Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
New Possibilities For Research Communication
1. New possibilities for research
communication with Web 2.0 tools
Ole Bisbjerg
Head of Music and Media Dept.
State and University Library
Aarhus, Denmark
1
2. agenda
Research promotion now
New digital means and media for
communication and promotion
Beyond one-way communication?
Examples
2
3. The situation now
Traditional channels of publication are still
dominating research communication:
periodicals, books.
Digital research communication is not yet widely
distributed ? OAI ! Growing fast
Remediation (Richard Grusin, 2001) – new digital
media provides the researcher with the
opportunity to expand communication
3
8. E-books
Often as real copies of the printed edition,
just with more possibilities to search and
retrieve infomation
More integrated possibilities
8
10. Digital possibilities / web 2.0
From push to pull
Internet based technologies, that provide
the user with the opportunity to retrieve
information when she wants
New media emerge – and
publication/communication becomes
easier(collaboration/discussion) is a real
possibility – quality control? Copyright
10
11. Web 2.0 tools: Weblogs, Wikis, Rss, social
bookmarking, pod- videocast, tagging,
folksonomies, mashups
11
14. Perspectives
To develop new genres of research
communication by using new media
Challenge: to avoid triviliazation and flaws
14
15. Examples – 3 scenarios
1. Research communication in the
scientific world
2. Research communication to partners in
institutions/organizations
3. Research communication to the public
15
16. 1. Scientific world
Weblogs (blogging)
A way to facilitate dialogue
Continuing entries, rss
Academic Blogs in music
web-logs need to be legitimized, for
example through peer-reviewing
16
17. RSS – is a very useful technology in several
ways: an example being the aspect of
social bookmarking:
Del.icio.us , connotea, furl.net
RSS: an easy way of retriving relevant
information, when you want
17
18. wiki
Wikis – excellent tools on collaboration –
often works in progress:
Example:
Scores wiki
Trad. score library
18
19. 2. Research communication to
partners
Mutual needs for infomation and dynamic
updates
Often a joint web-site
Digitalexperience
19
20. 3.
Difficult to specify target groups
Informed citizenship – often a trad pull
concept – but weblogs from the political
life has become increasingly popular
Museum communication – web 2.0 tools
are very relevant
Nationalmuseet
20
21. In Conclusion
wiki Read and collaborate
(Discuss)
Weblogs Discuss and share
Rss Recieve / read
21
22. In Conclusion
Web 2.0 tools:
communication with the option to have a
dialogue/collaboration with the user – push to
pull - in all 3 scenarios
Material may be used in different scenarios and
towards different user groups
– at the moment a supplement to trad.
communication but with huge potential for
research communication in the years to come
22
23. Thanks for your attention!
.pps is available on slideshare : tags
iaml2009
Twitter: http://twitter.com/bissen
Ole Bisbjerg – ob@statsbiblioteket.dk
0045 40649783
23