Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

AAN Biofuels and Land Grabbing

301

Published on

Talk on the issue of land grabbing for biofuel production in Africa and whether or not it can be sustainable. …

Talk on the issue of land grabbing for biofuel production in Africa and whether or not it can be sustainable.
Organised by the University of Sheffield African Affairs Network.

Speakers:

Lionel Cliffe
Emeritus Professor – University of Leeds
Founding editor of the Review of African Political Economy.
'Distinguished Africanist Award' from UK African Studies Association 2002

Dr Elisa Greco,
Research Associate , Institute for Development Policy and Management University of Manchester



Published in: Education, Business, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
301
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Ethanol is in redCommittee on World Food SecurityHigh Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and NutritionBiofuels and Food SecurityV0 DRAFTA zero-draft consultation paper9 January 2013Submitted by the HLPE
  • Private investors are not interested in development but in profit. Many deals are speculative.
  • customary systemsOnly 7 out of 55 African states recognise customary land rights as equivalent to statutory land rights.
  • Common ground for discussion : it is a governance problem. Governments are easily corrupted by investors but this can be redressed. affected people must be informed, consulted and their opinion be taken into account negotiations and contracts must be transparent
  • Many other regulations and declarations on land grabbing exist: - - African Union Framework and Guidelines on Land Policy in Africa- AU Declaration on Land Issues and Challenges in Africa- IFC Performance Standard on Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement
  • Rights and Resources Initiative: Landowners or labourers? January 2013Oxfam: ‘Our Land, Our Lives’: Time out on the global land rush – October 2012
  • Transcript

    • 1. Biofuels and Land Grabbing inAfricaAfrican AffairsNetwork7th March
    • 2. • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XurxqSFpK3s• http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/video/2011/nov/09/biofuel-tanzania-video
    • 3. Dr Elisa Greco
    • 4. Land grabsGeneral overviewReferring to the talk organised by theAfrican Affairs Network - Sheffield7.3.2013Dr Elisa GrecoResearcher, School of Environment andDevelopment, University of Manchester4
    • 5. What is a land grab?Rapid and large surge ofinternational investment andspeculationin landmostly in poor, non industrial countriesInvestment: creation of largefarms, plantations, monoculturesSpeculation: absentee landlords kicking outpeople and waiting to resell the land, or thestocks attached to it, to third parties5
    • 6. Whose land? And why bother?1. Expropriation and eviction of local people2. Deforestation: forest lands converted tomonocultures3. Intensification: marginal or extensively usedlands converted to monoculturesMost concerning cases:1. From food production to fuel production2. From production consumed locally –nationally to production for export
    • 7. The «war on data»• more than 60 countries targeted• hundreds of investment groups and afew governments involvedWorld Bank (2011) : 56 million hectaresleased or sold 2008-9ILC (2011) : 80 m hectares since 2001Land Matrix (2012) : 227 million hectaresClear trend
    • 8. Why – and why now?Triple crisis : feed – food – fuel1. biofuels2. the 2007/8 food price hike3. financial crisis: speculation on food –land - agricultureInvestments in land aim at securing:- Food- Biofuel- Land in itself- Speculation 8
    • 9. Change in use for food and feed versususe for biofuel, grains (2005-2012)
    • 10. What is new?1. capital goes into previously disregardedplaces• risky countries : political instability, corruption• poorly serviced regions : no infrastructures, no easyaccess to markets• environmentally marginal areas2. capital does not come from ex-colonialpowers onlyBRICS -Brazil, Russia, India,China, South Africa+ Middle Eastern governments3. financial capital and speculation 10
    • 11. What is old?EnclosuresEarliest historical example: British enclosures (1500 - 1700).Colonialism: continued enclosure - land alienation.Natives are dispossessed.Get the land and you’ll control the people = workersDispossessing people of land is an act of class power.Land dispossessionas primitive accumulationWhat happens to the dispossessed?11
    • 12. They are forced to work for somebody else.But:disconnect between dispossession andproletarianisationIn many poor areas, wage labour is notimmediately available:• people become destitute• they work for increasingly lower wagesfloating population + reserve army oflabour
    • 13. «Land acquisitions»…1. there is plenty of idle land there!“vacant land” argument1. capital injection = developmenti) infrastructuresii) employmentiii) more market access2. poor countries do not have the necessarycapital to develop rural areas: thereforeForeign Direct Investment (FDI) is a solution13
    • 14. …or land grabbing1. No land is vacant: eviction and dispossession.Easier when people haven’t formal land titles2. This is business and speculation:i) No investment : speculation and financialisationii) No employment : highly mechanized / importinglabouriii) No infrastructural developmentiv) Endangering local food systems : non food crops/ food export3. National investors : lose out to internationalcapital or become «partners»
    • 15. Why Africa ?• It’s cheap : labor and land are cheap• It’s easyLaw: citizens are «tenants» of the State ;¾ of land in Africa is not titled«weak governance»Global Land Project (2010) : 62 m hectares,27 countriesOakland Institute (2011) says 50 m ha in 20countries. 15
    • 16. Just a problem of governance?1. trasparency2. participation: Free, Prior andInformed Consent (FPIC)16
    • 17. Is land titling a possible solution?Formal land titling often works to theadvantage of stronger social groups• class bias : middle classes• gender bias : male owners• agrarian bias: less evident land usesrural > agrarian- pastoral uses- multiple uses- seasonal uses17
    • 18. Option 1- International governance1. Responsible AgriculturalInvestments Principles(RAI)Code of Conduct- World Bank- UNCTAD- IFAD and FAOFor whom?Private investors18
    • 19. Option 2 - International law2. Voluntary Guidelines on theResponsible Governance of Tenure ofLand, Fisheries and Forests in theContext of National Food Security- transnational agrarian movements and NGOs- Committee on Food Security (CFS) – insideFAOFor whom?Governmentsespecially of target countries
    • 20. Both RAI and the Guidelines are :non- bindingvoluntary= no sanctions against offendersUN Special Rapporteur on the Right toFood :- “trying to discipline the land deals”- “providing policymakers with achecklist to destroy the globalpeasantry responsibly”
    • 21. Option 3 – simply the economy,stupid!Private companies abandon projects ofplantations and large estates:shift to outgrower schemesandcontract farming
    • 22. contract farming- vertical integration of small farmers into theglobal food regime- Less risk of failure, less politicsCorporate Social Responsibility:Unilever, Nestlé, Kraft – large agribusiness whichare vertically integratedNot so appealing for the big five of agribusiness:ADM, Cargill, BungeBiofuel companies22
    • 23. Chose what, and with whom!• Rights and Resources Initiative: convinceprivate investors that land grabbing is risky.Contract farming as positive solution for all.• Oxfam: convince the WB to freeze land deals.Call to freeze International FinancialCorporation’s (IFC)support to «bad investors».• La Via Campesina : fight against investors onthe ground, get them to go away and give up,and refuse to become contract farmers bybuilding concrete alternatives to the corporatefood sytem : short chain,low input farming
    • 24. Activism can help existing resistance!Or: thinking outside the three options box• Land grab : threat of dispossession of smallrural producers.• Pushing people out of the land :dispossession, involuntary resettlement• Dispossession and proletarianisation :disappearance of small rural producers( «death of the peasantry»)• Many different people are fighting back• 2012: increasing repression against landactivists24
    • 25. Global food sovereigntyIn poor countries: regain local control over resources andproduction. 1) agribusiness power 2) Green Revolutions 3) cheapfood imports (including food aid and dumping)In rich countries:1) agrarian reform and repopulation of the countryside2) reconstruction of shorter commodity chains and local foodsystemsMarket supply and demand do not meet real foodneeds: they meet corporate needs.Agriculture must stop:- working for the rich and producing stuffed andstarved : obesity epidemics and chronic hunger bothcaused by the same global food system- consuming more energy than it produces 25
    • 26. Less obvious actions1. Support and solidarity to local land activists- 2012 has been the year of increasing violenceagainst land activists- Cambodia, Laos• ILC has set up an emergency fund for them2. Close monitoring of post- investment plansWhat happens when a land grab is stopped?Sometime the land is effectively returned toprevious occupiers, but stays in the hands ofstate agencies
    • 27. reflections on the land grabs in Tanzania1. Land dispossession and environmentalenclosures2. A land grab ante litteram3. Land grabs- 1/ongoing- 2/unclear- 3/ gone..but!4. Land dispossession, class and the role of theState
    • 28. Environmental enclosures in TanzaniaSource: Tanzania GIS Community
    • 29. environmental enclosuresRoderick Neumann 1998; Dan Brockington 2005forced evictions from protected areas• Restricted or prohibited: agriculture, hunting,charcoal making, wood collection, cattle-keeping13.787 km2 - totally inaccessible37.428 km2 – partially restrictedout of total 94.509 km2about 39% of the country
    • 30. Privatisation ofstate farms:Kapungaa land grabante litteram
    • 31. evidence of land concentration and class formation2005 elections : collective land claims and politicslocal large farmers + urban professionals investing inagricultureVs.precarious alliance: middle producers allied with smallrural producers, wage labourers, landless and too poorto farm• All lose out : privatised estates sold to large investors.• International capital involved: IFC – Carlyle Group• Land grabs build on this pre-existing class hegemony
    • 32. Land grabs in TanzaniaFELISA4,250hectaresOil palmAGRISOLDownsized:320,000hectaresnow 35,000KITOMONDOex Sekab2,000hectaresAim: 200,000Ex - KoreaEx – SekabNowgovernmentRUBADARufiji District
    • 33. • Long-term leasehold contracts : legal transfer(= expropriation) from Village Land to PublicLand/General Land• Once the land is put under lease, redistribution tolocal people is unlikely to happen• One investor may leave; the lease is under control ofthe Ministry of Lands• The Tanzania Investment Centre signals it asavailable to new investors• Speculation• Role of the state• Clear trend of dispossession
    • 34. Opposition parties and the land grab• Since general elections 2005: oppositionparties increasingly vocal on the land grab• Ministry of Land and ex- UN Habitat ExecutiveAnna Tibaijuka announces land ceiling to beimposed to foreign land acquistion• Ceiling: 3,000 hectares
    • 35. Basic resources - check these out!• Transnational Institute group on AgrarianJustice:http://www.tni.org/work-area/agrarian-justiceAnalysis and campaigns on land deals• Genetic Resources Action International -GRAINhttp://farmlandgrab.org/Daily and weekly news on land deals• International Land Coalition ILChttp://landportal.info/landmatrixLarge database on land deals
    • 36. Professor Lionel Cliffe
    • 37. LAND GRABBING FOR BIOFUEL &OTHER PRODUCTSWhat is behind it?What is ahead for Africa?
    • 38. WHAT BIOFUELS?• Food crops: sugar, maize and other grain –– But high cost production in money and energy• Jatropha, supposed to be OK on marginal land– but production may often use water• Palm oil, by afr the highest yields but may beat expense of forest or farmland
    • 39. BIOFUELS: the Scale• 50 million hectares worldwide acquired forbiofuels in recent years• EU’s Renewable Energy Directive target of 25%requires another 40 m. ha.• In Tanzania two allocations of 200,000+ ha.,several in range of 20 – 80,000
    • 40. Range of other Land Grabs• Long history: land grabs central to colonialism• Land grabs by local elites e.g. Kenya• Wide variety of Contemporary grabs:- Vast plantations- Irrigation schemes- Blocs of farms and gated villages- Displaced S African and Zimbabwe white farmers- Food and industrial crops, for export and local
    • 41. SYSTEMIC DRIVERS OF GRABSExponential growth since 2005Not simply response to new levels of food andfuel demandsGlobal shifts in AGRICULTURAL COMMODITYMARKETSDynamic and crisis of FINANCIAL SYSTEMS
    • 42. THE NEW LOGIC:Control of the Planet’s Land• Speculative motives for commodity and landinvestment require CONTROL of the ultimateresource.• Is a compromise possible based on institutingSecure PROPERTY Rights - for investors andlocals?• Or is dispossession via an African ENCLOSUREPORCESS INEVITABLE?

    ×