MIT Civic Games Panel

  • 120 views
Uploaded on

A talk given as part of a panel discussion on civic games, sponsored by the MIT Center for Civic Media in the fall of 2011.

A talk given as part of a panel discussion on civic games, sponsored by the MIT Center for Civic Media in the fall of 2011.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
120
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • The idea for this came from a conversation one of our professors was having with some students in the spring of 2010, in which the students said “we should get achievements for being awesome.” She took that idea to our chair, who took it to Microsoft Research, who said “here’s some seed money—think this through, then come back and tell us more.”
  • This is less about pushing them to do things that they wouldn’t otherwise do, and more about recognizing what they do, and allowing them to remember and reflect on their accomplishments.
  • Reflection is a powerful tool This is a service I signed up for a few months ago that tells me what I did a year ago in Foursquare. And these daily reminders are much more powerful than a leaderboard in encouraging me to check in on Foursquare regularly. What did we want to encourage our students to do?
  • When Andy first pitched this to MSR, he made a point of saying “GREAT DANGER HERE”…and he was right. The reason you don’t see this achievement approach everywhere in education is that it’s really hard to do well!
  • By adding external tangible rewards, we can actually do damage to our students’ intrinsic motivations. The focus needs to be on “now…that” rewards, rather than “if…then” rewards.
  • For this to be successful, it has to be voluntary, fun, and engaging. They have to vest in it as creators, not just consumers. This is the key takeaway from Deci & Ryan’s SDT work. We know this because we asked them 
  • http://gamification-research.org/2011/09/a-quick-buck-by-copy-and-paste/http://gamification-research.org/2011/09/gamification-by-design-response-to-oreilly/So….what feelings of competence did we want to focus on?
  • Big questions that guided our content development.
  • When we started really thinking about the natural tensions at RIT—in particular, for our students, between design and development—we found that the history of RIT yielded some fascinating historical context for that tension.
  • This was the model that emerged for us—the tension between the athenaeum and the mechanics institute, as well as the tension between individual and collaborative competencies. Bloom’s taxonomy informs the rings, but the important part is not just expansion but BALANCE. The problem with “atheneaeum”, however, is that NOBODY can pronounce (or spell) it. More importantly, we found as we tried to categorize activities it was too difficult to operationalize “athenaeum” and “mechanics”.
  • What we ended up with was one axis of “exploration” and “mastery”, and another of “individual” and “social”.
  • Students lining up on the first day of the game to get their PlayPasskeychains.
  • Chris Cascioli’s card requires you to give him a picture you’ve made of a boat. The first night of the game, students snuck into the lab he’d be teaching in the next morning, and put this drawing on the whiteboard.

Transcript

  • 1. Just Press Play: A gaming layer for undergraduate education Liz Lawley RIT School of Interactive Games & Media lawley.rit.edu
  • 2. It‟s the autonomy, stupid.
  • 3. “My point is that the „fun‟, the pleasure of these elements does not come from some extrinsic reward value of those elements, but chiefly from the experience of competence they give rise to.” stian Deterding
  • 4. What behaviors did we want to reward and encourage? What feelings of competence could we engender? What did we want our students to remember and reflect on?
  • 5. So, what happened?
  • 6. “On a side note, despite website difficulties, people are playing. The buzz is tremendously positive. Keith Whittington has already had several lovely interactions as people want his card. I have given out around 40 already of Weezes Wobble. People are breaking out in dance around me. I never want this to stop.”
  • 7. I walked in the next morning and several of the students (including Somara) were waiting outside the room to hear my reaction, which was my turning around and yelling "SOMARA!!!" Definitely a good time :)