CRITERIA            Relevance              Effectiveness            Efficiency          Potential Impacts          Sustain...
CRITERIA                           Relevance                        Effectiveness
                                       I...
WP2
PERFORMANCE TO
DATE VERY LOW ☺
Effectiveness                   Efficiency                      Potential Impacts                      Sustainability     ...
Value-for-money             Target Group Satisfaction
        Indicator 12       Indicator 13       Indicator 14




     ...
2.83   0
Indicator 2                      Indicator 3




  0                  1   0.35   0   0                 1   0.35   0   0


...
2.83   0   2.83       0




                  3
                  5
                  7
Indicator 4                      Indicator 5                      Indicator 6




              1   0.35   0   0          ...
2.83   0   2.83       0   2.83




                  7
Evaluating Member Normalized Decision M

               Indicator 7                      Indicator 8




0.35   0   0     ...
0   2.83       0   2.83




16              0
zed Decision Matrix

                   Indicator 9                      Indicator 10




          0    0                ...
0   2.83   0   2.83   0
Indicator 11                      Indicator 12




0                  1   0.35   0   0                  1   0.35   0




0...
2.83   0   2.83   0
Indicator 13                      Indicator 14




0                  1   0.35   0   0                  1   0.35   0




0...
2.83   0   2.83   0
SEPARATION SEPARATION
    IDEAL TARGET      ANTI-IDEAL           MEASURE    MEASURE ANTI-
    VALUES            VALUES    ...
0.354   0.354



0.354   0.354



0.354   0.354
0.354   0.354
0.354   0.354
SUM              RELATIVE
SEPARATION       CLOSENESS TO      SUM INPUT     INPUT ZERO
MEASURES         THE IDEAL         R...
0.200
CRITERIA                     Relevance                          Effectiveness
                                          IN...
Effectiveness                    Efficiency                      Potential Impacts                      Sustainability    ...
Value-for-money            Target Group Satisfaction
       Indicator 12       Indicator 13       Indicator 14




       ...
Indicator 2                      Indicator 3




  0                  1   0.35   0   0                 1   0.35   0   0


...
3
5
7
Indicator 4                      Indicator 5                      Indicator 6




              1   0.35   0   0          ...
7
Evaluating Member Normalized Decision M
               Indicator 7                      Indicator 8




0.35   0   0      ...
16   0
ed Decision Matrix
                   Indicator 9                      Indicator 10




          0    0                 1...
Indicator 11                      Indicator 12




0                  1   0.35   0   0                  1   0.35   0   0

...
Indicator 13                      Indicator 14




               1   0.35   0   0                  1   0.35   0   0




 ...
IDEAL TARGET      ANTI-IDEAL           SEPARATION        SEPARATION MEASURE
VALUES            VALUES               MEASURE...
RELATIVE
SUM SEPARATION      CLOSENESS TO THE SUM INPUT     INPUT ZERO
MEASURES            IDEAL            RANGE         ...
CRITERIA                          Relevance                         Effectiveness
                                   INDIC...
Effectiveness                    Efficiency                      Potential Impacts                    Sustainability      ...
Value-for-money             Target Group Satisfaction
        Indicator 12       Indicator 13       Indicator 14




     ...
Indicator 2                            Indicator 3                         Indicator 4




              1   0.35     0   ...
3
5
7
Indicator 5                      Indicator 6




0.35   0   0                 1   0.35   0   0                 1   0.35


...
7
Evaluating Member Normalized Decision Matrix
        Indicator 7                      Indicator 8




0   0               ...
ecision Matrix
              Indicator 9                      Indicator 10




          0                 1   0.35   0   ...
Indicator 11                      Indicator 12                      Indicator 13




               1   0.35   0   0      ...
Indicator 14




0.35   0   0                  1   0.35   0   0


0.35   0   0                  1   0.35   0   0


0.35   ...
SEPARATION SEPARATION         SUM
IDEAL TARGET      ANTI-IDEAL           MEASURE    MEASURE ANTI-      SEPARATION
VALUES  ...
0.354   0.354



0.354   0.354



0.354   0.354
RELATIVE         SUM       INPUT
CLOSENESS TO THE INPUT     ZERO
IDEAL            RANGE     VALUES




            0.000  ...
CRITERIA                        Relevance                          Effectiveness
                                         ...
Communication        1   1   1
                   toward European
                   Parliament members
                  ...
Effectiveness                   Efficiency                     Potential Impacts                       Sustainability     ...
1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1
Value-for-money             Target Group Satisfaction
        Indicator 12       Indicator 13       Indicator 14




     ...
1   1   1


              1    0.3   0



             11     0    0




            3.32         0
Indicator 2                      Indicator 3


0                 1   0.28   0   0                 1   0.28   0

0         ...
0      1    0.28   0   0     1    0.28   0



0.09    13      0    0        13      0    0




       3.61          0     ...
Indicator 4                      Indicator 5


0                 1   0.28   0   0                 1   0.28   0   0

0     ...
0     1    0.28     0    0     1    0.28     0    0



     13      0    0.01        13      0    0.01




    3.61       ...
Evaluating Member Normalized Decisio
Indicator 6                        Indicator 7                      Indicator 8


   ...
1    0.28     0    0     1    0.28     0    0     1



 13      0    0.01        13      0    0.01        13




3.61     ...
alized Decision Matrix
                         Indicator 9                      Indicator 10


         0.28   0    0    ...
0.28     0    0     1    0.28     0    0     1    0.28



  0    0.01        13      0    0.01        13      0




      ...
Indicator 11                      Indicator 12


0   0                  1   0.28   0   0                  1   0.28

0   0 ...
0    0     1    0.28     0    0     1    0.28



0.01        13      0    0.01        13      0




0.09       3.61       ...
Indicator 13                      Indicator 14


0   0                  1   0.28   0   0                  1   0.28   0

0 ...
0    0     1    0.28     0    0     1    0.28     0



0.01        13      0    0.01        13      0    0.01




0.09    ...
SEPARATION     SEPARATION
    IDEAL TARGET      ANTI-IDEAL           MEASURE        MEASURE
    VALUES            VALUES  ...
0   0.277   0.277   0.080   0.080



0   0.277   0.277
SUM             RELATIVE     SUM       INPUT
SEPARATION      CLOSENESS TO INPUT     ZERO
MEASURES        THE IDEAL    RANG...
0.160    0.500




        0.200
CRITERIA            Relevance                    Effectiveness
                                               INDICATORS I...
Effectiveness                    Efficiency                     Potential Impacts                       Sustainability    ...
Value-for-money             Target Group Satisfaction
        Indicator 12       Indicator 13       Indicator 14




     ...
Indicator 2                      Indicator 3                      Indicator 4




              1   0.58   0   0          ...
3
5
7
Indicator 5                      Indicator 6




0.58   0   0                 1   0.58   0   0                 1   0.58


...
7   16
Evaluating Member Normalized Decision Matrix
        Indicator 7                      Indicator 8




0   0               ...
0
ecision Matrix
              Indicator 9                      Indicator 10




          0                 1   0.58   0   ...
Indicator 11                      Indicator 12                      Indicator 13




               1   0.58   0   0      ...
Indicator 14




0.58   0   0                  1   0.58   0   0




0.58   0   0                  1   0.58   0   0




0.5...
SEPARATION     SEPARATION    SUM
IDEAL TARGET      ANTI-IDEAL           MEASURE        MEASURE ANTI- SEPARATION
VALUES    ...
0.577   0.577



0.577   0.577
0.577   0.577
0.577   0.577
0.577   0.577
0.577   0.577
0.577   0.577
0.577   0.577
0.577  ...
RELATIVE         SUM
CLOSENESS TO     INPUT        INPUT ZERO
THE IDEAL        RANGE        VALUES




         0.000     ...
0.200
RURENER Performance per Workpackage
                 WP1- Management 0.200
                                               ...
orkpackage                                        RURENER Performance per Workpackage

        1.00




        0.80




 ...
kpackage




nities
P5-Training, Communication and Dissemination
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09

235 views
184 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
235
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Evaluation Tool Rurener 30 11 09

  1. 1. CRITERIA Relevance Effectiveness Efficiency Potential Impacts Sustainability Value-for-money Target Group Satisfaction INDICATORS Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 Indicator 7 Indicator 8 Indicator 9 Indicator 10 Indicator 11 Indicator 12 Indicator 13 Indicator 14 SUM SEPARATION SUM RELATIVE SUM INPUT WP Task IDEAL TARGET ANTI-IDEAL SEPARATION MEASURE ANTI- SEPARATION CLOSENESS TO THE INPUT ZERO WP Name WP Task Actions Evaluating Member Normalized Decision Matrix VALUES VALUES MEASURE IDEAL IDEAL MEASURES IDEAL RANGE VALUES 1. Management Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 Indicator 7 Indicator 8 Indicator 9 Indicator 10 Indicator 11 Indicator 12 Indicator 13 Indicator 14 Management of Organization of project meetings kick-off meeting 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 112 112 Meetings coordination 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 On-line meetings and Consortium intranet 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Progress Reports, Intermediate Report, Final Reports Report 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cost Statements 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Monitoring & Creation of Evaluation monitoring board 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Evaluation Methodology 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Data collection to feed indicators 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0.354 0.354 WP1 PERFORMANCE TO DATE VERY LOW ☺ 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 0 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.200 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 3 7 16 0 5 7
  2. 2. CRITERIA Relevance Effectiveness INDICATORS Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 WP Name WP Task WP Task Actions 2. Opportunities and methods toward energetic- neutral villages 1 1 1 Share common Building on definitions (rural previous communities, experiences energetic neutrality...) 1 1 1 Identify and analyse pilot communities profiles (SWOT analysis, questioner) 1 1 1 Identify how energetic neutrality can impact local economic development Identify existing 1 1 1 methodologies of energy strategies in rural areas 1 1 1 Inventory of existing measure tools, analysis of strengths and weaknesses 1 1 1 Designing adapted A model toward methodological energetic neutrality modules 1 1 1 Building tools to measure progress 1 1 1 on-line pedagogical guidelines
  3. 3. WP2 PERFORMANCE TO DATE VERY LOW ☺
  4. 4. Effectiveness Efficiency Potential Impacts Sustainability Value-for-money Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 Indicator 7 Indicator 8 Indicator 9 Indicator 10 Indicator 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  5. 5. Value-for-money Target Group Satisfaction Indicator 12 Indicator 13 Indicator 14 Indicator 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 8 0 0
  6. 6. 2.83 0
  7. 7. Indicator 2 Indicator 3 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.13 8 0 0 8 0 0
  8. 8. 2.83 0 2.83 0 3 5 7
  9. 9. Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 8 0 0 8 0 0 8
  10. 10. 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83 7
  11. 11. Evaluating Member Normalized Decision M Indicator 7 Indicator 8 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0
  12. 12. 0 2.83 0 2.83 16 0
  13. 13. zed Decision Matrix Indicator 9 Indicator 10 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0
  14. 14. 0 2.83 0 2.83 0
  15. 15. Indicator 11 Indicator 12 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 8 0 0 8 0 0
  16. 16. 2.83 0 2.83 0
  17. 17. Indicator 13 Indicator 14 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 8 0 0 8 0 0
  18. 18. 2.83 0 2.83 0
  19. 19. SEPARATION SEPARATION IDEAL TARGET ANTI-IDEAL MEASURE MEASURE ANTI- VALUES VALUES IDEAL IDEAL 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0 0.354 0.354
  20. 20. 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354
  21. 21. SUM RELATIVE SEPARATION CLOSENESS TO SUM INPUT INPUT ZERO MEASURES THE IDEAL RANGE VALUES 0.000 0.000 112 112 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
  22. 22. 0.200
  23. 23. CRITERIA Relevance Effectiveness INDICATORS Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 3. A Network to WP Name enhance WP Task WP Task Actions energetic-neutral communities Use information and On-line Knowledge communication transfer technologies 1 1 1 Identify experts to answer to the communities' questions 1 1 1 Manage language barrier to allow mutualisation of expertise 1 1 1 Database of network members presenting their Mentoring process areas of expertise 1 1 1 Identify mentors, pupils and twins: “communities to support communities” 1 1 1 Network Charter, Sustainability of the updated database Network and information 1 1 1 Evaluate progresses Links with other of the Network rural/energy Community 1 1 1 networks; future structure of the network 1 1 1 WP3 PERFORMANCE TO DATE VERY LOW ☺
  24. 24. Effectiveness Efficiency Potential Impacts Sustainability Value-for-money Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 Indicator 7 Indicator 8 Indicator 9 Indicator 10 Indicator 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  25. 25. Value-for-money Target Group Satisfaction Indicator 12 Indicator 13 Indicator 14 Indicator 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 8 0 0 2.83 0
  26. 26. Indicator 2 Indicator 3 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.13 8 0 0 8 0 0 2.83 0 2.83 0
  27. 27. 3 5 7
  28. 28. Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83
  29. 29. 7
  30. 30. Evaluating Member Normalized Decision M Indicator 7 Indicator 8 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 2.83 0 2.83
  31. 31. 16 0
  32. 32. ed Decision Matrix Indicator 9 Indicator 10 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 2.83 0 2.83 0
  33. 33. Indicator 11 Indicator 12 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 2.83 0 2.83 0
  34. 34. Indicator 13 Indicator 14 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 2.83 0 2.83 0
  35. 35. IDEAL TARGET ANTI-IDEAL SEPARATION SEPARATION MEASURE VALUES VALUES MEASURE IDEAL ANTI-IDEAL 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354
  36. 36. RELATIVE SUM SEPARATION CLOSENESS TO THE SUM INPUT INPUT ZERO MEASURES IDEAL RANGE VALUES 0.000 0.000 112 112 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.200
  37. 37. CRITERIA Relevance Effectiveness INDICATORS Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 WP Name local WP Task 4. Concrete WP Task Actions actions in energetic-neutral communities Strategic commitment (become a 1 1 1 Commitment of Energetic-neutral communities community) Commitment to tools (benefit from network 1 1 1 tools and activities) Implementations Raising awareness 1 1 1 and actions at local level Collect energy data at the local level (see 1 1 1 WP2 t2) Set-up Energy strategies in small 1 1 1 rural communities Active mentoring and twinning: one to one 1 1 1 training and experience sharing Local progresses toward energetic- 1 1 1 Evaluation neutrality Annual local reports: impact on local 1 1 1 development WP4 PERFORMANCE TO DATE VERY LOW ☺
  38. 38. Effectiveness Efficiency Potential Impacts Sustainability Value-for-money Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 Indicator 7 Indicator 8 Indicator 9 Indicator 10 Indicator 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  39. 39. Value-for-money Target Group Satisfaction Indicator 12 Indicator 13 Indicator 14 Indicator 1 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 0.13 2.83 0
  40. 40. Indicator 2 Indicator 3 Indicator 4 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 2.83 0.13 0.13 2.83 0.13 2.83
  41. 41. 3 5 7
  42. 42. Indicator 5 Indicator 6 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 2.83 0 2.83
  43. 43. 7
  44. 44. Evaluating Member Normalized Decision Matrix Indicator 7 Indicator 8 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 2.83 0 2.83 0
  45. 45. ecision Matrix Indicator 9 Indicator 10 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 2.83 0 2.83 0
  46. 46. Indicator 11 Indicator 12 Indicator 13 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 1 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 1 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 2.83 0 2.83 0 2.83
  47. 47. Indicator 14 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0.35 0 0 1 0.35 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2.83 0
  48. 48. SEPARATION SEPARATION SUM IDEAL TARGET ANTI-IDEAL MEASURE MEASURE ANTI- SEPARATION VALUES VALUES IDEAL IDEAL MEASURES 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354
  49. 49. 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.354
  50. 50. RELATIVE SUM INPUT CLOSENESS TO THE INPUT ZERO IDEAL RANGE VALUES 0.000 112 112 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.200
  51. 51. CRITERIA Relevance Effectiveness INDICATORS Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 5. Training, WP Name WP Task WP Task Actions Communication and Dissemination Printing and Highlight best presenting members 1 1 1 practices fact sheets 1 1 1 Producing posters Shooting video diary 1 1 1 of community actions Develop web architecture, functions and 1 1 1 Website and graphical webtools composition Ensure sustainable 1 1 1 updating 1 1 1 Translation Producing practical guidelines: how to use the website, how to find a 1 1 1 mentor, how to share my Guidelines experience... Printing pedagogical guidelines (produced 1 1 1 in WP2.2) Training and information national Training seminars 1 1 1 seminars for members Participation in local and national exhibitions to 1 1 1 promote energetic neutral communities Other dissemination and communication 1 1 1 activities at the local level Organisation of a 1 1 1 European event and common European communication to event on innovative European entities rural development
  52. 52. Communication 1 1 1 toward European Parliament members and DG Officers WP5 PERFORMANCE TO DATE VERY LOW ☺
  53. 53. Effectiveness Efficiency Potential Impacts Sustainability Value-for-money Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 Indicator 7 Indicator 8 Indicator 9 Indicator 10 Indicator 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  54. 54. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  55. 55. Value-for-money Target Group Satisfaction Indicator 12 Indicator 13 Indicator 14 Indicator 1 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 0.3 0 1 1 1 0.3 0
  56. 56. 1 1 1 1 0.3 0 11 0 0 3.32 0
  57. 57. Indicator 2 Indicator 3 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0
  58. 58. 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0.09 13 0 0 13 0 0 3.61 0 3.61 0 3 5 7
  59. 59. Indicator 4 Indicator 5 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0
  60. 60. 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 13 0 0.01 13 0 0.01 3.61 0.09 3.61 0.09 7
  61. 61. Evaluating Member Normalized Decisio Indicator 6 Indicator 7 Indicator 8 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1
  62. 62. 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 13 0 0.01 13 0 0.01 13 3.61 0.09 3.61 0.09 3.61 16 0
  63. 63. alized Decision Matrix Indicator 9 Indicator 10 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28
  64. 64. 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0.01 13 0 0.01 13 0 0.09 3.61 0.09 3.61
  65. 65. Indicator 11 Indicator 12 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28
  66. 66. 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0.01 13 0 0.01 13 0 0.09 3.61 0.09 3.61
  67. 67. Indicator 13 Indicator 14 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0
  68. 68. 0 0 1 0.28 0 0 1 0.28 0 0.01 13 0 0.01 13 0 0.01 0.09 3.61 0.09 3.61 0.09
  69. 69. SEPARATION SEPARATION IDEAL TARGET ANTI-IDEAL MEASURE MEASURE VALUES VALUES IDEAL ANTI-IDEAL 0 0.302 0.302 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080
  70. 70. 0 0.277 0.277 0.080 0.080 0 0.277 0.277
  71. 71. SUM RELATIVE SUM INPUT SEPARATION CLOSENESS TO INPUT ZERO MEASURES THE IDEAL RANGE VALUES 0.160 0.500 182 182 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500 0.160 0.500
  72. 72. 0.160 0.500 0.200
  73. 73. CRITERIA Relevance Effectiveness INDICATORS Indicator 1 Indicator 2 Indicator 3 WP Task WP Name WP Task Actions 6. Common Dissemination Activities Creation and regular update of RURENER 1 1 1 information for IEE online information systems (one update after each progress and intermediate report) Contribution, upon request by the EACI, to the development of additional 1 1 1 information material (Intelligent Energy News Review, videos, images etc.) in the quality and format specified Participation and/or contribution, to information and dissemination events 1 1 1 (contractors’ workshops, conferences, briefing days, exhibitions, etc.) related to IEE or other relevant EU programmes WP6 PERFORMANCE TO DATE VERY LOW☺
  74. 74. Effectiveness Efficiency Potential Impacts Sustainability Value-for-money Indicator 4 Indicator 5 Indicator 6 Indicator 7 Indicator 8 Indicator 9 Indicator 10 Indicator 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  75. 75. Value-for-money Target Group Satisfaction Indicator 12 Indicator 13 Indicator 14 Indicator 1 1 1 1 1 0.58 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.58 0 0 1 1 1 1 0.58 0 0 3 0 0 1.73 0
  76. 76. Indicator 2 Indicator 3 Indicator 4 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.73 0 1.73 0 1.73
  77. 77. 3 5 7
  78. 78. Indicator 5 Indicator 6 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1.73 0 1.73
  79. 79. 7 16
  80. 80. Evaluating Member Normalized Decision Matrix Indicator 7 Indicator 8 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1.73 0 1.73 0
  81. 81. 0
  82. 82. ecision Matrix Indicator 9 Indicator 10 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1.73 0 1.73 0
  83. 83. Indicator 11 Indicator 12 Indicator 13 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 1 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.73 0 1.73 0 1.73
  84. 84. Indicator 14 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 0.58 0 0 1 0.58 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1.73 0
  85. 85. SEPARATION SEPARATION SUM IDEAL TARGET ANTI-IDEAL MEASURE MEASURE ANTI- SEPARATION VALUES VALUES IDEAL IDEAL MEASURES 0.577 0.577 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.577 0.577 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.577 0.577 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577
  86. 86. 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577 0.577
  87. 87. RELATIVE SUM CLOSENESS TO INPUT INPUT ZERO THE IDEAL RANGE VALUES 0.000 42 42 0.000 0.000
  88. 88. 0.200
  89. 89. RURENER Performance per Workpackage WP1- Management 0.200 1.00 0.200 WP2-Opportunities and methods toward energetic- neutral villages 0.200 WP3- A Network to enhance energetic-neutral communities 0.200 WP4- Concrete local actions in energetic-neutral communities 0.200 WP5-Training, Communication and Dissemination 0.200 0.80 WP6-Common Dissemination Activities 0.200 0.60 RURENER PERFORMANCE TO DATE VERY 0.40 LOW ☺ 0.20 0.00 WP
  90. 90. orkpackage RURENER Performance per Workpackage 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 WP3- A Network to enhance energetic-neutral communities WP1- Management WP5-Training, Communic
  91. 91. kpackage nities P5-Training, Communication and Dissemination

×