• Like


Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

"Advancing African Agriculture": Policy and knowledge strategies

Uploaded on

By John A. Okidi, IFPRI - Brussels, 17 October 2007 …

By John A. Okidi, IFPRI - Brussels, 17 October 2007

More in: Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. “Advancing African Agriculture” Policy and knowledge strategies John A. Okidi Research Fellow - IFPRI INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • 2. Introduction  Agric, the economic mainstay of Sub-Saharan Africans  Faces enormous, especially supply-side, constraints  Pessimist contend that nothing short of a Green Revolution kind of intervention is required  No originally ag-based LDC developed w/o ag dev’mt  Achieving the MDGs in Africa anchors on ag dev’mt  EC support is, therefore, targeting the right sector INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 2
  • 3. Rest of the presentation  Pose a general question about the EC communication  Highlight some missing links  Discuss policy, role of the state & general strategy  Reconsider the role of the EU  Outline issues on research & knowledge utilization  General closing remarks  Remarks on the partnership role of IFPRI INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 3
  • 4. The EU assistance package - Question  After financing  Formulation of ag development strategy  Capacity building for good sector governance  Research, knowledge systems & dissemination  Systems for quality assurance and improvement  Strengthening of animal disease control knowledge & systems  Organizational strengthening for risk management  Then what next? How do these translate to real improvements at the farm level? INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 4
  • 5. Some of the missing links  Indeed, the areas are consistent with the EC chosen focus on policy, regulatory & other enabling conditions  Further, the level of intervention is regional & continental  But why these choices?  Why the presupposition of farmers’ readiness to respond?  Reality: Most African farmers are severely constrained  Resources to ward off weather fluctuations, e.g. irrigation  Finances for improved inputs (seeds, fertilizer, pesticides)  Finances for other improved ag technologies  Finances for regular production, harvest, post-harvest and marketing requirements INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 5
  • 6. Policy, the state and strategy  Courageously redefine the role of the state, radically  Continue promoting regulatory & enabling environments  Incrementally re-engage in targeted farm subsidies  Relax the strategy of “restrictive use of subsidies”  If we can subsidize education & health, why not ag?  When ag is basically a public sector in the West, why can’t African gov’ts also act within reasonable limits?  At Africa’s dev’mt stage, public financing for real sector response to enabling conditions and opportunities is critical for broad-based growth INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 6
  • 7. Role of the EU  Minimize drawing lessons from EU experience  Hence, de-emphasize EU-originated technical assistance  Draw on continental, regional and national lessons from Africa’s past and present to the greatest extent possible  Engage Africa-based experts to the fullest extent  Emphasize budget support rather than project-like micro- involvement  Hence, harness greater ownership of the process and outcome  Encourage some deviation from current policy stance, e.g. expansionary fiscal policy, rationally-managed exchange rate regimes, less obsession with inflation targeting. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 7
  • 8. Socioeconomic Research and knowledge (1)  So much has been done, oftentimes asking the same questions that have been asked and answered before  Most research findings are “pretty much expected”  Lots of facts and figures, and knowledge exist  Lots of good policy documents, well-conceived implementation, and monitoring & evaluation strategies  Implication  Review what research components are really necessary  Focus on baseline stocktaking of current state of affairs & knowledge, to inform intervention design refinement  Provide for follow-ups for impact monitoring & evaluation INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 8
  • 9. Socioeconomic Research and knowledge(2)  Encourage research that experiment innovative ideas  Then deploy the services of • International research organizations • Continental research organizations • Regional research organizations • National research institutes • Networks of national research institutes  Minimize disparities in fee rates simply due to geography INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 9
  • 10. Closing remarks (1)  Recognizing ag as a sector in its own right is critical; not a transitory sector. Indeed, the communication recognizes the sector’s role in growth and poverty reduction  Remember: Good policies, strong institutions, effective regulatory framework and enabling environment alone cannot deliver the MDGs – they do not directly enter the typical production function  Note: The broad strategy in the communication, which is also the dominant strategy in development assistance sharply contrasts the state-driven, market-mediated and small-farmer based strategy that underpinned most Asian countries’ agricultural revolution. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 10
  • 11. Closing remarks (2)  Whatever policy, institutional and knowledge strategies  IFPRI’s role  To partner on research and policy analysis  To design credible and relevant research programs  To undertake program monitoring and impact evaluation  To experiment certain aspects of the intervention areas  To mobilize resources to take forward auxiliary issues  To partner with you on future programs INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 11