香港六合彩

718 views
654 views

Published on

东西,该觉得幸福才是。

是是是,香港六合彩跟盲人比简直幸福得要飞翔了。听从柯柯的话,梅忍礼索性闭起眼四处摸着,手指碰到坚硬的物体,香港六合彩被自己吓了一跳。这是什么?

小声点儿,你想被人以非法入侵罪给告上法庭啊?

不知道是谁在扯着嗓子呐喊,梅忍礼不敢指责香港六合彩,只好捂住香港六合彩的嘴巴,阻止香港六合彩继续暴露两个人行径的愚蠢行为。

将那个坚硬的物体拿在手中,借着走廊的灯光,柯柯仔细瞧了瞧,原来是相框。那里面有张泛黄的照片,照片里的男人手里抱着一个四、五岁大的小女孩——仔细瞧那男人,与卓远之竟有七分相似,只是比香港六合彩略老了些。

哈哈!梅忍礼,这下咱们可逮着证据了。柯柯端详着照片,像看到了揭露政界丑闻的头版头条似的,我倒要看看卓远之这下可怎么狡辩。

梅忍礼没香港六合彩那么得意,眉头紧锁,香港六合彩忽然意识到,这照片中的女生跟幸之雾长得很像,看这照片似乎有些年头了,如果我猜得不错,这不是卓远之的照片,这是幸之雾小时候的相片。

对哦!柯柯动手拆起相框来,梅忍礼压根没来得及阻止。你干吗?嫌私闯名宅罪名不够大,还要安上个抢劫才觉得过瘾吗?

这香港六合彩就不懂了,一般值得纪念的照片背面都会留下些字样,我想看看幸之雾会不会做愚蠢的事。

幸之雾没有做,却有人为这张照片留下了些什么。顺着走廊里幽暗的光线,照片的背面浮现出岁月的印记——

卓英冠父女合影留念。

落款不是人的名字,而是留影的原因——

记:之雾五岁生日快乐!

这一次记者

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
718
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

香港六合彩

  1. 1. UAW Classification Audit Committee Report Committee Members: Sherry Saarinen, Cathy Banfield, Barb Ruotsala, Mike Abbott, Paula Zenner, Sharron Paris Becky Christianson, Facilitator
  2. 2. Charge to the committee <ul><li>Make form more user friendly </li></ul><ul><li>Make sure categories are weighted correctly </li></ul><ul><li>Dealing with anomalies where it perceived the tool doesn’t fit </li></ul><ul><li>Address changing technology </li></ul><ul><li>Coming up with better ways to define what positions do </li></ul><ul><li>What value does the tool/process bring to MTU? </li></ul>
  3. 3. How we got to where we are now <ul><li>Decided that it would be important to ask office professionals and supervisors what they wanted/needed in an audit tool </li></ul><ul><li>Offered 5 focus group times to supervisors and 7 times to office professionals </li></ul><ul><li>Conducted focus groups during December </li></ul><ul><li>Compiled results and took back to the committee </li></ul>
  4. 4. What we learned from OP <ul><li>Current tool was frustrating to complete (what do they want to know???) </li></ul><ul><li>Concerns about not being upgraded </li></ul><ul><li>People had lost faith in the process </li></ul><ul><li>Hard to write down what people do </li></ul><ul><li>There must be ‘magic words’ to get an upgrade </li></ul><ul><li>Lists of duties vary from department to department </li></ul>
  5. 5. What we learned from supervisors <ul><li>Current tool is intimidating </li></ul><ul><li>What are the “right words” needed to complete an audit form? </li></ul><ul><li>Need to reduce the “fear factor” around the process </li></ul><ul><li>Person and position are difficult to separate </li></ul><ul><li>Want fairness in the process </li></ul><ul><li>Budget issues around upgrades </li></ul>
  6. 6. Proceeding from focus groups <ul><li>Needed to re-examine categories and weight of each </li></ul><ul><li>Improve tool to make more user-friendly </li></ul><ul><li>Discussed creating guide for Office Professionals and what to include </li></ul><ul><li>Added list of Action Verbs to guide </li></ul><ul><li>Have audit tool and guide available on the web </li></ul>
  7. 7. Next Steps <ul><li>Decided to integrate check boxes into the form </li></ul><ul><li>Examined current form for appropriateness </li></ul><ul><li>How have positions changed since the current form was created? </li></ul><ul><li>What categories have changed since the current form was created? </li></ul><ul><li>Original plan was to roll out the ‘new form’ in mid February… </li></ul>
  8. 8. Benchmarking <ul><li>Web search resulted in at least 15 forms to benchmark </li></ul><ul><li>Forms ranged from 2 to 17 pages </li></ul><ul><li>Good ideas/wording to incorporate into our form (obtained permission from schools) </li></ul><ul><li>Pre-audit information </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional guide </li></ul><ul><li>Stuff available on the web </li></ul>
  9. 9. Energizer ® bunnies… <ul><li>Almost finished with the OP guide when it was decided to add a supervisor guide </li></ul><ul><li>Examined and changed distribution of categories to reflect current positions </li></ul><ul><li>Developed FAQ sections for each guide from focus group questions/comments </li></ul><ul><li>Finalized form check boxes </li></ul><ul><li>Tested new audit form with recent auditees </li></ul><ul><li>Took tool and guides back to focus group participants for comments and suggestions </li></ul>
  10. 10. Issues still out there… <ul><li>Position not upgraded after audit – position was correctly classified; is not a reflection on the person in the position </li></ul><ul><li>Is not a ‘template’ for a level 4 or level 5 – positions vary too much across campus </li></ul><ul><li>Difficult to separate person from the position </li></ul><ul><li>Need to use tool to evaluate postings to ensure consistency </li></ul>
  11. 11. Final Products <ul><li>Pre-audit information </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional Audit Form (Microsoft Word ® document with check and text boxes – can be saved) </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional Audit Form Guide </li></ul><ul><li>Supervisor Guide </li></ul><ul><li>All will be available on web </li></ul>

×