The document summarizes the evaluation of a conversation film task. It notes that some shots were difficult to get right when both actors needed to be in the frame. It also discusses technical issues in Adobe Premiere Pro that resulted in a low resolution final export. Lessons learned include asking someone to act as a double or using different actors for difficult shots, and adjusting sequence settings in Premiere Pro to produce a higher quality final video.

1. AndrasUjlaki
Evaluation of Conversation Task
We used a variety of shots, and the slow motion editing goes well with the
music I chose.
However, someof the shots were hard to get right, as we wereboth acting in
the film so there was nobody left to move or zoom, or control the camera in
shots wherewe were both shown in the same shot, such as the over-the-
shoulder shots.
If I was to re-film the conversation, I may ask someoneto act in the over-the-
shoulder shotas my double, or get different actors.
Alternatively, we could havegotten rid of these shots, and filmed the
conversation using only shots with only one of the characters shown. However,
I think it is always good to haveat least one shot with both characters shown,
because otherwise, the audience may feel confused aboutthe characters’
positions in the shot.
I also encountered some technical difficulties with Adobe Premiere Pro’s
sequence settings, and due to this, the final edit is of quite low resolution, as
Premiere Pro scaled it down, then up again when exporting, resulting in poor
quality video.
Next time, I will use differentsequence settings to solvethis issue, and make
surethe final result is HD.