The Media Police
  Ofcom: television, radio and
  ‘communications industries’
 BBFC: film, DVD, video games
    PCC : newspapers and
          magazines
ASA: adverts/advertising industry
    BBC Trust: BBC output
Behind the Scenes at the BBFC
•   Who are they?
•   What do they do?
•   History
•   Legal issues
•   Accountability
•   Examining
•   Borderline works
                       3
History


• Established 1912
• Independent, non-governmental body funded through
  charged fees
• Classifies Films on behalf of Local Authorities – the
  Licensing Act, 2003
• Classifies Videos, DVDs and some Digital Games under
  the Video Recordings Act, 1984

                                                      4
1916
                            History
  1. Indecorous, under-clothing’ and
                                ambiguous
  T.P. O’Connor’s ‘Forty-Three Grounds for Deletion’
   ‘Unnecessary exhibition of
  irreverent titlestoand subtitles
        ‘Drunken scenes carried excess’
 ‘Men and women in bed together’
  2. Cruelty to animals scenes’
        ‘Indecorous dancing’         ‘'First Night'
    ‘Materialization of the conventional figure of Christ’
  3. The irreverent treatment of
                   ‘References to controversial politics’

  sacred subjects morphia, cocaine, etc’
    ‘Scenes laid in disorderly houses’
       ‘The drug habit. e.g. opium,
  4. Drunken scenes carried to
‘Scenes tending to disparage public characters and institutions’   5
Legislation
  The Licensing Act, 2003:
• Cinemas require a licence
• The BBFC classifies on behalf of Local Authorities
  but they can:
  – ignore BBFC certificates
  – grant their own certificates
  – effectively ‘ban’ Films



                                                  6
The Video Recordings Act, 1984




•   ‘Video Nasties’ and the VRA 1984
•   Criminal Justice & Public Order Act, 1994
•   The ‘Harm’ test
•   Video Games

                                                7
Other Legislation…




•   The Obscene Publications Act, 1959 & 1964 (obscenity law)
•   Cinematograph Films (Animals Act), 1937 (animal cruelty)
•   Protection of Children Act, 1978 (indecency/children)
•   Human Rights Act, 1998 (freedom of expression)
•   Racial + Religious Hatred Act 2006 (incitement to religious hatred)
•   Criminal Justice + Immigration Act 2007 (extreme
    pornography, pseudo-photographs of children, hate crime - sexuality)
                                                                     8
Accountability

     • Guidelines: February
       2005, updated 2009
     • Public Consultation
       – Citizens Juries
       – Research
       – Questionnaires
     • Research Projects


                              9
BBFC current classification symbols




                                10
Examining: Issues
•   Violence
•   Language
•   Sex
•   Sexual References
•   Sexual Violence
•   Drugs
•   Criminal Activity
•   Weapons
•   Imitable Techniques
•   Horror
•   Theme
•   Legal Issues
•   Discrimination (added 2009)     11
Other Considerations
•   the work – its story, style, treatment
•   the audience – address and appeal
•   the moral framework
•   artistic or educational merit
•   potential level of offensiveness
•   precedent
•   possible harm
•   context

                                             12
Other Outcomes



• Split Decision
• Confirmatory Viewing
• Cuts
 - legal reasons
 - policy
 - ‘category cuts’
• Rejection
                         13
Cuts: Examples

• Imitable Techniques:
  violent, criminal, harmful
• Glamorisation of Offensive
  Weapons
• Sexual Violence: eroticised
  rape or sexual assault
• Illegal Material
• Instruction in Drug Use


                                  14
sbbfc: the Student Guide

• History, Legislation,
  Classification
 • Resources
    Timelines
    Case Studies
    Research
    Articles
    Downloads
    News
    Reading List
    Web Links



                                         15
Education




                               www.sbbfc.co.uk
                                   Launched May 2005




www.cbbfc.co.uk
  Launched June 2003
                                                       16
The Examiners
•   30 Full-Time/Part-Time Examiners
•   8 Specialist Video Games Examiners
•   Cantonese/South Asian Language Examiners
•   4 Senior Examiners
•   Various Backgrounds
•   Four Teams


                                               17
Examining

        Examiner Duties
    •   Viewing
    •   Examiners’ Meeting
    •   Team Projects
    •   Networking
    •   Correspondence


                             18
The Examining Process
    •   Viewing in pairs (with exceptions)
    •   Over 5.5 Hours per day
    •   Random
    •   Examiner’s Log
    •   Post viewing discussion linked to:
        – Guidelines
        – Policy
        – Legal Restrictions
    • Decision Agreed upon…
    • Reports Filed
    • Reports Checked
                                             19
Some Facts
• In 2009, the BBFC classified:
   – 555 films
   • 15 were cut
   • 220 of these were passed 15
   – 10,068 Videos & DVDs
      • 4600 of these were passed U or PG
   – 181 Digital Games
      • 81 of these were passed 15 or 18
   – 2138 Trailers and Ads
      • 1000 of these were for cinema release
• In 2009, the BBFC rejected only TWO works
                                                20

Film classification introduction

  • 1.
    The Media Police Ofcom: television, radio and ‘communications industries’ BBFC: film, DVD, video games PCC : newspapers and magazines ASA: adverts/advertising industry BBC Trust: BBC output
  • 2.
    Behind the Scenesat the BBFC
  • 3.
    Who are they? • What do they do? • History • Legal issues • Accountability • Examining • Borderline works 3
  • 4.
    History • Established 1912 •Independent, non-governmental body funded through charged fees • Classifies Films on behalf of Local Authorities – the Licensing Act, 2003 • Classifies Videos, DVDs and some Digital Games under the Video Recordings Act, 1984 4
  • 5.
    1916 History 1. Indecorous, under-clothing’ and ambiguous T.P. O’Connor’s ‘Forty-Three Grounds for Deletion’ ‘Unnecessary exhibition of irreverent titlestoand subtitles ‘Drunken scenes carried excess’ ‘Men and women in bed together’ 2. Cruelty to animals scenes’ ‘Indecorous dancing’ ‘'First Night' ‘Materialization of the conventional figure of Christ’ 3. The irreverent treatment of ‘References to controversial politics’ sacred subjects morphia, cocaine, etc’ ‘Scenes laid in disorderly houses’ ‘The drug habit. e.g. opium, 4. Drunken scenes carried to ‘Scenes tending to disparage public characters and institutions’ 5
  • 6.
    Legislation TheLicensing Act, 2003: • Cinemas require a licence • The BBFC classifies on behalf of Local Authorities but they can: – ignore BBFC certificates – grant their own certificates – effectively ‘ban’ Films 6
  • 7.
    The Video RecordingsAct, 1984 • ‘Video Nasties’ and the VRA 1984 • Criminal Justice & Public Order Act, 1994 • The ‘Harm’ test • Video Games 7
  • 8.
    Other Legislation… • The Obscene Publications Act, 1959 & 1964 (obscenity law) • Cinematograph Films (Animals Act), 1937 (animal cruelty) • Protection of Children Act, 1978 (indecency/children) • Human Rights Act, 1998 (freedom of expression) • Racial + Religious Hatred Act 2006 (incitement to religious hatred) • Criminal Justice + Immigration Act 2007 (extreme pornography, pseudo-photographs of children, hate crime - sexuality) 8
  • 9.
    Accountability • Guidelines: February 2005, updated 2009 • Public Consultation – Citizens Juries – Research – Questionnaires • Research Projects 9
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Examining: Issues • Violence • Language • Sex • Sexual References • Sexual Violence • Drugs • Criminal Activity • Weapons • Imitable Techniques • Horror • Theme • Legal Issues • Discrimination (added 2009) 11
  • 12.
    Other Considerations • the work – its story, style, treatment • the audience – address and appeal • the moral framework • artistic or educational merit • potential level of offensiveness • precedent • possible harm • context 12
  • 13.
    Other Outcomes • SplitDecision • Confirmatory Viewing • Cuts - legal reasons - policy - ‘category cuts’ • Rejection 13
  • 14.
    Cuts: Examples • ImitableTechniques: violent, criminal, harmful • Glamorisation of Offensive Weapons • Sexual Violence: eroticised rape or sexual assault • Illegal Material • Instruction in Drug Use 14
  • 15.
    sbbfc: the StudentGuide • History, Legislation, Classification • Resources Timelines Case Studies Research Articles Downloads News Reading List Web Links 15
  • 16.
    Education www.sbbfc.co.uk Launched May 2005 www.cbbfc.co.uk Launched June 2003 16
  • 17.
    The Examiners • 30 Full-Time/Part-Time Examiners • 8 Specialist Video Games Examiners • Cantonese/South Asian Language Examiners • 4 Senior Examiners • Various Backgrounds • Four Teams 17
  • 18.
    Examining Examiner Duties • Viewing • Examiners’ Meeting • Team Projects • Networking • Correspondence 18
  • 19.
    The Examining Process • Viewing in pairs (with exceptions) • Over 5.5 Hours per day • Random • Examiner’s Log • Post viewing discussion linked to: – Guidelines – Policy – Legal Restrictions • Decision Agreed upon… • Reports Filed • Reports Checked 19
  • 20.
    Some Facts • In2009, the BBFC classified: – 555 films • 15 were cut • 220 of these were passed 15 – 10,068 Videos & DVDs • 4600 of these were passed U or PG – 181 Digital Games • 81 of these were passed 15 or 18 – 2138 Trailers and Ads • 1000 of these were for cinema release • In 2009, the BBFC rejected only TWO works 20