1. CUT & PASTED FROM: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/21/sen-paul-rails-against-do-nothing-senate-2/
This article is being shared for informational/educational purposes in accordance with federal laws.
May 21st, 2011
05:10 PM ET
608 days ago
Sen. Paul rails against 'do-nothing' Senate
Posted by
CNN's Alison Harding
(CNN) - Republican Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul railed against his colleagues Friday, saying the Senate’s inaction
sometimes makes him want to return his paycheck.
“We go week after week in the Senate and do nothing. I feel like sometimes I should return my check because I go
up, they do no votes and no debate,” the freshman senator griped during an interview on “Anderson Cooper 360.”
“We go up week to week, and there's no debate in Congress, no debate in the Senate. We sit idly by,” he continued.
Paul’s frustration stems from his attempt to introduce a resolution challenging the constitutionality of the U.S.
military operation in Libya. The motion was tabled 90-10.
“They don't want to have any debate. I'm asking right now to vote on Libya. I have a resolution saying we're in
violation of the War Powers Act. It's hard for me to get the floor unless I somehow sneak on the floor when no one is
looking to try to get a vote,” Paul said.
The 1973 War Powers Act says that if the president does not get congressional authorization 60 days after military
action, the mission must stop within 30 days. Obama formally notified Congress about the mission in Libya with a
letter on March 21, which made Friday the 60-day deadline.

2. Shortly after Paul’s interview, CNN learned that the president sent another letter Friday to congressional leaders
expressing support for the bipartisan resolution that Obama said is being drafted in the Senate. The resolution would
confirm congressional support for the U.S. mission in Libya.
But Paul told CNN’s Anderson Cooper that Obama is already in violation of the law.
“The War Powers Act says there's only three reasons a president can go to war: Declaration of war by Congress,
authorization or force by Congress or imminent danger,” Paul said.
“He should have come to Congress, spoken to a joint session of Congress and said, I need the power to go to war, this
is why, and explain to the people.”
Paul also said he was upset that Obama had time to get permission from the United Nations and the Arab League, but
not Congress.
“Well, boy, if that's what we're living under, we really are completely ignoring our own Constitution. We never
wanted one person, one person, the president, to be able to decide to take us to war. We always wanted the debate
between a president and a Congress, so we didn't go to war willy-nilly, or we didn't go to war without careful
consideration,” Paul said.