Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Christology debates

3,354 views

Published on

A simplified explanation of some of the debates among Christians in the 4th and 5th centuries about the dual nature of Christ (God and man)

Published in: Spiritual

Christology debates

  1. 1. Christology Debates<br />Alexandrine / Antiochene Viewpoints<br />Appolinarianism<br />Nestorianism<br />
  2. 2. The East<br />Alexandria<br />Antioch<br />Constantinople<br />Both sides wanted their bishop to be in charge of Constantinople, because it had become powerful in the East – like Rome in the West<br />
  3. 3. Christology<br />Alexandrine View<br />Main point was<br />REVELATION<br />Christ revealed God to us<br />Therefore<br />It’s most important<br />that Christ was Divine<br />Because to reveal God, he must fully know God – and how could he fully know God unless he fully participates in God’s nature?<br />Antiochene View<br />Main point was <br />SALVATION<br />Christ saved us<br />Therefore<br />It’s most important<br />that Christ was Human<br />Because to save and redeem all aspects of humanity, he must fully participate in all aspects of humanity – which means any part of him that was NOT fully human could not fully be saved in us.<br />
  4. 4. Christology - Summary<br />Antiochene View<br />Jesus was Human<br />(and divine)<br />Alexandrine View<br />Jesus was Divine<br />(and human)<br />
  5. 5. Controversies: Appolinarianism<br />Appolinaris<br />(Alexandrine viewpoint)<br />Argument:Christ had a physical body<br />but a divine mind<br />Gregory of Nazianzus<br />(Antiochene viewpoint)<br />Counter argument: It can’t be - because anything in Jesus that wasn’t human couldn’t be saved<br />Council of Constantinople – 381<br />Appolinarianism  Antiochene Position Wins<br />
  6. 6. Controversies: Nestorianism<br />Nestorius(Patriarch of Constantinople)<br />(Antiochene viewpoint)<br />Statements<br /><ul><li>Jesus & God: 2 natures, 2 persons
  7. 7. Mary: Christotokos, not Theotokos</li></ul> (“Christ-bearer” not “God-bearer”)<br />Purpose:possibly to prevent the divine from overwhelming the human<br />Bishop Cyril(Supported by west and Emperors Valentinian III, Theodosius II)<br />(Alexandrine viewpoint)<br />Action:Get Theodosius II to call council against Nestorius<br />Council of Ephesus – 431<br />
  8. 8. Controversies: Nestorianism<br />Nestorius <br />(Supported by John of Antioch and others)<br />Bishop Cyril<br />(Supported by west and Emperors Valentinian III, Theodosius II)<br />Council of Ephesus – 431<br />Decided against Nestorius<br />(in his absence – he was late)<br />Protest<br />Nestorius and supporters convene their own council and decide against Cyril<br />Protest against the protest<br />Against Nestorius again<br />(and everyone else who participated with him)<br />
  9. 9. Controversies: Nestorianism Cont’d<br />Council of Ephesus – 431<br />Decided against Nestorius<br />Protest<br />Counter-protest<br />Theodosius II intervenes<br />Bishop Cyril<br />John of Antioch(Nestorius’ supporter)<br />Negotiations … “Formula of Union” - 433<br />Upholds original council<br />Alexandrine Position Wins Nestorianism<br />Nestorius – deposed, exiled<br />

×