Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

香港六合彩

799 views

Published on

东西,该觉得幸福才是。

是是是,香港六合彩跟盲人比简直幸福得要飞翔了。听从柯柯的话,梅忍礼索性闭起眼四处摸着,手指碰到坚硬的物体,香港六合彩被自己吓了一跳。这是什么?

小声点儿,你想被人以非法入侵罪给告上法庭啊?

不知道是谁在扯着嗓子呐喊,梅忍礼不敢指责香港六合彩,只好捂住香港六合彩的嘴巴,阻止香港六合彩继续暴露两个人行径的愚蠢行为。

将那个坚硬的物体拿在手中,借着走廊的灯光,柯柯仔细瞧了瞧,原来是相框。那里面有张泛黄的照片,照片里的男人手里抱着一个四、五岁大的小女孩——仔细瞧那男人,与卓远之竟有七分相似,只是比香港六合彩略老了些。

哈哈!梅忍礼,这下咱们可逮着证据了。柯柯端详着照片,像看到了揭露政界丑闻的头版头条似的,我倒要看看卓远之这下可怎么狡辩。

梅忍礼没香港六合彩那么得意,眉头紧锁,香港六合彩忽然意识到,这照片中的女生跟幸之雾长得很像,看这照片似乎有些年头了,如果我猜得不错,这不是卓远之的照片,这是幸之雾小时候的相片。

对哦!柯柯动手拆起相框来,梅忍礼压根没来得及阻止。你干吗?嫌私闯名宅罪名不够大,还要安上个抢劫才觉得过瘾吗?

这香港六合彩就不懂了,一般值得纪念的照片背面都会留下些字样,我想看看幸之雾会不会做愚蠢的事。

幸之雾没有做,却有人为这张照片留下了些什么。顺着走廊里幽暗的光线,照片的背面浮现出岁月的印记——

卓英冠父女合影留念。

落款不是人的名字,而是留影的原因——

记:之雾五岁生日快乐!

这一次记者

Published in: Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

香港六合彩

  1. 1. UAW Classification Audit Committee Report Committee Members: Sherry Saarinen, Cathy Banfield, Barb Ruotsala, Mike Abbott, Paula Zenner, Sharron Paris Becky Christianson, Facilitator
  2. 2. Charge to the committee <ul><li>Make form more user friendly </li></ul><ul><li>Make sure categories are weighted correctly </li></ul><ul><li>Dealing with anomalies where it perceived the tool doesn’t fit </li></ul><ul><li>Address changing technology </li></ul><ul><li>Coming up with better ways to define what positions do </li></ul><ul><li>What value does the tool/process bring to MTU? </li></ul>
  3. 3. How we got to where we are now <ul><li>Decided that it would be important to ask office professionals and supervisors what they wanted/needed in an audit tool </li></ul><ul><li>Offered 5 focus group times to supervisors and 7 times to office professionals </li></ul><ul><li>Conducted focus groups during December </li></ul><ul><li>Compiled results and took back to the committee </li></ul>
  4. 4. What we learned from OP <ul><li>Current tool was frustrating to complete (what do they want to know???) </li></ul><ul><li>Concerns about not being upgraded </li></ul><ul><li>People had lost faith in the process </li></ul><ul><li>Hard to write down what people do </li></ul><ul><li>There must be ‘magic words’ to get an upgrade </li></ul><ul><li>Lists of duties vary from department to department </li></ul>
  5. 5. What we learned from supervisors <ul><li>Current tool is intimidating </li></ul><ul><li>What are the “right words” needed to complete an audit form? </li></ul><ul><li>Need to reduce the “fear factor” around the process </li></ul><ul><li>Person and position are difficult to separate </li></ul><ul><li>Want fairness in the process </li></ul><ul><li>Budget issues around upgrades </li></ul>
  6. 6. Proceeding from focus groups <ul><li>Needed to re-examine categories and weight of each </li></ul><ul><li>Improve tool to make more user-friendly </li></ul><ul><li>Discussed creating guide for Office Professionals and what to include </li></ul><ul><li>Added list of Action Verbs to guide </li></ul><ul><li>Have audit tool and guide available on the web </li></ul>
  7. 7. Next Steps <ul><li>Decided to integrate check boxes into the form </li></ul><ul><li>Examined current form for appropriateness </li></ul><ul><li>How have positions changed since the current form was created? </li></ul><ul><li>What categories have changed since the current form was created? </li></ul><ul><li>Original plan was to roll out the ‘new form’ in mid February… </li></ul>
  8. 8. Benchmarking <ul><li>Web search resulted in at least 15 forms to benchmark </li></ul><ul><li>Forms ranged from 2 to 17 pages </li></ul><ul><li>Good ideas/wording to incorporate into our form (obtained permission from schools) </li></ul><ul><li>Pre-audit information </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional guide </li></ul><ul><li>Stuff available on the web </li></ul>
  9. 9. Energizer ® bunnies… <ul><li>Almost finished with the OP guide when it was decided to add a supervisor guide </li></ul><ul><li>Examined and changed distribution of categories to reflect current positions </li></ul><ul><li>Developed FAQ sections for each guide from focus group questions/comments </li></ul><ul><li>Finalized form check boxes </li></ul><ul><li>Tested new audit form with recent auditees </li></ul><ul><li>Took tool and guides back to focus group participants for comments and suggestions </li></ul>
  10. 10. Issues still out there… <ul><li>Position not upgraded after audit – position was correctly classified; is not a reflection on the person in the position </li></ul><ul><li>Is not a ‘template’ for a level 4 or level 5 – positions vary too much across campus </li></ul><ul><li>Difficult to separate person from the position </li></ul><ul><li>Need to use tool to evaluate postings to ensure consistency </li></ul>
  11. 11. Final Products <ul><li>Pre-audit information </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional Audit Form (Microsoft Word ® document with check and text boxes – can be saved) </li></ul><ul><li>Office Professional Audit Form Guide </li></ul><ul><li>Supervisor Guide </li></ul><ul><li>All will be available on web </li></ul>

×