This is a multi author presentation of the Slow Fish manifesto. Slow Fish are a chapter of the Slow Food movement. Words written by John Wedgewood Clarke after extensive discussions by a group of activists, scientists and producers. In Bergen I gave it with Lucy Gilliam on behalf of Slow Fish (part of the Slow Food movement) to highlight the problems facing artisanal fishers. I presented it again at the 2014 Terra Madre Slow Fish workshop.
17. Authenticity in the mouth! Taste the truthfulness of strange utterances:
rigour mortis, red gills, the moment caught in the sea’s clear eye
18. Study the dictionary of fish; learn the mother tongues of
the sea; sing the poem of the fish on your plate
19. Ask the slow fish whence it came, and the sea enters the room in the
names of boats, in the word of the fisher, in the dream of an ecosystem
20. Catch the policy in nets; don’t glimpse it like a tourist out for a day trip
in a boat.
21. Not a plate of
fish, but a dish of
tides, grounds,
nets and hooks –
all that was not
caught
sweetening the
flavour
22. Wake the life of fish on ice: face up to the strange and local shapes of the sea – be changed!
23.
24. Energy company tax dodge / windfarm
Marine “Conservation” Zone
Working class exclusion zone
Anchorage for ships
Everything else
25.
26.
27. Elinor Ostrom
“Complex
problems require
complex
solutions”
Folke et al (2012) An Uncommon Scholar of the Commons. Ecol Soc 17:1–3.
Editor's Notes
Knowledge economy – everyone needs food though. Place for people to succeed and garner respect without academic qualifications in Northern Europe.
So – I hope you have gained the impression by now that there is an intrinsic link between people and fisheries and that the how we manage people is at least as important as how we manage fisheries.
Final argument is that when we try to invent complex solutions to complex problems we generally fail. These are the latest rules and regulations that govern the prawn fishery in the north sea. They are detailed, complex and change frequently. Unfortunately, they are also inappropriate, often ludicrous and detested by the users they are supposed to serve.
“Now that we know those dependent on these resources are not forever trapped in situations that will only get worse overtime, we need to recognise that governance is frequently an adaptive process involving multiple actors at diverse levels. Such systems look terribly messy and hard to understand. The scholars’ love of tidiness needs to be resisted. Instead we need to develop better theories of complex adaptive systems focussed on overcoming social dilemmas, particularly those that have proved themselves able to utilize renewable natural resources sustainably over time” Ostrom 2005, p286. (in Rodgers et al, 2010)