Open Gov Partnership 2012:
High Performance Participation FOR Better Governance
The Structured Public Involvement team
Telephone
survey
Distributive process mapping (DPM)
Process scale
Role of consensus
V. Small (~10) Small (20-50) Medium (5...
DPM: stakeholder resource investment vs. process
Stakeholder resource investment
Strong (days)
Moderate (hours)
Weak (minu...
Process Metrics: Q, I, C and E
Criterion Indicator Data
Process quality Participant satisfaction Open quality evaluation
I...
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Q
I
C
E
Focus group methods
Town hall
Deliberative democracy
SPI
Online participation
Phone survey
Com...
Metrics: Q
0 2 4 6 8 10
Mean process satisfaction where 1 = "awful" and 10 = "wonderful". Total "n=3146.
Mean satisfaction...
Open Government Partnership Metrics/SPI Slides Apr 12
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Open Government Partnership Metrics/SPI Slides Apr 12

85
-1

Published on

Public involvement process performance chart; QICE metrics; framework; some SPI project results

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
85
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Open Government Partnership Metrics/SPI Slides Apr 12

  1. 1. Open Gov Partnership 2012: High Performance Participation FOR Better Governance The Structured Public Involvement team
  2. 2. Telephone survey Distributive process mapping (DPM) Process scale Role of consensus V. Small (~10) Small (20-50) Medium (50-500) Large >500 None Weak Moderate Strong Deliberative democracy (America Speaks, Public Agenda Focus group, CBPC etc. Expert panel Traditional Public Meeting Structured Public Involvement
  3. 3. DPM: stakeholder resource investment vs. process Stakeholder resource investment Strong (days) Moderate (hours) Weak (minutes) None Conflict/dispu te resolution Charette/delib erative democracy Focus group SPI/F2F public meeting Phone survey/online data elicitation Extreme (weeks)
  4. 4. Process Metrics: Q, I, C and E Criterion Indicator Data Process quality Participant satisfaction Open quality evaluation Inclusion Number of organizations, citizens and groups Count attendees, participant groups Clarity/utility of decision support Expert evaluation Testimonials, narratives, comparisons to state of the art methods Efficiency Cost and time $ spent on public involvement, time taken and demanded
  5. 5. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Q I C E Focus group methods Town hall Deliberative democracy SPI Online participation Phone survey Comparison of process methods across QICE
  6. 6. Metrics: Q 0 2 4 6 8 10 Mean process satisfaction where 1 = "awful" and 10 = "wonderful". Total "n=3146. Mean satisfaction with SPI Processes 2000-2012

×