1. “SUCCESSFUL FORESTRY
PROJECT EXPERIENCES IN
THE MATO GROSSO DO SUL
SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEM”

2.  CM FLORESTAL LTDA.
 CELSO LUIZ MEDEIROS LIMA.
 Forestry engineer
 Email: cmflorestal@uol.com.br
Skype: celso.medeiros50
 Telephone – (67) 9281 0257
 (67) 3301 8359

3. ESTIMATED AAG
(average annual growth)
 Basic premise:
 Average local rainfall = 1,400 mm
 1 m³ wood = 30 mm of rain
 Expected productivity: 1,400mm/30mm
 Expected AAG 46.6 m³/ha/year
Obs: Consider
 Local water deficit
 Applied technology

4. BASIC FERTILIZING
 Dolomitic limestone: 2,000 kg;
 Agricultural gypsum: 800 kg
 Reactive phosphate : 350 kg;
 10+30+10 + micronutrients: 150 kg;
 20+05+20 + micronutrients: 150 kg;
 18+00+18 + micronutrients: 180 kg;
 Leaf analyses followed by three
supplementary applications.

5. CONVERSION RATE
 CLONE GG 100
 SILVOPASTORAL 424 trees/ha
 AAG= 4th year: 33.20 m³/ha/year.
 Tree volume = 0.313 m3/tree
 CONVENTIONAL 1,111 trees/ha
 AAG= 4th year: 43.50 m³/ha/year.
 Tree volume = 0.1566 m³

6. WORK IN PROGRESS
 Soil: quartz sand (10 to12%)
 Rainfall: 1,300 mm
 Stand: 884 trees/ha
 Productivity: 40 m³/ha/year

7. WORK IN PROGRESS
 Soil: quartz sand (18 to 20%)
 Rainfall: 1,300 mm
 Stand: 884 trees/ha
 Productivity: 46 m³/ha/year

8. SOME MISTAKES
 6.0 x 1.5 meters in São Paulo yielded
27% productivity loss
 8.0 x 2.0 meters yields low productivity
wood and pasture

9. SILVOPASTORAL
CONCEPT
 Produce wood
 Sequester carbon
 Produce pasture
 Produce crops
 Respect the environment

10. TREES IN ROWS
 Space between the rows: 14 to 35 m (Porfírio-da-Silva, 2006)
10 to 50 m (Oliveira et al., 2003)
 Space between the trees in each row: 1.5 to 4.0 m (Porfírio-da-
Silva,2006)

11. DIRECTION OF PLANTING
 East/West
 On the same level
 Water is a limiting production factor

12. SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEM
RESULTS
 Increased density
 Timber production and cattle raising
in the same area
 Thermal comfort for the animals
 Improved health of the animals
 Protection of the pasture against frost

13. SILVOPASTORAL SYSTEM
RESULTS
 Less need to restore pastures
 Control of soil erosion
 Increased income from the property

14. MOST COMMONLY USED
CLONES
 Urograndis: I- 144, I- 224, H- 13, H-77
C- 041, C- 219, 1528
 Urophylla: GG- 100
 Urocam: VM- 01
 Grancam: 1277
 Camalcornis VM58

15. CLONES AND THEIR USES
 Pulp: H-13, H-77, C-219, C-041, I-144.
 Charcoal/Manufacturing: VM-01,
GG100, 1528.
 Sawmills: 1277, I- 224, H- 13, VM 01.

16. IMPLEMENTATION
 Soil that can support a standing forest
 Water is a limiting production factor
 Adequate sunlight and suitable
temperatures

17. IMPLEMENTATION
 Soil preparation
 Facilitate future maintenance
 Place the fertilizer (phosphorus) close to
the root system
 Controlled release fertilizer (Basacote)
 Specific herbicide for eucalyptus
plantations

18. IMPLEMENTATION
 Soil correction – limestone, gypsum
 Combating ants
 Topography / contour line / grading
 Building and maintaining roads
 Herbicide in the area worked on

19. IMPLEMENTATION
 Mechanized soil preparation +
phosphate
 Planting / replanting + gel
 Irrigation
 Fertilizing using NPK
 Pre-emergence application of
herbicide

20. MAINTENANCE
 Combating ants
 Fertilizing
 Mechanical weeding along the rows
 Grading of the land between the rows
 Pre-emergence application of herbicide
throughout the entire area
 Mechanical and chemical weeding between
the rows

21. MAINTENANCE
 Pruning
 Forest inventory
 Fire prevention
 Pest control

22. HARVEST
 Thinning
 Final cutting

23. THINNING / HARVESTING
Nº of Age Nº of Trees Volume Use
Thinnings (years) (m³/ha)
Initial Removed Remainder
1º 4 884 250 634 45 Biomass
(0.18 m³)
2º 7 634 384 250 135 Biomass
(0.35 m³) Sawmills
Final cut 12 250 250 0 195 Sawmills
130 Biomass
(1.30 m³)
Total 505 m³

24. OPERATING COST (per ha) OF
IMPLEMENTATION / MAINTENANCE
 Implementation = R$ 2,012.96
 Maintenance = R$ 3,367.50
 Total = R$ 5,380.46

25. THINNING AND FINAL
CUTTING
 45 m³ X R$ 40.00 = R$ 1,800.00
 135 m³ X R$ 50.00 = R$ 6,750.00
 325 m³ X R$ 74.46 = R$24,200.00
 Total = R$ 32,750.00

26. REVENUE vs EXPENSES
 Expenses up to 12 years
R$ 5,380.46 / ha
 Revenue
R$ 32,750.00 / ha
PROFITABILITY = R$ 27,369.54 / ha / 12 years
Per year = R$ 2,280.80 / ha

27. PRODUCTION COST vs
SALES
 Total production volume 505 m³
 Production cost R$ 5,380.46
 Cost per meter of standing timber:
 R$ 5,380.46 / 505 m³ = R$ 10.65 m³
 Minimum sale value of standing
timber: R$ 40.00 m³

49. Atalho para DSC03325.lnk
Atalho para DSC03325.lnk

58. E II E NOSSA SENHORA APARECIDA