2. resale or redistribution.
96
Chapter Outline
3.1 Overview of Job and Process Costing
Environment
Materials, Labor, and Overhead Costs
Focal Point for Cost Accumulation
3.2 Modified and Hybrid Systems
3.3 The Job Cost System
3.4 The Cost Elements in a Process Cost System
Materials
Conversion Costs
Cost Flows
3.5 The Equivalent Unit Concept
Unit Costs
Flow of Physical Units
Stage of Completion
Timing of Inputs
Computational Steps
3.6 Cost of Production Report
Management’s Use of Cost of Production Reports
Ethical Considerations
3.7 Simplifications of JIT and Automation
4. One day, Stein decided to invest his growing profits into a new
venture that would be
oriented to preparing specialized wills. One of Stein’s many
concerns was how he would
determine the costs of these customized jobs. He knew that the
process costing system used
for his current firm would not be suitable for his new venture.
This chapter discusses how to determine the costs of products
produced in a process cost
environment as well as products produced in a job cost
environment. Although we focus on
manufactured products, the concepts presented are applicable in
service organizations, as
was just indicated in the above vignette.
3.1 Overview of Job and Process Costing
A job cost system identifies costs with individual jobs or
products. A separate tracking of
costs is associated with each job or product. The costs
accumulated for a job in process can be
determined at any point in time by referring to the job order
cost sheet.
A process cost system identifies costs with individual
departments for an interval of time,
such as one month. Costs are not charged to specific units or
orders as work is performed,
but unit costs are based on costs incurred during a time period
and on the volume of output
during the same period. The unit cost of a final product will be
the sum of all costs allocated
to the product by each department that worked on it.
Several other characteristics distinguish job costing from
6. performed during the assembly process.
In a job cost environment, sales orders usually precede
production. Production is for a spe-
cific order. In a process cost environment, however, production
usually precedes sales. Goods
are produced for anticipated sales.
Materials, Labor, and Overhead Costs
A process cost environment will generally use materials that are
standard. In a job cost set-
ting, materials requirements are often unique to each job, and
sometimes even the types of
materials needed are unknown. Hence, process cost companies
usually have larger invento-
ries of materials.
Tasks in a process cost environment are generally routine. Less-
skilled labor is usually needed
than in a job cost environment, where workers need to perform a
greater variety of tasks
because of the different types of jobs. Automation is found
more often in process cost settings.
Therefore, the proportion of overhead cost in the total product
cost will generally be higher
than for job cost settings.
Focal Point for Cost Accumulation
In process cost systems, we identify materials, labor, and
overhead costs with specific depart-
ments or operating centers. This differs from job cost systems,
which identify costs with spe-
cific batches or customer orders. In this chapter, the term
department will be used as a generic
term and will cover the traditional concepts of department,
operating or work center, opera-
8. labor and factory overhead
costs for the operations can use a process cost system.
Figure 3.1: Comparison of job costing and process costing
PRODUCT SIMILARITY
Job costing Process costing
TIMING
MATERIALS
LABOR
OVERHEAD
COST IDENTIFICATION
Products/jobs differ from one
another
Products are all alike
Salesorders precede
production
Production precedes sales; goods
produced for anticipated sales
Unique materials for each
product/job
Standard materials for all products
Variety of tasks are preformed due
10. missions, and so forth may be produced where a job cost system
is used. In assembly, every
car, regardless of model, has the same assembly operations
performed. Therefore, the labor
and factory overhead costs of the assembly operations may be
accounted for using a process
cost system. Hybrid cost systems can involve various sequences
of job and process costing,
depending on the particular production process.
Operation costing is a term often used to refer to modified or
hybrid cost systems. Except in
the simplest of cases, pure job costing or process costing does
not exist. There is usually some
modification. Managers need to understand their own
organization’s cost system in order to
evaluate the cost information generated by that system. The
remainder of this chapter pro-
vides detailed discussions of job cost and process cost systems.
3.3 The Job Cost System
The job cost system accumulates separately the costs of
materials, labor, and overhead for
each job, whether a job of one unit or a job of many units.
Every job is assigned a number,
which is used for accumulating the costs of that job. Daily,
weekly, or monthly cost summaries
for each job are generated. These summaries are referred to as
job, work, or production
orders. The file of production orders in process constitutes a
subsidiary ledger in support of
the work in process account in the general ledger.
Whereas a job cost system accumulates costs by jobs, a process
cost system accumulates costs
by departments. This, and other differences, changes the
12. als are added in the first department or in subsequent
departments. Distinguishing between
direct materials and indirect materials is not considered critical
to obtain accurate unit costs.
Two major differences in accumulating materials costs between
the job cost system and the
process cost system should be noted. Materials costs are
identified first with departments
and then assigned to individual units in a process cost system.
Materials costs bypass depart-
ments and are charged directly to specific jobs in a job cost
system. In process costing, materi-
als costs are accumulated for a period of time and averaged over
all units receiving materials
during the period. This averaging of costs is broader in a
process cost system than in a job cost
system, where costs would be averaged only over the batch of
units comprising a particular
job.
Conversion Costs
Labor and overhead costs are incurred to convert materials into
a finished product; hence,
labor and overhead costs are called conversion costs. Because
labor and overhead often enter
the process at the same time, we combine them for illustrations
throughout the chapter. This
assumes that overhead is applied to production using direct
labor hours or dollars. Where
another cost driver is used, we separate the two cost elements.
Labor cost is measured monthly, by department, and without
identifying specific orders.
Labor time tickets may be used for payroll accounting, but are
not needed to measure the
14. ure 3.2.
Both the physical units and costs will be identified for the
fabricating operation over a period
of time, such as a month. When the inner components of the
phones are completed in the fab-
ricating operation, the units with their costs are transferred by
automated guided vehicles to
the next operation—in this case, the molding operation where
the casings are formed. Addi-
tional costs will be incurred and accounted for in the molding
operation. At the completion
of the molding operation, the units and accumulated costs of
preceding operations will be
transferred to the last operation in this example, the finishing
operation.
Figure 3.2: Flow of units and costs in a process manufacturing
system
Department B,
Molding
Operation
Department C,
Finishing
Operation
Finished Goods
Inventory
Cost of
Goods Sold
Department A,
16. Figure 3.3: Flow of units and costs for subassembly components
Department B,
Molding
Operation
Department C,
Finishing
Operation
Finished Goods
Inventory
Cost of
Goods Sold
Department A,
Fabricating
Operation
Department X,
Soldering
Operation
Transfer units and
costs to Dept. C.
Department W,
Forming
Operation
Start units.
Add costs.
17. Transfer units and
costs to Dept. B.
Add Dept. B
costs.
Start subassembly
units and costs.
Transfer units and
costs to Dept. X.
Add Dept. X
costs.
Transfer units and
costs to Dept. C.
Add Dept. C
costs.
Transfer units and
costs to Finished
Goods Inventory.
Record the cost
of goods sold.
Main Production Line Subassembly Production Line
Because costs need to be identified with departments, a process
cost system normally involves
accounting transfers between departmental work in process
inventory accounts. Each depart-
ment has its own work in process account; when goods are
completed in one department,
19. the units are wholly or par-
tially completed. The mechanism for tracing costs to units is a
unit cost.
Unit Costs
When calculating unit costs, we typically think of a formula
similar to the following:
Unit cost =
Total costs
Units produced or work done
Applying this formula to the typical process cost situation is
complicated by two major fac-
tors: (1) the stage of completion of units in work in process
inventories, and (2) the different
points in time that materials and conversion costs enter a
departmental process. We will dis-
cuss point (2) in more detail later in the chapter.
The number of units completed is not a good measure for
determining an appropriate unit
cost when there are partially completed units in beginning or
ending inventories. Conse-
quently, an equivalent unit must be identified. Equivalent units
represent the theoretical
number of units that could have been produced had the
resources been applied to units that
were started and completed during the period. We can also think
of equivalent units as rep-
resenting the actual work done on the physical units. For
instance, two physical units 50%
complete represent the equivalent of one unit 100% complete.
Flow of Physical Units
21. 105
Section 3.5 The Equivalent Unit Concept
Stage of Completion
In a process cost system, the units in the beginning and ending
inventories are usually at
different stages of completion. The stage of completion is the
average percentage of work
completed on a unit of product at any point in time. For a
department, it is useful to identify
three distinct groupings of products when computing equivalent
units:
1. Partially completed units in the beginning inventory that are
completed during the
current period. The work to complete these units is represented
by 100% less the
stage of completion when the period started. We generally
assume a first-in, first-out
flow, which will be explained in more detail later in this
chapter.
2. Units started and completed during the period. The work
completed is represented
by 100%.
3. Partially completed units at the end of the period. The work
completed is represented
by the percentage of completion at the end of the period.
When all three of these groups are summed, the result is
equivalent units of output for this
time period—the work done by the workers in this department.
This is the number of units
that could have been produced if all production were started and
22. completed during the
period, assuming no beginning or ending work in process
inventories.
For example, the Norwich Post Office has a sorting department.
On March 1, 15,000 units
were in process and were 60% completed. During March, the
department started work on
200,000 units. On March 31, 20,000 units were in process and
were 30% completed. From
our flow of physical units formula, we calculate the number of
units completed as follows:
Figure 3.4: Relationship among physical units within a
department
Units Completed and Transferred Out
Units in beginning
work in process
inventory
Units started and completed
during the period
Units in ending
work in process
inventory
Units Started During the Period
24. Units completed and transferred 195,000
− Units in beginning inventory (15,000)
Units started and completed 180,000
Units started during period 200,000
– Units in ending inventory (20,000)
Units started and completed 180,000
We now have the three groups of units and their stages of
completion, which are necessary to
find the number of equivalent units. The calculation for the
equivalent units of output for the
period is as follows:
Timing of Inputs
Materials, labor, and overhead are the inputs to the production
process. These inputs may
enter at different points during the process. The most common
situation is for materials to
enter at the beginning of a departmental process and for labor
and overhead to be added
continuously throughout the process. Consequently, it is
possible for some units in process to
have all of their materials added but only part of the labor and
overhead. In other processes,
the materials may be added continuously or at the end of the
process. For our purposes,
unless otherwise stated, presume that materials are added at the
beginning of the process,
and labor and overhead enter the process together and are added
continuously or evenly
throughout the process.
26. The last step checks whether the four previous steps were
completed accurately. This step veri-
fies that the total costs distributed to the units equal the total
costs charged to the department.
Each of these steps will be presented in detail as part of
developing a cost of production report.
We assume a first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method in
progressing through the five compu-
tational steps. The beginning inventory is completed before new
units are completed. Costs
incurred flow in the same manner. Most companies using
process costing use the FIFO cost
method. Another frequently used method, the weighted average
cost method, is discussed
later in this chapter.
Under FIFO, the older units and costs are transferred out first,
and the more current units
and costs are transferred out next. Only the most recent costs
are held as ending inventory.
With the FIFO cost method, the equivalent units of output are
literally the units that could
have been completed if all efforts during the period were
devoted to starting and completing
units, allowing no partially completed units. Usually, however,
some units will be in a stage
of partial completion at both the beginning and at the end of the
month. The beginning work
in process units are completed during the month, and a start has
been made on the units in
ending work in process.
To illustrate the computational steps, consider the current plant
of Shirts Unlimited. Sweat-
28. Total units 16,000
Work in process, May 1:
Units 4,000
Stage of completion:
Materials 100%
Conversion costs 40%
Costs:
Materials $400,000
Conversion costs 80,000
Beginning inventory total cost $480,000
Units started 12,000
Units completed and transferred 14,000
Current period costs:
Materials $1,200,000
Conversion costs 650,000
Total costs added $1,850,000
Work in process, May 31:
Units 2,000
30. May’s work in ending inventory:
2,000 × 100% 2,000
2,000 × 30% 600
Equivalent units (work done during May) 12,000 13,000
Materials Conversion Total
Beginning inventory $400,000 $80,000 $480,000
May’s costs 1,200,000 650,000 1,850,000
Total costs $1,600,000 $730,000 $2,330,000
Note that in deriving the 2,400 equivalent units to complete the
beginning inventory for con-
version costs, we multiply the 4,000 physical units by 60%
(100% – 40%) because the units
were already 40% complete and another 60% of work is needed
in the current period to
complete those units.
Step 3: Compute Unit Costs. We begin this step by itemizing
the costs for which the Cutting
Department will be held accountable.
The unit costs for materials and conversion costs are calculated
from the current month’s
costs and equivalent units. Last month’s costs and equivalent
units of work are included in
the beginning inventory amount and will be treated separately.
Using May’s costs and the
equivalent units from above, the costs for May are divided by
the equivalent units for May to
32. occur very often.
Step 4: Distribute Total Costs to Units. We next show the
distribution of costs to units using
the unit costs and equivalent units derived earlier.
Costs Accounted for: Materials Conversion Total
Completed and transferred to Sewing:
Work in Process, May 1:
Prior period costs $400,000 $80,000 $480,000
May:
Equivalent units 0 2,400
Times costs per unit $100 $50
Costs $0 $120,000 $120,000
Completed cost of beginning inventory $400,000 $200,000
$600,000
Started and Completed:
Units 10,000 10,000
Times cost per unit $100 $50
Costs $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,500,000
Total cost of completed and transferred units $1,400,000
$700,000 $2,100,000
34. assigned to units completed
and units in ending inventory. If rounding errors occur, it is
customary to adjust the costs
assigned to units completed to compensate for the rounding
error.
Step 5: Reconcile the Costs. This final step in the computational
process is really a check to
ensure that all department costs are charged to units completed
and units in the ending inven-
tory. As shown in Step 3, the total costs charged to the Cutting
Department are $2,330,000.
After distributing the costs to the units completed and units in
the ending inventory, the sum
should also equal $2,330,000. This is confirmed by the total
costs accounted for in Step 4.
This check shows that materials and conversion costs charged to
the department have indeed
been distributed to all units.
3.6 Cost of Production Report
The five computational steps provide all of the calculations
needed to prepare a cost of pro-
duction report for May. This report, which presents information
about units, costs charged
to the department, and how the costs are accounted for, is
shown in Figure 3.5.
In T-account form, the transactions reflected in the cost of
production report would be sum-
marized as shown in Figure 3.6.
We use the same procedures to determine costs for subsequent
departments in the process-
ing operation. In departments after the first, however, unit costs
must be combined with the
36. Physical
Units
4,000
Shirts Unlimited
Cutting Department
Cost of Production Report for the Month of May
Materials Equivalent
Units
Conversion Equivalent
UnitsUnits:
Beginning work in process:
Prior Month
4,000 × 100%
4,000 × 40%
May’s work:
4,000 × (100% – 100%)
4,000 × (100% – 40%)
Units started and completed:
37. 10,000 × 100%
Ending work in process
2,000 × 100%
2,000 × 30%
Total units
Equivalent units of output
10,000
2,000
16,000
$ 400,000
4,000
$ 100
$1,200,000
12,000
$ 100
$1,600,000
4,000
10,000
39. Beginning work in process:
Costs
Divided by equivalent units
Cost per unit
May’s production:
Costs
Divided by equivalent units
Cost per unit
Total costs charged
0 2,400
Costs Accounted for:
Completed and transferred to Sewing:
Prior period costs
May: Equivalent units
Times cost per unit
Costs
Completed cost of beginning
inventory
40. Started and completed:
Units
Times cost per unit
Costs
Total cost of completed and transferred units
Work in process, May 31:
Equivalent units
Times cost per unit
Costs
Total costs accounted for
$ 400,000
0
$ 100
$ 0
$ 400,000
10,000
$ 100
$1,000,000
43. show trends. Here certain
questions arise. Are inventories bouncing around, or are they
stable? Why? Why are unit
costs steadily moving up, or why are they erratic? Are we
changing the mix of workers as
reflected in labor cost changes? These and many other questions
help managers understand
their working environment and the company’s focus much
better.
Ethical Considerations
As with all financial reports, production reports can easily be
manipulated. Estimating the
stage of completion of the work in process is an area
particularly susceptible to manipulation
by production managers. These estimates are very subjective.
Two reasons explain why man-
agers might be motivated to overestimate the stage of
completion. First is pressure to meet
production quotas of units or equivalent units produced. A
second reason relates to minimiz-
ing unit costs. A higher estimate for the degree of completion of
the work in process inventory
results in a greater number of equivalent units of output for the
period. This, in turn, gener-
ates a lower cost per equivalent unit. Notice, however, that any
overestimate in one period
results in an opposite impact in the following period.
Management accountants, nevertheless,
need to be aware that temptations to overestimate the stage of
completion may exist.
Beg. Inventory
Materials
44. Conversion
End. Inventory
480,000
1,200,000
650,000
230,000
Completed 2,100,000 Transferred in 2,100,000
Work in Process — Cutting Work in Process — Sewing
Figure 3.6: Flow of cost from Cutting Department to Sewing
Department
Contemporary Practice 3.1: Process Costing
at a Consumer Packaged Goods Company
A journal article describes process costing at a consumer
packaged goods company as
follows: “Production volume that’s in process at the end of the
reporting period is estimated
based on the standard cost per unit multiplied by a percentage-
complete standard. A study
is conducted periodically that analyzes the level of work-in-
process over time. Results
indicate that work-in-process tends to be, on average, 75%
complete. The company uses this
percentage (75%) of the inputs placed into production for the
period as the volume standard
to apply to work-in-process inventory for reporting purposes.”
(Dosch & Wilson, 2010, p. 43)
46. have fairly uniform amounts of
beginning and ending work in process inventories. Thus, work
done during the period will be
approximately equal to the number of units completed during
the period.
In addition, little need exists to transfer costs from one
department to the next. The costs of
the period can be recorded directly to the cost of goods sold
account. Process costs per unit
can still be computed, but on a daily or weekly basis. The unit
costs will be calculated using
units produced, rather than equivalent units. Further aspects of
JIT product costing are dis-
cussed in Chapter 4.
In JIT factories, certain departments remain idle until their
outputs are needed by the next
department. This may cause a particular department to appear
inefficient in one period and
very efficient in another. Therefore, evaluations of managers
and costs in JIT plants need to
consider the flow of production and who controls decisions of
what and when to produce.
Many managers believe that a system truly operating under JIT
will have no inventories and,
therefore, no need for a process cost system. Because the
process flow time is not zero, some
items are always in production in a partially completed stage.
Process costing becomes greatly
simplified in such a setting, but it is not eliminated.
3.8 Weighted Average Cost Method
An alternative to the first-in, first-out cost method for
calculating equivalent units is the
48. simplicity. One can argue that a
process which produces identical or similar units should
generate the same unit costs from
one month to the next. In addition, if beginning and ending
inventories do not differ signifi-
cantly from period to period, the costs per unit are relatively
stable. However, the weighted
average method commingles costs and production efforts of two
time periods. The resulting
product costs do not match production management’s measures
of inputs and outputs. Thus,
many managers view the extra effort for FIFO as worthwhile.
Weighted Average Computational Steps
We apply the same computational steps to the weighted average
cost method that we used
for the FIFO cost method. A slight difference occurs in the
“Costs Accounted for” section of the
cost of production report. In this section, costs are distributed to
units completed and units in
the ending inventory. The weighted average cost method will
usually have different unit costs
from FIFO.
We continue the example of Shirts Unlimited that we explored
earlier in the chapter. For the
Cutting Department, we prepared the cost of production report
using the FIFO cost method.
Now, we apply the weighted average cost method to the data.
Step 1: Determine Flow of Physical Units. Determining the flow
of physical units for a
department is the same as for the FIFO method:
Units in beginning work in process 4,000
50. 116
Section 3.8 Weighted Average Cost Method
Step 3: Compute Unit Costs. The unit costs for materials and
conversion costs are calculated
from the total costs and the equivalent units. The costs for
which the Cutting Department will
be held accountable are:
Costs Charged to Dept. Materials Conversion Total
Beginning inventory $400,000 $80,000 $480,000
Current month 1,200,000 650,000 1,850,000
Total costs $1,600,000 $730,000 $2,330,000
We calculate unit costs by using the equivalent units from
above and dividing them into the
total costs:
Unit Costs for May:
Unit cost for materials = $1,600,000 / 16,000 = $100
Unit cost for conversion = $730,000 / 14,600 = $50
These unit costs are identical to those calculated using the FIFO
cost method because April’s
unit costs were the same as those for May. Usually, some
difference will occur in the numbers,
but generally not a significant one.
52. 117
Section 3.8 Weighted Average Cost Method
Cost of Production Report
The five computational steps provide all of the calculations
needed to prepare a cost of pro-
duction report for May. The report prepared under the weighted
average cost method appears
in Figure 3.7.
Figure 3.7: Cost of production report for Cutting Department
(weighted
average method)
Physical
Units
Shirts Unlimited
Cutting Department
Cost of Production Report for the Month of May
Material Equivalent
Units
Conversion Equivalent
UnitsUnits:
Units completed:
53. 14,000 × 100%
Ending work in process:
2,000 × 100%
2,000 × 30%
Total units
Equivalent units of work to date
14,000
2,000
16,000
14,000
2,000
16,000
14,000
600
14,600
Materials Conversion Total
Materials Conversion Total
Prior period cost
54. Current month costs
Total per unit
Divided by equivalent units
Cost per unit
$ 400,000
1,200,000
$1,600,000
16,000
$ 100
$ 80,000
650,000
$730,000
14,600
$ 50
$ 480,000
1,850,000
$2,330,000
Costs Charged to Department:
55. Costs Accounted for:
Completed and transferred to Sewing:
Units
Times cost per unit
Costs
Work in process, May 31:
Equivalent units
Times cost per unit
Costs
Total costs accounted for
14,000
$ 100
$1,400,000
2,000
$ 100
$ 200,000
$1,600,000
$2,100,000
58. resale or redistribution.
119
Summary & Resources
cost of production report A report that
presents information about units, costs
charged to the department, and how the
costs are accounted for.
equivalent units The theoretical number of
units that could have been produced had the
resources been applied to units that were
started and completed during the period.
first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method A
process costing method that presumes the
beginning inventory is completed before
new units are completed.
hybrid cost system One type of cost system
is used for one phase of the production
process, and another system is used for a
subsequent phase.
job cost system A cost system that sepa-
rately tracks costs associated with each job
or product.
job order A cost summary for each job.
just-in-time (JIT) philosophy An inven-
tory management approach that seeks to
60. 120
Summary & Resources
Problem for Review
Irene Carol Fisheries raises cutthroat trout for local restaurants
and uses a FIFO process cost
system. The fish represent materials. The process involves three
ponds: raising, growing, and
fattening. Fingerlings are grown after hatching in the raising
pond. At a specified point, the
fingerlings are moved to the growing pond, where they mature.
After maturing, the fish are
transferred to the fattening pond. The growing pond had 5,000
fingerlings on April 1 that
were 10% complete for the growing pond. During the month, an
additional 30,000 fingerlings
were put into the pond. By the end of April, 28,000 fish had
been moved to the fattening pond.
The fingerlings remaining in the growing pond were 30%
complete.
Questions:
1. Determine the equivalent units for fingerlings.
2. Determine the equivalent units for conversion costs.
Solution
61. :
1. Equivalent units for fingerlings:
Physical flow:
Beginning inventory 5,000
Add units started during month 30,000
Available 35,000
Minus units completed (28,000)
Ending inventory 7,000
Started and completed:
Units completed 28,000
Minus beginning inventory (5,000)
Units started and completed 23,000
or
63. Summary & Resources
2. Equivalent units for conversion costs:
To complete beginning inventory: 5,000 × (100% − 10%) 4,500
Units started and complete: 23,000 × 100% 23,000
Ending inventory: 7,000 × 30% 2,100
Equivalent units 29,600
Questions for Review and Discussion
1. Distinguish between a job cost system and a process cost
system as to the timing of
sales versus production.
2. What is the focal point for cost accumulation in a process
cost system?
3. Distinguish between a modified cost system and a hybrid cost
system.
4. What is the purpose of a job, work, or production order?
5. List the five computational steps necessary to account for
64. costs in a process cost
system.
6. Explain how equivalent units are computed under the FIFO
method of process
costing.
7. How are the unit costs computed under the FIFO method of
process costing?
8. Why are equivalent units for materials usually different from
equivalent units for
conversion costs?
9. What accounting report is the major document for a process
cost system?
10. How can one check to ensure that cost distribution to
completed units and ending
inventory has been done properly?
11. How can management use a cost of production report?
12. Which aspect of determining unit costs in a process cost
system is particularly sus-
ceptible to manipulation by production managers?
65. 13. Explain how a just-in-time environment can simplify a
process cost system.
14. What is the distinction between equivalent units under the
FIFO method and equiva-
lent units under the weighted average method?
15. Under what circumstances will both FIFO and weighted
average yield the same
equivalent units?
16. On a cost of production report, the costs of units completed
and transferred out are
treated one way under the FIFO method and a different way
under the weighted
average method. Explain this difference.
Exercises
3-1. Physical Flow. Rolnick’s Protective Coating Service
specializes in providing
protective coating for eyeglasses. The company’s work in
process inventory in
Operation 1 on July 1 was 2,500 units. During July, 72,000
units were completed
67. Cleaners uses a FIFO
process cost system. Its work in process on December 1
consisted of 8,000 gar-
ments, which were 20% complete; $12,800 in processing costs
were incurred last
month for these garments.
During December, 82,000 garments were started and 78,000
were completed. Pro-
cessing costs during December amounted to $245,225. The
ending work in process
was 80% complete.
Question:
Determine the cost of the finished garments and the cost of the
ending work in process.
3-3. Cost of Completed Units. Blair Products of Wellington,
New Zealand, produces a
kiwi fruit drink and uses a FIFO process cost system. The units
and equivalent units
(in liters), as well as unit costs, for the Initial Mix Department
are as follows:
69. 123
Summary & Resources
3-4. Conversion Costs. The Fabrication Department is the first
stage of Hiller Company’s
production process. Conversion costs in beginning work in
process for this depart-
ment were 70% complete, and in the ending work in process
they were 40% com-
plete. Hiller Company uses a FIFO process cost system.
Conversion costs data in the
Fabrication Department for January are as follows:
Units
Conversion
Costs
Work in process at January 1 28,000 $ 51,000
Units started and costs incurred during January 153,000
$293,000
70. Units completed and transferred to next department during
January 131,000
Questions:
1. What was the conversion cost of work in process in the
Fabrication Department at
January 31?
2. What were the conversion costs per equivalent unit last
month and this month,
respectively?
3-5. Distribution of Total Cost and Ethics. There were 5,000
units in process in the
Cutting Department of Grossman & Marcus, Inc., at the
beginning of February. These
units had materials and conversion costs of $48,000 and were
60% complete for
conversion costs. Materials are added at the beginning of the
process. During Febru-
ary, 60,000 units were started. The ending inventory for the
month totaled 8,000
units, 25% complete for conversion costs. The unit cost
71. calculation shows $4 for
materials and $8 for conversion costs. A FIFO process cost
system is used.
Questions:
1. Compute the cost of units completed and transferred to the
next department.
2. Compute the cost of units in the ending inventory for the
month.
3. Why might the production manager wish to inflate the
estimate of the degree of
completion of the ending inventory from 25% to 50%? Support
your answer with
computations.
3-6. Unit Costs in a Bank. Chittenden Bank of Columbus, Ohio,
processes checks in its
Check Clearing Department. No materials costs are incurred in
this department. On
June 1, 4,000 checks in process were 25% complete with an
associated processing
cost of $200. During June, 100,000 checks were started in
process. By the end of June,
73. process that were 25%
complete for conversion costs. Materials (a coating) are added
at the end of the
process. The cost of the beginning work in process was $1,800.
July conversion costs
were $36,000, and the materials costs were $17,000. Koniver
Products started and
completed 60,000 units in July. The work in process inventory
on July 31 of 10,000
units was 60% complete.
Questions:
1. What was the total cost of work transferred to the finished
goods inventory in July?
2. Determine the cost of work in process inventory on July 31.
3-8. Equivalent Units—FIFO and Weighted Average.
Schroeder’s Photo Lab began the
month with 6,000 items in inventory, which averaged 50%
complete for materials
and 40% complete for conversion costs. At the end of the
month, there were 7,000
items in inventory, which averaged 60% complete for materials
and 30% complete
74. for conversion costs. During the month, 65,000 items were
completed.
Questions:
1. Using the FIFO method, determine the appropriate numbers
of equivalent units
needed to compute unit costs for materials and for conversion
costs.
2. Using the weighted average method, determine the
appropriate numbers of equiva-
lent units needed to compute unit costs for materials and for
conversion costs.
3-9. Conversion Costs—Weighted Average Cost Method. Abe’s
Vineyards grows
grapes; after sorting and crating them, it sells the crates of
grapes to Madelyn’s Win-
ery. On December 1, Abe’s Vineyards had 10,000 pounds of
grapes that were 40%
complete for conversion costs. The conversion costs in the
beginning work in pro-
cess inventory were $20,000. In December, 150,000 pounds of
grapes were started
76. beginning and end
of the year as follows:
Percentage of Completion
Direct Materials Processing Costs
January 1 – 3,000 pounds 40% 10%
December 31 – 2,000 pounds 80% 40%
The company completed 41,000 pounds of finished products
during the year.
Costs incurred during the year were: direct materials, $242,600;
processing costs,
$456,200. Work in process at January 1 was carried at a cost of
$16,600 (direct
materials, $13,000; processing costs, $8,900).
Questions:
1. Compute the cost of ending work in process using the
weighted average method.
2. Compute the cost of finished products using the weighted
average method.
77. 3-11. Total Costs—FIFO and Weighted Average. Lefkove, Inc.
manufactures staplers.
Materials are added at the beginning of the process; conversion
costs are incurred
uniformly. Beginning work in process consisted of 6,000
staplers. These units were
65% complete. During the period, the company began working
on an additional
87,000 staplers, and finished the period with 9,000 staplers that
were 30% com-
plete in ending work in process.
Costs attached to beginning inventory were $7,500 for
materials and $9,500 for
conversion costs. Costs added during the period were $74,000
for materials and
$22,000 for conversion.
Questions:
1. Compute the cost of finished products and the cost of ending
work in process using
the FIFO method.
79. information from his accountant:
Equivalent units for the weighted average method 4,780
Equivalent units for FIFO method 5,000
Costs in beginning work in process $800
Question:
Compute the unit cost for the weighted average method.
Problems
3-13. Cost of Production Report. McKemie Robotics, a
subsidiary of U.S.-based Kutner
Robotics located in Dublin, Ireland, manufactures a small robot
that looks like a
leprechaun and can be moved by remote control. It can be used
as a novelty to serve
food and drinks to guests; and, with a special attachment, it can
vacuum the carpet.
The materials are all added at the beginning of the Assembly
Operation (the first
80. operation). Labor and overhead are added during the month.
Data for the month of
July in the Assembly Operation are as follows:
Units
Work in process, July 1 35,000
Units started in process 250,000
Costs
(in U.S. Dollars)
Work in process, July 1:
Materials $240,000
Labor and overhead 80,000
July costs:
Materials $3,500,000
Labor and overhead 1,457,280
82. Municipality uses a FIFO
process cost system to compute water purification costs. All
materials (chemicals)
are added at the beginning of the purification process. Data for
the month of May are
given as follows (units are kiloliters of water):
Units
Work in process, May 1 5,000
Units started in process 120,000
Costs
Work in process, May 1:
Materials $15,000
Labor and overhead 2,500
May’s costs:
Materials $360,000
84. 128
Summary & Resources
3-15. Explanations About a Cost of Production Report. Daniel
S. Tryker’s Painting Ser-
vice receives a continuous flow of clear light bulbs from
various manufacturers who
want their bulbs painted—typically yellow or black. A partial
production report,
using FIFO, for the month of May is as follows for Department
1 (units are packages
of eight bulbs):
Physical Units:
Work in process, May 1 (40% complete) 500
Started and completed 1,700
Work in process, May 31 (50% complete) 300
Total units 2,500
85. Costs Charged to Department:
Work in process, May 1 $ 800.00
Production costs, May 9,020.00
Total costs charged $9,820.00
Costs Accounted for:
Transferred to Department 2:
Work in process, May 1 $ 800.00
Cost to complete work in process, May 1 1,258.60
Started and completed 7,132.09
$9,190.69
Work in process, May 31 629.30
Total costs accounted for $9,819.99*
87. Summary & Resources
3-16. Cost of Production Report—Several Months. David Jared
Industries is a bottling
company that purchases orange juice from growers in Florida
and bottles the juice
in one-gallon plastic containers for sale to grocery stores. Only
in its second year
of operations, the company’s accounting system is evolving and
has not been fully
formalized. A chief accountant, Alan Neal, has been hired to
bring order to the paper
shuffling. In the process, Neal has gathered data to prepare
FIFO cost of produc-
tion reports for Activity Center A for the first three months of
the current fiscal year
(April, May, and June). This information is as follows:
April May June
Gallons:
Beginning inventory 10,000 ? ?
Started in production 80,000 65,000 70,000
90. Summary & Resources
3-17. Analysis of a Work in Process Account. Garber
Pharmaceutical Company manu-
factures a tablet for allergy sufferers and uses a FIFO process
cost system. All
ingredients are added at the beginning of the Blending
Operation. Conversion costs
flow uniformly throughout the process. Tableting and Coating
are operations down-
stream from Blending. Information on the Blending Operation
for October is as
follows:
Work in Process – Blending Operation
October 1, balance (100,000 units,
40% complete for conversion costs)
$ 151,760 Completed and transferred to
Tableting:
Direct materials added (1,000,000 units) $1,310,000 Units – ?
91. Direct labor costs ? Costs – ?
Factory overhead (applied at 180%
of direct labor cost)
$396,000
October 31, balance (200,000 units,
70% complete for conversion costs)
?
The October 1 balance consists of the following cost elements:
Direct materials $128,000
Direct labor 8,800
Factory overhead 14,960
Total costs $151,760
Questions:
1. Compute the amount of direct labor cost for the period.
93. 131
Summary & Resources
Work in process, May 1:
Units (claims) 3,200
Conversion costs (10% complete) $6,900
Units (claims) started in May 13,500
May’s conversion costs $285,000
Work in process, May 31:
Units (claims) 1,900
Stage of completion for conversion costs 60%
Questions:
94. 1. Using the FIFO method, compute the cost of the May 31 work
in process.
2. Using the weighted average method, compute the cost of the
May 31 work in process.
3-19. Finished Goods and Work in Process Costs—Weighted
Average. The following
information is available for the Assembly Department of
Lerman Enterprises for
August:
Units Costs
Work in process, August 1 (70% complete) 5,000
Direct materials $ 6,000
Direct labor 3,000
Manufacturing overhead 4,000
Total work in process, August 1 $13,000
Started in production during August 20,000
96. 132
Summary & Resources
3-20. Work in Process—FIFO and Weighted Average. The
Division of Corporate Taxa-
tion processes corporate tax returns for a state located in the
northeastern United
States. Processing costs for this agency were 70% complete as
to the beginning work
in process and 60% complete as to the ending work in process.
Information on pro-
cessing costs for the month of August is as follows:
Number of
Returns
Processing
Costs
Work in process at August 1 8,000 $ 95,000
97. Returns started and costs incurred during August 45,000
$666,000
Returns completed during August 49,000
Questions:
1. Using the FIFO method, what amount of processing cost was
in work in process at
August 31?
2. Using the weighted average method, what amount of
processing cost was in work in
process at August 31?
3-21. Cost of Finished Units—FIFO and Weighted Average. The
Department of Motor
Vehicles processes auto tag applications. All materials costs
(i.e., tags) are completed
when processing begins. The following information was
obtained by the controller,
Arthur Kurtz, for October:
The October 1 work in process had 5,000 applications (40%
completed) and the fol-
98. lowing costs:
Direct materials $2,700
Direct labor 16,880
Overhead 31,400
During October, 11,000 applications were completed, and the
following costs were incurred:
Direct materials $5,200
Direct labor 95,775
Overhead 159,925
On October 31, there were 2,400 partially processed
applications on hand (80% completed).
Questions:
1. Using the FIFO method, determine the cost of completed
applications.
2. Using the weighted average method, determine the cost of
100. partially empty. Over certain segments, the line moves faster
than elsewhere as more product
is placed in and taken out. The line carries various products,
including crude oil of varying
weights, home heating oil, and numerous other petroleum
products.
As a transportation company, Wyncote Pipelines does not own
the products transported.
Instead, it is paid a fee for its services based on moving 10,000
barrels (420,000 gallons) of
product one mile. The variable cost of running the line is for the
30 pumping stations along
the line: the higher the traffic, the higher the fuel cost for
pumping. The other cost of running
the line is overhead cost, which relates to line maintenance. One
unit is considered to be
moving 10,000 barrels of product one mile.
On April 1, the Corpus Christi to Kansas City line had 1.44
million units in process (18 million
barrels that were to be transported an average of 800 miles),
which were 60% complete.
During the month, the line completed 12 million units of
delivered product and had ending
101. units in process of two million units (20 million barrels to be
transported 1,000 miles) that
were 40% complete. The beginning units in transit had
accumulated costs of $8,800,000,
of which $2,400,000 were variable costs. During the month, the
Corpus Christi to Kansas
City line had $33,420,800 in variable costs and $81,168,800 in
fixed costs. The completed
deliveries were billed at $134,400,000 for services.
Questions:
1. What is the nature of the costs incurred as to direct materials,
direct labor, and
variable or fixed overhead?
2. Why should this application be considered for a modified
process cost system?
3. Compute the equivalent units of production for the Corpus
Christi to Kansas City
line. (Round to four places, if needed.)
4. Compute a cost per unit of output for variable and fixed
costs.
5. What were the profits before administrative expenses and
taxes during April?
103. /
First Solar Preview: Manufacturing Costs,
Project Order Book In The Spotlight
Great Speculations
Opinions expressed by Forbes Contributors are their own.
Trefis Team , Contributor
First Solar, one of the world’s largest solar panel manufacturers
and project
developers, is expected to release its fourth quarter 2013 results
on February 25.
During Q3 2013, the company’s revenues stood at around $1.26
billion, up by
around 50% year-over-year, while operating income nearly
doubled to around $207
million. For the fourth quarter, we expect the company’s
earnings to be influenced
by revenue recognition on its Desert Sunlight project as well its
104. improving
manufacturing efficiencies. Here is an overview of what to
expect and some of the
factors we will be tracking when the company reports.
See Our Complete Analysis For Solar Stocks First Solar |
SunPower |
Yingli |Trina Solar
Desert Sunlight Project Will Power Results, Watching For New
Project
Orders
First Solar's project business now accounts for over 80% of the
company’s revenues.
For this quarter, we expect the 550 megawatt Desert Sunlight
project, which the
company is building in California, to contribute significantly to
revenues and
margins. While the company has been executing its existing
project orders relatively
smoothly, we will be watching its progress in improving its new
order book. At the
end of the third quarter, the company’s total outstanding
bookings stood at around
105. 2.7 gigawatts, while bookings in terms of expected revenues
were about $7.8 billion
(including contracted module sales), which is slightly below the
December 2012
value. However, the company has indicated that it has potential
project
opportunities to the tune of 7.7 GW, of which around 1.4 GW of
the opportunities
https://www.forbes.com/investing
https://www.forbes.com/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/people/trefis/
http://finapps.forbes.com/finapps/jsp/finance/compinfo/CIAtAG
lance.jsp?tkr=fslr&tab=searchtabquotesdark
https://www.trefis.com/company?hm=FSLR.trefis
http://finapps.forbes.com/finapps/jsp/finance/compinfo/CIAtAG
lance.jsp?tkr=spwr&tab=searchtabquotesdark
http://finapps.forbes.com/finapps/jsp/finance/compinfo/CIAtAG
lance.jsp?tkr=yge&tab=searchtabquotesdark
https://www.trefis.com/company?hm=YGE.trefis
http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/FSLR/2952337849x0x70
2079/3a7826e0-e577-4c41-8391-
1cffc05c3abb/Q313_Earnings_Call_Presentation_FINAL.pdf
http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/
106. 2/14/2018 First Solar Preview: Manufacturing Costs, Project
Order Book In The Spotlight
https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2014/02/24/first
-solar-preview-manufacturing-costs-project-order-book-in-the-
spotlight/#635b41381f20 2/2
are in the mid to late stages. We will be watching the
company’s progress in
converting these leads into project orders.
Panels Manufacturing Costs And Efficiencies
Although First Solar’s standalone panel sales remain small
when compared to its
systems sales , the company’s panel technology is an important
factor in driving its
competitiveness in the solar power systems business. Over the
third quarter, the
company took some significant strides in reducing its core panel
manufacturing
costs (excluding freight, recycling and warranty charges) by
around 12% sequentially
107. to $0.49 per watt, which is the lowest in the solar industry. The
company also
increased the conversion efficiency of its panels by around 30
basis points to about
13.3%, while the efficiency for its lead production line touched
13.9%. For this
quarter, we will be watching the company’s progress in bringing
down its
manufacturing costs further and also its progress in replicating
its lead line
conversion efficiency gains across its other production lines.
Trefis will be updating its model and price estimate for First
Solar following the
earnings release.
See More at Trefis | View Interactive S&P Capital IQ Analyses
(Powered by
Trefis)
Like our charts? Embed them in your own posts using the Trefis
WordPress
Plugin.
https://www.trefis.com/company?hm=FSLR.trefis