VIP Model Call Girls Budhwar Peth ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5...
ย
Media Investigation: Relating These Issues To My Production
1. Media Investigation: Materialism in Music โ How Do These Issues Relate To My Production? The crucial factor here is this: do materialistic videos improve the chances of success for the artist? This is important because it relates to how we (my group) can improve our music video and either answer to the said question has the potential to influence our production. In order to explore the possible answers, I will put forward key talking points while considering results from my audience research to support or contradict each point. These key talking points will include the ideas of branding, genre and audience pleasures. Brands and status symbols are unquestionably important elements in modern life and have the potential to deeply influence our judgements of others. It seems that in any industry, be it clothing, cars or electrical goods, there is a hierarchy of what is deemed โdesirableโ or โundesirableโ. For instance, a Mercedes is widely recognised to be more desirable than a Skoda. But what is it that cements a productโs place in the โdesirableโ category and becomes recognised as a status symbol (an indicator of wealth and/ or desirability)? In the case of Mercedes vs. Skoda, it is clear that a combination of differences in quality and price have lead to the longstanding perceptions of the two brands being on almost opposite ends of the desirability scale. However, this is a very โout-datedโ example (in the sense that the perceptions of each brands were shaped centuries ago โ and with much less influence from the media than there might be today). In order to discuss the influence the media might have on shaping mass opinion on products, a more modern example, such as that of the iPod, must be considered. If the most important differences in desirability between Mercedes and Skoda were quality and price, can the same be said for the iPod compared to its rivals? Well, according to www.pcworld.co.uk on 28/11/09, it seems there is a very slim price difference, the most expensive iPod Touch (64GB) costs ยฃ299 whilst the most expensive non-Apple MP3 player is the Sony NWZX1060 Touchscreen (32GB) at ยฃ289.99. At the top of the range, then, it seems that in terms of price the iPod touch isnโt significantly more expensive than its nearest rival, but, in terms of quality, it out-trumps its rival with twice as much memory (64GB vs. 32GB). Lower down in the range though, an iPod Nano (8GB) costs ยฃ115 while the SanDisk Sansa Clip (8GB) costs ยฃ39.99. With the performance of these two products being equally balanced, why is it that the iPod is being sold for almost three times as much? And, more interestingly, why do people by the iPod over the SanDisk when it is, for apparently little good reason, this much more expensive?
2. However, itโs only when we start thinking about it that the question becomes difficult, the answer is really very simple; usually itโs either โbecause I saw it on TVโ or โbecause everyone else has oneโ โ last year in a Media Studies lesson a show of hands revealed that all (of which I must admit I was a part of) but one member of the class owned an iPod, and none except that one person checked out the specifications of competing MP3 players before making the purchase. Our classroom scenario is a little bit of proof that the majority of audiences respond more to advertising and word of mouth than private research and comparison. We can then perhaps assume that, in the modern world, the quality of advertising is equally or even more important than the quality of the product in the creation of a status symbol โ for the quality of two products may be very similar, but the quality of advertising may be very different. The iPod is now undoubtedly an established status symbol; in the โAudioโ section of www.pcworld.co.uk there are separate categories for โApple iPodsโ and โPortable Audioโ ( http://www.pcworld.co.uk/martprd/editorial/MP3_homepage/?int=left_nav ). It seems clear that materialist consumerism exists in these industries, but can the same be said for the music industry? After all, we do refer to it as an industry, but do audiences really consume music in the same way they do the car/ electronic/ clothing industries? Furthermore, do audiences of different genres consume music in different ways? It seems perhaps a little unlikely, since music has long been one of the most expressive of art forms. By assuming that audiences consume music in the same materialistic way as they do clothes, one effectively brings into question the validity of modern music as an art form. After all, you surely wouldnโt regard an advertising poster to have the same artistic values as a painting by da Vinci/ Raphael/ Monet/ Van Gogh? In my research I have shown that much of todayโs most popular music videos are strongly materialistic and, in a sense, โadvertisement-likeโ. For example, Taio Cruzโs โBreak Your Heartโ (number one in the UK singles chart on 11/10/09), portrays Taio Cruz as a very desirable protagonist, โ at least, from a male point of view โ heโs rich, fashionable and has all the women he could possibly want. By doing this, he creates an image or persona of himself and his music, using tools such as attractive women and glamorous locations to increase his desirability and consequently that of his music also. The point to consider is whether such techniques can create a hierarchy of desirability among artists and their music in a similar way as in other industries, i.e. will people listen to popular and fashionable artists in order to be seen as fashionable themselves โ is modern popular music consumed as fads just as any other industry? Can an artist be regarded as a status symbol? A further point to consider is that Taio Cruz has also recently launched a fashion and accessory brand named Rokstarr which has so far had a focus on sunglasses and is becoming increasingly popular among other celebrities and artists (e.g. Kelly Rowland, JLS and Kanye West etc.).
3. โ Rokstarrโ is also the title of his latest album โ allowing for simultaneous promotion of his music and his brand. This isnโt a unique occurrence; the rap group G-Unit launched the โG-Unit Clothing Companyโ in 2003 in collaboration with Marc Ecko (the founder of Eckล Unlimited) and Pharrell Williams (rapper/ producer and member of The Neptunes, N.E.R.D and Child Rebel Soldier) launched two lines of luxury clothing; โBillionaire Boys Clubโ and โIce Creamโ in 2005 together with Nigo (founder of BAPE). All of these brands describe themselves as โluxury streetwearโ and consequently all have an aspect of exclusivity and can also be regarded as status symbols. The websites of the brands show extremely materialistic welcome pages: Note the immediate, blatant objectification of the female body as an advertisement tool.
4. This is an especially interesting advert for a pair of sunglasses, since only one half of the pair can be seen and the viewer is quite clearly drawn to another area of the image...and it isnโt difficult to guess which. This particular pair of sunglasses (The Mono โ designed to make a statement) costs ยฃ165. We can note also that, when searched on Google, that the description of the website reads โROKSTARR music production and high street fashionโ, yet nowhere on the website is there any information about Taio Cruzโs music. This suggests that fashion and music are very closely linked, perhaps supporting the claim that audiences consume music in a similar way to other industries in which materialism dominates. It also suggests that the music a person listens to will heavily dictate what kind of clothes they wear, that each genre is exclusive to a particular type of audience holding a particular set of ideologies and that audiences seek to be included and labelled in these groups. This would also suggest that the true pleasure that audiences gain from music is more to do with social classification and recognition than the actual pleasure of listening to the music for sheer entertainment purposes. This would support the argument that audiences consume modern popular music in a similar way as they do fads from other aspects of popular culture (most notably fashion) and that social inclusion is key to an individual when choosing which music to listen to โ just as it is when an individual chooses which clothes to buy.
5. The Billionaire Boys Club homepage is more quirky than โin-your-face marketing ploysโ. However, when we โenter the storeโ we are presented with a heart-warming message that reads โWealth is of the heart and mine, not the pocketโ, which becomes rather ironic, perhaps even laughable, when we look at the price of products.
6. A plain white t-shirt with the brand name costs $80. This jumper costs $515.
7. These Ice Cream trainers cost $205. Considering the price of these products, surely there is something contradictory about the motto?
8. These are printscreens of the Billionaire Boys Club โgroupโ (a fan page) on Facebook, which people have joined and then uploaded and commented on pictures of themselves and their collections of Billionaire Boys Club/ Ice Cream products. This is a good example of audiences using the music they listen to as a social tool and this particular group has 3, 715 members from many different countries โ there are comments from France, Argentina, USA, UK, South Africa and The Mauritius. Of course, however, these examples and my research up to now has only shown a link between materialistic/ โadvertisementalโ music videos and success without establishing a definite cause-and-effect relationship.
9. My audience research shows that, out of the 52 participants aged 13-18, 63% said that โa bad music video can ruin a decent song and a good one can improve a mediocre songโ, while 29% said that โonly the music countsโ. The same research also shows that R&B was the most popular genre. With the majority believing that a mediocre song can become successful with a good music video, this suggests a stronger link between the argument that artists can sell themselves by other means than their music, i.e. their desirability doesnโt rest simply on the quality of their product (the music) but also on other factors such as creating a fashionable image (advertising). This is also supported by a comment left by a participant in reply to the question โIn your opinion, what/ which of the following is important in a good music video?โ who said โdance routines that become โcoolโ such as SOULJA BOYโ and the fact that R&B was the most popular genre, as we know it is rich in materialistic music videos. The comment left by the participant is significant because it supports the argument that artists can create a positive or desirable image of themselves by including factors that are โcoolโ in their music videos. It is this โcoolโ factor which can arguably turn a mediocre song into a status symbol of โcoolโ โ which audiences respond to and consequently consume as the latest fashion.
10. The previous graph shows the responses of those who selected one or more of either R&B, Hip-Hop or Rap as their preferred genre(s). It tells us that, while well-choreographed dance moves and relevant visuals are still the most important factor, other factors such as a desirable/ fashionable protagonist and glamorous locations have risen significantly compare to the initial sample of all 52 participants. We also notice that well-choreographed dance moves are more important than relevant visuals (the other way around compared to all participants). This is perhaps significant as well-choreographed dance routines provide an opportunity to include a โcoolโ factor โ just as in the example of Soulja Boy. The graph also shows a decline in the importance of attractive women, however this can be attributed to a heavily gender biased sample (6 males vs. 20 females). We can say this with confidence as 83% of male participants highlighted attractive females to be important, compared to the 50% from the initial sample who selected the answer. There was also a rise in the importance of attractive men from the female participants, rising from 39% of all females to 45% of females who prefer R&B/ Hip-Hop/ Rap. This pie chart suggests that R&B/ Hip-Hop/ Rap fans do place a higher importance on music videos than our initial, mixed sample did as the โnot at all, only the music countsโ response dropped from 29% to 27% while the โmusic videos have the power to make or break a songโ response rose from 6% to 8%, the โvery important, a song can only be good if it has a good music videoโ response doubled from 2% to 4% and the โthe quality of the music video is more important than the quality of the songโ response also rose.
11. So, we have identified that audiences who prefer R&B/ Hip-Hop/ Rap music are more likely to respond to materialistic content in music videos (such as glamorous locations, attractive members of the opposite sex, desirable protagonist etc. โ all of which were included as โmaterialism signifiersโ in my previous research) when compared to a mixed audience. But is there a link between how important music videos are and what content is regarded as important? I shall now examine this by analysing the responses of those who regard music videos as either โQuite important, a really bad one can ruin a decent song/ a good one can improve a mediocre songโ, โVery important, a song can only be good if it has a good music videoโ, โMusic videos have the power to make or break a songโ or โThe quality of the music video is more important than the quality of the songโ. Here I will use a mixed audience (i.e. not a specifically R&B/ Hip-Hop/ Rap orientated audience) in order to focus more on the link between the importance and subsequent importance of content in music video rather than genre. Interestingly, this graph shows that materialistic factors such as attractive members of the opposite sex and glamorous locations are seen as less important in an audience who hold a higher level importance of music videos than an R&B/ Hip-Hop/ Rap audience. This suggests that there is a stronger link between genre and materialistic values than there is between the level of importance placed on the video and any materialistic content.
12. This therefore suggests that the answer to the initial question of โdo materialistic videos improve the chances of success for the artist?โ could be yes for some genres (e.g. R&B) but perhaps not others. This is further supported by the results of our target audience (an indie/ rock audience) โ among whom attractive members of the opposite sex, glamorous locations and a desirable/ fashionable protagonist were all seen as less important compared to the R&B audience. This would consequently seem to suggest that, when applying the initial question to our genre and considering our target audience, the high levels of materialism found in R&B music videos wouldnโt have the same influence if transferred to indie music videos. This has been reflected in my past research, since the song โSweet Dispositionโ by The Temper Trap (a rock/ alternative rock song) was a huge outlier compared to other songs in the top ten โ scoring an all-time low of zero out of fourteen (Taio Cruzโs โBreak Your Heartโ was ten out of fourteen). To our group, therefore, the answer to the initial question is โnoโ, given the low importance attributed to materialistic factors by our target audience.