11. UOBM: Load time Semantic Web project Benchmarking Results Conclusions
12. Load Time: PA Dataset Semantic Web project Benchmarking Results Conclusions
13.
14. UOBM: Query execution Partially Answered N Query was not answered by this tool Semantic Web project Benchmarking Results Conclusions N N N N N N Q15 0.016 N N N N(infinite) N Q14 N N N N N N Q13 0.016 N N N 476.507 N Q12 0.062 N(infinite) 0.094(P) 0.001(P) N(infinite) N Q11 0.016 0.001 0.001 0.001(P) 0.25 0 Q10 0.031(P) N N N N N Q9 0.031 N N N 6.843(P) N Q8 0.001 N N N 300.12 N Q7 0.047 N N N 1153.025 N Q6 0.047 N N N 1.281 N Q5 0.063 120 0.14 N N(infinite) N Q4 0.062 0.016 0.109 N 651.237 N Q3 0.062 0.001(P) 0.001(P) N 8.906(P) N Q2 0.047 0.031 0.203 0.141 21.921 6.766 (P) Q1 BigOWLIM Jena TDB Sesame Oracle Allegrograph Virtuoso No. Execution Timings (seconds)
15. PA Dataset: Query execution Semantic Web project Benchmarking Results Conclusions Partially Answered N Query was not answered by this tool 0.031 N N 1.688 N Q15 0.641 0.001 0.016(P) 1.812 5.563(P) Q13 0.079 N N 16.14 N Q12 0.062 0.001 0.11 1.734 N Q11 0 N 0.047 1.734 0.001 Q10 0.016 N 0.171 1.782 0.156 Q9 0.062 0.001 0.11 3.39 0.047 Q8 0.093 N 0.203 28.688 84.469 Q7 0.45 0.001 N 3.765 N Q6 0.078 N 0.141 1.719 0.172 Q5 0.047 N N N N Q4 0.063 N N N N Q2 0.219 0.047 0.469(P) 26.422 2.234 (P) Q1 BigOWLIM Jena TDB Sesame Allegrograph Virtuoso Query No.
16. Two complete stores: BigOWLIM v/s Allegrograph Semantic Web project Benchmarking Results Conclusions
17. Two fast stores: BigOWLIM v/s Sesame Semantic Web project Benchmarking Results Conclusions