![[object Object],12TH. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGENCY MEDICINE SAN FRANCISCO, USA 3RD - 6TH APRIL 2008 Nik HNA Rahman 1 (MBChB, MMed), R Ahmad 2 (MD, MMed) A Hashim 3 (MBBS, MMed) (Emergency Physicians) 1 Head of Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia 2 Lecturer in Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia 3 Head of Accident & Emergency Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sabah Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, 16150, Malaysia. Tel: 00609-766 3000, Fax: 00609-765 3370 Email: nhliza@hotmail.com](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/propofolmidazolam-12529313538095-phpapp01/85/Propofol-VS-Midazolam-Randomized-Controlled-Trial-In-Prosedural-Sedation-1-320.jpg)
![INTRODUCTION ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (18)
Viewers also liked
Similar to Propofol VS Midazolam - Randomized Controlled Trial In Prosedural Sedation
Similar to Propofol VS Midazolam - Randomized Controlled Trial In Prosedural Sedation (20)
Propofol VS Midazolam - Randomized Controlled Trial In Prosedural Sedation
- 15. RESULTS The youngest subject that has been recruited in this trial was 13 years of age while the oldest being 78 years old with the mean age of 37.8 years In subjects receiving propofol, the mean age was 39.52 ± 17.64 while for midazolam the mean age of subjects was 37.00 ± 15.58 (p>0.05)
- 16. RESULTS MAP dropped for both drugs BUT p>0.05 MAP improved post procedures Prior to discharge Respiratory rate increased slightly Intraprocedure and normalized post procedure (Both drugs) (P=0.106)
- 17. RESULTS No significant dropped in O 2 Saturation for both drugs No significant change in ETCO 2
- 18. RESULTS Decreased Decreased Decreased Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged BUT P>0.05
- 19. RESULTS