• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Print efficiency in Heatset Web Offset
 

Print efficiency in Heatset Web Offset

on

  • 1,058 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,058
Views on SlideShare
973
Embed Views
85

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
35
Comments
0

1 Embed 85

http://www.sappi.com 85

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Print efficiency in Heatset Web Offset Print efficiency in Heatset Web Offset Presentation Transcript

    • Print Efficiency in Heatset Web Offset1 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Print Efficiency in Heatset Web Offset2 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Status of Print Media Increasing efficiency is crucial for printing business sustainability Print end-users need to maintain cost efficiency in their print media spending Burning topic for heat-set printers = How to maintain or reach positive profit margin in killing competition? Efficiency development is very challenging for many printers Equipment is no longer cost-competitive Debt level prevents new investments and burdens cost level3 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Heatset printer – efficiency example Heatset printing:  Average paper use efficiency: 80%  Average time efficiency: 65%  Overall efficiency (80% x 65%) = 52% Practical room for improvement is about 8% units in overall efficiency  Overall efficiency (85% x 71%) = 60% Printer with MEUR 70 turnover and 50 ktons paper usage  About MEUR 1.5 lower paper costs – (5% x 50k x 700€ - resale value)  About MEUR 1.3 improved capacity utilisation margin – (106% x gross margin) – same fixed costs)4 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Paper waste in heatset printing Reel Storage Makeready Running Bindery/trimming preparation ~5-10% Core&packaging ~1% Extra copies ~0.5% ~2-10% ~3-6% ~1-2% White wate ~0.5% Trim ~21% “You cannot manage, what you cannot measure”5 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Time waste in heatset printing • Example of time waste sources in heatset printing • Percentages are strongly dependent on run lenghts6 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Paper waste categorisation  Trim waste (~5-10%)  Trim waste is dependent on the layout design of the printed product in question  Trim waste optimisation requires – Web width standardisation – to reduce stock items – Product size standardisation – fixed format offerings – Effective cut-off utilisation  Storage waste (~0,5%)  Paper storage losses due to damaged/lost reels  Unused leftover reels7 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Paper waste categorisation  Core&Packaging (~1%)  Core and packaging are included in the paper price  White waste (~0.5-1%)  White waste consists of – Slab waste (how much is taken from the reel) – Core waste (how much is left on core on reel change)  Slab waste is more important 1250 mm reel diameter 10% of  Training of reel preparation personnel crucial the 50% of the paper paper Thickness, um Waste-% 5 layers 0.3 mm 0.1% 10 layers 0.6 mm 0.2 % 50 layers 3 mm 1% 100 layers 6 mm 2% Paper thickness 60 um8 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Paper waste categorisation  Makeready waste (~2-10%) Makeready usually consists of – Colour ok o Usually around 4000-6000 copies – however in some cases much more o Can be influenced by good colour management and paper standardisation – Folder adjustments o Reel width and paper grade standardisation decreases the time needed for folder adjustments o Run sequences - similar jobs after each other9 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Paper waste categorisation  Running waste (~3-6%)  Washing waste – Depending on washing interval and amount of copies lost in wash  Other running waste – Including web breaks, folder jams and other unexpected problems  Can be decreased by paper grade standardisation  known behaviour of certain house papers  Extra sheets for bindery (1-2%)  Amount of extra sheets printed on top of the actual order  Should be calculated precisely in order to avoid extra waste10 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • The effect of run length  Run length “dependent” waste  Makeready  Extra copies  Run length “independent” waste  Washing  Web breaks11 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Hypothetical case Press cost: 12 733 € 31 % 64-page magazine printed on Paper cost: 24 963 € 62 % 32-page press Ink cost: 2 006 € 5%  Run length 200 000 copies Other cost 800 € 2%  Web width 900 mm Printing cost 40 502 €  MWC 70 gsm  Makeready 10 000/6 000 cps White waste 1,3 %  Washing interval 30 000 cps Makeready waste 4,0 %  Extra sheets 1500 cps Washing waste 4,8 % Other running waste 1,0 %  Average speed 35000 cps/h Extra sheets 0,8 %  Press hourly rate 800€/h 11,8 % Production waste without trim waste12 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Hypothetical case 64-page magazine printed on Press cost: 11 842 € 31 % 32-page press Paper cost: 24 051 € 62 %  Ink cost: 1 943 € 5% Makeready 6000/4000 Other cost 800 € 2%  Washing interval 50 000 Printing cost 38 636 €  Extra sheets 800  Decrease slab waste 2mm White waste 0,6 % Makeready waste 2,5 % Washing waste 3,2 % Decrease total cost 5% Other running waste 1,0 % Extra sheets 0,4 % 7,7 %13 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]
    • Interested to hear more how Sappi can help increase efficiency from paper procurement to final product? Please contact: Henrik.Damen@sappi.com Jouni.Marttila@sappi.com14 | [Presentation title] | [Client Name] | [Date]