Wiki Research Rubric
CATEGORY Exemplary
3
Proficient
2
Partially Proficient
1
Unsatisfactory
0
Selection and
Quality of
So...
Wiki Story Rubric
TOTAL POINTS: __________ / 12
CATEGORY Exemplary
3
Proficient
2
Partially Proficient
1
Unsatisfactory
0
...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Wiki rubric

793 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
793
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
16
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Wiki rubric

  1. 1. Wiki Research Rubric CATEGORY Exemplary 3 Proficient 2 Partially Proficient 1 Unsatisfactory 0 Selection and Quality of Sources Identified highly appropriate sources in a variety of formats (books, journals, electronic sources). Identified mostly appropriate sources in a variety of formats (books, journals, electronic sources). Identified a few appropriate sources but made little attempt to balance format types. Identified no appropriate sources in any format. Selection and Quality of Information Extracted relevant information to enrich the story. Extracted mostly relevant information to enrich the story. Extracted a lot of information which wasn’t relevant to enrich the story. Extracted irrelevant information. Citations/ Documentation Cited all sources of information accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented. (MLA) Cited most sources of information in proper format and documented sources to enable accuracy checking. (MLA) Cited most sources of information improperly and provided little or no supporting documentation to check accuracy. (MLA) Created citations which were incomplete or inaccurate, and provided no way to check the validity of the information gathered. (MLA) TOTAL POINTS: _____/9
  2. 2. Wiki Story Rubric TOTAL POINTS: __________ / 12 CATEGORY Exemplary 3 Proficient 2 Partially Proficient 1 Unsatisfactory 0 Grammar/Mechanics/Spelling Edits the text with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Edits the text with minor additional editing required for grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Edits the text, but errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling distract or impair readability. (3 or more errors) Edits the text but numerous errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling repeatedly distract the reader and major revision is required. (more than 5 errors) Development Beginning creates interest, middle is well-developed, and the end is satisfying. Table of Contents and Layout are excellent. Story has a clear and interesting beginning, middle, and end. Table of Contents and Layout are good. Story has a clear beginning, middle, and end but needs details to make it interesting. Table of Contents and Layout are fair. Story does not have a clear beginning, middle, or end. It is hard to follow. Table of Contents and Layout are disorganized. Content Story makes complete sense. Writing is clear and easy to understand. Main value is clear. Research information was used in a very creative way. Writing is pretty understandable. Some ideas may be out of place. Main value is pretty clear. Research information was used in a creative way. Story is hard to follow and somewhat confusing. Main value is not clear. Research information was used in a fairly creative way. The reader will not be able to understand this writing. Ideas do not make sense. Main value is not clear. Research information was not used. Attractiveness Makes excellent use of links, font, color, images, audio, video, etc. to enhance the presentation. Makes good use of links, font, color, images, audio, video, etc. to enhance the presentation. Makes fair use of links, font, color, images, audio, video, etc. to enhance the presentation. Makes no use of links, font, color, images, audio, video, etc. to enhance the presentation.

×