnson, Smith, Willis, Levine, & Haywood, 2011, p. 11). Findings from McLoughlin and Lee (2008), Bec- kenham (2008) and Ito et al. (2008) show strong student engagement occurring through the use of SNSs in the classroom. Given that SNSs are the most popular form of communication amongst teenag- ers (Ellison, 2008) there is an opportunity to transfer motivation and associated information and communication literacies into an educational context. Overall, SNSs permits students to participate in numerous activities. For example, ‘Flickr and YouTube facilitate the sharing of photos and videos with both “real world” and “virtual” friends, whereas Facebook, MySpace and Friendster allow users to utilise a range of multimedia elements’ (McLoughlin & Lee, 2007, p. 665). PBworks and Ning have been identified as having great potential for promoting online and offline collaboration and for disseminating research and resources (Knobel & Lankshear, 2009). Thus, SNSs may contribute to an improvement in literacy and numeracy as well as preparing them as citizens in a global world (Murray, 2008) and may enable self-regulated learning (Vie, 2008) by exposing them to deeper learning and developing higher cognitive skills (Lynch, Debuse, Lawley, & Roy, 2009). Unfortunately, limitations surrounding the SNS expertise of teachers, perhaps due to the Digital Divide as conceptualised by Oblinger and Oblinger (2005) and the potential abuse of online spaces (Boyd, 2008b) may inhibit successful use of the tool. The Ning Network, which has been the focus of benchmark studies for Arnold and Paulus (2010), Barbour and Plough (2009) and for the Horizon Project, 2011 (Johnson, Smith, Willis, Levine, & Haywood, 2011), is used in this study to examine how SNSs may enhance the learning processes in a high school teaching and learning environment. The study investigated if SNSs can be used to pedagogi- cally enhance learning of curriculum. An emerging finding from the study was the role of the teacher in contributing to the quality of the student learning experience. Methodology A total of 48 Year 10 (Stage 5) commerce students from a school in the western region of Sydney participated in the research study (24 students in each of the two classes). In 2011, the school had 870 students enrolled, of whom 122 students were in Year 10. Of these Year 10 students, 84% had a language background other than English (LBOTE) and the vast majority were of European background. Out of 48 participants, four students were recognised as having learning difficulties. All stu- dents in this year group had their own laptop which was used in all five 60 minute periods daily. The two classes that participated in this study were not graded or streamed. Two Ning Plus versions of the Ning Network were used to conduct this research. The Ning SNS enabled all registered students to work in secure environ- ment only accessible by account holders. Identical SNS tools and lesson material specific to ‘Stage 5 commerce: Employment issues’ was created on each class’s Ning Network (see Figure 1, below). The Ning Network contained all of the detailed class work instructions and all of the tools that students were required to use. The tools used in the first four lessons included, but were not limited to chat, forum discussions (13 in total), blogs Educational Media International 3
  • 4. (four in total), and video and photo albums. An assessment task (e-portfolio assess- ment) complete with a marking criteria was to be completed in the fifth and final lesson. The range of tools were selected to utilise the varying ICT abilities of students based on existing claims such as that by Hansford and Adlington (2008) that digital natives regularly engage with these tools, thus have already developed quite complex IT capabilities. The overall module used Anderson and Krathwohl’s (2001) Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in the design of the lessons. The Anderson and Krathwohl’s Taxonomy provides a hierarchy of cognition that classifies learning into levels that extend from lower order thinking skills of ‘remember’, ‘understand’, and ‘apply’ to higher order thinking skills of ‘analyse’, ‘evaluate’ and ‘create’. Some questions and tasks required students to use Ning tools such as the blog to demonstrate higher order thinking skills. Other tasks used simple and common SNS tools such as ‘Chat’ to exercise lower order prerequisite tasks. The taxonomy is recognised as ‘being more useful as the taxonomy intersects and acts upon different types and levels of knowledge’ (Wilson, 2006, p. 2). Both Ning Networks were accessed over five consecutive 60 minute lessons stemming over three weeks during Term 1. Students logged onto Ning via a link that was emailed to their student email. Three classroom teachers and the researcher all took part in observing students. Both classroom teachers observed their own classes for all five lessons. In order to increase the reliability of observations, an additional teacher also observed all lessons in both classes (10 lessons in total). The additional expert observer was a permanent executive staff member employed by the school to assist other teachers in their development of ICT lessons and pedagogies. All three observers were Figure 1. The interface design for the two Ning Networks. 4 N. Callaghan and M. Bower
  • 5. provided with identical training, structured training materials and observation frameworks. Data was recorded in detailed observation instruments that had been designed for the project. The instruments included information such as the period in which the lesson took place, the number of students present that particular lesson and the number of students who had a laptop with them as well as both open and closed questions regarding student behaviours, student learning and general classroom climate. Closed questions were measured on a five-point Likert scale from ‘strongly agree’ to ‘strongly disagree’. The researcher observed all online activity in real time from off-site and saved all student contributions to Ning electronically. All observations were recorded in an observation journal. Particular attention was afforded to the number of postings in each tool, the quality of work, and if student online behaviour was influenced by the actions of their peers or teacher. The researcher also marked the e-portfolio assess- ment task. Together all observers (teachers and researcher) monitored front and back- stage behaviour permitting the identification of patterns surrounding SNS use. All work created by students were saved electronically, printed and used to sup- port observer and researcher findings. Calculations of the number of postings con- tributed by total students and by class in all tools allowed objective analysis to be conducted. Each contribution was categorised into either social or learning contribu- tions. Those considered a learning contribution were then assessed according to its level on Anderson and Krathwohl’s cognitive process dimension. This resulted in a comparative matrix denoting the cognitive ability of participating students when using particular tools. The NetLingo dictionary (NetLingo, 2010) was used to inter- pret and decipher any online acronyms posted or jargon that students posted in their contributions to Ning. At the completion of the fifth and final lesson, students were asked to complete a five minute online Student Feedback Survey. This survey was directly linked from their Ning website and comprised of five point Likert scales, closed and open ended questions regarding student’s general use of SNSs as well as their feelings toward using Ning. A range of strategies were implemented to maintain continuity of findings and promote impartiality including: • Using predefined learning material for five lessons (lesson plans). • Using two identical Ning Networks (one per class; Class 1 and Class 2). • Recoding contributions for all participating students (student contributions to Ning). • Using predefined observation and survey instruments. • Conducting one training session for observing teachers. • Using additional observers; traditional (teacher observers) and online in real- time (researcher). Triangulating researcher observations with teacher observations reduced the potential for speculative reporting thus enhancing the reliability and validity of find- ings (Johnson & Christensen, 2008; Yin, 1994). Educational Media International 5
  • 6. Table1.Class1andClass2. Total%Commerce1%Commerce2% Chat481002410024100 ForumDiscussion481002410024100 GiftGiving4696241002292 PostingMessagesonProfilePages4696241002292 InvitedFriends459423962292 AfterHoursActivity336916671771 ProfileColours316517711458 ProfilePhoto23488331563 Blog2348142292 e-PortfolioAssessment1838141771 SharingPhoto/ImageFiles12258331563 AddedExternalApplication240028 SharingVideosFiles000000 TypicalSNS Behaviours 6 N. Callaghan and M. Bower
  • 7. Results Overall activity Class 2 was observed at completing more class work than Class 1. Class 1 limited their activity to ‘Chat’ and forum discussions, whereas it was observed that Class 2 was engaged with the conceptual challenges posed within the module by participat- ing in forum discussions and blog entries. Table 1 depicts the percentage of students who used each tool in each class and overall. Both initially and throughout the study, teacher observations indicated that stu- dents in both classes were excited to be using Ning. Students did not encounter any problems locating the Ning Network, creating an account or navigating around the SNS. Immediately, students showed signs of past SNS use. There were no major differences between Class 1 and Class 2 in their ability to transfer these skills into the classroom as all students were observed at using Ning without any complica- tions and without needing additional verbal instructions from their teacher. This was re-enforced by the responses to the Student Feedback Survey as 91% of students stated that they have used a SNS in the past with 77% disclosing that they found Ning easy to use due to the likeness of similar functionalities on Face- book. This was further observed by the researcher as all students actively used ‘Chat’ and the forum discussion immediately after initial login. A total of 2359 contributions were made by all students. Table 2 illustrates the number of total contributions posted in each Ning tool during the course of the research study. Table 2. Number of contributions in each Ning tool. Total Class 1 Class 2 Chat 1,238 1,103 135 Forum 458 210 248 Posting Messages on Profile Pages 188 80 108 Invited Friends 178 93 85 Gift Giving 156 68 88 Blog 79 7 72 Sharing Photo/Image Files 37 6 31 e-Portfolio Assessment Task 23 1 22 Added External Application 2 0 2 Sharing Videos Files 0 0 0 Table 3. Key difference in class activity. Class 1 Class 2 Little activity overall A lot of activity overall Chat and Forum Discussion focused Forum Discussion and Blog focused Inconsistent behaviours observed Focused and engaged behaviour observed Massive amount of Net Lingo used Minimal Net Lingo used No sharing of multimedia Sharing of photos Selected particular questions to complete Followed all instructions Only one student completed the e-portfolio assessment task Majority of students completed the e-portfolio assessment task Educational Media International 7
  • 8. Of all students, 69% logged onto Ning outside of class time to complete lesson work with 67% and 71% of students from Class 1 and Class 2, respectively, accessing the SNS after hours. There were limited differences between students of both classes when accessing Ning outside the classroom, however, the researcher observed that students accessed all of Ning’s tools except ‘Chat’ even though they could see their peers online. Analysis of student contributions to Ning identified 55% of students working ahead whilst 45% used this time to complete unfinished tasks. All three observers identified the main differences between the two classes as outlined in Table 3 below. Levels of cognition There was great variance in the way students used the site. Students in Class 1 displayed extremely social behaviours resulting in one third of participants only using their time to converse in ‘Chat’ in all five lessons. The majority (96%) of stu- dents in Class 1 did not progress past forum discussions and the quality of these responses in this tool generally did not constitute any considerable degree of intel- lectual rigor. Further, in this class only one student completed all 13 forum discus- sions, one of the four blog entries as well as the e-portfolio assessment task. This resulted in students only completing tasks that required the identification or the defining of key terms and concepts. As students (except one) did not complete their blog or e-portfolio assessment task, only activity in the lower order levels as presented by Anderson and Krathwohl’s Taxonomy was observed. Contrastingly in Class 2, 71% of students used all Ning tools as required by the module. Students developed their learning and created connections between the dif- ferent tools on Ning. In reference to Anderson and Krathwohl’s Taxonomy, 92% of students were observed in applying higher order thinking skills of ‘evaluate’ and 71% demonstrating ‘create’. Additionally in this class, 17 students completed all 13 forum discussions, all four blogs as well as the e-portfolio assessment task. Figure 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Create Evaluate Analyse Apply Understand Remember Anderson&Krathwohl'sTaxonomy Cognition Levels Percentage of Students Class 1 Class 2 Figure 2. Anderson and Krathwohl (2001), cognition levels achieved in each class. 8 N. Callaghan and M. Bower
  • 9. below depicts the percentage of students in each class who successfully attaining each taxonomy level of cognition. As stated a total of 2359 contributions were made by all students. The contribu- tions of Class 1 were primarily of a social nature (see Figure 3 below). Contribu- tions scored as ‘learning’ met the lower order levels of this taxonomy hierarchy and were visible in contributions made to forum discussions, blogs and in the sharing of photo/image files. There were 31 instances where students copied the work of their peers and posted it as their own. Contrastingly, in Class 2 less social and more learning contributions were posted on Ning (see Figure 4). More students were observed to use higher order thinking skills in most module contributions, which is directly opposite to Class 2. Figure 3. Hierarchy of cognitive process levels present in contributions in each Ning Tool in Class 1. Figure 4. Hierarchy of cognitive process levels present in contributions in each Ning Tool in Class 2. Educational Media International 9
  • 10. Self-directed learning Overall, 87% of total students reported in their Student Feedback Survey that they believed that Ning assisted them in contributing to their own learning, as one student elaborated by stating that they ‘were able to find and develop their own information’. However, students in Class 1 limited their online activity to ‘Chat’ and to at least one forum discussion (out of 13). Forum discussions were selected based on ‘ease’ and although responses were related to the question, they were brief and typically consisted of ‘copy and pasted’ answers found in Google search, Yahoo Answers and the textbooks CD ROM. Only 17% of students completed all of the 13 forum discussions which interestingly, comprised of the more ‘vocal’ stu- dents whom in a traditional learning environment would not normally complete as much class work (observation posited by Teacher 1). Class 2 students demonstrated proficient self-directed learning as at the commencement of all five lessons, students arrived in class, logged onto Ning and began completing their work without the intervention of Teacher 2. Teacher 2 also reported that she often felt redundant as students took control of their learning immediately. These students were observed by the researcher to follow the lesson instructions and complete all tasks sequentially, resulting in completing more class work, making more connections between tasks and producing better researched and articulated responses than students in Class 1. In Lesson 4, Class 2 students began using ‘Chat’ to ask their peers questions about how to complete certain tasks and began using the forum discussion to compare and clarify their responses against their peer’s postings. In the final lesson, Teacher 2 commented that all students completed the e-portfolio assessment task autonomously. Synthesis In this study, the term ‘synthesis’ is used to refer to the connections that a student makes between various pieces of their own work and the work of others that is posted in different areas on Ning such as on two different discussion threads or in at least two different tools. Due to the differing quantities of work posted by stu- dents, vast differences between the two classes emerged. As a result of the inactivity as recorded in the contributions in Class 1, it could not be determined if connections between work was made. Alternatively, in Class 2, 65% of students were observed to make connections between the different tools on Ning as they linked ideas, drew on content, evaluated and created new informa- tion in their forum discussions and blogs. Synthesis consistently grew over the five lessons in Class 2 and by the final lesson connectivity was immense and easily observable in the e-portfolio assessment task (an example of this is provided in Figure 5). In Class 2 there were 15 (out of 18) students who incorporated work that they completed during the first four lessons into their e-portfolio assessment task. Modes of social interaction In this study, social rapport refers to the strength of relationships between students. All students accessed their profile page (as pictured in Figure 6) and used the ‘Chat’ and forum discussion tools in varying degrees throughout the five lessons. Particular 10 N. Callaghan and M. Bower
  • 11. paths were followed in the development of friendships. Students were observed to typically begin by chatting to their peers and strengthening their relationships by sending invitations to each other to be their ‘friend’. Once this was completed, the two students would give gifts to each other, and then converse collaboratively before contributing to learning tasks. Minimal NetLingo was used by Class 2 and similarly to Class 1, it was restricted to ‘Chat’. However, NetLingo was used to replace words in responses and not for conversing on matters irrelevant to the task at hand. All but one student in Class 1 commented in their surveys that they viewed Ning as more of a ‘social’ site. Developing and maintaining social rapport appeared to be the key focus of this class as gift giving was a prominent activity for all Class 1 students. So prominent was this that competitions quickly arose between students of whom received the most gifts. It was found in their contributions that students received up to seven gifts. On average, students in Class 1 received three gifts. The observing teachers later commented that students became quite verbal regarding the exchange of gifts and began broadcasting that they received a gift and its sender’s identity to the class. This encouraged additional gift giving, and motivated more students to invite each other to their profile page. On the other hand, Class 2 reported that they viewed Ning more as a ‘learning’ resource. Observations by teachers and the researcher concur that students extended themselves past ‘Chat’ and forum discussions and completed ample amounts of work in any one period. Interestingly, students in Class 2 spent less time establish- ing their friendship network but overall, invited more friends to their profile pages Figure 5. Connectivity observed in a student’s e-portfolio assessment task. Educational Media International 11
  • 12. (having an average of four friends) and distributed up to eight gifts (on average, students received four gifts). Importantly, none of the teacher–observers reported any incidences of misuse of the SNS tool and there were no reports of foul play, cyber bullying or intimidation. Additionally, no such instances were identified in any of the student contributions. Teacher–student interactions It was observed by the researcher that Teacher 1 did not log on to Ning and by the expert observer that little communication between Teacher 1 and his students took place. As a result, students did not rely on their teacher for assistance if required. Figure 6. An example of a students profile page (student identity hidden). 12 N. Callaghan and M. Bower
  • 13. Opposite observations were found in regards to Class 2 by the observing teach- ers. Teacher 2 proved to be very nurturing and spent a great deal of time discussing class content with her students as a group and in one-on-one situations. The adviser further added that Teacher 2 used (traditional) structures in her classroom whilst using Ning permitting her students to entrust her and openly share their class work with her as well as their peers. In one lesson, the adviser also reported that there were up to six instances where students asked the teacher to check their work before it was posted online. In terms of online presence, the two teachers displayed extremely differently behaviours. Teacher 1 did not log onto Ning whereas Teacher 2 did and ensured that all students in Class 2 were also logged on before proceeding to actively use Ning herself. Teacher 2 also connected her laptop to the classroom projector and displayed her work to her students. She too, participated in traditional SNS behaviours of Chatting, sending invitations and gift giving (see Figure 7). According to Teacher 2, students were forthcoming with information and delib- erated about the content of their responses before posting them online. Numerous postings by students in this class were well researched, constructed and presented. These students also asked for their teacher to check their work as soon as it was posted in order to receive immediate recognition (as reported in her observation Figure 7. Teacher 2’s profile page. Educational Media International 13
  • 14. instrument). It was also observed by the researcher that when Teacher 2 was participating in a particular tool, such as posting a contribution to a forum discus- sion, students were more likely to be engaged with the same task. It was observed by the adviser that the online presence of the teacher strengthened teacher-student relationships. As stated, Teacher 2 participated in traditional SNS behaviours such as partaking in gift giving which in this instance signified the acknowledgement of commendable work. Teacher 2 reported that students felt privi- leged when they received such a gift and responded by calling out or making an announcement on their profile page (as observed by the adviser and researcher). Such activities also prompted other students to complete their work in an attempt to captivate their teacher’s attention. Such behaviours were not observed nor identified in Class 1. Discussion This study elucidates that the use of SNSs in high school classes may lead to vary- ing learning outcomes that may not depend on the SNS itself. The vast differences between the two classes which used identical instruments is essential to this study as this depicts that the level of success of SNS learning activities can vary between classes depending on the way they are implemented. Factors such as teacher– student relationships, establishing expectations, classroom implementation and the nature of online teacher intervention could facilitate a positive classroom climate that enhanced overall student engagement and learning. The lack of online presence of Teacher 1 may have indicated to students that their work would not be checked and therefore it did not need to be completed. This may rationalise why Class 1 students made limited use of the tools in Ning as well as why their quality and level of learning contributions was lower. Teacher 2 logged onto Ning and used it in real-time with her students. This appeared to contribute to her students completing more work, staying on task and displaying a higher level of maturity in taking ownership of their work. The pre-existing climate of the classroom appeared to also influence the students’ learning experience with SNS, with more positive student-teacher relationships leading to more on-task learning behaviours. The SNS activities could support a full range of levels of thinking based on the tasks and tools. In Class 1, almost all contributions posted were of a social nature (refer to Figure 2), whereas in Class 2, 97% of contributions were of a learning nature and could be categorised according to the cognitive levels of Anderson and Krathwohl’s Taxonomy (as shown in Figure 3). The e-portfolio assessment task required students to more deeply synthesise their understanding, which may have acted as an intellectual challenge to some students. This was observed particularly in Class 1 where 92% did not attempt to complete the e-portfolio assessment task and did not extend their thinking past ‘analysis’. Contrastingly, 65% of Class 2 students made clear links between content in various tools when completing their e-portfolio assessment tasks. It was found that when students made larger volumes of non-social contribu- tions, students were more likely to display behaviours of synthesis (refer to Figure 5) and demonstrated higher order thinking skills (refer to Figure 2). Such activity concurs with Burden and Atkinson’s (2008) study that students are able to actively perform activities of sharing information, discovering information, aggregating information, and modifying content when using SNSs. Given that one class achieved these outcomes and the other did not, establishing the students’ conceptu- 14 N. Callaghan and M. Bower
  • 15. alisation of SNSs as a learning tool rather than a social tool may therefore be criti- cal in terms of promoting higher order thinking in SNS environments. SNSs enabled self-directed learning. Students in Class 2 were able to log onto Ning and immediately attend to all of the tasks as instructed without any teacher intervention. These students systematically followed all instructions and were able to work collaboratively online when required. Such behaviours were observed when students used the ‘Chat’ tool asking each other for assistance. It was also observed that those students who displayed higher levels of engagement took ownership of their own learning made more connections between posted data. The structured approach offered by the SNS enabled to work ahead on their module tasks by logging in outside school hours. SNSs promoted motivation and engagement. This was observed by the class- room observers that 85% of students overall remained on task during each lesson and by classroom observers whom reported that they strongly disagreed that stu- dents were disengaged. Over 2000 contributions were posted online during the course of the module indicating that students were motivated to collaborate in a dig- ital framework. However, Teacher 1 claimed that although the number of contribu- tions was not as high as Class 2, Class 1 students still completed more work whilst using Ning than in a traditional classroom setting. Therefore, regardless of how established or structured the classroom climate is prior to SNS integration, the level of engagement overall was found to have increased. Students appeared to be able to effortlessly transfer their skills of using social media personally into an educational context. All students were able to access and use Ning’s tools immediately after log on without requiring teacher support. In regards to the overall experiences of students with the Ning SNS, no differences between classes were identified; all students were able to take immediate ownership of their online space. This observation coupled with the differences in learning out- comes between the two classes indicates that technical competencies in SNSs do not necessarily result in a higher quality of student contribution or learning. SNSs also promoted social rapport. Students were able to communicate using more social modes that they enjoy such as using NetLingo. Interestingly, this was restricted to ‘Chat’ suggesting that students acknowledged that colloquialisms were appropriate in some but not other contexts such as the e-portfolio assessment. Gift giv- ing was also a prominent activity between students in both classes. This supports the notion that SNSs assisted in maintaining social rapport between students and in the creation of a positive online learning climate within the classroom, though the extent to which this supports or interferes with learning appears to depend on the instantia- tion itself. Although this comparative study does provide evidence for how different imple- mentations of the same SNS can lead to different learning outcomes, the small scale of this research study limits the extent to which findings can be generalised. Future research could also investigate cause-and-effect relationships to determine a compre- hensive set of strategies for improving the quality of interaction and learning in SNS environments. The use of similar methodologies could investigate how to provide effective professional development and may involve recognising and imple- menting taxonomies of learning. Such knowledge would not only empower students by enhancing their learning experience, but also empower teachers and educators in their design and delivery of SNS based learning experiences. Furthermore, research Educational Media International 15
  • 16. could also gauge if students with learning disabilities and learning difficulties would benefit more than mainstreamed students in using SNSs. Conclusion This study demonstrates the critical role of the teacher in engaging effective online learning in SNS environments. The quality of teacher–student relationships, the extent to which a ‘learning’ rather than ‘social’ attitude was established, and the online pres- ence that the teacher exerted in the SNS all correlated with more successful student learning. Positive teacher behaviors were associated with greater levels of student maturity and more on-task performance. There appeared to be a trade-off between the amount of social contributions that students made to the SNS and the level of thinking they demonstrated as measured by Anderson and Krathwohl’s (2001) Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and the degree of synthesis they evidenced. In an age where students are using SNSs as part of their everyday lives and teachers are often reluctant to use SNS due to fear of the unknown, this study dem- onstrates that the type and quality of learning that transpires in SNSs does not appear to be attributable to the technology. SNSs can promote greater levels of student motivation and engagement, and enable students to utilize higher order thinking skills. Utilising SNSs draws directly on students’ experience with social networks and can be used to develop their technological and media literacies. However, the extent to which these outcomes are achieved in SNSs ultimately depends on the way the SNS learning activities are implemented by the teacher. References Albion, P.R. (2008). Web 2.0 in teacher education: Two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25(3/4), 181–198. Doi: 10.1080/07380560802368173 Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. Alexa. (2011). Alexa, The Web Information Company. Retrieved September 3, 2011, from http://www.alexa.com/ Arnold, N., & Paulus, T. (2010). Using a social networking site for experiential learning: Appropriating, lurking, modelling and community building. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 188–196. Barbour, M., & Plough, C. (2009). Social networking in cyberschooling: Helping to make online learning less isolating. TechTrends, 53(4), 56–60. Beckenham, A. (2008). Face off online: Pedagogy and engagement in social network sites. Canberra: University of Canberra. Boyd, D. (2008a). Taken out of context; American teen sociality in networked publics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Boyd, D. (2008b). In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Why youth LOVE social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, Retrieved December 10, 2010, from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.119. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230. Burden, K., & Atkinson, S. (2008). Evaluating pedagogical ‘affordances’ of media sharing Web 2.0 technologies: A case study. Paper presented at the Computers in the Schools Conference, Melbourne. comStore. (2011). ComStore Inc. Retrieved September 3, 2011, from www.comscore.com/ 16 N. Callaghan and M. Bower
  • 17. DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Ploucher Francis, A. (2008). Moodle vs. Face- book: Does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction? In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Chesapeake, VA, AACE. Michigan State University, USA. Education, N.D.o. (2011). My school. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from http://myschool.edu.au/ Ellison, N. (2006, June 19–23). Spatially bounded online social networks and social capital: The role of Facebook. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA), Dresden, Germany. Ellison, N. (2008). Social networking sites. Students and Information Technology, Study, 8, 81–98. Facebook. (2011). Facebook. Retrieved September 3, 2011, from www.facebook.com Hansford, D., & Adlington, R. (2008). Vigital spaces and young people’s online authoring: Challenges for teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 32(1), 55–68. Healy, A. (2007). Multiliteracies and diversity in education: New pedagogies for expanding landscapes. Queensland, Australia: Oxford University Press. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., Pascoe, C.J., & Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Building The Field of Digital Media and Learning, 2–4. Retrieved on December 10, 2010, from http://www.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7BB0386CE3- 8B29-4162-8098-E466FB856794%7D/DML_ETHNOG_WHITEPAPER.PDF Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Johnson, S., Smith, R.S., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon report. Paper presented at the New Media Consortium, Austin, Texas. Knobel, N., & Lankshear, C. (2009). Wikis, digital literacies, and professional growth; Digital literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, April, 631–634. Leung, L. (2003). Impacts of Net-generation attributes, seductive properties of the Internet, and gratifications-obtained on Internet use. Telematics and Informatics, 20, 107–129. Lynch, K., Debuse, J., Lawley, M., & Roy, S. (2009, 6–9 July). An early investigation into factors in student’s choice of technology for e-learning. Paper presented at the 32nd HERDSA Annual Conference, Darwin. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M.J.W. (2008). Mapping the digital terrain: New media and social software as catalysts for pedagogical change. Paper presented at the Proceedings Ascilite Conference, Singapore. pp. 664-675. Retrieved December 10, 2010, from http://www. ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf Murray, C. (2008). Schools and social networking: Fear or education. Synergy, 6(1), 8–12. NetLingo. (2010). The list of chat acronyms and text message shorthand. Retrieved Septem- ber 23, 2010, from www.netlingo.com/acronyms.php Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Educating the net generation. Retrieved January 28, 2011, from www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/ Sale, R., & Sims, R. (2008). Online learning design: Does generational poverty influence the young adult learner? Paper presented at the Hello! Where are you in the landscape of edu- cational technology?, Proceedings Ascilite Conference, Melbourne, pp. 866-874. Retrieved on December 10, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/ sale.pdf Shaheen, M. (2008). Use of social networks and information seeking behavior of students during political crises in Pakistan: A case study. The International Information & Library Review, 40, 142–147. Vie, S. (2008). Digital Divide 2.0: ‘Generation M’ and online social networking sites in the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 25, 9–23. Wilson, L. (2006). Leslie Owen Wilson’s curriculum pages; Beyond Bloom – a new version of the cognitive taxonomy. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from www.uwsp.edu/educa- tion/lwilson/curric/newtaxonomy.htm Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing. Educational Media International 17
  • 18. Copyright of Educational Media International is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.