This paper presents some findings around musical genres. The main goal is to analyse whether there is any agreement between a group of experts and a community, when defining a set of genres and their relationships. For this purpose, three different experiments are conducted using two datasets: the MP3.com expert taxonomy, and last.fm tags at artist level. The experimental results show a clear agreement for some components of the taxonomy (Blues, HipHop), whilst in other cases (e.g. Rock) there is no correlations. Interestingly enough, the same results are found in the MIREX2007 results for audio genre classification task. Thus, showing the fact that a musical genre could have a multi–faceted definition; using expert based classifications, dynamic associations derived from the community driven annotations, and content–based analysis would improve genre classification, as well as other relevant MIR tasks such as music similarity or music recommendation.
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
The Quest for Musical Genres: Do the Experts and the Wisdom of Crowds Agree?
1. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008
The Quest for Musical Genres:
Do the Experts and the Wisdom of Crowds
Agree?
Mohamed Sordo, Òscar Celma, Martin Blech, Enric Guaus
(Music Technology Group ~ UPF)
9. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
outline
1) Mapping tags to genres
2) Computing similarity among genres
3) Agreement between experts and wisdom of crowds
4) Reconstructing the taxonomy from the folksonomy
10. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
outline
1) Mapping tags to genres
2) Computing similarity among genres
3) Agreement between experts and wisdom of crowds
4) Reconstructing the taxonomy from the folksonomy
17. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
outline
1) Mapping tags to genres
2) Computing similarity among genres
3) Agreement between experts and wisdom of crowds
4) Reconstructing the taxonomy from the folksonomy
20. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
outline
1) Mapping tags to genres
2) Computing similarity among genres
3) Agreement between experts and wisdom of crowds
4) Reconstructing the taxonomy from the folksonomy
21. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
agreement experts ~ wisdom of crowds
• 1) Separate (taxonomy) genre components
using (folksonomy) genre sim.
intra-component similarity
inter-component similarity
• 2) Correlation between (taxonomy) genre
path distance and (folksonomy) genre sim.
DistanceTAXONOMY(g1, g2) ~???~ SimFOLKSONOMY(g1, g2)
22. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
agreement experts ~ wisdom of crowds
• 1) intra-component similarity, using LSA
23. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
agreement experts ~ wisdom of crowds
• 1) intra-component similarity, using LSA
32. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
outline
1) Mapping tags to genres
2) Computing similarity among genres
3) Agreement between experts and wisdom of crowds
4) Reconstructing the taxonomy from the folksonomy
33. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
reconstruct taxonomy from folksonomy
• Select closest parent, using folk. genre sim.
Get genres at level n
34. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
reconstruct taxonomy from folksonomy
• Select closest parent, using folk. genre sim.
For each genre at level n
35. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
reconstruct taxonomy from folksonomy
• Select closest parent, using folk. genre sim.
Get all nodes at level n-1 (possible parents)
42. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
...and also!
• MIREX 2007 results (Team: IMIRSEL-M2K SVM)
RAPHIPHOP 84.05%
BLUES 77.68%
EDANCE 77.68%
JAZZ 72.53%
COUNTRY 71.37%
ROCKROLL 69.53%
BAROQUE 65.81%
METAL 61.11%
ROMANTIC 52.79%
CLASSICAL 33.33%
43. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
conclusions
• Consensus in some genres
expert, community, and audio
• Discovery in terms of taxonomy/folksonomy
coarse / fine grained
static / dynamic
• Taxonomy adapts according to the folksonomy
• Do we need experts?
• Are some (wisdom-of-crowds) shepherds more
experts than “THE” experts?
44. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008 // òscar celma // MTG / UPF
future work
• Use more taxonomies and folksonomies
• Agreement measures
Uncovering affinity of artists to multiple genres from social behaviour data
(Claudio Baccigalupo, Justin Donaldson, Enric Plaza)
45. ISMIR / Philadelphia, US // September, 18th 2008
THANKS!!!
Mohamed Sordo, Òscar Celma, Martin Blech, Enric Guaus
(Music Technology Group ~ UPF)