• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Wiki rubric
 

Wiki rubric

on

  • 464 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
464
Views on SlideShare
464
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Wiki rubric Wiki rubric Document Transcript

    • Wiki Research Rubric CATEGORY Exemplary 3 Proficient 2 Partially Proficient 1 Unsatisfactory 0 Selection and Quality of Sources Identified highly appropriate sources in a variety of formats (books, journals, electronic sources). Identified mostly appropriate sources in a variety of formats (books, journals, electronic sources). Identified a few appropriate sources but made little attempt to balance format types. Identified no appropriate sources in any format. Selection and Quality of Information Extracted relevant information to enrich the story. Extracted mostly relevant information to enrich the story. Extracted a lot of information which wasn’t relevant to enrich the story. Extracted irrelevant information. Citations/ Documentation Cited all sources of information accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. (MLA) Cited most sources of information in proper format and documented sources to enable accuracy checking. (MLA) Cited most sources of information improperly and provided little or no supporting documentation to check accuracy. (MLA) Created citations which were incomplete or inaccurate, and provided no way to check the validity of the information gathered. (MLA) TOTAL POINTS: _____/9
    • Wiki Story Rubric TOTAL POINTS: __________ / 12 CATEGORY Exemplary 3 Proficient 2 Partially Proficient 1 Unsatisfactory 0 Grammar/Mechanics/Spelling Edits the text with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Edits the text with minor additional editing required for grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Edits the text, but errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling distract or impair readability. (3 or more errors) Edits the text but numerous errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling repeatedly distract the reader and major revision is required. (more than 5 errors) Development Beginning creates interest, middle is well-developed, and the end is satisfying. Table of Contents and Layout are excellent. Story has a clear and interesting beginning, middle, and end. Table of Contents and Layout are good. Story has a clear beginning, middle, and end but needs details to make it interesting. Table of Contents and Layout are fair. Story does not have a clear beginning, middle, or end. It is hard to follow. Table of Contents and Layout are disorganized. Content Story makes complete sense. Writing is clear and easy to understand. Main value is clear. Research information was used in a very creative way. Writing is pretty understandable. Some ideas may be out of place. Main value is pretty clear. Research information was used in a creative way. Story is hard to follow and somewhat confusing. Main value is not clear. Research information was used in a fairly creative way. The reader will not be able to understand this writing. Ideas do not make sense. Main value is not clear. Research information was not used. Attractiveness Makes excellent use of links, font, color, images, audio, video, etc. to enhance the presentation. Makes good use of links, font, color, images, audio, video, etc. to enhance the presentation. Makes fair use of links, font, color, images, audio, video, etc. to enhance the presentation. Makes no use of links, font, color, images, audio, video, etc. to enhance the presentation.