2. Facts of the case Samuel Sheppard challenged his verdict as the product of an unfair trial. He was accused of second-degree murder of his pregnant wife.
3. Questions Does the publicity of his trial interfere with the fairness of his trial? Did this interfere with his civil liberty of a fair trial that’s guaranteed in the Bill of Rights? Bill of Rights: The first ten amendments. Civil liberties: Rights to protect from government.
4. Table Self-incrimination: The situation occurring when an individual accused of a crime is compelled to be a witness against his/herself in court. 5th Amendment: Designed to protect the rights of the persons accused of crimes.
5. Conclusion The warren court found in an 8-to-1 decision that Sheppard did not receive a fair trial. The court concluded that the trial judge should’ve either postponed or transferred the case so it could be a fair trial.
