0
Year                 Term Unit Role           Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Questions  2004 S2   IP  ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Michael de Percy Teaching Feedback 2004 2011

398

Published on

This is my teaching feedback from 2004-2011. Please note that the questionnaire changed in 2010, so my latest feedback will appear in a new file.

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
398
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Michael de Percy Teaching Feedback 2004 2011"

  1. 1. Year Term Unit Role Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Questions 2004 S2 IP Tutor 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.7 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.2 1.  All things considered, how would you rate the teaching of this lecturer in this unit? 2005 S1 SM Tutor 7.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.4 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.2 2.  The lecturer made the objectives clear for each session. 2005 S1 GBR Tutor 6.1 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.5 3.  The lecturer was able to explain concepts clearly. 2005 S1 PDN Tutor 6.0 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.6 4.1 3.9 3.7 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.  The lecturer seemed well prepared for each session. 2005 S2 GBR Both 5.5 3.9 4.0 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.7 3.3 3.4 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.9 5.  The lecturer taught the unit matter in a way that helped me understand it. 2006 S1 GBR Lecturer 5.3 4.0 3.9 4.4 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.9 4.0 3.6 3.6 6.  The lecturer tried to make the unit interesting. 2006 S2 LIC Lecturer 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.4 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.3 4.2 3.9 4.1 7.  The lecturer demonstrated the relevance of the unit to the whole course. 2007 S1 GBR Lecturer 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.3 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.7 5.3 5.0 8.  The lecturer made opportunities to ask questions. 2007 S2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.7 5.8 6.0 5.7 6.1 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.4 4.8 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.6 9.  The lecturer was available for consultation. 2008 S1 GBR Lecturer 5.8 5.7 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.3 5.5 5.3 5.1 5.5 5.0 5.6 5.7 5.5 4.6 10.   The lecturer made clear the criteria used to assess student work. 2008 S2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.8 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.1 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.5 11.    The lecturer gave adequate feedback on assignments and other prescribed work. 2009 S1 GBR Lecturer 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.4 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.0 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.8 5.7 5.5 5.3 12.   The unit covered what the unit description said it would. 2010 T1 GBR Lecturer 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.0 6.2 6.6 6.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 N/A 6.1 6.1 5.9 6.0 13.   Assessment tasks set and/or exams were related to unit goals. 2010 T3 GBR Lecturer 6.1 6.0 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.4 5.9 6.0 5.9 6.0 N/A 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.0 14.   Assessment tasks allowed me to demonstrate what I had learnt. 2010 HKT4 GBR Lecturer 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 N/A 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 15.   The workload was comparable to other units at this level. 2011 SGT1 LIC Lecturer 6.4 5.6 6.0 6.2 5.8 6.4 6.0 6.0 6.2 6.0 N/A 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.8Legend: LIC = Leadership, Innovation & Change IP = International PoliticsGBR= Government-Business Relations PDN = Politics of Developing Nations SM = Strategic Management Graph 1: Longitudinal Feedback Summary 7.0 6.0 5.0 Result out of 7 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Column E Column F Column G Column H Column I Column J Column K Column L Column M Column N Column O Column P Column Q Column R Column S Question Number Row 2 Row 3 Row 4 Row 5 Row 6 Row 7 Row 8 Row 8 Row 10 Row 11 Row 12 Row 13 Row 14 Row 15 Row 17
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×