1. David Wilson Library
Liberating Your Policies
(Or Theory’s all very well in practise)
Gareth J Johnson
LRA Manager
www.twitter.com/llordllama
18th Feb 2009
National Library of Wales
www.le.ac.uk lra.le.ac.uk

2. Why Am I Here today?
• Give a personal view of repository policy
• Used to work for a (in)famous JISC funded
project
– With a pet repository alongside
• Today
– A repository manager in the HE wilds

3. So what’s it all about?
• I’ve always believed that policy
– Underpin repository development &
practise
– Should be evolutionary not in
homeostasis
– Are invaluable for coping with staff
changes
– Provide transparency/clarity of
purpose, function and decision making

4. The SHERPA years (06-08)
• Repository Development Officer
– Externally funded on multiple projects
– Also Repo Administrator on Nottingham Eprints
• Policies in place before in post
– All standard meta, data, preservation etc
– Devised by SHERPA team, agreed by InfoServices
• A purist outlook and acceptance
– A broad church of item acceptance
– Full text only with an avoidance of metadata only
• Author-mediated submission
– Admin checks ©, metadata creation then live

5. The SHERPA years (06-08)
• Practically this meant that
– Repository over-shadowed by national project work
– Result not as high impact internally as externally
• But IR high on institutional agenda
– Funding open access pay-up-front model
– Internal impact was less than it might have been
• So what drove policy developments?
– External projects and events
– Software developments
– Emerging best practice examples
– A slowly creeping centralisation culture…

6. OpenDOAR & Policy
• OpenDOAR survey of 1,000 repositories
– Included examination of policy
– Conclusion at time 80% had few or no polciies
• Policies seemed a private thing
– “This is how we run the repository, but we
don’t tell anyone”
– Uncertainty as to what made a good policy
created fear
• OpenDOAR policy generation tool

7. Policies today?
• Submission most commonly defined
• Still an apparently weak area

8. Moving into the Real World
• Leicester University
– Research focussed university means a research
focussed repository
• Origins (2006)
– Library wanted IR but didn’t want to be first
– Research Committee interest
• Secondment of 0.5 FTE
– Formation of project group
– Tried establishing Academic Steering Group
• Mediated deposit
– All handle-turning done by LRA team

9. Academic
RSS
Ignored
Publication Letter of
LRA: Live
alert Feed Notification
Potential
No
Archived
Yes
Prepared
Info Academic Info
Request Embargo
Yes
Embargo Deposit
Librarians
Librarians Author ?
Stored
expired?
No
Submitted
LRA: Deposit Academic
Delete
article Letter of
Submissions Submitted
Notification
File
LRA
Yes
Publisher
Can No
Yes Do
Rights
article be
Do we Publisher
Records
used as
Yes
have an rights
provided?
author allow
license? ingest?
No
SHERPA/ Unclear
RoMEO
No
Academic
Academic Author Contact
Rights
Author
holder
Recontact
Recontact
LRA: Publisher Recontact
Response No
Response Pending
No
?
? No
Yes Yes
Response
Signed
Depositable ?
Author
version
Licence
Yes
Suitable
Yes
format
version
LRA Item Yes
Permission
available?
Granted?
No
Submission & Academic
No
Ingest Letter of
notification
(non-theses)

10. LRA Today
• Took over from old manager Jan 09
– Still around and a gold mine of information
• Staff
– 0.5 FTE Manager
– 0.5 FTE Administrator (two people)
– No FTE tech, but excellent ad hoc support
• Project Group
– Library Director, ProVC, IT Services plus staff
– Considers operational and practical issues
– Approves policies

11. Where’s Poli(c)y?
• More formal approach to policy from the
start
– Research Committee and Project Group
• Final version focus, No learning objects, Preprints
left to faculties but strong retention policy
• Operational policy
– Fits into existing processes
– Internal focus for documentation

12. Policy Evolution
• In-house custom and practise
– Author deposit license
– Takedown statement – not true policy
– Data & Conferences at Leicester
• Made use of OpenDOAR Policy tool
– Standardising with the community
– Exposed via OAI and on Web

13. Driving Forces
• Internal drivers
– Quick wins and metrics
– RAE, REF & bibliometrics
– Data archiving
– Etheses mandate implementation
• External drivers
– Ethos
– Watching the national scene but not leading

14. Etheses Mandate
• All PhD’s now mandated to deposit etheses
– Decision taken by Board of Graduate studies
– Up to 3 yr moratorium possible (as with print)
– Total embargo also possible
• Policy devised collaboration with Graduate Office
– Rights agreement devised with strong input from LRA
Copyright Officer
– LRA chasing incomplete or missing forms
• Promotion
– A role for the LRA and Librarians
– Embedding is going to take time

15. Bibliometrics
• LRA Uses Google Analytics
– Implemented by not much done to date
– Starting monthly analytical runs in Feb
• Bibliometrics
– Provision for new Bibliometrician post in 2009
– Webometrics (11th or 15th in the UK)
– Will work closely with departments towards REF
– Interest already from the Chemistry department
– May well significantly impact on how the repository
operates and operating policies

16. So what have I actually learned?
• The attitude might be: “It works…so
why do we need policy?”
• But policy is crucially important
– Defines the repository service
– Underpins developments as well as
activities
– Essential for long term sustainability

17. Policy Liberates the Future…

18. Contact Details
gjj6@le.ac.uk
www.twitter.com/llordllama
0116-252-2055