T1 Undercurrent ROS Pulse Score
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

T1 Undercurrent ROS Pulse Score

on

  • 2,526 views

To truly practice what we preach, we have decided to begin measuring how we score on our own rubric. We're looking for other orgs to help us validate this as a product and help us define some ...

To truly practice what we preach, we have decided to begin measuring how we score on our own rubric. We're looking for other orgs to help us validate this as a product and help us define some benchmarks. More details at Responsive.org.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,526
Views on SlideShare
1,311
Embed Views
1,215

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
10
Comments
0

11 Embeds 1,215

http://responsive.org 844
http://anjalir.wordpress.com 252
https://anjalir.wordpress.com 65
http://feedly.com 18
http://adipose.co 12
https://www.rebelmouse.com 11
http://tools.opoint.com 6
http://adiposedotco.wordpress.com 3
http://anjali.flavors.me 2
http://www.newsblur.com 1
https://adiposedotco.wordpress.com 1
More...

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    T1 Undercurrent ROS Pulse Score T1 Undercurrent ROS Pulse Score Presentation Transcript

    • HELLO THERE, OURSELVES.
    • HOW DO WE MEASURE UP TO OUR OWN YARDSTICK?
    • CAVEAT This is the first use of the survey tool, which will become an on-going instrument.
    • UNDERCURRENT AT A GLANCE Hierarchy Beneath the CEO 1 StepAway 2 3 4 5 6 7 Tenure in Number of Years 2 3 4 5 61
    • (50)% 0% 50% 100% PURPOSE PEOPLE PROCESS PRODUCT PLATFORM JUST HOW RESPONSIVE DO WE THINK WE ARE? Overall, First Years, Lifers (4-6 year tenure), Top Tier, Everyone Else
    • WHAT BROUGHT DOWN OUR SCORES? WE’RE NOT ON THE SAME PAGE WE DON’T KNOW WHAT EACH OTHER IS WORKING ON OUR COMMUNITY ISN’T INCENTIVIZED TO IMPROVE OUR PRODUCTS Overall, we scored-17%. TopTiers scored us a -50% vs 0% for everyone else. Lifers scored us a 0% vs -14% for FirstYears. HYPOTHESIS:There are tensions in the org that are not being processed. Overall, we scored 0%. Top Tiers scored us a -8% vs 5% for everyone else. Lifers scored us a 13% vs -7% for FirstYears. HYPOTHESIS: Our strong tendency toward individual autonomy has hurt team cohesiveness. Overall, we scored 12%. Top Tiers scored us a -33% vs 36% for everyone else. Lifers scored us a 13% vs 50% for FirstYears. HYPOTHESIS: Our product mix lacks standardization before it can become open to our community.