• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
English debate competition
 

English debate competition

on

  • 968 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
968
Views on SlideShare
968
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
33
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    English debate competition English debate competition Presentation Transcript

    • ENGLISH DEBATE COMPETITION Technical Meeting - May 16th , 2011 Harmony of Indonesian Food Heritage
    • There are 40 minutes for every round that consists of : •Rules & Roles (read only at Preliminary Round I) •Introduction = ± 5 minutes •Debate = ± 25 minutes •Verbal Adjudication = + 10 minutes •16 participants from 9 high schools •Preliminary Round IA/ IB preliminary round II  Semifinal Final •Competition use KNOCKOUT system •Full English GENERAL
    • Themes (1) • Preliminary Round 1A : – Utilization of artificial sweetener in traditional foods is not recommended • Preliminary Round 1B: – The use of banana leaf sa packaging for traditional foods cannot be substituted by plastic • Preliminary Round II : – The industrialization of traditional foods should be encouraged
    • Themes (2) • Semifinal : – The habit of consuming junk food can threaten the existence of traditional foods • Final (motion preferences) : – Fresh traditional beverages are better than instant traditional beverages – GMP (Good Manufacturing Process) should be applied in traditional food manufacture – Food diversification can reduce rice consumption effectively
    • RUNDOWN • 07.30-08.30 = Registration • 08.30-09.00 = Opening Ceremony • 09.00-09.40 = Preliminary round IA • 09.50-10.30 = Preliminary round 1B • 10.50-11.30 = Preliminary round II • 12.00-12.40 = Semifinal • 12.40-13.30 = Lunch Time • 13.30-14.00 = Motion Preference + Case Building • 14.00-14.50 = Final
    • RULES & ROLES • No statement about SARA, abuse, dan pornograph during debate • Debate held in full english • Affirmative : supoorting themes, negative : rejected themes • Good behave during debate • No interruption while another team say their arguments • Standing when share the statement • No interaction between participant and audience during debate • Audience may not disturb debate competition
    • • Applause only given when debate ends • Konfirmasi hanya akan diakomodasi setelah hasil lomba keluar • No cellular phone during debate • Participants must come 5 minutes before debate start • Peserta diharap menunggu di gedung Thomas Aquinas dan harus hadir 5 menit sebelum lomba berlangsung • Bagi peserta yang belum bertanding, harus menunggu di ruang isolasi. • The final decision from jury can’t be refused
    • ADJUDICATOR MARK SYSTEM Matter (jumlah 20 point) • Matter meliputi argument yang disajikan peserta debat. Materi yang baik meliputi argument yang logis dan difukung contoh yang relevan. Manner (jumlah 20 point) • Manner meliputi cara peserta menyampaikan argumennya. Manner yang baik harus dapat menarik bagi pendengar, sehingga dapat membuat argumennya lebih meyakinkan. Peserta harus memiliki eye contact dengan pendengar, berbicara dengan jelas. Method (jumlah 10 point) • Method meliputi struktur penyampaian argument dari speaker. Struktur yang baik harus mengidentifikasi key issues, menghubungkannya, penyampaian yang konsisten dan koheren, dan peserta harus dapat mengalokasikan waktu dengan baik.
    • SPEAKERS ROLE 1st affirmative speaker • Define the topic: explain the issue of the debate briefly describing the argument that each side must present • Present the pro statements. Summarize the main argument of the team briefly 1st negative speaker • Clarify the issue established by the pro definition • Present a rebuttal (response that the debater makes to the arguments of the opposing team). • Summaries the arguments reised in her/his speech briefly
    • 2nd affirmative speaker • Present a rebuttal: the speaker rebuts the main points raised by the first negative speaker and support the arguments made by the first affirmative speaker • Present argument • Summarized not only the points made in their own speech, but also the main points raised by their team as a whole 2nd negative speaker • Present a rebuttal: the speaker rebuts the main points raised by the first affirmative speaker and support the arguments made by the first negative speaker • Present argument • Summarized not only the points made in their own speech, but also the main points raised by their team as a whole
    • 3rd affirmative speaker • Present a rebuttal: thematic rebuttal should address the key issues of the debate, relating arguments and counter arguments of the pro and contra • Summarize: the third speaker should allow time for a careful and convincing summary their team’s main arguments and significant issues in the debate • Note: the third speaker are not allowed to introduce any new matter into the debate 3rd negative speaker • Present a rebuttal: thematic rebuttal should address the key issues of the debate, relating arguments and counter arguments of the pro and contra • Summarize: the third speaker should allow time for a careful and convincing summary their team’s main arguments and significant issues in the debate • Note: the third speaker are not allowed to introduce any new matter into the debate
    • ADJUDICATOR • Jumlah: 12 juri • Penyisihan I, II, dan semifinal dihadiri oleh 3 juri @ ruangan • Final dihadiri oleh 7 juri • Juri merupakan dosen dari Fakultas Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Hukum, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, dan Fakultas Psikologi
    • CHAMPIONSHIP • Winner : Rp 1.000.000 + gold medal + certificate • Runner-up : Rp 750.000 + silver medal + certificate • 2nd runner-up : Rp 500.000 + bronze medal + certificate • Great debater : Rp 200.000 + “great debater” medal + certificate
    • PARTICIPANTS • Tritunggal : 4 team • Kebon Dalem : 2 team • Regina Pacis : 2 team • SMA Terang Bangsa : 2 team ? • SMK Terang Bangsa : 2 team ? • De Britto : 2 team • Sedes : 1 team • Nusa Putera : 1 team • Theresiana 01 : 2 team ?? • TOTAL : 16 team
    • 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 1010 1111 1212 1313 1414 1515 16161
    • DETERMINED • 1 : • 2 : • 3 : • 4 : • 5 : • 6 : • 7 : • 8 : • 9 : • 10 : • 11 : • 12 : • 13 : • 14 : • 15 : • 16 :
    • PRELIMINARY ROUND 1A R. 3.2 R. 3.2 R. 3.2 R. 3.2
    • PRELIMINARY ROUND 1B R. 3.2 R. 3.2 R. 3.2
    • PRELIMINARY ROUND 2 R. 3.2 R. 3.2 R. 3.2
    • SEMI FINAL R. 3.2 R. 3.2
    • FINAL Vs
    • THANK YOU DO YOUR BEST