College Athletics Are Great For Many Reasons

College Athletics Are Great For Many Reasons
College athletics are great for many reasons. Not only does is it give young men and women the
opportunity to play the sport they love, it markets colleges and universities very well. Some athlete's
ways of getting out of struggles back home is through their sport, and for most sports, before they
step on a professional field, they have to play in college first. Although college athletics have many
great aspects about it, there also negative features that highlight college athletics. In recent years, the
payment of college athletes, and if it should happen or not, is a hot topic. College athletes are
looking for compensation from his or her college or university, for the revenue him or her make for
the school. I believe that college athletes should in fact be paid, but most importantly be unionized
by the NCAA. For the NCAA to grow the next best thing is recognizing their athletes as employees.
Every school is different from its revenue stream in athletics, but once athletes are seen as
employees of the school, the deliberations between the athletes and head school officials can begin.
Each year that goes by that the NCAA has yet to unionize college athletes, as well as find a way to
compensate them, college athletics become more controversial and problematic. Currently in present
day, the NCAA sees all of its athletes as "amateur athletes", meaning they are not allowed to receive
compensation for their sport. Even though that TV deals between NCAA conferences and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

College Facilites for Division III Athletics Essay
Division III athletics have become more then high school athletes holding onto a dream and
competing at the non–scholarship level of the National collegiate athletic association. From 2004 to
2012 the average cost of having a division III athletics program has gone up 200% (Fulks, 2013).
From 2004 until 2012 the average cost per athlete has also gone up, from $3,500 to $5,800. This
money does not even touch the levels that are being spent in Division I, but Division III athletics are
on an upward trend of spending. The commitment to athletics in Division III has lead to money
being spent on new sports and recreation facilities. So much so that it's been put to question if there
is an "arms race" to who can build the biggest and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The point of facilities has been to give the "wow" factor to visiting prospects. In almost all cases the
facilities at a college will be better then the high school or junior college the student athlete is
coming from. It is also believed that having better facilities will directly correlate with recruiting
success, especially against rival colleges. The belief that new facilities bring in better recruits was
tested by the research into the subject. Although new facilities did attract more initial interest from
recruits (Schneider, 2012) the final decision about which school to attend came down to other
different factors. In the study of "The impact of Athletic Faculties on the Recruitment of Student
Athletes" college athletic prospects were asked why they choose the college they did. With factors
such as playing time, location, tradition, education, facilities, teammates, and school color to name a
few, the results were as follows. Non–Scholarship athletes that had no option to receive finical aid
from the school they planned on attending, like the ones in division III, had top five factors of 1)
playing time, 2) social life, 3) Education, 4) Location and 5) Financial Aid. Not until after the top
ten did weight room and locker rooms came into effect. In another study it was shown that
scholarship athletes in Division I were motivated by completion and achievement, while in division
III the main motivator to play was the "experience" or the social

College Athletes Are Being Consumed By The World Of...
Americans have become consumed by the world of college athletics. This excitement can be seen all
around us. Here at the University of Florida, we experience the energy of division I college sports
every day. Whether we choose to participate on football game days, wear Gator athletic apparel, or
make conversation every day revolving around topics such as "Tebow's non–existent NFL career" or
"that one basketball player that kept us out of the championship", the star athletes of our universities
become household names across the country. Although it seems to be a life of fame and fortune for
these individuals that live the life of a star student athlete, it comes at a cost. Today, college athletes
are exploited because of the lack of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This information was found in a study conducted by the National College Players Association
entitled "The Price of Poverty in Big Time College Sport" where it was found that 86% of players
were living below the federal poverty line. Meanwhile, the players are not earning the education that
will land them decent or high paying jobs if there may be the case of not going pro, or receiving an
injury making them ineligible to play. Legally, players are fighting for a more secure representation
and a better system of financial security. Next, although the opposing argument is that the athlete
receives a free education, this has shown to not always be true. With a "work week" longer than the
national average (43.3 hours) how can we say that they receive a free education? In fact, I would
argue that they are employees of the school they attend. Also, schools are not producing scholars,
they are producing a group of athletes that have about a 2% chance of getting drafted, and an even
larger group that either do not graduate, or end up dropping out of school do to an injury, stress, etc.
This is also the moment when the racial factor becomes an issue. In "Taboo: Why Black Athletes
Dominate Sports and Why We Are Afraid to Talk About It" written by Jon Entine, senior

The Negative Effects of Media on Sports in Usa
The Negative Effects of Media on Sports
I. Media and Sports Introduction A. John Wooden Quote B. The tendencies of the media THESIS:
The media must take significant strides towards reforming the way they portray sports to change the
current system of altering the ideals of athletes and diminishing the prestige of modern sports. II.
History of media in sports
III. Publication of shameful actions A. Celebrations B. Commercials C. XFL
IV. Multimedia A. Cable Networks B. League and team–owned channels C. Video Games D.
Fantasy sports
V. College and amateur athletics A. Teenage phenoms B. False views of success C. Antitrust Law D.
BCS bowls
VI. Sex and media A. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
During the transition into the new millennium, a number of factors including new technology, sports
personalities, and originality of new fans, led to the media destruction of modern sports. The media
changed professional and amateur athletics into businesses rather than into moralistic entertainment
while disgracefully exploiting higher education and individuals in the sporting world. The press has
also produced a new set of ideals and attitudes in the fans and players of popular sports (Torr
49).What began in the transition to the new millennium is now an ever–occurring phenomenon that
plagues the wide world of sports. While it is true that the media occasionally broadcasts stories of
unlikely successes and cordial charity, it consistently publicizes the most shameful and less copious
actions of certain athletes and leagues. One of the most prolific examples derives from the National
Football League, which has a substantial problem with regulating touchdown celebrations and
dances. Rather than help control the problem, the media feels the need to emphasize the celebrations
more so than the actual plays. Athletes have engaged in line dances, dice rolling, fake photo shoots,
air guitar playing, and many other imprudent dances and actions. The most notable occasions
(thanks to the media) include: Joe Horn removing a cell phone from the

The Difference Between College and High School Athletics
The Difference between High School and College Athletics When I was applying to college I talked
to the coach of the University of Central Oklahoma cheerleading squad in hopes that I could tryout
for the team. I thought that another commitment in addition to my school work would help to keep
me focused for the second semester. One thing that I didn't expect is the time and energy you need to
put aside to play a sport in college. In high school, playing a sport was a much easier task. College
sports are very competitive and the athletes playing for the college are the most talented in the
school division. I am not saying that I am not capable of cheerleading at a college level; more that it
would be a strenuous commitment for a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Conditioning and strength is also a huge difference between high school and college level sports.
You have to stay in peak physical shape to continue building your skills or you will regress. So if
you feel like slacking on some days, it becomes even more difficult. Furthermore, athletes who play
at the college level work out constantly. All college competitors have been focused and experienced
in their sport for quite a long time. Also, the commitment level has intensified in college sports.
Playing a sport in college is a year round commitment, not a seasonal one. The sport consumes you
and becomes your everyday life. If you are looking to have fun and work out here and there, a
serious college sport might not be the route to go. Lastly, all college athletes must be able to balance
academics and their sport. This requires a certain amount of maturity, experience, strength training,
and commitment. All and all, stepping up to a college level sport after playing in high school is quite
a leap. You have to be completely ready to do nothing else but that sport and maintain your

Allocating College Athletic Programs
In the state of Oklahoma, there have been multiple revenue failures since the beginning of the year
and nearly every public school has been forced to deal with mid–year funding cuts. In the face of all
this lost revenue, is it a reasonable solution to eliminate athletics as a cost–saving measure? This
financial issue is something that not only effects current students, but future students as well.
Although there is a lot of disagreement surrounding whether or not colleges should keep athletic
programs, both college athletic enthusiasts and advocates for eliminating college athletics can agree
on wanting what is best for the colleges and the students, and therefore, keeping athletic programs in
college while allocating 50% of their revenue ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the article "Is College Football Profitable for Universities" by Ben Mangrum, he states in regards
to the University of Florida football program, "The muddled–perhaps diluted–contribution of
revenue from football is particularly dubious when athletics received a $2 million dollar increase in
their budget at the same time as the University eliminated its Computer Science Program in 2012 to
save $1.4 million" (Mangrum). This is a prime example of how funds could be better allocated to
benefit academics, rather than athletics. In this case, it is obvious that a compromise could have
been made. Funds were essential for the computer science program, but were instead given to the
football program. In the article "The Importance of College Athletic Programs to Universities",
Linda Emma shows, "The University of Alabama athletic department raked in nearly $124 million,
thanks in large part to the storied Crimson Tide football program" (Emma). The large sum of
revenue brought in by athletic programs could make a tremendous difference at any school if
allocated the right way to benefit both academics and athletics. If the compromise to split the
revenue 50/50 was made, it could make improvements across all parts of schools. The compromise
of giving academics and other programs 50 percent of all

The Collegiate Athletic Association Of College Athletics
The NCAA continues to prohibit payment to its student athletes, while its member universities
continue to seek new ways to increase revenue from the athlete's accomplishments. The National
Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is the nonprofit governing body of college athletics. The
primary task of the NCAA is to oversee the actions of all student athletes and universities to verify
that both parties abide by the rules and regulations within the principles of amateurism, defined by
the Association. However, the NCAA has been ruthlessly exploiting the athlete's talents in the hopes
of maximizing profits. The NCAA and its member universities carry little concern regarding the
success of student athletes, currently; their priorities have become profit oriented. In the rapidly
growing industry of College Athletics, a one sided business relationship has evolved between
colleges and student athletes. Former University of Connecticut basketball standout Shabazz Napier
has recalled his experience as a collegiate athlete in a statement: "there have been hungry nights
where I'm not able to eat, and yet I'm still forced to play to the best of my abilities. After I noticed
my jersey being sold I felt like I should get something in return." [1] The aforementioned Napier has
spent, on average 43.3 hours per week on sports related activities [2]. With copious amounts of time
dedicated towards the sport of basketball, he lacked the ability to seek employment at a professional
job.

Benefits Of Paying College Athletes
Paying College Athletes For over a decade, there has been an ongoing debate for and against paying
college athletes. Those in favor quickly point out the benefits to players. Those against this practice
concentrate on the possible detriment to both the educational and athletic systems currently in place
at institutions of higher learning. Merit can be found in both arguments; however, the changes that
would be necessary to put the payment practice into place would take years to implement. Many
current and former athletes and coaches have spoken out publicly in favor of paying athletes a small
stipend or salary while they are in college. One of the reasons most frequently cited in favor of
payment is the risk of physical injury to the athlete. These injuries can be career ending both on and
off the field. If a player is injured during practice or a game and they are unable to continue playing,
they are likely to lose their athletic scholarship. Without these scholarships many players would not
be able to cover the gap left by their financial aid in their tuition. If the players are paid per game,
there may be money available to finish their educations. Because of the severity of some of these
injuries, may have to be changed to something less demanding physically that the players are able to
do. This could result in a postponed graduation date. These injuries often also lead to extended
periods of medical care and expensive medical bills that neither the player nor the

How College Athletics Are Run
Since the 1950's the NCAA has promoted an idea that student athletes that are given a full
scholarships are receiving a free ride for their education. In this article Ramogi Huma, and Ellen
Staurowsky highlight controversial issues about how college athletics are run. In the article it is
noted that 45% of football, and 52% of basketball players do not graduate. The two programs that
revenue the most money for an athletic program are Men's Football, and Men's Basketball. The
article debates that the NCAA uses the money that athletes in men's football and basketball generate
from their play to assist in funding other programs in the athletic department. While athletes are
generating millions of dollars for their universities, the athlete spends on average of $3,222 in out of
pocket expenses. While attending these universities these athletes live at or under the poverty line. If
these athletes were allowed access to the fair market like the professional athletes, the average FBS
football and basketball player would be "worth approximately $121,048 and $265,027 respectively
(not counting individual commercial endorsement deals)" (Huma). The NCAA maintains that these
athletes are amateurs and to keep their eligibility to participate in college athletics they can receive
zero compensation for their talent. By maintaining this view point the NCAA allows athletes to only
receive grant–in–aid's which reward the athlete with free tuition, and room and board and can
receive no other

The Value Of College Athletics
The Value of College Athletics Athletic programs in college have grown tremendously since they
first began years ago, and now some believe that collegiate athletics have no place in higher
education. Contrary to this, if one takes a closer look they see that college athletics do play a
valuable role in higher education and should continue to play a part in the college experience.
Students who participate in college athletics help carry out their school's traditions, and by
competing at such a high level they have the chance to put their school on the map. While
competing, these people handle the load of a full–time college student and learn to be responsible
and reliable. Some see college athletics as just a business, but truly they provide an opportunity for
young adults to compete in the sport that they love, while getting an education and learning lessons
that will last a lifetime. For 150 years, college sports have been an important aspect of American
universities and abolishing them would eliminate the benefits that they bring ("College Athletics
Programs"). One of the greatest benefits of college athletics is that they bind the school to the
community. People who live in a college town love to support their institution and showing up at
numerous athletic events displays how far their dedication goes. Not only do college sports attract
people who live in the college town, but also alumni and future students. The school's spirit and
unity extends far beyond the

Should College Athletics Be Paid?
Should college athletics be paid
College athletes devote much of their time and energy to their teams, and in return the teams often
receive a big–time deal, College athletics spend at least 43.3 hours per week to practice and have a
commit to the team. Have you ever wondered why teams are so good, the reason for that is colleges
recruit the best players around the country or state so their team overall can be the best all time. So
why not pay the athletics if colleges are getting ranked players. Athletes in college receives a lot of
attention, through their practices and performance on and off the field.be. They uplift the names of
their colleges and give it a name that would otherwise not be acquired. They make their college
mates proud of their college, and they may boost enrolment of many others, which would benefit the
school. Athletics stand a position to earn a school other benefits, not only to the players but other
students too. They may win study scholarships for their school mates by their exemplary
performance (Owens et al 20). College athletes should be entitled to the same rights to payment as
other employees comprising of medical covers and adequate compensation for using their God
given talents. Often, these players are injured when in the field; sometimes others may pass out due
to the extreme use of energy. Thus, they incur additional costs that may not be refunded. They
should be offered financial security to take care of these emergencies so that

College Athletes : National Collegiate Athletic Association
As writer Jon Saraceno would say, "The NCAA [National Collegiate Athletic Association] is a tax–
exempt organization that operates as a monopoly, its rulebook denser than the New Testament"
(Saraceno 38). He explains that the NCAA has various rules, and coaches and players do not know
what is right or wrong. Others view that athletes are already receiving pay with scholarships.
Athletes in higher revenue generating sports, comparable to basketball and football, are usually
more likely to earn a full–ride scholarship. Full–ride scholarships allow an athlete to attend
institutions at little to no cost. Without full–ride or partial scholarships, certain players could not
afford to attend school. This is due to the poverty in areas where ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
People all over the United States believe that a selection of the money should go back to the players.
They believe not much, but a little bit of the revenue made would go back into a fund to pay these
college athletes. The argument against giving these players compensation starts with the athletic
departments. These people say that the athletic departments already operate under the red. However,
the athletic departments cannot operate in the red since they bring anywhere from $30 million to
$163 million in revenue every year. The only schools that possibly operate in a deficit would be the
smaller, less popular schools. Although to help out, the BCS, Bowl Championship Series, gives
83.4% of their $174 million in revenue from 5 bowl games to 6 different conferences. When the
conferences develop the money, they split the money with the colleges of their conference. For
example, in 2007, the $36 million made from the BCS championship game was disrupted to Florida
and Ohio State along with their conferences (Saraceno). In addition to making the universities
money, the athletes also create revenues for the schools with shoe companies, and also the TV
networks. One shoe can make a massive revenue for the shoe company and also the athlete's college
on the assumption that this certain athlete is famous. Exploiting college athletes act as the main
agreement for paying players. Exploitation is defined by the action or fact of treating somebody
unfairly in

Paying College Athletes : Ncaa ( National Collegiate...
TJ White Ms. Heise Honors English III 14 May 2015 Paying College Athletes The NCAA (National
Collegiate Athletic Association) makes over $871 million dollars a year on college athletics. Some
studies estimate as much as one billion dollars each year. A college university can make anywhere
from several million dollars up to $120 million from their athletic programs. A college athlete gets
paid nothing and yet a majority of their time and schedule is dictated by the sport they play. In the
book Student Athlete's Guide to College, author Hillary Abramson says, "If you've gotten to the
college athletic level, you 're accustomed to making sacrifices to benefit your athletic career. In
college these sacrifices only get harder." (Abramson 8). In Dominic Alessi's 5 Reasons Why NCAA
Athletes Should be Paid, he points out that student athletes schedules are much harder than regular
students schedules. "By late afternoon they have already put in a 10 hour work day." (Alessi). Even
though they are considered student athletes, the NCAA actually has rules which allow the athletes to
miss class in order to fulfill their team obligations. College athletes should be paid because they
spend a majority of their time with their sport, many colleges in the NCAA make a large amount of
income from the sports programs, and it would help many athletes learn to be financially stable and
help them in the real world as only a small fraction of college athletes turn professional and make a
career

The Influence Of Athletics On College Students
Research question: Does Athletics help a college student manage their time and excel academically
and socially?
Reference: DeMeulenaere, E. (2010). Playing the game: sports as a force for promoting improved
academic performance for urban youth. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 17(4), 127–135 9p.
https://baypath.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=ip&db=ccm&AN=104972488&site=ehost–live&scope=site
Purpose of study: The purpose of the study was to examine six different ways that a student's
involvement in sports promote their success as a student.
Setting of Study: The study look place in several urban schools.
Study Design: The study examined how athletics can effect a student academically, socially and
emotionally. 3 male student and 1 female student were selected to participate in this study. ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When he got to high school and joined the football and basketball team. His involvement in athletics
helped him control his behavior in the classroom and gave him an outlet for all his energy. Jalisha
was another student who struggled behaviorally in school but, didn't struggle academically. Once
involved in an athletic team she was able to connect better with others socially and became less
disruptive in the classroom. Jamal struggled academically and behaviorally throughout school. Once
he joined a sports team it helped him stay afloat. This was due to having his teammates as his
mentors and role models. James was a student who was constantly reprimanded for his behavior due
to challenges he faced in his life. Once James joined the football team and track team, it helped him
propel academically and took away his behavioral outbursts. It was concluded that a student's
involvement in sports helps promote; structured schedules, incentives, confidence, gives them
positive adult and peer mentors and help them create future

Money In College Athletics
Money In College Athletics
A huge topic in sports right now is whether or not college athletes should get paid. If you turn on
any sports channel that discuss sports topics you will find this debate being discussed. Turn on
sports radio and you will be sure to find callers with strong opinions on the subject. In the sports
world this is a hot topic. College athletes should not be paid for playing any college sports at any
level. Collegiate football athletes should not get paid for the revenue they help produce for the
university they attend. By looking at American college athletes, one can see why college athletes
should get paid for playing in high profit games. This subject is important because the NCAA
should not change the rule because that would change the structure of college and professional
games. "Rising cost of athletic programs are being passed on to college students in the form of
increasing tuition and fees" (Schneider 3). The more the athletic programs make and get known the
higher the cost of tuition and fees go up. If the top end athletes get paid to play this will get passed
down to the students that are attending college for an education. Most students who are not involved
in athletics will not agree with college athletes getting paid. Of course the athletes themselves think
they should get paid, but who would disagree with getting paid to do anything. "The value of an
athletic scholarship typically ranges from $5000 to a max of $20,000" (Brown 2).

Minding the Business of College Athletic Programs
Minding the Business of College Athletic Programs 28
"The NCAA's father was football and its mother was higher education." Kaye Hawes, staff writer
for The NCAA News
Introduction
"Be a sport," young people are admonished. "Play fair." "Play by the rules." Everywhere in the
developed world, sports are raised high up on social pedestals as redeeming activities that
characterize the best of the human spirit, fair competition, and physical achievement. Society
welcomes athleticism due largely to anticipation of the wholesome and upstanding values with
which it is associated. Character is said to be built through participation in sports. While certainly
there are elements of these high expectations and standards for athletes, there too has been a steady
erosion of these traditional foundations and nowhere is this more evident than in collegiate sports.
Intercollege sports are big business, and those associated with it take a very business–like attitude
toward the games (Eitzen & Sage, 1978). The driver in intercollegiate sports is competition, just as it
is in business (Eitzen & Sage, 1978). And, as in business, unfair advantage is translated into
competitive edge. Responsibility morphs into power. In such an environment, the notion of cheating
becomes blurred (Eitzen & Sage, 1978). Recruitment of college athletes commonly means looking
the other way when rules are broken. Athletes are paid under the table, and are admitted according
to a separate set of rules than those

Should College Athletes Be Paid For Their Athletic...
There is an on–going debate over whether college athletes should be compensated for their athletic
participation at universities. Under current NCAA policy, college athletes are compensated via
scholarships. Scholarships are payments that are placed towards a student's education. These provide
athlete's food, board, and cover all education expenses. The NCAA provides approximately
1380,000 scholarships to Division I and II sports each year (US News).The majority of athletic
scholarships must be renewed each year. In other words, colleges can drop an athlete's scholarship
after the academic year. This puts pressure on students to not only perform well in their sport, but
also academically. Also, college athletes must perform well on the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Their basis for considering athletes amateurs is that their education comes before sports. Others
believe it is an out for the NCAA to get by without compensating their athletes. The NCAA is not
the only other sport association to use the amateurism defense. The Olympics used to also not pay
their participants either. After frustration from athletes, the Olympics dropped amateurism entirely.
The United States now pays athletes $25,000 per gold medal, $15,000 per silver medal, and $10,000
for a bronze. More importantly, players use their likness to sign large endorsement deals. Michael
Phelps, one of the most notable American Olympians, earns $10 million a year off his endorsements
alone. Those against paying college athletes say it would be too difficult to implement such a system
because of Title IV. Title IV, signed Richard Nixon, declared, "No person in the United States shall,
on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance (US
Department of Education). Though there are exclusions to the rule, college athletics does fall under
Title IV standards. This, in effect, means all collegiate sports programs, if compensated, would have
to be compensated equally across the board. Even though college football and basketball bring

The Effect of College Athletics on Academics
College is a time for young people to develop and grow not only in their education, but social
aspects as well. One of the biggest social scenes found around college campuses are athletic events,
but where would these college sports be without their dedicated athletes? Student athletes get a lot
of praise for their achievements on the field, but tend to disregard the work they accomplish in the
classroom. Living in a college environment as a student athlete has a great deal of advantages as
well as disadvantages that affect education and anti–intellectualism.
Around the country, college athletic programs are pushing their athletes more and more every day.
The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) is an association set up to ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the reality of being a college athlete, "student" in most cases does not come first in terms of
priorities.
Although rules and regulations are set up by the NCAA, colleges find ways around the rules in order
to bring in money. After all, college athletics center on making profit from their athletes. With such a
brutal athletic schedule, it makes staying on track academically a challenge for most athletes
especially in college.
Academic Grades
Multiple studies have shown that college athletes do not perform as well in the classroom as their
nonathletic peers. For example, according to Michael Maloney in the article An Examination of the
Role that Intercollegiate Athletic Participation Plays in Academic Achievement, he states that "SAT
scores of athletes are, on average, 150 points below non– athletes. Similarly, athletes come to
college with inferior high school preparation in academics. Their high school rank is 20 percentage
points below nonathletes."
Education isn't a priority for college athletes as it should be which therefor leads to anti–
intellectualism in more ways than one. The requirements for athletes to get into college should be
the same as non athletes, but we tend to make "exceptions" if the talent is good enough. "Most

College Athletics And The Creation Of The Ncaa
Accountability Structures & Governance:
1. Institutions Commitment to College Athletics and the Creation of the NCAA
2. Academic Reform ( SRK,Knight Commission, APR, GSR)
3. Need for Academic Support Services
4. Degree Completion programs
Institutions Commitment to College Athletics and the Creation of the NCAA
Intercollegiate athletics have been a part of the college experience dating back to 1852, when
Harvard and Yale competed against each other in their first annual regatta race. Initially, the entry of
collegiate sports onto America's college campuses was the result of professors' realization that a
complete college experience required more than accomplishments in letters (Lewis, 1970).
Furthermore, Shulman & Bowen (2011) assert ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It was this realization that led, then President Teddy Roosevelt in 1905, to call a meeting with
college faculty, alumni, and coaches to discuss a reform to the game of football. A meeting that
initially focused on the liabilities of football as a collegiate sport led to a series of other meetings
with increased input from universities across the nation to discuss the future of intercollegiate
athletics, institutional accountability, and its regulation. Ultimately, a committee created to discuss
the risks of football turned into a committee that was committed to the regulation of intercollegiate
athletics, thus the National Collegiate Athletics Association was formed in 1906.( Evolution of
Academic Services dissertation
NCAAAcademic Reform, GSR, and APR as Accountability Measures Literature surrounding
athletic participation and its impact on the college experience is well documented (LaForge &
Hodge, 2011). Many scholars purport that athletic participation enhances the academic experience,
while others argue that it creates a divide between colleges' missions and student–athletes lived
campus experiences. To support this claim, Lawrence, Henedricks & Ott (2007) found in their study
that nearly one–third of faculty who responded to their survey indicated that they believed that
academic standards are lowered to achieve success in the sports of football and basketball. One
question that is often posed by

Athletic Scholarship For College Athletes
The NCAA's purpose is to direct competition in a just, safe and sportsmanlike manner, and to
assimilate intercollegiate athletics into higher education so that the experience of the student athlete
is the best it could be. It describes a professional team as an organization that provides any player
excess amounts of money for involvement on the team."Because of this paying student athletes
would cross the line between professionalism and amateurism and would demolish the spirit of
being a student athlete. Although players are not paid, they are often given athletic scholarships to
attend college. In one year alone more than 5,000 athletic scholarships are given in the Division one
(Div 1) level for just football. Moreover NCAA is by far the largest collegiate athletic association in
the U.S. with well over 1,000 schools in its fold. Divisions I, II, and III serve to establish these
athletic programs. Formal athletic scholarships can be extended to athletes that play for Div I and II
schools creating many opportunities for athletes to acquire an athletic scholarship. This exemplifies
that Top College athletes already do get paid, in the form of amazing scholarships. Furthermore,
those with professional ambitions benefit from the critical training and exposure that enhances their
draft prospects and bring them to the next level; this shows that colleges dispense roughly $1billion
dollars in athletic scholarships each year. Giving student athlete's payment would be equal to

The Impact Of College Athletic Programs On Academics
The impact of college athletic programs on academics has always been a controversial and
contentious topic. It seems that athletic programs have some contemplative effects on academics of
colleges and universities. Different people have different ideas about how college athletic programs
should be carried on. College presidents, administrations, student athletes, parents of students, and
athletic trainers are along with these people who point out different facts about the fallouts of
athletics on academics. A bunch of people suggest that athletic programs should be dropped from
college system, while another group suggests that athletic programs should be taken care with more
advertence. An analysis on the effects of college athletics on ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
These programs cost more money than that for academic programs, and profitability of these
programs are very low. In comparison to the amount of money disbursed, profit and income rates are
not sufficient. Therefore the argument shows that college athletic programs have become a luxury in
colleges, and a distraction for academics.
Moreover, college athletes have shown a poor academic success rate in past few years, in brief.
Their academic performances were significantly low due to the distraction caused by athletic
programs. Athletics are not only a distraction for athletes, but also for institutions which are holding
these athletic programs. "The low graduation rates among athletics, particularly in sports like
football and basketball, are alarming, although there is strong evidence that this problem is endemic
to the entire academic enterprise" ("College"). Average outcome GPA of an athlete is way lower than
that of a normal student in general. Missing classes regularly, missing assignments, and missing
exams have been the reasons for these poor academic performance rates. Daily practices and
tournaments are the reason for them to miss their academics. Another side of this argument is that
athletes are given unfair advantages in academics unlike other students. They were given excessive
grade changes and extra points to maintain their athletic eligibility. This situation degrades the
quality of academic programs and it debases

The National College Athletic Association
Every year the NCAA helps Universities provide more than 2.7 billion dollars in athletic
scholarships to more than 150,000 students. Full scholarships cover tuition and fees, room and
board, course related books, and a full meal plan. The majority of each scholarship allotted per
student is taken care of through the schools income rather than the NCAA themselves. The National
College Athletic Association acknowledges twenty four different sports and over 460,000 athletes
that compete in the organization. In the 2014 fiscal year the NCAA had a total revenue of over one
billion dollars, with nearly eighty point five million in surplus. Since 2008 the NCAA's total revenue
has already doubled and is still on the rise yet the NCAA claims to be a non–profit organization.
With all this profit going to the NCAA people fail to recognize where the money is coming from,
and not necessarily where the proceeds are going but where they are not. Every athlete that
competes in a collegiate sport, whether on scholarship or not help supply the NCAA's income; every
athlete that helps supply the NCAA's billion dollar industry is not allowed to receive one cent in
payment for their service. Although this may seem fair to many, 460,000 hardworking athletes
believe different. For a student to participate in the NCAA's organization they must sign the "student
athlete form". This form is set to define athletes as amateurs opposed to professionals; of every
structured sport acknowledged only 2

The Athletic Advantage in a College Education
Attending college is not only a chance for students to further their education, but it also allows them
to experience the lessons life has to offer. One of the hardest lessons to learn is how unfair life can
be. Students who work diligently to achieve academic success in the classroom may quickly realize
their academic efforts do not "pay off" as much as the student–athlete who possesses the ability to
kick a football fifty yards. There is an evident failure in the educational system when the student–
athlete's performance and how they contribute to a winning season, is more valuable to the
university, than the academic student who strives to graduate with honors. Students who focus their
efforts on an academic based education are not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In contrast, they suggest the burden lies on the faculty. In order to fulfill the student–athlete's special
needs, they must extend deadlines, create make–up work, and conform to the infamous "special
privilege" stigma surrounding athletes today (Jensen et al.). Many researchers believe million dollar
coaching salaries and the commercialization of college athletics are destroying undergraduate
education (Finn). The Knight Commission is a research group who unveiled that many universities
spend over $100,000 annually, per athlete, to provide support services and special arrangements for
them (Finn). This does not include what is already being spent on housing, food, and tuition (Finn).
Those who oppose this frivolous spending, see it far more important to invest in the education of our
students, rather than investing in a win for the athletic department. Some people will continue to
profess that our society needs to be geared towards entertainment. However, the primary purpose of
attending college should be to obtain an education, and that is being lost along the way. We need to
take a moment to reflect on the decisions we make as a society. When the locker room is nicer than
the entire medical department, or the head football coach is paid more than the governor of the state,
it should be evident and clear that a major problem exists in the university's policies and priorities.
Having said this, it is illogical to think that athletics should be

Athletics And College Athletic Association
Athletics and academics go hand–in–hand when it comes to college athletes, after all, the NCAA
(National College Athletic Association) states that the players are students first, and athletes second.
Because they are student–athletes, obtaining their degree and furthering their education should come
first and foremost; above how many games they win, how many points they score and if the school
wins a National Championship. As many know or have seen, this is not always the case especially
when it comes to Division I FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision) Universities and revenue–generating
sports (e.g. Men's Basketball and Football). One example of academics taking a back seat to
athletics is the term 'Academic Clustering', which is defined as "25% or more of players from a team
being enrolled in a single major. Furthermore there are "super clusters" which is 50% or more of
players as well as "mega clusters" 75% or more of players are enrolled in a single major" (Fountain
& Finley, 2011, p. 25). Academic clustering is an important topic that requires additional research,
as there's limited research done thus far on the topic. Educators, students and parents should be
aware of this issue, given that when students are clustered into majors that may be deemed "easier"
and/or "more convenient/flexible", they then lose out on a college experience they would enjoy by
majoring in something they are interested in. Furthermore, there is an issue of athletes' graduating
with degrees that

National Athletic Director At The National College...
One day I hope to get the opportunity to work for the National College Athletic Association. The
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is an association made up of 1,261 institutions,
conferences, organizations and individuals devoted to the administration of intercollegiate athletics
(NCAA.org). The purpose of the National College Athletic Association is to maintain intercollegiate
athletics as an essential part of the educational program and the athlete as an essential part of the
student population. The association's purpose is to help student athletes maintain a proper balance in
life. They enforce the concept of athletes putting school before anything else. Specifically within the
NCAA organization, I hope to become an ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I think that in order to be a successful athletic director, one needs to keep the functional areas of
sport management in mind. These four areas include: planning, organizing, leading, and evaluating
(Masteralexis, Barr, & Hums, 2015). The first aspect of planning is something that athletic directors'
need to be very good at doing. An athletic director needs to have both short and long term goals. If I
were to become an athletic director, I would want to make sure all of the student athletes received
the proper tools to succeed both on and off the court. I would make sure each student athlete,
scholarship and non–scholarship, had a tutor available to them at all times. I know that the
University of Florida allows each athlete to have a tutor, however, it is optional. The reason that it is
optional is because it is something that is enforced by the coaches. Therefore, I would make it a
university athletic department policy that all coaches must force their student athletes to use a tutor.
I would want to make sure each athlete used their tutor to their advantage so they could be aware of
what was going on in the classroom. This would also allow students to not be stressed about their
studies, and that way they have a proper balance between their sport and education. It is a huge goal
of the NCAA for their students to have a proper balance in life, therefore I think through this plan I
could implement that balance. In order to make this possible

Opinion Of Non-College Athletic Association
Opinion: "Non–College Athletic Association": Removing the "C" from the NCAA
Intro
In 2012, former Ohio State Buckeye and now current LA Rams quarterback, Cardale Jones, sent the
college sports world a buzz with his infamous "we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to
play SCHOOL" tweet. In the weeks after, this tweet would ignite debates ranging from the "amateur
spirit" of college sports–to the true purpose of athletics on campuses.
One debate topic that always resurfaces every few months when we are hit with a new college sports
scandal is the role and necessity of the multi–billion dollar non–profit organization that is the
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). From proposed restructuring of the organization
to the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As the NCAA's Bowl Championship Series (BCS) and March Madness continue to grow, the
organization has been struggling to uphold its nonprofit status and validate not paying its athletes.
Between national television deals, apparel licensing, and even the recently discontinued "EA Sports
NCAA Football" series, the NCAA has all the means to comfortably compensate players; albeit
maybe none of the desire. Therefore, the true financial tipping point in the NCAA's favor would be
the preemptive development and implementation of a self–regulated pay structure outside the
academic system.
By separating from the current university model the NCAA would avoid a forced student athlete
stipend/salary that will inevitably be passed and undoubtedly have a few academic caveats. This
separation would give the organizations true oversight of its athletes and no longer have to battle
with the fading idea that these are amateur "student–athletes", who just so happen to spend 40–hours
a week working and compromising their education.
Instead, these athletes would then be able to "apply" and/or be recruited to work for the Crimson
Tide Football Club, while also having the full academic freedom of their peers. The disconnect
between academics and athletics would be as apparent as

Is College Athletics A Bonding?
College Athletics: Bonding
Introduction
Every team, every group, and line up at some point has to come together to achieve a goal, it can be
classroom, game, or team oriented. Team bonding may not happen as soon as one may think time,
chemistry, agreements, and disagreements all play major roles into team bonding. 2 Studies show
that this concept is reflected in Astin's theory of involvement, which essentially suggests "students
learn by becoming involved" (1985, p. 133). 3 This relationship between team bonding and
"becoming involved goes hand in hand, for example In particular, this study examines what
contributes to the student athletes' experiences in relation to student–faculty interaction, peer
interaction, participation in student ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
These compounding factors only add to the additional building blocks of a successful team bonding,
further research even shows that College athletics is an important social institution. Hodgson (2006,
p. 2) defines institutions as "systems of established and prevalent social rules that structure social
interactions."5 Without the first stepping–stone being successful social interaction, there will be no
such thing as team bonding. A prime example of a University setting its "stepping stones" correctly
is Since its inception in the late nineteenth century, Southwestern State University has established
six core values in an attempt to display such characteristics throughout all branches of the
institution: Excellence, Integrity, Leadership, Loyalty, Respect, and Selfless Service. As a university
devoted to its stated core values, the established Southwestern State brand promise is unequivocal in
its purpose: ''to model our core values in all that we do'' (Southwestern State University, 2011a).
Which in fact places a responsibility upon a athlete who has to model and represent the University
in a certain way as shown above. Furthermore, if an athlete does not withheld these stepping–stones,
there actions are noticeable by first there coaches and teammates resulting in a negative social
interaction. Which ultimately leads to a non–team bonding aspect due to one player, which
ultimately may result in

Gender Equality Within College Athletics
Inequality is often defined as the condition of being unequal; a lack of equality; a disparity or
unequal opportunity, or treatment resulting from this disparity. Almost forty–four years ago a federal
law was mandated that enforced gender equality in all schools. At the time Title IX was enacted,
only 30,000 women were participating in an NCAA sport, compared to the 170,000 men. The
National Collegiate Athletic Association, or NCAA offered no scholarships to women, nor did they
offer championship tournaments (Tigay). Since the enactment of this law, the number of women
who compete in college–level sports has increased more than five times since 1972, however,
advocates say there is still a significant amount of work to be done while those against it say the law
has come with unintended consequences. Those in favor of Title IX marvel at the continuing strides
in granting women athletic equality, however, critics have opposed such advances due to the unjust
impact it has had on male athletes.
Although Title IX was authorized to enforce gender equality within college athletics, it has also had
a huge impact on women's professional athletics. This impact includes a significantly higher amount
of women being able to compete in athletics at the high school, college, and professional level.
Many advocates say that the use of Title IX has given women's professional sports teams a chance to
reach greatness. They prove this by stating that because there are more opportunities given

The Athletic Advantage in a College Education
Attending college is not only a chance to further one's education; but an opportunity to experience
lessons in life. One of the hardest lessons to learn is how life is not always fair. Students who work
diligently to achieve academic success can realize all too soon how countless hours of studying to
achieve the grade, may not pay off as much as the ability to kick a football fifty yards. It appears the
ability of the student athlete to contribute to a winning season is valued much more than the ability
of the academic student to graduate with honors. Evidence suggests that students who focus on a
college education geared toward academics are not rewarded with the same advantages, resources,
and fringe benefits that their student ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many researchers believe that million dollar coaching salaries and commercialization of college
athletics is destroying undergraduate education (Finn). The Knight Commission is a research group
who unveiled that many universities spend over $100,000 annually to provide support services and
special arrangements for each individual football player (Finn). This does not include what is
already being spent on housing, food, and tuition. Those who are in opposition to this frivolous
spending see if far more important to invest in the education of our children instead of investing in a
win for the athletic department. Some people will continue to profess that our world should be a
society geared towards entertainment. The primary focus of attending college is to obtain an
education, and that is being lost along the way. There is no need to place such emphasis on college
athletics. We need to take a moment to reflect on the decisions we make as a society. When the
locker room is nicer than the entire medical department, or the head football coach is paid more than
the governor of the state in which the university resides, it should be evident and clear that a major
problem exists in the priorities of the university. Having said this, it is illogical to think that athletics
should be prioritized over education. Education is the basis for advancement. Without advancing
education the future lives of generations to come will suffer

College Athletics Becoming The New Face Of Professional Sport
Are college athletics becoming the new face of professional sport leagues? What is the value of
going to college when you have a $24–million–dollar contract on the table to go play for the
Yankees, Celtics, or the Broncos? Is there any person that would give the opportunity, experience, or
money to go play for a college on a scholarship? Because that amount of money is so insignificant,
it will not pay for his/her whole tuition and have a chance at a career ending injury in result. These
are the questions that loom around the mind of a student–athlete entering this stage in their career.
However, there is a serious fight to having high school students attend college, earn a degree, and
then enter a draft to a professional team. The disgrace with college sports makes us ask: should
Division l athletes be paid over and beyond their scholarship?
The inquiry into college athletes to be paid – beyond scholarships – should be conducted by the
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), Student–Athlete Advisory Committee (SAAC),
also athletes and family. The NCAA's nonsense about protecting the tradition of amateurism and
junior athletes is the main energy source powering the fight of college athletes not being paid. The
punitive governing body of college sports spends most of its time sniffing out minor violations to
punish the athletes responsible for generating annual revenue that is expected to peak into the
billions. For starters, since when does a cost–free college

The Effect of College Athletics on Academics
When I first came to South Dakota State, I decided that I wanted to go pre–dental but after talking
with my advisor, I ended up undecided on my major and took courses irrelevant to anything I
wanted to do for a career. I still remain bitter that I let my advisor talk me out of what I wanted to
do, but he did have a point. If I took the classes I needed to go pre dental, I would most likely get
bad grades due to traveling, practices, games, and lifts that take up my study time. I decided to
major in Exercise Science but still have to take summer school classes in order to fulfill my
requirements in four years. This is just one example of how academics are put on the back burner for
student athletes. Dave Meggyesy, former Syracuse ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Instead the money made by hardworking athletes goes to coaches and athletic directors. From 2011
to 2012, bowl– eligible schools increased their coaches' salaries by 35 percent. Alabama head
football coach Nick Saban makes more than $7 million per year to coach the crimson tide
(Edeleman, 3). Meanwhile athletes can't even fill their gas tank or fly home to see their parents since
there is no time for a real job during season and athletic scholarships only cover tuition, food,
housing, and books. "The coaches own the athletes' feet, the collages own the athletes' bodies, and
the supervisors retain the large rewards." (Wulf, 26) Advantages As a student athlete I experience
firsthand what it's like to balance school and sport and though it is hard work, I wouldn't be doing it
if I didn't love it. I've talked a lot about the disadvantages of being a student athlete, but there are a
great deal of advantages as well. Being a division one soccer player, I do receive a small athletic
scholarship that helps with paying for school. Big time sports like men's football and basketball
receive full scholarships that can cover tuition, books, food, and housing for athletes. College is
essentially paid for while athletes participate in their sport which means a free education and no
need to take out student loans. There are also many academic support services for athletes to ensure
grades stay up for eligibility. Another positive side to

Spelman College Athletic Performance Analysis
In 2005, Spelman College, a private historically Black college (HBCU) in Atlanta, GA exclusively
for women were admitted full membership into the NCAA as a division III school under the Great
South Atlantic Conference (GSAC) (Spelman College Athletics). During Spelman's tenure with
athletics, the school provided 7 varsity teams. These 7 sports included basketball, cross–country,
golf, soccer, softball, tennis, and volleyball. However, in 2012, Spelman College's then president,
Dr. Beverly Tatum, announced that the college would end it tenure with athletics and focus on
bringing wellness to the entire college community rather than just to a select few of its students.
Therefore, at the end of the 2012 athletic season, Spelman College parted ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Each team compromised of rosters that ranged from 8 for cross–country to a larger roster of 16 for
soccer and softball. However, with all 7 sports, the total number of young women who made up the
entire athletic department was 80–plus students (Spelman College Athletics). Even though sports
such as tennis were highly successful and accomplished at the college, Dr. Tatum saw that the
funding of the athletic was a detriment to the school rather than an added bonus for increasing
revenue or attracting students. Therefore, Dr. Tatum decided to make a decision that would not just
benefit a few athletes on campus, but the entire 2,100 students and faculty that make up the Spelman
College community. In an online magazine, Clutch, journalist Demetria Irwin wrote in a 2013
article, " Spelman College announced its decision to abandon its 80–student, $900,000 athletics
department (out of a $100 million total budget) in favor of using that money for health and fitness
programs for the entire student population" (Irwin, 2013). Even though the decision was met with
controversy from student–athletes who had to abandon their sports, the majority of the college and
its alumnae welcomed the change to improve and increase the health of all students at Spelman
(ESPN,

College Athletics : The Top Of Everyone 's Interest
Ryan Apicello
Professor Dean Ulseheimer
English 1110&1111
22 November 2014
College athletics have always been popular across the United States. In recent years it seems to have
escalated tenfold. Football and basketball being at the top of everyone's interest. Collegiate sports
have brought in a large sum of revenue to their Universities, in addition to increasing the overall
popularity of the college. For example, in an article from Forbes website, "that the University of
Alabama's Athletic Program had the highest revenue of any other University in 2014 at
$81,993,762" (Jessop). Even though the college made a large sum of money, no college athletes
were legally rewarded for their work. According to NCAA rules you must obey their rules ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Student athletes should be compensated for their work, as they are the sole reason for the Athletic
Program's success. These athletes are working hard and risking their health to bring money to the
University every day, yet are not rewarded with any monetary compensation. These athletes are
working for the schools and are doing a service to the college that seems to go unnoticed. This lack
of pay is not seen anywhere else in the work place and should not be seen here either. Everywhere
else athletes are paid, so why shouldn't college athletes too? Some critics may argue that these
student–athletes are amateurs, and if paid then are becoming professional athletes. This statement
could be made true if it weren't for the fact that these college athletes are risking their futures for the
benefit of the colleges. Defining College athletes as amateurs creates another problem in addition to
not being paid by the university: athletes can't promote themselves. The NCAA states "student–
athletes shall be amateurs...and should be protected from exploitation by professional and
commercial enterprises" (NCAA). However, with this statement it seems that colleges and
universities are the people that exploit them. The NCAA has rules that "Student– Athletes can make
up to $2000 in a given school year" (Bedinger). This would hardly cover educational costs,
especially if not on scholarship. Also with all the time practicing and working in the classroom, how
many athletes have time to

College Athletics And Education : College Athletes
College Athletics and Education How are college athletes able to make time for classes during
college? In this day and age, college athletics take up a huge amount of time for college athletes.
They have to devote lots of time to practice and games. After awhile, all that time can really add up.
How are they able to attend classes without hurting their athletic schedules? College athletic
programs do not play a valuable role in higher education because most student–athletes don 't attend
college for an education, college athletics are too commercialized, the athletes have to devote too
much time to practice and games, and the grade–point average for student–athletes have been
decreasing over the years. College sports have been the heart and soul of America for quite some
time. But, what lies underneath this extravagant organization? Are they able to get a good education
while playing sports? Well, college athletes have to travel a lot. For example, the Indiana Hoosiers
basketball team recently went to Hawaii for the Maui Invitational. Although they didn 't do the best,
they still had to miss several days of class because the tournament was held during the week. Were
they able to make up the missed class time? Unfortunately we won 't be able to find out, but
according to CNN, most of the student athletes that go to college aren 't there for an education...they
are there for the sport. In an interview, Rashad McCants–a former North Carolina basketball player–
told CNN 's

The Contributions Of College Athletics
College athletics have become one of America's most lucrative businesses grossing billions of
dollars off of student–athletes and competing against the entertainment giants, however, this has not
always been the case. In a way, the student–athlete has become our culture's holy man as he or she is
admired for their immense feats of athleticism and skill on the gridiron or the court. To understand
the miraculous story of the change of the student–athlete, an individual must first look at the origin
of the term student–athlete. In the 1950s, Ray Dennison died from a blunt force cerebral trauma
received while playing football in Colorado for the Fort Lewis A&M Aggies. Therefore, the
Dennison family filed for worker's compensation death ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As a result, student–athletes have struggled to maintain their GPA. Furthermore, the graduation rates
for power five conference universities (PAC 12, BIG 10, SEC, ACC, and BIG 12) are horrendous
because of the lack of time allocated for academics. For example, in 2010, the average graduation
rate for March Madness, the NCAA Basketball championship tournament, teams' was 43%, an
unacceptable rate. On the other hand, the increase in hours spent per week has caused student–
athletes to identify more as athletes than students (Best college online). A direct effect of the
universities admitting college athletes that are not ready is students cannot complete basic general
education classes. According to Mary Willingham, a learning specialist at the University of North
Carolina, there were basketball players at the University of North Carolina who were illiterate. All
in all, the shift of student–athletes to solely athletes is unacceptable, however, can be solved by the
following: have an agency within the NCAA to keep universities accountable for rule violations that
disrupt the learning of athletes, use revenue generated from the student–athletes to provide academic
support to ensure learning, and/or have a third party agency keep universities accountable for rule
violations.
The first proposed idea that would place precedence on the student aspect of being a student–athlete
is

Athletic Privileges in College Programs
Current student athletes at colleges get treated like they are part of the royal family. A majority, if
not all, of their schooling is paid for, they have their own academic centers to work in that are
provided with tutors if needed, better housing units, and the list can go on and on. Many would say
that this is acceptable, that they worked hard to play for a college team; however, several are against
it. Athletes should be given more privileges than the average college student, but not as many are
received. Whatever view a person chooses to take, one thing is clear, there is a significant different
in treatment to students by colleges between athletes and non–athletic students. High School is an
important part in a child's life. It ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is as if a huge scholarship isn't enough. Critics on student athletes argue that colleges should be
more concerned with the business of education not just entirely on if their team can be number one.
Colleges have been noticed and criticized for their special treatment of their athletes. Desert News
reports that,"...public universities now spend six times as much to support student athletes as they
spend to support the education of the larger student body." While some consider this a harmless
treatment for those who provide something more for the college or university, it can also hurt the
funding that goes into academics. The previous article also goes on to state, "spending on sports
begins to crowd out spending on academics, which is currently happening at a ratio of at least 6–to–
1." However, an argument has been made to defend the athletes too. Many say that students who
engage in athletic activities for the college give back to their college, and so deserve more. As these
students bring in more revenue and more fame for a college, they too should receive greater
rewards. Those who criticize athletic privileges must also remember that athletics can build positive
skills in students. Robert. J. Sternberg of the N.A.C.U.B.O. (National Association of College and
University Business Officers) remarks that college also seeks to teach its students certain qualities,
"...traits and skills such as strategic and tactical

College Athletics Is A Major Part Of People'S Lives Around
College athletics is a major part of people 's lives around the world. From the athletes playing the
various sports to the fans watching from their televisions it has become a huge thing. A portion of
these people seem to think that the athletes deserve more then what is already given to them. A
question has been brought up and debated on whether or not these athletes should be paid to play.
College athletes are hard working young adults trying to earn a degree at whichever school they
have chosen. They are nothing but the most talented players and deserve to be respected and taken
care of by their schools but to an extent. Although a college education is very expensive, these
athletes do not need to be sidetracked by the dollar signs, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Another reason why these athletes do not need to be paid is because college athletes are, in my
opinion, some of the best sports stars there are. The games that they play are always high paced and
the players always give 110 percent of effort. What makes these games so interesting is that the
players are trying their absolute hardest during every game so they might get the chance to be
looked at by a professional level. College sports is just one step beneath the professional level and
the serious athletes are reaching for this level so it can be their profession. If the college athletes are
getting paid to play, then whatever sport they are doing will become their profession and they will
no longer strive to be part of a professional team since they are already on one. Professional teams
would not be so elite and would not be as sought after if you could make good money at the college
level. Paying these athletes at the college level might wipe out professional sports all together.
College athletes should not be paid to play their sport because the money aspect of it. Horace
Mitchell debated with another author in an article and said "they are students receiving access to a
college education through their participation in sports, for which they earn scholarships to pay
tuition, fees, room and board, and other allowable expenses." If college athletes were being paid and
college sports turned into all about money than any scholarship given

The Is The Bedrock Principle Of College Athletics And The...
Amateurism is defined as one who engages in an art, science, study, or athletic activity as a pastime
rather than as a profession. ("Definition of AMATEURISM", 2017). In sports terms, an amateur is
an athlete who has never accepted money, or who accepts money under restrictions specified by a
regulatory body, for participating in a competition. According to the NCAA, amateurism is the
bedrock principle of college athletics and the NCAA. Maintaining amateurism is crucial to
preserving an academic environment in which acquiring a quality education is the first priority.
("Amateurism", 2017). Though the argument on whether or not to pay student athletes is nothing
new and has endured the test of time. The NCAA has remained strong in their ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Amateurism is set "to ensure the students priority remains on obtaining a quality educational
experience and that all of student–athletes are competing equitably" (Clevens, 2013, Vol. 143, No.
4). The NCAA expects the athletes to uphold the amateur policy or their eligibility could be
jeopardized. Athletes are aware of this prior to signing their letter of intent and must abide by this
policy the entirety of their athletic college career.
Currently, a number of student athletes are of the opinion that they should receive additional
monetary compensation for two reasons. First, they argue that due to their rigorous and demanding
schedules they are unable to hold jobs to receive an income. Secondly, that they should receive
payment because of the amount of revenue they bring into the university; whether that is through
jersey sales, video game sales, or being a high profile athlete that increases ticket sales and exposure
of the university. This is mainly referring to football and men's basketball. The NCAA bylaw
12.5.2.1, forbids "the use of his or her name or picture to advertise, recommend or promote directly
the sale or use of a commercial product or service of any kind" (Clevens, 2013, Vol. 143, No. 4). "It
would be unfair to other students if the university paid athletes to play college sports, although many
may disagree. Scholarships

College Athletic Compliance Website Comparison
College Athletic Compliance Webpage Comparison The main page that CSI has and Baruch does
not have is a page regarding Title IX. CSI's Compliance Forms & Handbooks page has more forms
for the coaches and students than the one for Baruch. In total Baruch has 5 forms while CSI has
approximately 13. Columbia was able to add a glossary for their compliance page. Moreover, they
added information about NCAA banned substances, ethical conduct and the receipt of extra benefits.
College of Staten Island – Consists of multiple pages explaining compliance requirement. p.1
Compliance – Academic Requirements The page talks about the academic requirements for first
year students and returning students. For instance, "To be an eligible to participate in athletics as an
incoming freshman you have to be admitted into one of our baccalaureate programs, pass (or be
exempt from) all three assessment tests and be registered for full–time load of credits (12 or more)."
Baruch College Compliance– Consists of multiple pages explaining compliance requirement. The
page starts with an introduction about how Baruch is part of the NCAA Division III and how it
strictly follows the rules. It then briefly states the process and requirements a student needs to meet
if he or she wishes to play on a Baruch athletic team. Ex. The student must fill out a NCAA
eligibility form. The student must be a full–time student and have a 2.0 cumulative gpa. It also talks
about the amount of eligible years

College Athletics Are Great For Many Reasons

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sonya Johnson

More from Sonya Johnson (8)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

College Athletics Are Great For Many Reasons