Student Freedom Of Speech

1,177 views

Published on

Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Students Rights, Student Freedom of Speech, Student Expression, Pickering and other cases, Censsorship of Student Publications, Due Process, Discrimination, Diversity, Multicultural Issues, Personnel Administration

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,177
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Student Freedom Of Speech

  1. 1. Student Freedom of Speech William Allan Kritsonis, PhD
  2. 2. Loco Parentis <ul><li>Acting in Place of Parents </li></ul><ul><li>School Authorities are acting in Loco Parentis and are not subject to the constraints of the 4 th Amendment. </li></ul><ul><li>Before the 1960’s regulations were very lose in this area and state courts rarely and federal courts almost never got involved in student vs. school affairs regarding this. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Symbolic Speech (1969) <ul><li>Tinker vs. Des Moines </li></ul><ul><li>~ Kids suspended for wearing armbands as a war protest. </li></ul><ul><li>~ School violated 1 st and 14 th amendment rights </li></ul><ul><li>~ Armbands were symbolic speech akin to pure speech. </li></ul>
  4. 4. Tinker vs. Des Moines <ul><li>Student speech cant interrupt learning; the armbands did not. </li></ul><ul><li>“Students and teachers do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.” </li></ul>
  5. 5. Lewd and Offensive Speech <ul><li>Bethel vs. Fraser (1986) </li></ul><ul><li>~ Student was suspended for assembly speech based on sexual metaphor. </li></ul><ul><li>~ 1 st and 14 th amendment rights not violated </li></ul><ul><li>~ Schools can restrict speech that under minds the basic educational mission. </li></ul>
  6. 6. School Sponsored Speech <ul><li>Hazelwood vs. Kuhlmeier (1988) </li></ul><ul><li>~ Right of school to control school sponsored newspaper-experiences of 3 pregnant students and students going through divorce, in which principal took out the articles. </li></ul><ul><li>~Articles not protected in 1 st and 14 th amendments </li></ul>
  7. 7. School Sponsored Speech cont. <ul><li>~ School not required to promote controversial speech. </li></ul><ul><li>~ School action must be reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical concern. </li></ul>
  8. 8. Key Points <ul><li>Tinker- Cant suspend for an armband unless disruption or invasion of others rights </li></ul><ul><li>Bethel- Lewd speech is always unprotected. </li></ul><ul><li>Hazelwood- School Sponsored content is unprotected. </li></ul>
  9. 9. Protected Speech <ul><li>Must be actual or symbolic, meaningful to the school community, convey a message that is easy to understand. </li></ul>
  10. 10. The End

×