SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Evaluator: Kevin Wilson – Structural Engineer Date: 9/7/11
Unit: All Building: All Elevation: All
Location: All
References:
None
Problem Description:
Design a hanger bracket for scaffold storage to be fabricated out of 3/8” thick x 2” wide bar.
Evaluation Summary:
The bracket can be fabricated from 3/8” thick x 2” wide bar as shown on Sketch 1 on the following page.
The rated capacity of this hanger bracket is 450 lbs.
1 of 6
ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Sketches and Drawings:
SKETCH 1
2 of 6
Evaluation of Hanger Bracket load rated at
450 lbs.
Engineering Evaluation
Bellefonte Nuclear Plant
Evaluation of Hanger Bracket for Material Storage:
kip 1000 lb⋅:= ksi 1000
lb
in
2
⋅:= psi 1
lb
in
2
⋅:=
Calculate Section Properties for 3/8" thick x 2" wide Bar:
W 2.0in:= H 0.375in:=
A W H⋅:= Area A:= AY
2
3
⎛
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎠
A⋅:= AX AY:=
Moment of Inertia Calculation:
Ix
W H
3
⋅
12
:= Iy
H W
3
⋅
12
:=
Radius of Gyration Calculation:
rx
H
12
:= ry
W
12
:=
Section Modulus Calculation:
Sx
W H
2
⋅
6
:= Sy
H W
2
⋅
6
:=
Properties:
Area 0.75 in
2
=
X-Axis Y-Axis
AX 0.5in
2
= AY 0.5in
2
=
rx 0.108 in=Ix 0.009 in
4
= ry 0.577 in=Iy 0.25 in
4
=
Sx 0.047 in
3
= Sy 0.25 in
3
=
rx 0.108 in= ry 0.577 in=
3 of 6
Evaluation of Hanger Bracket load rated at
450 lbs.
Engineering Evaluation
Bellefonte Nuclear Plant
E 29000000psi:=
Fy 36ksi:=
w 32.2
lb
in
:= l 14in:=
R
w l⋅
2
:=
R 225.4 lb⋅=
V R:=
Shear Stress Check:
Fv 0.52 Fy⋅:= V 0.225 kip⋅= Av A
2
3
⋅:=
fv
V
Av
:= fv 0.451 ksi⋅= < Fv 18.72 ksi⋅= OK
Bending Stress Check:
M_max
w l
2
⋅
8
:=
M_max 0.789 in kip⋅⋅= Fb 0.66 Fy⋅:=
fb
M_max
Sx
:= fb 16.8299 ksi⋅= < Fb 23.76 ksi⋅= OK
Deflection Check:
Δmax
5w l
4
⋅
384 E⋅ Ix⋅
⎛
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎠
:= Δmax 0.06319 in⋅= < 0.125in OK
4 of 6
Evaluation of Hanger Bracket load rated at
450 lbs.
Engineering Evaluation
Bellefonte Nuclear Plant
Calculations for loading on angle brace as a Column subjected to compression (formulas are from AISC Steel
Manual, Section 1.5 & 1.6:
Properties of the beam section:
E 29000000psi:= Fy 36ksi:=
Cmx 1.0:= Cmy 1.0:=
PC 0.320kip:= PBX 0kip:= PBY 0kip:=
l 1.5ft:= K 1.2:=
General Calculations:
r min rx ry,( ):= Fex
12 π
2
⋅ E⋅
23
K l⋅
rx
⎛
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎠
2
⋅
:= Fey
12 π
2
⋅ E⋅
23
K l⋅
ry
⎛
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎠
2
⋅
:= Fbx 0.66 Fy⋅:=
Fby 0.66Fy:=
Calculate Allowable Compression Stress:
CC
2π
2
E⋅
Fy
:= Sr
K l⋅
r
:= Sr 199.532=
CC 126.099=
Fa
12π
2
E
23 Sr
2
⋅
Sr CC≥if
1
Sr
2
2 CC
2
⋅
−
⎛
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎟
⎠
Fy⋅
5
3
⎛
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎠
3Sr
8 CC⋅
⎛
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎠
+
Sr
3
8 CC
3
⋅
⎛
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎟
⎠
−
Sr CC<if
:=
Fa 3.751 ksi⋅=
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Maximum Compressive Load Calculation:
Pcr 1.7 Area⋅ Fa⋅:= Pcr 4.782 kip⋅= Pallow Pcr
2
3
⎛
⎜
⎝
⎞
⎟
⎠
⋅:= Pallow 3.188 kip⋅= > PC 0.32 kip⋅=
OK
Calculate Axial Stress:
fa
PC
Area
:= fa 0.427 ksi⋅= fa
Fa
0.114= < 1.0 OK
5 of 6
Evaluation of Hanger Bracket load rated at
450 lbs.
Engineering Evaluation
Bellefonte Nuclear Plant
1
1 3
3
2
2
d
c2
kip 1000 lb⋅:= ksi 1000
lb
in
2
⋅:=
d 2 in⋅:=
Fu 70 ksi⋅:= Weld electrode minimum
tensile strength for E70XX.
Fy 21.3 ksi⋅:= Base metal yield strength for
ASTM A36 @ 100° F.
Forces and Moments on weld group:
F1 0.450 kip⋅:= F2 0 kip⋅:= F3 0 kip⋅:=
M1 0 kip⋅ in⋅:= M2 0 kip⋅ in⋅:= M3 0 kip⋅ in⋅:=
Weld group section properties:
AW1 d:= AW2 AW1:= AW3 AW1:= c2
d
2
:= c3 0 in⋅:=
AW1 2 in⋅= AW2 2 in⋅= AW3 2 in⋅= c2 1 in⋅= c3 0 in⋅=
SW3
d
2
6
:= JW
d
3
12
:=
SW3 0.667 in
2
⋅= JW 0.667 in
3
⋅=
Forces on weld:
f1
F1
AW1
M3
SW3
+:= f2
F2
AW2
M1 c3⋅
JW
+:= f3
F3
AW3
M1 c2⋅
JW
+:=
f1 0.225
kip
in
⋅= f2 0
kip
in
⋅= f3 0
kip
in
⋅=
fr f1
2
f2
2
+ f3
2
+:= fr 0.225
kip
in
⋅=
Weld size required:
wbase_metal
fr
0.4 Fy⋅
:= wbase_metal 0.026 in⋅= wweld_metal
fr
0.707 0.3⋅ Fu⋅
:= wweld_metal 0.015 in⋅=
wprovided .1875in:= IR
max wbase_metal wweld_metal,( )
wprovided
:= IR 0.141= < 1.0 ∴ OK
6 of 6

More Related Content

Similar to SI63_Hanger_Bracket_Evaluation

SI33_Evaluation_Temp_Support_Jet_Imping
SI33_Evaluation_Temp_Support_Jet_ImpingSI33_Evaluation_Temp_Support_Jet_Imping
SI33_Evaluation_Temp_Support_Jet_ImpingKevin Wilson
 
Calculation_Tubelock_Load_Capacity
Calculation_Tubelock_Load_CapacityCalculation_Tubelock_Load_Capacity
Calculation_Tubelock_Load_CapacityKevin Wilson
 
Rectangular tank example_latest
Rectangular tank example_latestRectangular tank example_latest
Rectangular tank example_latestVedachalam Mani
 
Me307 machine elements formula sheet Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer Univers...
Me307 machine elements formula sheet Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer Univers...Me307 machine elements formula sheet Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer Univers...
Me307 machine elements formula sheet Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer Univers...Erdi Karaçal
 
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdfLecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdfAberaMamoJaleta
 
12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...
12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...
12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...Hossam Shafiq II
 
تصميم المنشآت المعنديه - د-سعد الدين مصطفي.pdf
تصميم المنشآت المعنديه - د-سعد الدين مصطفي.pdfتصميم المنشآت المعنديه - د-سعد الدين مصطفي.pdf
تصميم المنشآت المعنديه - د-سعد الدين مصطفي.pdfHUSAM63
 
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERINGDESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERINGLiyaWilson4
 
Basement wall design
Basement wall designBasement wall design
Basement wall designCETCBIM
 
Piezo electric power generating shock absorber
Piezo electric power generating shock absorberPiezo electric power generating shock absorber
Piezo electric power generating shock absorberEcway Technologies
 
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog 1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog Latifs Chile
 
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog 1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog Latifs Chile
 
Design of machine elements - DESIGN FOR SIMPLE STRESSES
Design of machine elements - DESIGN FOR SIMPLE STRESSESDesign of machine elements - DESIGN FOR SIMPLE STRESSES
Design of machine elements - DESIGN FOR SIMPLE STRESSESAkram Hossain
 
Solucionario faires
Solucionario fairesSolucionario faires
Solucionario fairesjuan02468
 
Flow Chart - One Way Joist Construction
Flow Chart - One Way Joist ConstructionFlow Chart - One Way Joist Construction
Flow Chart - One Way Joist ConstructionQamar Uz Zaman
 

Similar to SI63_Hanger_Bracket_Evaluation (20)

SI33_Evaluation_Temp_Support_Jet_Imping
SI33_Evaluation_Temp_Support_Jet_ImpingSI33_Evaluation_Temp_Support_Jet_Imping
SI33_Evaluation_Temp_Support_Jet_Imping
 
Calculation_Tubelock_Load_Capacity
Calculation_Tubelock_Load_CapacityCalculation_Tubelock_Load_Capacity
Calculation_Tubelock_Load_Capacity
 
Rectangular tank example_latest
Rectangular tank example_latestRectangular tank example_latest
Rectangular tank example_latest
 
Me307 machine elements formula sheet Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer Univers...
Me307 machine elements formula sheet Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer Univers...Me307 machine elements formula sheet Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer Univers...
Me307 machine elements formula sheet Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer Univers...
 
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdfLecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
Lecture-3-Column-Design.pdf
 
12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...
12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...
12-Examples on Compression Members (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mo...
 
تصميم المنشآت المعنديه - د-سعد الدين مصطفي.pdf
تصميم المنشآت المعنديه - د-سعد الدين مصطفي.pdfتصميم المنشآت المعنديه - د-سعد الدين مصطفي.pdf
تصميم المنشآت المعنديه - د-سعد الدين مصطفي.pdf
 
Chapter 12
Chapter 12Chapter 12
Chapter 12
 
311 C H18
311 C H18311 C H18
311 C H18
 
gantry crane report
gantry crane reportgantry crane report
gantry crane report
 
RCC BMD
RCC BMDRCC BMD
RCC BMD
 
unit-3.ppt
unit-3.pptunit-3.ppt
unit-3.ppt
 
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERINGDESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING
 
Basement wall design
Basement wall designBasement wall design
Basement wall design
 
Piezo electric power generating shock absorber
Piezo electric power generating shock absorberPiezo electric power generating shock absorber
Piezo electric power generating shock absorber
 
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog 1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
 
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog 1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
 
Design of machine elements - DESIGN FOR SIMPLE STRESSES
Design of machine elements - DESIGN FOR SIMPLE STRESSESDesign of machine elements - DESIGN FOR SIMPLE STRESSES
Design of machine elements - DESIGN FOR SIMPLE STRESSES
 
Solucionario faires
Solucionario fairesSolucionario faires
Solucionario faires
 
Flow Chart - One Way Joist Construction
Flow Chart - One Way Joist ConstructionFlow Chart - One Way Joist Construction
Flow Chart - One Way Joist Construction
 

More from Kevin Wilson

Proposal Conemaugh Bottom Supports
Proposal Conemaugh Bottom SupportsProposal Conemaugh Bottom Supports
Proposal Conemaugh Bottom SupportsKevin Wilson
 
Proposal_Coutant_SW_Upgrade
Proposal_Coutant_SW_UpgradeProposal_Coutant_SW_Upgrade
Proposal_Coutant_SW_UpgradeKevin Wilson
 
47A400-11-99_Rev002
47A400-11-99_Rev00247A400-11-99_Rev002
47A400-11-99_Rev002Kevin Wilson
 
74-2RHR-R059_Rev002
74-2RHR-R059_Rev00274-2RHR-R059_Rev002
74-2RHR-R059_Rev002Kevin Wilson
 
03B-2AFW-V207_Rev002
03B-2AFW-V207_Rev00203B-2AFW-V207_Rev002
03B-2AFW-V207_Rev002Kevin Wilson
 
Exploded_View_Reedy_Motor3
Exploded_View_Reedy_Motor3Exploded_View_Reedy_Motor3
Exploded_View_Reedy_Motor3Kevin Wilson
 
Aux_Bldg_Cover_Load_Capacity
Aux_Bldg_Cover_Load_CapacityAux_Bldg_Cover_Load_Capacity
Aux_Bldg_Cover_Load_CapacityKevin Wilson
 
SI71_Grating_Capacity_Turbine_Bldg
SI71_Grating_Capacity_Turbine_BldgSI71_Grating_Capacity_Turbine_Bldg
SI71_Grating_Capacity_Turbine_BldgKevin Wilson
 
SI58_SKETCHES_EVAL
SI58_SKETCHES_EVALSI58_SKETCHES_EVAL
SI58_SKETCHES_EVALKevin Wilson
 
SI33_Jet_Impingement_Shield_Sketches
SI33_Jet_Impingement_Shield_SketchesSI33_Jet_Impingement_Shield_Sketches
SI33_Jet_Impingement_Shield_SketchesKevin Wilson
 
Safety_Trailer_Addition
Safety_Trailer_AdditionSafety_Trailer_Addition
Safety_Trailer_AdditionKevin Wilson
 
Kelly_Building_Sketches
Kelly_Building_SketchesKelly_Building_Sketches
Kelly_Building_SketchesKevin Wilson
 
U2_OUTAGE_BLDG_7-16-15
U2_OUTAGE_BLDG_7-16-15U2_OUTAGE_BLDG_7-16-15
U2_OUTAGE_BLDG_7-16-15Kevin Wilson
 

More from Kevin Wilson (19)

Proposal Conemaugh Bottom Supports
Proposal Conemaugh Bottom SupportsProposal Conemaugh Bottom Supports
Proposal Conemaugh Bottom Supports
 
Proposal_Coutant_SW_Upgrade
Proposal_Coutant_SW_UpgradeProposal_Coutant_SW_Upgrade
Proposal_Coutant_SW_Upgrade
 
02964-4E9256-00
02964-4E9256-0002964-4E9256-00
02964-4E9256-00
 
47A400-11-99_Rev002
47A400-11-99_Rev00247A400-11-99_Rev002
47A400-11-99_Rev002
 
74-2RHR-R059_Rev002
74-2RHR-R059_Rev00274-2RHR-R059_Rev002
74-2RHR-R059_Rev002
 
03B-2AFW-V207_Rev002
03B-2AFW-V207_Rev00203B-2AFW-V207_Rev002
03B-2AFW-V207_Rev002
 
2-62A-809_Rev002
2-62A-809_Rev0022-62A-809_Rev002
2-62A-809_Rev002
 
Exploded_View_Reedy_Motor3
Exploded_View_Reedy_Motor3Exploded_View_Reedy_Motor3
Exploded_View_Reedy_Motor3
 
JD317-01-Pack
JD317-01-PackJD317-01-Pack
JD317-01-Pack
 
Aux_Bldg_Cover_Load_Capacity
Aux_Bldg_Cover_Load_CapacityAux_Bldg_Cover_Load_Capacity
Aux_Bldg_Cover_Load_Capacity
 
SI71_Grating_Capacity_Turbine_Bldg
SI71_Grating_Capacity_Turbine_BldgSI71_Grating_Capacity_Turbine_Bldg
SI71_Grating_Capacity_Turbine_Bldg
 
SI58_SKETCHES_EVAL
SI58_SKETCHES_EVALSI58_SKETCHES_EVAL
SI58_SKETCHES_EVAL
 
SI51_PACK
SI51_PACKSI51_PACK
SI51_PACK
 
SI33_Jet_Impingement_Shield_Sketches
SI33_Jet_Impingement_Shield_SketchesSI33_Jet_Impingement_Shield_Sketches
SI33_Jet_Impingement_Shield_Sketches
 
Safety_Trailer_Addition
Safety_Trailer_AdditionSafety_Trailer_Addition
Safety_Trailer_Addition
 
Kelly_Building_Sketches
Kelly_Building_SketchesKelly_Building_Sketches
Kelly_Building_Sketches
 
SK-FE038_DWG_PACK
SK-FE038_DWG_PACKSK-FE038_DWG_PACK
SK-FE038_DWG_PACK
 
U2_OUTAGE_BLDG_7-16-15
U2_OUTAGE_BLDG_7-16-15U2_OUTAGE_BLDG_7-16-15
U2_OUTAGE_BLDG_7-16-15
 
S1
S1S1
S1
 

SI63_Hanger_Bracket_Evaluation

  • 1. ENGINEERING EVALUATION Evaluator: Kevin Wilson – Structural Engineer Date: 9/7/11 Unit: All Building: All Elevation: All Location: All References: None Problem Description: Design a hanger bracket for scaffold storage to be fabricated out of 3/8” thick x 2” wide bar. Evaluation Summary: The bracket can be fabricated from 3/8” thick x 2” wide bar as shown on Sketch 1 on the following page. The rated capacity of this hanger bracket is 450 lbs. 1 of 6
  • 2. ENGINEERING EVALUATION Sketches and Drawings: SKETCH 1 2 of 6
  • 3. Evaluation of Hanger Bracket load rated at 450 lbs. Engineering Evaluation Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Evaluation of Hanger Bracket for Material Storage: kip 1000 lb⋅:= ksi 1000 lb in 2 ⋅:= psi 1 lb in 2 ⋅:= Calculate Section Properties for 3/8" thick x 2" wide Bar: W 2.0in:= H 0.375in:= A W H⋅:= Area A:= AY 2 3 ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ A⋅:= AX AY:= Moment of Inertia Calculation: Ix W H 3 ⋅ 12 := Iy H W 3 ⋅ 12 := Radius of Gyration Calculation: rx H 12 := ry W 12 := Section Modulus Calculation: Sx W H 2 ⋅ 6 := Sy H W 2 ⋅ 6 := Properties: Area 0.75 in 2 = X-Axis Y-Axis AX 0.5in 2 = AY 0.5in 2 = rx 0.108 in=Ix 0.009 in 4 = ry 0.577 in=Iy 0.25 in 4 = Sx 0.047 in 3 = Sy 0.25 in 3 = rx 0.108 in= ry 0.577 in= 3 of 6
  • 4. Evaluation of Hanger Bracket load rated at 450 lbs. Engineering Evaluation Bellefonte Nuclear Plant E 29000000psi:= Fy 36ksi:= w 32.2 lb in := l 14in:= R w l⋅ 2 := R 225.4 lb⋅= V R:= Shear Stress Check: Fv 0.52 Fy⋅:= V 0.225 kip⋅= Av A 2 3 ⋅:= fv V Av := fv 0.451 ksi⋅= < Fv 18.72 ksi⋅= OK Bending Stress Check: M_max w l 2 ⋅ 8 := M_max 0.789 in kip⋅⋅= Fb 0.66 Fy⋅:= fb M_max Sx := fb 16.8299 ksi⋅= < Fb 23.76 ksi⋅= OK Deflection Check: Δmax 5w l 4 ⋅ 384 E⋅ Ix⋅ ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ := Δmax 0.06319 in⋅= < 0.125in OK 4 of 6
  • 5. Evaluation of Hanger Bracket load rated at 450 lbs. Engineering Evaluation Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Calculations for loading on angle brace as a Column subjected to compression (formulas are from AISC Steel Manual, Section 1.5 & 1.6: Properties of the beam section: E 29000000psi:= Fy 36ksi:= Cmx 1.0:= Cmy 1.0:= PC 0.320kip:= PBX 0kip:= PBY 0kip:= l 1.5ft:= K 1.2:= General Calculations: r min rx ry,( ):= Fex 12 π 2 ⋅ E⋅ 23 K l⋅ rx ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ 2 ⋅ := Fey 12 π 2 ⋅ E⋅ 23 K l⋅ ry ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ 2 ⋅ := Fbx 0.66 Fy⋅:= Fby 0.66Fy:= Calculate Allowable Compression Stress: CC 2π 2 E⋅ Fy := Sr K l⋅ r := Sr 199.532= CC 126.099= Fa 12π 2 E 23 Sr 2 ⋅ Sr CC≥if 1 Sr 2 2 CC 2 ⋅ − ⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ Fy⋅ 5 3 ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ 3Sr 8 CC⋅ ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ + Sr 3 8 CC 3 ⋅ ⎛ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ − Sr CC<if := Fa 3.751 ksi⋅= __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Maximum Compressive Load Calculation: Pcr 1.7 Area⋅ Fa⋅:= Pcr 4.782 kip⋅= Pallow Pcr 2 3 ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ ⋅:= Pallow 3.188 kip⋅= > PC 0.32 kip⋅= OK Calculate Axial Stress: fa PC Area := fa 0.427 ksi⋅= fa Fa 0.114= < 1.0 OK 5 of 6
  • 6. Evaluation of Hanger Bracket load rated at 450 lbs. Engineering Evaluation Bellefonte Nuclear Plant 1 1 3 3 2 2 d c2 kip 1000 lb⋅:= ksi 1000 lb in 2 ⋅:= d 2 in⋅:= Fu 70 ksi⋅:= Weld electrode minimum tensile strength for E70XX. Fy 21.3 ksi⋅:= Base metal yield strength for ASTM A36 @ 100° F. Forces and Moments on weld group: F1 0.450 kip⋅:= F2 0 kip⋅:= F3 0 kip⋅:= M1 0 kip⋅ in⋅:= M2 0 kip⋅ in⋅:= M3 0 kip⋅ in⋅:= Weld group section properties: AW1 d:= AW2 AW1:= AW3 AW1:= c2 d 2 := c3 0 in⋅:= AW1 2 in⋅= AW2 2 in⋅= AW3 2 in⋅= c2 1 in⋅= c3 0 in⋅= SW3 d 2 6 := JW d 3 12 := SW3 0.667 in 2 ⋅= JW 0.667 in 3 ⋅= Forces on weld: f1 F1 AW1 M3 SW3 +:= f2 F2 AW2 M1 c3⋅ JW +:= f3 F3 AW3 M1 c2⋅ JW +:= f1 0.225 kip in ⋅= f2 0 kip in ⋅= f3 0 kip in ⋅= fr f1 2 f2 2 + f3 2 +:= fr 0.225 kip in ⋅= Weld size required: wbase_metal fr 0.4 Fy⋅ := wbase_metal 0.026 in⋅= wweld_metal fr 0.707 0.3⋅ Fu⋅ := wweld_metal 0.015 in⋅= wprovided .1875in:= IR max wbase_metal wweld_metal,( ) wprovided := IR 0.141= < 1.0 ∴ OK 6 of 6