X-Pod for VDI Reference Architecture Enabled by Cisco UCS, VMware Horizon View, and ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array
Providing a simple yet best of breed converged infrastructure for virtualized desktop solutions
X-Pod for Citrix VDI on UCS with ISE 700 Hybrid Storage ArrayX-IO Technologies
Validated reference architecture for Citrix XenDesktop on Cisco UCS with X-IO's Hybrid Storage Array. This document covers performance differences between XenDesktop 7.5 MCS and PVS provisioning services.
Learn about Virtualization Performance on the IBM PureFlex System. the white paper shows that the IBM PureFlex system can deliver VM consolidation in a heterogeneous, self-contained environment capable of impressive levels of throughput performance. It can dramatically reduce time to production for virtualized data center application operations, providing multiple compute and operating system platforms, advanced storage, and integrated networking in a single manageable system.
The Dell PowerEdge VRTX is an all-inclusive platform, suitable for rapid deployment of a virtual environment, such as Citrix XenDesktop 7.5. The integrated components of the VRTX means your business has a centralized management console for the necessary data center components that support VDI environments. We found that the Dell PowerEdge VRTX and XenDesktop set up, configured, and deployed VDI users easily. The addition of Dell Wyse terminals demonstrates how your end-users can access your XenDesktop VDI environment with efficient hardware and little administrative effort. The combination of Dell PowerEdge VRTX and Citrix XenDesktop 7.5 can offer a unified, efficient, and simple enterprise-value VDI solution for your business, but without the resources and commitment need for supporting an enterprise data center.
VDI with Dell EqualLogic hybrid arrays: A comparative study with the industry...Principled Technologies
To determine whether a storage platform would deliver acceptable virtual desktop performance, we created a VMware View virtual desktop pool of 800 virtual desktops (vDTs) hosted on a EqualLogic PS6110XS storage array, and another on the industry-leading SAN storage solution with a similar configuration. We instructed each virtual desktop pool to reboot all 800 vDTs, wait for an idle state, and run two sequential iterations of Login VSI medium workloads. Both iterations consisted of a 20-minute login storm, a 30-minute steady state, and a 15-minute logout period. We did not achieve a Dynamic VSImax for either storage platform.
Figures 9 and 10 illustrate our physical networks connectivity with respect to the storage solutions tested: We created a 10Gbps LAN with two stacked Dell Power Connect™ 8024F switches and a 10Gbps SAN with two stacked Force10™ S4810 switches. We installed a Dell PowerEdge M1000e chassis fully populated with Dell PowerEdge M420 blade servers. We configured six Force10 MXL switches to create three fabrics for the chassis, fabrics A, B, and C. We connected Fabric A to our data network and fabrics B and C to our SAN. Each of the Power Edge M420 server LOM NICs are on Fabric A, and each of the Mezzanine NICs are on Fabric B or C. We attached all storage including the EqualLogic PS6110XS array and the industry-leading SAN storage solution to our storage network.
The document discusses grid solutions from Sun-Oracle-AMD that transform data center infrastructure with AMD Opteron processors. It describes how virtualization and grid computing can consolidate underutilized servers to improve efficiency while maintaining security and management. Key benefits include higher utilization rates, flexibility to dynamically allocate resources, reduced costs, and improved availability.
Presidio's Data Center Practice focuses on delivering advanced data center solutions through virtual data centers (VDCs) to help customers reduce costs and complexity while improving service levels. Presidio specializes in VMware, Cisco, and EMC technologies and can rapidly deploy VDCs using its expertise in server virtualization, virtual desktop infrastructure, converged networks, unified computing, storage, and backup/recovery solutions.
When considering whether to upgrade to the new Dell PowerEdge VRTX or repurpose older hardware, the advantages of new hardware are clear. Not only do you get newer hardware that is faster and is better-equipped to handle the increasing demands of today’s business applications and workloads, but you also benefit from advances that make deployment and management easier than ever.
In our labs, we compared the Dell PowerEdge VRTX with four server nodes and shared storage and networking to a similar infrastructure using four legacy tower servers, external network switches, and an external SAN. Our testing revealed the following:
· PowerEdge VRTX took 78.5 percent less time and 150 fewer steps to configure and deploy out of the box compared to the legacy solution.
· PowerEdge VRTX It took less than 1 hour to unbox and configure into a highly available VMware vSphere cluster compared to over 4 hours on the legacy solution.
· Deploying the Dell PowerEdge VRTX used just a single management tool, the integrated Chassis Management Controller, whereas the tower solution required six separate management tools.
Choosing such a complete solution during your next server refresh can simplify infrastructure setup and configuration, boost performance through built-in high availability features, and potentially save your organization space and operating costs over the life of the hardware.
VDI with Dell EqualLogic hybrid arrays: A comparative study with the industry...Principled Technologies
Building a VDI environment requires a solid storage system capable of meeting the demands of a large number of users. Being able to support all your users with an attractively priced storage solution is ideal.
We found the Dell EqualLogic PS6110XS to be simple to set up and manage during the course of testing, and it provided significantly higher usable capacity, at 9.1 TB versus 6.7 TB for the competing similarly configured, industry-leading NAS solution.
The Dell EqualLogic PS6110XS also was more power efficient, requiring 68.6 percent less power, while providing comparable performance to the industry-leading competitor. In addition, the solution also saved roughly 51.6 percent on the initial investment in hardware, software, and support, at a cost of $102 per desktop versus $210 for the competitor. The ease of setup and management, performance capabilities, and potential savings with the Dell EqualLogic PS6110XS show that it has the potential to power your VDI environment while helping your bottom line.
X-Pod for Citrix VDI on UCS with ISE 700 Hybrid Storage ArrayX-IO Technologies
Validated reference architecture for Citrix XenDesktop on Cisco UCS with X-IO's Hybrid Storage Array. This document covers performance differences between XenDesktop 7.5 MCS and PVS provisioning services.
Learn about Virtualization Performance on the IBM PureFlex System. the white paper shows that the IBM PureFlex system can deliver VM consolidation in a heterogeneous, self-contained environment capable of impressive levels of throughput performance. It can dramatically reduce time to production for virtualized data center application operations, providing multiple compute and operating system platforms, advanced storage, and integrated networking in a single manageable system.
The Dell PowerEdge VRTX is an all-inclusive platform, suitable for rapid deployment of a virtual environment, such as Citrix XenDesktop 7.5. The integrated components of the VRTX means your business has a centralized management console for the necessary data center components that support VDI environments. We found that the Dell PowerEdge VRTX and XenDesktop set up, configured, and deployed VDI users easily. The addition of Dell Wyse terminals demonstrates how your end-users can access your XenDesktop VDI environment with efficient hardware and little administrative effort. The combination of Dell PowerEdge VRTX and Citrix XenDesktop 7.5 can offer a unified, efficient, and simple enterprise-value VDI solution for your business, but without the resources and commitment need for supporting an enterprise data center.
VDI with Dell EqualLogic hybrid arrays: A comparative study with the industry...Principled Technologies
To determine whether a storage platform would deliver acceptable virtual desktop performance, we created a VMware View virtual desktop pool of 800 virtual desktops (vDTs) hosted on a EqualLogic PS6110XS storage array, and another on the industry-leading SAN storage solution with a similar configuration. We instructed each virtual desktop pool to reboot all 800 vDTs, wait for an idle state, and run two sequential iterations of Login VSI medium workloads. Both iterations consisted of a 20-minute login storm, a 30-minute steady state, and a 15-minute logout period. We did not achieve a Dynamic VSImax for either storage platform.
Figures 9 and 10 illustrate our physical networks connectivity with respect to the storage solutions tested: We created a 10Gbps LAN with two stacked Dell Power Connect™ 8024F switches and a 10Gbps SAN with two stacked Force10™ S4810 switches. We installed a Dell PowerEdge M1000e chassis fully populated with Dell PowerEdge M420 blade servers. We configured six Force10 MXL switches to create three fabrics for the chassis, fabrics A, B, and C. We connected Fabric A to our data network and fabrics B and C to our SAN. Each of the Power Edge M420 server LOM NICs are on Fabric A, and each of the Mezzanine NICs are on Fabric B or C. We attached all storage including the EqualLogic PS6110XS array and the industry-leading SAN storage solution to our storage network.
The document discusses grid solutions from Sun-Oracle-AMD that transform data center infrastructure with AMD Opteron processors. It describes how virtualization and grid computing can consolidate underutilized servers to improve efficiency while maintaining security and management. Key benefits include higher utilization rates, flexibility to dynamically allocate resources, reduced costs, and improved availability.
Presidio's Data Center Practice focuses on delivering advanced data center solutions through virtual data centers (VDCs) to help customers reduce costs and complexity while improving service levels. Presidio specializes in VMware, Cisco, and EMC technologies and can rapidly deploy VDCs using its expertise in server virtualization, virtual desktop infrastructure, converged networks, unified computing, storage, and backup/recovery solutions.
When considering whether to upgrade to the new Dell PowerEdge VRTX or repurpose older hardware, the advantages of new hardware are clear. Not only do you get newer hardware that is faster and is better-equipped to handle the increasing demands of today’s business applications and workloads, but you also benefit from advances that make deployment and management easier than ever.
In our labs, we compared the Dell PowerEdge VRTX with four server nodes and shared storage and networking to a similar infrastructure using four legacy tower servers, external network switches, and an external SAN. Our testing revealed the following:
· PowerEdge VRTX took 78.5 percent less time and 150 fewer steps to configure and deploy out of the box compared to the legacy solution.
· PowerEdge VRTX It took less than 1 hour to unbox and configure into a highly available VMware vSphere cluster compared to over 4 hours on the legacy solution.
· Deploying the Dell PowerEdge VRTX used just a single management tool, the integrated Chassis Management Controller, whereas the tower solution required six separate management tools.
Choosing such a complete solution during your next server refresh can simplify infrastructure setup and configuration, boost performance through built-in high availability features, and potentially save your organization space and operating costs over the life of the hardware.
VDI with Dell EqualLogic hybrid arrays: A comparative study with the industry...Principled Technologies
Building a VDI environment requires a solid storage system capable of meeting the demands of a large number of users. Being able to support all your users with an attractively priced storage solution is ideal.
We found the Dell EqualLogic PS6110XS to be simple to set up and manage during the course of testing, and it provided significantly higher usable capacity, at 9.1 TB versus 6.7 TB for the competing similarly configured, industry-leading NAS solution.
The Dell EqualLogic PS6110XS also was more power efficient, requiring 68.6 percent less power, while providing comparable performance to the industry-leading competitor. In addition, the solution also saved roughly 51.6 percent on the initial investment in hardware, software, and support, at a cost of $102 per desktop versus $210 for the competitor. The ease of setup and management, performance capabilities, and potential savings with the Dell EqualLogic PS6110XS show that it has the potential to power your VDI environment while helping your bottom line.
A well-designed, feature rich VDI solution can make a significant difference in maximizing datacenter resources efficiency, and minimizing unwanted downtime. Failure to do both these things can drive up per user costs and affect user satisfaction. VMware Horizon View 5.2 reclaimed 27 percent of its previously used disk space from its virtual desktop, ran more efficient AV scans, and when deploying VMs, the VMware solution was faster than the Citrix solution by 38 percent. If your business needs to manage the time and resource burdens created by a VDI user base, VMware Horizon View 5.2 on VMware vSphere 5.1 provides strong advantages over Citrix XenDesktop 7 hosted on Citrix XenServer 6.2.
Enterprise Desktops Well Served - a technical perspective on virtual desktopsMolten Technologies
This document discusses desktops as a service (DaaS) and the technical challenges of deploying virtual desktop solutions in an enterprise. It outlines recommendations for addressing challenges in areas like networking, storage, servers, offline access, and licensing. While DaaS currently delivers virtual desktop operating systems, the document predicts that technologies like rich internet applications will allow DaaS to move away from true desktop OSes. Further development is still needed for applications and cloud services to integrate seamlessly.
The document discusses Vblock Powered Solution for VMware View, which provides a pre-integrated converged infrastructure from Cisco, EMC, and VMware to enable virtual desktop deployments. It offers modular growth, rapid provisioning and decommissioning of desktops, simplified management, self-curing architecture to ensure performance, and support for thousands of desktops on a single Vblock infrastructure package. The solution aims to address the high costs of traditional desktop deployments and deliver desktops as a managed service through a centralized, private "desktop cloud" infrastructure.
Harness Enterprise Data with SQL Server 2008 R2 and New Intel Xeon ProcessorsReadWriteEnterprise
The document discusses how SQL Server 2008 R2 and new Intel Xeon processors can help enterprises harness large volumes of data. It describes innovations in SQL Server 2008 R2 like self-service BI and complex event processing. It also outlines developments in Intel Xeon processors 7500 and 5600 series that improve scalability, performance, virtualization, and reliability. The combination of these software and hardware advances provides massive processing power, flexibility, and lower costs to help organizations address challenges of rapidly growing and complex enterprise data.
While apps may display several symptoms indicative of slow or erratic response after being virtualized, the problem boils down to contention for shared storage resources; contention
that did not occur when the apps had the storage all to themselves.
These so called “bottlenecks” occur in spurts as application requests collide randomly, resulting in spikes of sluggish, unpredictable latency. The more frequent, the greater the
users’ dissatisfaction. You may recall that one of the primary reasons these business critical apps were originally
sequestered on separate physical machines was to avoid such collisions
VDI performance comparison: Dell PowerEdge FX2 and FC430 servers with VMware ...Principled Technologies
Replacing your legacy VDI servers with a new Intel Xeon processor E5-2650 v3-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a great boon for your enterprise.
In the Principled Technologies (PT) labs, this space-efficient, affordable solution outperformed a legacy server and traditional SAN VSAN by offering 72 percent greater VDI users. Additionally, it achieved greater performance while using 91 percent less space and at a cost of only $176.52 per user.
By supporting more users, saving space, and its affordability, an upgrade to the Intel-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a wise move when replacing your aging, older infrastructure.
VDI Comparison: Five Reasons XenDesktop beats Horizon ViewCitrix
Organizations like yours have many reasons for considering VDI, from providing remote access to Windows apps, to enabling BYOD, to taking a more strategic approach to desktop refresh. As you evaluate your options, you’re probably looking at the industry’s two top solutions for implementing VDI: Citrix XenDesktop and VMware Horizon View. The choice you make will define the business value you drive, so it’s important to go beyond assumptions and first impressions and determine which solution will best help you achieve the goals of your own VDI initiative.
Advantages of Mainframe Replication With Hitachi VSPHitachi Vantara
Learn how Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform mainframe replication capabilities can address your business continuity and disaster recovery requirements. Also learn how Brocade switches and directors complement HDS mainframe replication capabilities and add value to HDS solutions. By viewing this webcast, you’ll learn: Trends driving changes to business continuity requirements, and how HDS replication products such as Hitachi Universal Replicator and hyperswap integration capabilities with Hitachi Business Continuity Manager are best positioned to address them. The key features and functions of Brocade FCIP switches and Fibre Channel/FICON director inter-data center connectivity that provide additional value to HDS replication solutions. Examples of how companies have implemented complete HDS solutions to solve their mainframe BC and DR needs. For more information on our mainframe solutions please read: http://www.hds.com/solutions/infrastructure/mainframe/?WT.ac=us_mg_sol_mnfr
This document provides an overview of virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) and desktop as a service (DaaS). It defines VDI and DaaS, describes different delivery methods for VDI including on-premise, cloud-based (DaaS), and hybrid models. It discusses factors that influence choosing VDI vs DaaS and lists benefits and challenges of each approach. The document also provides market data on adoption rates and top vendors for VDI and DaaS solutions.
This document summarizes test results of deploying virtual Windows 7 desktops using Citrix XenDesktop 4, Microsoft Hyper-V, and Intel Xeon processors. Key findings include:
- A server with an Intel Xeon 7500 series processor supported 239 virtual desktops, a new density record.
- Servers with Intel Xeon 5600 series processors saw a 30% decrease in processor utilization compared to Xeon 5500 series for the same workload.
- One configuration supported 671 virtual desktops using either a Xeon 5600 or 7500 series processor based server.
This document discusses why VMware is the best choice for server virtualization over other solutions. It provides several key advantages of VMware:
1) VMware vSphere is the most trusted virtualization platform due to its secure and reliable hypervisor architecture that is purpose-built for virtualization, unlike competitors that rely on general-purpose operating systems.
2) vSphere is proven to support business-critical applications requiring high availability and performance through features like HA, DR, and workload optimization.
3) vSphere delivers the lowest total cost of ownership through reduced hardware costs, simple management, and automation that decreases operational expenses.
Infosys Deploys Private Cloud Solution Featuring Combined Hitachi and Microsoft® Technologies. For more information on Hitachi Unified Compute Platform Solutions please visit: http://www.hds.com/products/hitachi-unified-compute-platform/?WT.ac=us_mg_pro_ucp
The document discusses the benefits of using the new 2010 Intel Core vPro processors and Microsoft Office 2010 together for business PCs. It notes that these products provide improved performance and security features that allow businesses to better support mobile workforces, comply with regulations, and remotely manage devices. Using these solutions can help IT organizations tackle challenges around deployment, data access, and keeping PCs secure and up to date.
This document provides an overview of PHD Virtual Backup for Citrix XenServer. PHD was founded in 2005 and provides backup software for virtual environments. Their solution uses a unique architecture that delivers performance, scalability, reliability, flexibility and reduced costs. It has full integration with Citrix XenCenter and supports various hypervisors. The presentation demonstrates the installation, backup and restore capabilities. Pricing starts at $2,000 per host and includes support.
Setting up a failover cluster on the Dell PowerEdge VRTX is a straightforward process. In very little time, you can deploy Dell PowerEdge VRTX with up to four M-series servers, switches, and storage in a redundant configuration using Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V. By setting up a failover cluster on your compact Dell PowerEdge VRTX, you can maximize server uptime to keep your business moving.
The All New 2010 Intel Core vPro Processor Family and Windows 7: Your Best Ch...ReadWriteEnterprise
1. The technical white paper discusses how the new 2010 Intel Core vPro processor family and Windows 7 operating system provide increased performance, security, and manageability for business PCs.
2. Key benefits include up to 2x faster multitasking, reduced security incidents on newer PCs, out-of-band management capabilities, virtualization support, and improved power management to lower costs.
3. Refreshing PCs with Intel Core vPro processors can reduce IT operational costs by up to 50% through features that ease deployment and management tasks like operating system migrations.
Comparing performance and cost: Dell PowerEdge VRTX vs. legacy hardware solutionPrincipled Technologies
Keeping a legacy, disparate hardware solution instead of choosing the new Dell PowerEdge VRTX may cost you more than you realize. We found that the Dell PowerEdge VRTX increased application performance over a legacy, disparate hardware solution across email, database, and file/print server simultaneous workloads while reducing power consumption by 19.8 percent. The VRTX did so in 70.6 percent less rack-equivalent space than the legacy, disparate hardware solution and with one-third as many cables, to reduce complexity and reduce the burden of space in small offices. Finally, despite a larger initial investment, the Dell PowerEdge VRTX could actually lower your total cost of ownership over years as much as 26.0 percent, delivering a solid return on your investment in less than three years.
As our test results show, investing in the Dell PowerEdge VRTX solution could provide you with a compact solution to optimize application performance, reduce complexity, and even lower the total cost of your solution over its lifetime.
Citrix XenDesktop Reference Architecture for 750 usersX-IO Technologies
A reference architecture that delivers a low-cost, high performance storage solution that with no-risk consistency and simple management for the virtualization administrator.
Fusion-io Virtualization Reference Architecture: Deploying Server and Desktop...Principled Technologies
In our testing, Fusion ioControl, Cisco UCS, and VMware technologies created a high-performance, easy-to-configure and manage solution that could handle a demanding mixed application environment consisting of common virtualized business applications and VDI. By prioritizing performance resources with ioControl QoS service levels and policies, we demonstrated that mission-critical and business-critical applications will run at optimum performance levels in a 600 virtual desktop boot storm, or an OLTP heavy-workload use case. By adding Fusion ioTurbine software and Cisco Fusion ioDrive2 into the UCS Blade Server, we further extended OLTP performance with no additional solution footprint. With the Fusion ioControl UI and ioSphere UI integration with vCenter Server, you can manage all aspects of storage, both ioControl and UCS-side Fusion ioDrive flash, from within vCenter console. Fusion ioControl Hybrid Storage and Cisco UCS is a strong solution to meet today’s demanding mixed workloads in your VMware virtualized data center.
A well-designed, feature rich VDI solution can make a significant difference in maximizing datacenter resources efficiency, and minimizing unwanted downtime. Failure to do both these things can drive up per user costs and affect user satisfaction. VMware Horizon View 5.2 reclaimed 27 percent of its previously used disk space from its virtual desktop, ran more efficient AV scans, and when deploying VMs, the VMware solution was faster than the Citrix solution by 38 percent. If your business needs to manage the time and resource burdens created by a VDI user base, VMware Horizon View 5.2 on VMware vSphere 5.1 provides strong advantages over Citrix XenDesktop 7 hosted on Citrix XenServer 6.2.
Enterprise Desktops Well Served - a technical perspective on virtual desktopsMolten Technologies
This document discusses desktops as a service (DaaS) and the technical challenges of deploying virtual desktop solutions in an enterprise. It outlines recommendations for addressing challenges in areas like networking, storage, servers, offline access, and licensing. While DaaS currently delivers virtual desktop operating systems, the document predicts that technologies like rich internet applications will allow DaaS to move away from true desktop OSes. Further development is still needed for applications and cloud services to integrate seamlessly.
The document discusses Vblock Powered Solution for VMware View, which provides a pre-integrated converged infrastructure from Cisco, EMC, and VMware to enable virtual desktop deployments. It offers modular growth, rapid provisioning and decommissioning of desktops, simplified management, self-curing architecture to ensure performance, and support for thousands of desktops on a single Vblock infrastructure package. The solution aims to address the high costs of traditional desktop deployments and deliver desktops as a managed service through a centralized, private "desktop cloud" infrastructure.
Harness Enterprise Data with SQL Server 2008 R2 and New Intel Xeon ProcessorsReadWriteEnterprise
The document discusses how SQL Server 2008 R2 and new Intel Xeon processors can help enterprises harness large volumes of data. It describes innovations in SQL Server 2008 R2 like self-service BI and complex event processing. It also outlines developments in Intel Xeon processors 7500 and 5600 series that improve scalability, performance, virtualization, and reliability. The combination of these software and hardware advances provides massive processing power, flexibility, and lower costs to help organizations address challenges of rapidly growing and complex enterprise data.
While apps may display several symptoms indicative of slow or erratic response after being virtualized, the problem boils down to contention for shared storage resources; contention
that did not occur when the apps had the storage all to themselves.
These so called “bottlenecks” occur in spurts as application requests collide randomly, resulting in spikes of sluggish, unpredictable latency. The more frequent, the greater the
users’ dissatisfaction. You may recall that one of the primary reasons these business critical apps were originally
sequestered on separate physical machines was to avoid such collisions
VDI performance comparison: Dell PowerEdge FX2 and FC430 servers with VMware ...Principled Technologies
Replacing your legacy VDI servers with a new Intel Xeon processor E5-2650 v3-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a great boon for your enterprise.
In the Principled Technologies (PT) labs, this space-efficient, affordable solution outperformed a legacy server and traditional SAN VSAN by offering 72 percent greater VDI users. Additionally, it achieved greater performance while using 91 percent less space and at a cost of only $176.52 per user.
By supporting more users, saving space, and its affordability, an upgrade to the Intel-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a wise move when replacing your aging, older infrastructure.
VDI Comparison: Five Reasons XenDesktop beats Horizon ViewCitrix
Organizations like yours have many reasons for considering VDI, from providing remote access to Windows apps, to enabling BYOD, to taking a more strategic approach to desktop refresh. As you evaluate your options, you’re probably looking at the industry’s two top solutions for implementing VDI: Citrix XenDesktop and VMware Horizon View. The choice you make will define the business value you drive, so it’s important to go beyond assumptions and first impressions and determine which solution will best help you achieve the goals of your own VDI initiative.
Advantages of Mainframe Replication With Hitachi VSPHitachi Vantara
Learn how Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform mainframe replication capabilities can address your business continuity and disaster recovery requirements. Also learn how Brocade switches and directors complement HDS mainframe replication capabilities and add value to HDS solutions. By viewing this webcast, you’ll learn: Trends driving changes to business continuity requirements, and how HDS replication products such as Hitachi Universal Replicator and hyperswap integration capabilities with Hitachi Business Continuity Manager are best positioned to address them. The key features and functions of Brocade FCIP switches and Fibre Channel/FICON director inter-data center connectivity that provide additional value to HDS replication solutions. Examples of how companies have implemented complete HDS solutions to solve their mainframe BC and DR needs. For more information on our mainframe solutions please read: http://www.hds.com/solutions/infrastructure/mainframe/?WT.ac=us_mg_sol_mnfr
This document provides an overview of virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) and desktop as a service (DaaS). It defines VDI and DaaS, describes different delivery methods for VDI including on-premise, cloud-based (DaaS), and hybrid models. It discusses factors that influence choosing VDI vs DaaS and lists benefits and challenges of each approach. The document also provides market data on adoption rates and top vendors for VDI and DaaS solutions.
This document summarizes test results of deploying virtual Windows 7 desktops using Citrix XenDesktop 4, Microsoft Hyper-V, and Intel Xeon processors. Key findings include:
- A server with an Intel Xeon 7500 series processor supported 239 virtual desktops, a new density record.
- Servers with Intel Xeon 5600 series processors saw a 30% decrease in processor utilization compared to Xeon 5500 series for the same workload.
- One configuration supported 671 virtual desktops using either a Xeon 5600 or 7500 series processor based server.
This document discusses why VMware is the best choice for server virtualization over other solutions. It provides several key advantages of VMware:
1) VMware vSphere is the most trusted virtualization platform due to its secure and reliable hypervisor architecture that is purpose-built for virtualization, unlike competitors that rely on general-purpose operating systems.
2) vSphere is proven to support business-critical applications requiring high availability and performance through features like HA, DR, and workload optimization.
3) vSphere delivers the lowest total cost of ownership through reduced hardware costs, simple management, and automation that decreases operational expenses.
Infosys Deploys Private Cloud Solution Featuring Combined Hitachi and Microsoft® Technologies. For more information on Hitachi Unified Compute Platform Solutions please visit: http://www.hds.com/products/hitachi-unified-compute-platform/?WT.ac=us_mg_pro_ucp
The document discusses the benefits of using the new 2010 Intel Core vPro processors and Microsoft Office 2010 together for business PCs. It notes that these products provide improved performance and security features that allow businesses to better support mobile workforces, comply with regulations, and remotely manage devices. Using these solutions can help IT organizations tackle challenges around deployment, data access, and keeping PCs secure and up to date.
This document provides an overview of PHD Virtual Backup for Citrix XenServer. PHD was founded in 2005 and provides backup software for virtual environments. Their solution uses a unique architecture that delivers performance, scalability, reliability, flexibility and reduced costs. It has full integration with Citrix XenCenter and supports various hypervisors. The presentation demonstrates the installation, backup and restore capabilities. Pricing starts at $2,000 per host and includes support.
Setting up a failover cluster on the Dell PowerEdge VRTX is a straightforward process. In very little time, you can deploy Dell PowerEdge VRTX with up to four M-series servers, switches, and storage in a redundant configuration using Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V. By setting up a failover cluster on your compact Dell PowerEdge VRTX, you can maximize server uptime to keep your business moving.
The All New 2010 Intel Core vPro Processor Family and Windows 7: Your Best Ch...ReadWriteEnterprise
1. The technical white paper discusses how the new 2010 Intel Core vPro processor family and Windows 7 operating system provide increased performance, security, and manageability for business PCs.
2. Key benefits include up to 2x faster multitasking, reduced security incidents on newer PCs, out-of-band management capabilities, virtualization support, and improved power management to lower costs.
3. Refreshing PCs with Intel Core vPro processors can reduce IT operational costs by up to 50% through features that ease deployment and management tasks like operating system migrations.
Comparing performance and cost: Dell PowerEdge VRTX vs. legacy hardware solutionPrincipled Technologies
Keeping a legacy, disparate hardware solution instead of choosing the new Dell PowerEdge VRTX may cost you more than you realize. We found that the Dell PowerEdge VRTX increased application performance over a legacy, disparate hardware solution across email, database, and file/print server simultaneous workloads while reducing power consumption by 19.8 percent. The VRTX did so in 70.6 percent less rack-equivalent space than the legacy, disparate hardware solution and with one-third as many cables, to reduce complexity and reduce the burden of space in small offices. Finally, despite a larger initial investment, the Dell PowerEdge VRTX could actually lower your total cost of ownership over years as much as 26.0 percent, delivering a solid return on your investment in less than three years.
As our test results show, investing in the Dell PowerEdge VRTX solution could provide you with a compact solution to optimize application performance, reduce complexity, and even lower the total cost of your solution over its lifetime.
Citrix XenDesktop Reference Architecture for 750 usersX-IO Technologies
A reference architecture that delivers a low-cost, high performance storage solution that with no-risk consistency and simple management for the virtualization administrator.
Fusion-io Virtualization Reference Architecture: Deploying Server and Desktop...Principled Technologies
In our testing, Fusion ioControl, Cisco UCS, and VMware technologies created a high-performance, easy-to-configure and manage solution that could handle a demanding mixed application environment consisting of common virtualized business applications and VDI. By prioritizing performance resources with ioControl QoS service levels and policies, we demonstrated that mission-critical and business-critical applications will run at optimum performance levels in a 600 virtual desktop boot storm, or an OLTP heavy-workload use case. By adding Fusion ioTurbine software and Cisco Fusion ioDrive2 into the UCS Blade Server, we further extended OLTP performance with no additional solution footprint. With the Fusion ioControl UI and ioSphere UI integration with vCenter Server, you can manage all aspects of storage, both ioControl and UCS-side Fusion ioDrive flash, from within vCenter console. Fusion ioControl Hybrid Storage and Cisco UCS is a strong solution to meet today’s demanding mixed workloads in your VMware virtualized data center.
This document summarizes a proposal for implementing a virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) at ABC Inc. It includes an executive summary highlighting benefits of VDI like simplified provisioning and centralized management. It then provides an overview of the current desktop challenges, typical corporate desktop models, and advantages of VDI. The objective is to evaluate the financial and operational impacts of VDI solutions. The analysis compares the 5-year total cost of ownership for the current (BAU) environment versus a VDI solution. It finds that while the VDI solution has higher initial capital costs, it provides overall savings of $66,000 over 5 years through reduced operating expenses.
This reference architecture document describes deploying the VMware vCloud Enterprise Suite on the IBM PureFlex System hardware platform. Key points:
- The vCloud Suite software provides components for managing and delivering cloud services, while the IBM PureFlex System provides an integrated hardware platform in a single chassis.
- The reference architecture focuses on installing the vCloud Suite management components as virtual machines on an ESXi host to manage consumer resources.
- The IBM PureFlex System provides servers, networking, and storage in a single chassis that can then be easily scaled out. This standardized deployment accelerates provisioning of cloud infrastructure.
- Deployment considerations cover systems management using IBM Flex System Manager, server, networking, storage configurations
If your business is considering using a hyperconverged
computer/storage solution rather than disparate dedicated appliances, a Nutanix storage cluster powered by Dell XC630 appliances could bring many benefits. Thanks to its powerful Dell servers with Intel processors, this space-efficient solution was able to handle nine SQL Server 2014 OLTP workloads at over 420,000 OPM, 160 mailboxes in Microsoft Exchange 2013, and file/print and web server disk workloads; that’s enough to meet your present demands and still have room for future growth. With software-defined tiered storage, high availability, and a redundant network architecture, the hyperconverged solution based on Dell XC630 appliances can help your business get the job done.
The IBM BladeCenter Foundation for Cloud white paper provides an overview of the platform and its advantages for enterprises. It discusses how the solution combines servers, storage, networking, and software into an optimized unified architecture. The paper highlights how the platform delivers outstanding performance through its converged networking and scalable architecture. It also emphasizes how the solution provides reliability through redundancy and quality support from IBM.
The document discusses VMware View and desktop virtualization. It describes how VMware View enables IT to deliver desktops as a managed service by centralizing management, providing security and compliance benefits, and reducing costs. It allows delivering desktops from templates while providing a rich user experience across different devices and locations through features like USB redirection and multimedia redirection.
Presentation smart computing starts with a virtual desktop strategysolarisyougood
This document discusses IBM and VMware's joint virtual desktop infrastructure solutions. It highlights how the companies have partnered for over a decade on virtualization innovations. It then provides an overview of VMware's Horizon product suite for delivering and managing virtual desktops and applications across devices. The document also presents IBM and VMware's integrated reference architecture approach for desktop virtualization, which provides tested solutions while allowing flexibility. Finally, it shares a case study of a large bank that deployed VMware View to 20,500 users, achieving significant cost reductions and improved manageability.
The document provides a reference architecture for deploying 3000 virtual desktops using Nutanix Complete Clusters with VMware vSphere 5 and View 5. It details the setup of a 50 node Nutanix cluster, including compute, storage, and networking configurations. Performance tests were run using the VMware RAWC tool to simulate a morning login boot storm and daily user workload across the 3000 virtual desktops. Test results showed the infrastructure could handle the workload with predictable performance even at scale.
The document discusses how client consolidation (virtualization) can significantly reduce the total cost of ownership for PCs. It states that hardware and software costs make up less than 30% of total PC costs, while other non-hardware operation and support costs dominate. Client consolidation through virtualization can lower these total costs by reducing operational and end-user support expenses. Sample pricing information is provided for a virtual desktop infrastructure solution.
VDI-in-a-Box is a simple virtual desktop solution that reduces costs through integrated connection brokering, provisioning, load balancing and profile management. It provides virtual desktops to any user on any device for less than new PCs. The solution simplifies deployment and management of virtual desktops and scales easily by adding more standard servers. It ensures high availability without complex shared storage or load balancing components.
IBM SmartCloud Desktop Infrastructure (SDI) is IBM’s answer to end-user virtualization and integration needs. It offers robust virtual desktop solutions, infrastructure, and services designed to make the deployment of virtual desktops easier as is based on a reference architecture approach. As such, IBM SDI supports a wide range of hardware, hypervisors and software platforms from multiple vendors, providing a high degree of flexibility and customization choices. IBM SDI helps offer a more cost-effective, manageable, virtual desktop environment for a wide range of customer sizes, user types and industry segments. For more information on IBM Systems, visit http://ibm.co/RKEeMO.
Visit http://on.fb.me/LT4gdu to 'Like' the official Facebook page of IBM India Smarter Computing.
Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) allows users to access a virtualized desktop hosted on a remote server over the internet. It provides flexibility for remote access and centralized management. Implementing VDI involves sizing server infrastructure, determining networking needs, and deploying virtual desktops on a hypervisor. Major vendors like VMware and Citrix provide VDI solutions consisting of client software, virtual desktop agents, connection servers, and administrative consoles.
VDI & Storage:Deep Impact.
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, or VDI, is hot. It‟s cool, secure, centrally managed, flexible - it‟s an IT manager‟s dream.
VDI comes in two flavours; Service Hosted VDI (Centralized, single-user remote vDesktop solution) and Client-Side VDI (local, single-user vDesktop solution).
This white paper describes the design of a 50,000-seat virtual desktop deployment using VMware View and vSphere virtualization technologies. Key partners in the project include NetApp, VMware, Cisco, Fujitsu, and Wyse Technology. The design uses a "pool of desktops" approach with standardized server and storage configurations that can be replicated modularly to scale the deployment from 5,000 to 50,000 seats. Detailed specifications are provided for the servers, storage, networking, and other infrastructure components used in the deployment.
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper V server overviewaboobakar sanjar
Virtualization allows multiple operating systems to run on a single machine by dividing the physical hardware resources into virtual machines. Hyper-V is Microsoft's virtualization technology built into Windows Server. It uses a hypervisor to allocate resources to guest VMs. Benefits include reduced costs, high availability, centralized management, and increased efficiency. Hardware requirements include virtualization support from the CPU and enabled data execution prevention. Key Hyper-V components include virtual switches, virtual hard disks (VHD/VHDX files), and child partitions.
Managing the HCI stack: A comparison of two approaches with Dell EMC VxRail a...Principled Technologies
VxRail is a hyperconverged infrastructure solution from Dell Technologies and VMware that provides fully integrated hardware, software, and management tools. It aims to simplify operations through automation and reduce the effort required for tasks like updates, troubleshooting, and support. While other solutions like vSAN ReadyNodes and vSphere Lifecycle Manager offer valuable components, VxRail includes additional management software that integrates all elements and handles ongoing maintenance, providing a more comprehensive "all-inclusive" experience for customers.
Hosted Desktop and Evolution of Hardware Server Technologies-2015 EditionAhmed Sallam
This document discusses the evolution of hardware-assisted server technologies and their benefits for hosted desktops and virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI). It covers technologies like fabric-based infrastructure, in-memory computing, persistent memory, and server virtual IO. These technologies improve security, flexibility, agility and resilience while reducing costs and downtime for VDI deployments. The document provides an overview of key evolving server technologies and how they are shaping the future of desktop virtualization.
Similar to X-Pod for VDI Reference Architecture Enabled by Cisco UCS, VMware Horizon View, and ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array (20)
“An Outlook of the Ongoing and Future Relationship between Blockchain Technologies and Process-aware Information Systems.” Invited talk at the joint workshop on Blockchain for Information Systems (BC4IS) and Blockchain for Trusted Data Sharing (B4TDS), co-located with with the 36th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 3 June 2024, Limassol, Cyprus.
Infrastructure Challenges in Scaling RAG with Custom AI modelsZilliz
Building Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems with open-source and custom AI models is a complex task. This talk explores the challenges in productionizing RAG systems, including retrieval performance, response synthesis, and evaluation. We’ll discuss how to leverage open-source models like text embeddings, language models, and custom fine-tuned models to enhance RAG performance. Additionally, we’ll cover how BentoML can help orchestrate and scale these AI components efficiently, ensuring seamless deployment and management of RAG systems in the cloud.
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial IntelligenceIndexBug
Imagine a world where machines not only perform tasks but also learn, adapt, and make decisions. This is the promise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a technology that's not just enhancing our lives but revolutionizing entire industries.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and MilvusZilliz
Spark is the widely used ETL tool for processing, indexing and ingesting data to serving stack for search. Milvus is the production-ready open-source vector database. In this talk we will show how to use Spark to process unstructured data to extract vector representations, and push the vectors to Milvus vector database for search serving.
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-und-domino-lizenzkostenreduzierung-in-der-welt-von-dlau/
DLAU und die Lizenzen nach dem CCB- und CCX-Modell sind für viele in der HCL-Community seit letztem Jahr ein heißes Thema. Als Notes- oder Domino-Kunde haben Sie vielleicht mit unerwartet hohen Benutzerzahlen und Lizenzgebühren zu kämpfen. Sie fragen sich vielleicht, wie diese neue Art der Lizenzierung funktioniert und welchen Nutzen sie Ihnen bringt. Vor allem wollen Sie sicherlich Ihr Budget einhalten und Kosten sparen, wo immer möglich. Das verstehen wir und wir möchten Ihnen dabei helfen!
Wir erklären Ihnen, wie Sie häufige Konfigurationsprobleme lösen können, die dazu führen können, dass mehr Benutzer gezählt werden als nötig, und wie Sie überflüssige oder ungenutzte Konten identifizieren und entfernen können, um Geld zu sparen. Es gibt auch einige Ansätze, die zu unnötigen Ausgaben führen können, z. B. wenn ein Personendokument anstelle eines Mail-Ins für geteilte Mailboxen verwendet wird. Wir zeigen Ihnen solche Fälle und deren Lösungen. Und natürlich erklären wir Ihnen das neue Lizenzmodell.
Nehmen Sie an diesem Webinar teil, bei dem HCL-Ambassador Marc Thomas und Gastredner Franz Walder Ihnen diese neue Welt näherbringen. Es vermittelt Ihnen die Tools und das Know-how, um den Überblick zu bewahren. Sie werden in der Lage sein, Ihre Kosten durch eine optimierte Domino-Konfiguration zu reduzieren und auch in Zukunft gering zu halten.
Diese Themen werden behandelt
- Reduzierung der Lizenzkosten durch Auffinden und Beheben von Fehlkonfigurationen und überflüssigen Konten
- Wie funktionieren CCB- und CCX-Lizenzen wirklich?
- Verstehen des DLAU-Tools und wie man es am besten nutzt
- Tipps für häufige Problembereiche, wie z. B. Team-Postfächer, Funktions-/Testbenutzer usw.
- Praxisbeispiele und Best Practices zum sofortigen Umsetzen
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
X-Pod for VDI Reference Architecture Enabled by Cisco UCS, VMware Horizon View, and ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array
1. Validated Reference Architecture
August 2014
X-Pod for VDI
Providing a simple yet best of breed converged infrastructure for virtualized desktop solutions
Enabled by:
X-IO ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array
VMware Horizon View 5.3
Cisco UCS
2. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 2
Table of Contents
Introduction..................................................................................................... 3
Key takeaway ...................................................................................................................................... 3
Executive Overview.......................................................................................... 3
Why VDI? ............................................................................................................................................ 4
VDI—Business Benefits ................................................................................... 5
Flexible Desktop Environment .............................................................................................................. 5
Better, Easier Desktop Management .................................................................................................... 5
Desktop by Template ........................................................................................................................... 6
Security and Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 6
BYOD Support ..................................................................................................................................... 6
Virtual Desktop Implementation Risks ............................................................... 7
Performance & Capacity: Not a Trade-Off ............................................................................................ 7
Reliability and Redundancy .................................................................................................................. 7
Deploying and Expanding Desktops Pools ........................................................................................... 8
Redefining “Steady-State” Operations .................................................................................................. 8
VDI Planning Questions to Ask ......................................................................... 9
Solution Overview...........................................................................................10
Components ...................................................................................................................................... 10
Solution Architecture ......................................................................................13
Hardware Components ...................................................................................................................... 14
Software Components........................................................................................................................ 15
Cisco Unified Compute System (UCS) ............................................................................................... 15
VMware vSphere 5 ............................................................................................................................ 16
VMware Horizon View 5 Environment Architecture ............................................................................. 18
VMware vCenter Operations Manager................................................................................................ 21
X-IO ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array .................................................................................................... 22
Performance Analysis of Tested configurations ................................................23
Test Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 23
Workload Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 23
Virtual Desktop Deploy Operations..................................................................................................... 27
Virtual Desktop Boot Storm ................................................................................................................ 29
Conclusion .....................................................................................................31
Contact X-IO technologies ................................................................................................................. 31
Appendix........................................................................................................32
Appendix A: Detailed Analysis of vSphere Performance Graphs, Login VSI 500 User Run ................ 32
Appendix B: EXAMPLE Login VSI Target Desktop Pool Configuration................................................ 33
3. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 3
Introduction
This white paper provides a primer for the X-Pod for VDI converged infrastructure solution, powered by X- IO storage. X-Pod is a reference architecture designed to deliver a repeatable, high-performance virtual desktop infrastructure. It utilizes an industry-leading VMware Horizon View 5.3.1 environment, hosted on Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) Blade Servers, with storage housed on a single, high- performance, X-IO ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array.
The environment described herein has been extensively tested by X-IO and verified by VMware. This document is intended to provide insight into the components, the architecture, and the performance required to meet the demands of a 500, 1000, and 1500 seat virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) deployment.
Key takeaway
This paper details the extensive testing that X-IO has performed and provides guidance as to the performance requirements of various operations based on the X-Pod core components of Cisco UCS server and networking hardware together with the X-IO Intelligent Storage Element (ISE) systems. This validated testing demonstrates that this solution is capable of delivering a high-performance desktop experience at up to 97% concurrency.
It is designed to act as both a primer for VDI deployments and as a technical overview of the X-Pod architecture. Those readers who are comfortable with the business and technical benefits of deploying VDI together with the pitfalls of implementing such an infrastructure should progress to the Solution Overview section of this document.
Executive Overview
When discussing VDI architectures with customers and solution providers, X-IO have noticed a common trend of two concerns. Firstly whether the technical statistics and benchmarks provide are “real-world” or marketing-hyped numbers. Secondly whether VDI architects should be utilizing hyper-converged systems or using best of breed components. It is therefore worth briefly covering these points in turn.
When it comes to VDI design, there are many pitfalls that can occur. This has led to a frightening statistic that for every successful VDI implementation, there are 7 to 10 that fail, the vast majority of these being due to an inappropriate storage design. X-IO have therefore worked with real-world benchmark tools such as Login VSI to ensure that any benchmarks carried out are true reflections of user actions rather than synthetic workloads applied by I/O testing tools. All of the user counts reflected in this document are actually high-utilization loads and if anything, are worst-case numbers rather than optimistic based upon assumptions or unrealistic scenarios (e.g. zero user data or ridiculously high data de-duplication forecasts).
With regards to the argument for hyper-converged systems, the systems out there today undoubtedly have their place, however they need to be precisely architected for today’s workload and are relatively inflexible for future growth or change of use. This has often led to a difficult decision for architects as to
4. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 4
whether to endure the complexity and risk of using best of breed components or to compromise and deploy a pre-converged, collapsed stack. With the arrival of converged solutions such as X-Pod, best of breed components can be deployed, however using pre-architected and tested blueprints that give the peace of mind previously only found with hyper-converged systems.
Why VDI?
Virtualization of servers and IT infrastructure has been well established in the business landscape. Operating expense (OPEX) cost reductions are routine in a virtualized data center due to the reduced number of physical servers, more centralized management tools, energy savings, and many other factors. This cost savings makes desktop virtualization such a promising opportunity to transform a major cost for IT organizations. Unfortunately, virtualized desktop workloads are unlike most of the server virtualization workloads with which organizations have experience. While “steady-state” desktop operations are what is commonly sized for (for example, 10-20 IOPS/desktop), it is the “non-standard” operations and misconfigured sizing operations that eventually cause poor user experience and make VDI such a challenging, and expensive, solution to design and implement.
By leveraging desktop virtualization solutions such as VMware Horizon View, IT organizations can provide their customers with a superior desktop experience while decreasing management cost and increasing flexibility of the organization. IT organizations can now increase the leverage of their IT staff by consolidating desktop management and hardware into the enterprise virtualization computing model. For example, relatively few IT staff can manage hundreds (if not thousands) of desktops for patch management or application upgrades. Using tools such as VMware Horizon (with View) to manage snapshots, gold images can be quickly reverted to a known state if required, which reduces capacity as only data changes are stored for each snapshot. By contrast, traditional methods of patch management require excessive involvement from the IT organization across hundreds (if not thousands) of physical machines that could be spread around the world.
In addition to desktop virtualization, tools are now available to virtualize applications as well. End users can be provisioned individual applications that can be delivered to any device, whether that is a laptop, tablet, or smartphone. As the “bring your own device” (BYOD) phenomenon continues to grow, users demand more flexible access to the resources they need to perform their jobs. Policies that prohibit employees from using personal devices, and that the company does not pay for, are becoming more difficult to defend.
Implementing a virtual desktop solution can be immensely beneficial to the organization, but if implemented incorrectly, it can be an equally impressive failure. User experience is the “gold standard” that any solution will be held to, because users will evaluate the new solution based on the physical desktop that was just replaced. Proof of Concept (POC) testing is essential when evaluating any new solution, because the process of configuring the test gives essential information about how the system will perform. Tools such as Login Virtual Session Indexer (Login VSI™) are critical for simulating “like” production workloads and are a worthwhile investment as part of evaluating different solutions. Inadequately designed VDI implementations often perform well in the POC phase but are overwhelmed when placed into production. In a majority of these cases, storage performance is often the cause of poor user experience, is the most often undersized for performance, and can be the most expensive single component of any VDI solution.
5. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 5
VDI—Business Benefits
Properly sized and implemented, a VDI project can provide users with a “whole” desktop experience that surpasses their physical desktop machine. However, the benefits to the business are similar to server virtualization but are applied at an order of magnitude greater scale. Enterprise-class computing hardware can be applied to end-user computing (reliability/availability/performance) and can leverage large-scale virtualization management techniques (capacity/scale). This can allow for greater leverage of existing IT staff, enable higher levels of reliability (including disaster recovery), and reduce overall ongoing costs to the business.
While VDI can be a tremendous advantage for the business, data storage costs are the single largest cost component of the solution and the most common cause of poor user experience and failed implementations. Listed below are some advantages to the business and the role that storage has to play in each.
Flexible Desktop Environment
Many types of desktop needs are seen across various organizations and industries. Based upon the load pattern and use case, different kinds of desktop virtualization options are available. In fact, it is likely that multiple types of implementations exist in a single, larger organization.
For example, the resource requirements for graphic designers, software developers, Microsoft Office power users, and executives are quite different than the requirements for a call center or kiosk desktop. The power users will generally have higher CPU and memory requirements and will likely require that the desktop be persistent. Power users will expect any changes to their desktop to be preserved and in the same state they left it when logging off.
In a call center (or kiosk) configuration, users expect to log in to any desktop and have the exact same experience with nothing preserved on the desktop. If one desktop has an issue, the user simply moves to another desktop instance and tries again. There is usually a standard suite of software that these virtual desktops utilize to support the business functions. This is especially true if, for example, cloud-based customer resource management (CRM) service or Office365 are being used.
Better, Easier Desktop Management
With physical desktops, the IT organization has to go out and physically touch each desktop in some cases to remediate a problem. This geographic dispersion, even if within the same office building, increases the staffing requirements to manage the end-user desktops and increases the time required for “break/fix” functions. There is also an increased risk of data theft when users store corporate data on physical desktops that reside anywhere in the organization. Desktop virtualization allows for centralized management of the most commonly touched component in the desktop solution, the desktop itself.
Backups can also be more effective, since all user data is kept in the datacenter – even though it looks to the user like an attached, physical disk housed on local storage. This eliminates many of the issues seen with trying to back up hundreds and thousands of remote, physical desktop machines. Network interruptions, issues with individual operating system bugs, failing physical hard drives, and so on are all mitigated by utilizing a common storage platform. In addition, since the effective storage for each user desktop is deduplicated by the VDI layer (VMware View Composer Linked Clones), the amount of storage actually needing to be backed up is vastly reduced and quickly recovered.
VMware has for years provided a rich API to enable storage partners to better integrate with the VMware ecosystem. This enables the virtualization administrator (vAdmin) to quickly and efficiently assign storage
6. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 6
resources where required while the complex provisioning of storage resources up through the different virtualization and hardware layers is done by software. This greatly leverages the amount of storage the vAdmin can effectively manage and ensures that best practices are followed for storage configuration, thereby reducing risk.
Desktop by Template
IT organizations can create a library of virtual desktop templates, each of which can be carefully tuned and configured for the business need. These templates can then be used to provision virtual desktop machines very, very quickly—in minutes in most cases.
For example, if an organization routinely uses contractors for a few different types of functions, a “gold image” template can be created for each, which can include the appropriate operating system, security settings, and all the applications contractors would need to accomplish their tasks. When a new contract employee is added, the IT staff need only deploy a new virtual desktop based upon the appropriate template. This can be done literally in minutes, but this can also generate an enormous amount of storage traffic—or I/Os per second (IOPS)—with a relatively small number of deploy operations.
NOTE: Deploying a desktop is one of the most performance-demanding operations that storage will encounter in a desktop virtualization solution. Performing these operations during “steady-state” operations can put an abnormally large strain on the storage infrastructure and can impact the user experience of all other users on the system.
Security and Compliance
VDI allows an IT organization to have much better control over corporate data. As such, it makes the job of implementing consistent, common security and compliance features easier. Depending upon the industry the organization is in, compliance and security concerns can be important or strictly mandated.
With physical desktops and mobile devices, corporations face the increased risk of data loss and theft of any device where data is stored “locally.” Desktop virtualization enables employees to work with data securely on centralized corporate resources. In some cases, users can work from any device in any location with their data meeting the security requirements of the organization.
Depending on the role of the desktop users, certain data regulations may apply that require data separation and isolation (e.g., financial, legal, and medical). This requires separate storage devices that must be able to support high IOPS and capacity levels that the separated pools require. Modular-based storage systems are inherently designed to accommodate this data security requirement.
BYOD Support
Increasingly, organizations are supporting (and are being demanded to support) “bring your own device” (BYOD) functionality. The workforce is changing, and the growing expectation is that applications and desktop access will be available on whatever device the employee has, from laptop to tablet to smartphone. This also has an immense benefit to the business, as the employee is providing a “preferred” end-point device that can be used to be productive.
VMware Horizon View offers a very rich interface that allows users to access their applications and desktop on any mobile device. Individual applications can be virtualized, further enabling employee productivity and easing the demands to corporate computing resources.
7. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 7
Virtual Desktop Implementation Risks
While the list of benefits that can be realized by VDI implementation, both in manpower and in operating expenses (OPEX), is impressive, the opportunities for failure are equally concerning. This section lists several areas that can put a VDI initiative at risk. In all cases, sufficient planning for the final production load and careful monitoring of operations are required to ensure smooth operations.
Performance & Capacity: Not a Trade-Off
Performance has a direct effect on end-user experience, and poor storage performance sizing is usually the number one reason. Many VDI solutions are sized only for “steady-state” performance requirements. Common VDI operations, such as boot storms, login storms, deploy operations, recovery, and other “maintenance operations,” can require an enormous amount of transactional performance (IOPS) from storage systems. VDI instances have to respond with little or no discernable impact to the end user when these maintenance operations are conducted.
Performance is not the only thing to consider when sizing a VDI solution, as there must be enough capacity to satisfy the requirements for user data, operating systems, application data, and user persona. While there are several techniques to increase the amount of effective capacity a solution can provide (VMware View Composer Linked-Clones), there is still an underlying requirement for capacity— performance. Unlike regular “file server” class capacity, this data has performance requirements that go across all of the data (e.g., there is little “dead data”). This broad requirement means that while there may be areas of high-performance concentration (base images or replicas), the rest of the data has a high IOPS/TB requirement as well. This rest of the data is what the individual VDI instances have to work with, so any slowdown in capacity will directly affect the end-user experience. Solutions that rely on calculated deduplication and compression techniques will see degrading performance ratios as the capacity is consumed, as there are limited amounts of processing power and memory capacity in the storage controllers (i.e., the number of calculations increases with increasing capacity).
According to VDI support organizations, storage systems account for 80 – 90% of the VDI performance issues reported. Often this is due to read and write latency in the storage system.
Reliability and Redundancy
No virtualized datacenter is sustainable without reliability and redundancy. In the past, services running in the data center did not necessarily represent a disaster if there was a service disruption. For example, a service event to the CRM applications, or email services, would be painful to the organization if they were sluggish, non-responsive, or unavailable for a period of time. Users could still use their desktop for other productive functions, such as Microsoft Office applications or researching on the internet.
Virtual Desktop Infrastructures, on the other hand, can represent a true disaster if they become sluggish or non-responsive. The user is no longer impacted by only one or two applications but by the very desktop itself. Imagine the majority of the workforce reduced to typing 10 or 20 words per minute or login times in excess of 30 minutes. Any slowdown in the VDI ecosystem has a very “public” result. Storage systems incur a tremendous performance penalty when performing disk drive recovery operations, and these have a dramatically negative impact to the end-user experience. Even if data is separated into “groups” or “sets,” centralized storage controllers are now responsible for managing recovery operations in addition to ongoing operations. Storage companies would not generally consider this a “single point of failure,” but users will.
8. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 8
Deploying and Expanding Desktops Pools
Over the course of the reference architecture testing, various user configurations were tested. At one point in the testing, three desktop pools of 500 users each were expanded by 10 desktops each. This was done while all of the desktops were powered on, but no workload was being applied (idle). Below is the graph of the IOPS from the single ISE 740 system that was tested. Regular spikes in IOPS can be seen to reach over 12,000 IOPS, and the entire operation lasted for roughly 10 minutes. Performing this activity during the production period would have a significant impact to other functions that required storage performance, unless the storage system had enough headroom to accommodate the additional load. Traditional storage solutions that can accommodate this level of activity are cost prohibitive and are often undersized for this level of performance.
Figure 1 - Deployment Operations and High IOPS
The majority of the deployment time and performance requirements came from the Sysprep operations for the Windows 7, 32-bit operating system. Cloning of the base images and creation of the View Composer linked clones represented ~1/3 of the deployment time for the 30 desktops mentioned above. In testing with large numbers of desktops (500), the time and performance required for the Sysprep functions (not cloning the base image) comprised the vast majority of the deploy operation time and performance required.
Redefining “Steady-State” Operations
When sizing a VDI environment, many different operations must be planned for. Accommodating hosted desktop users during “steady state” with a low-latency experience has to be satisfied during maintenance operations. Boot storms and login/logout storms of relatively few numbers of users can push a storage system designed only for “steady state” well past its breaking point. These operations are part of the normal desktop access activity for users, and as such they should be included in any storage sizing discussion for “normal” operations.
In testing with Login VSI, storage performance (IOPS) required during the user login phase was two times the “steady-state” workload. Considerable thought should be given to user behavior patterns and how many users will be concurrently initiating connections to the desktop environment. Login VSI is capable of adjusting the rate at which users log in to the environment for the test and is an excellent method for exploring the performance of the solution during various login activity levels. In the testing X-IO performed, user login rates of 16/min, 25/min, and 33/min were tested. The single greatest impact to the
9. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 9
login times was the high compute (CPU and RAM) utilization of the UCS blade servers when the majority of the users had connected to the solution.
VDI Planning Questions to Ask
Proper planning is essential to a successful VDI roll-out. Here is a non-exhaustive set of questions to help guide your investigation into a VDI pilot program and your full production program.
What are the different kinds of users you will have to support (i.e., kiosks, developers, power users, tellers, knowledge workers)?
What is the scope of each user type?
How many simultaneous desktops will be required?
What are the expected resource demands for each user (i.e., CPU, memory, disk space, network traffic)?
What is the planned concurrency for your user pools and will their usage be offset from each other (i.e., shifts, geographical support)?
What are the relative benefits for virtualizing desktop access for each user type?
What are the relative risks for each user type, if there are access issues?
What existing infrastructure can be used for the VDI implementation?
For each user type, would persistent or non-persistent desktops be more appropriate?
For each user type would linked clones, full clones, or dedicated virtual machines be more appropriate?
What existing IT management and monitoring tools do you have in place?
Will your infrastructure support iSCSI? Fibre Channel? Is either preferable to you?
Will the pilot program be based on actual users or will it use validation software like Login VSI?
For the pilot program, what are your success criteria?
How much cost will there be in extending the warranty beyond what was included with the base support period?
What metrics are important to you? For example:
o Total number of IOPS
o Total throughput
o Recompose wall-clock duration
o Maximum latency as seen by end user
o Virtual machine boot time
o Login / logout times
How will the transition from pilot program to full production implementation be done?
10. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 10
Solution Overview
This X-Pod reference architecture white paper describes a compact configuration to deliver a high- performance VDI environment that supports up to 1500 virtual desktops. In the following sections, Cisco UCS, Cisco Nexus, Cisco MDS, VMware vSphere, VMware Horizon View, and the ISE hybrid storage array are described.
Components
The following components were chosen for this X-Pod reference architecture.
Cisco Unified Computing Systems (UCS)
The underlying premise of a VDI solution is to run user desktops on powerful datacenter servers rather than on distributed physical machines. Cisco has focused on the characteristics needed to support this functionality in datacenter servers and has developed the following innovations:
Extended memory
Virtualization optimization, with Cisco VN-Link technology
Unified I/O access and unified fabric
Unified, centralized management
Service profiles
The bottom line is Cisco has developed and refined the Unified Computing System to specifically meet the Enterprise VDI requirements. Simplified architecture and management geared toward datacenter fulfillment of virtual desktops leads to reduced total cost of ownership (TCO) by lowering acquisition costs, lowering operating costs, and lowering ongoing operational costs.
The UCS unites compute, network, storage access, and virtualization into a cohesive system. The system is integrated on a low-latency, 10-Gigabit ethernet (10GbE) unified network fabric with enterprise-class, x86-architecture servers. It is an integrated, multi-chassis platform in which all resources participate in a unified management domain. The Cisco UCS accelerates the delivery of new services simply, reliably, and securely through end-to end provisioning and migration support for both virtualized and non- virtualized systems.
For more on UCS:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/data-center-virtualization/unified- computing/at_a_glance_c45-523181.pdf
Cisco Nexus
The Cisco Nexus 5548P is a one-rack-unit (1U), 1 GbE, 10 GbE, and FCoE access-layer switch built to provide 960 Gbps of throughput with very low latency. It has 32 fixed, 1 GbE, or 10 GbE ports that accept modules and cables meeting the Small Form-Factor Pluggable Plus (SFP+) form factor. One expansion module slot can be configured to support up to 16 additional 1 GbE and 10 GbE ports or eight Fibre Channel ports plus eight 1 GbE and 10 GbE ports. The switch has a single serial console port and a single out-of-band 10/100/1000-Mbps Ethernet management port.
11. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 11
Cisco MDS
Cisco MDS 9148 Multilayer Fabric Switch is a high-performance Fibre Channel switch platform. It provides low power consumption and high density with up to 48 line-rate 8 Gbps ports in one rack unit (1U).
VMware Horizon View
Horizon View is used to deliver virtual desktops as a service in a broad range of enterprise use cases, enabling the best user experience for maximum productivity. IT administrators can easily provision and customize the environment to comply with corporate policy and end-user needs. Desktop virtualization with Horizon View enables organizations to do more with less and adopt a user-centric, flexible approach to computing. By decoupling applications, data, and the operating system from the endpoint—and by moving these components into the datacenter, where they can be centrally managed in your cloud— desktop and application virtualization offers IT a more streamlined, secure way to manage users and provides agile, on-demand desktop services.
X-IO Technologies Intelligent Storage Element (ISE)
Consolidation and business intelligence are key themes in today’s IT. Consolidation brings with it challenges in server multi-tenancy and hosted desktops while database management systems become the keys to a successful business. In both cases, fast and reliable solutions lead to a more productive and profitable enterprise. The ISE 700 series hybrid storage system keeps pace with the performance demands of today’s IT without the high cost it takes traditional storage systems to keep up. The ISE 700 series provides an ideal balance of price, performance, capacity, and reliability by combining SSD and HDD into a single hybrid pool of capacity to provide SSD performance at HDD pricing. ISE outperforms systems that are up to ten times more expensive and provides an outstanding TCO by reducing operating costs associated with management, power, cooling, and datacenter footprint.
ISE Manager Suite
Enterprise storage is not only facing a challenging future it’s facing a challenging present. Today’s datacenters are increasingly heterogeneous and multifaceted. Virtualization technologies, diverse storage platforms, and cloud services create obstacles for traditional storage systems and storage management. How can you as a storage administrator be expected to efficiently and effectively manage storage in such a complex environment? The answer lies in your management tools, which must have deep integration with virtualization technologies and host operating systems while being precise, streamlined, and user- friendly.
Ideal for the challenging storage scenarios of modern enterprises, ISE Manager 4.0 is the solution for today and tomorrow. It is an intuitive, flexible interface that provides simplified end-to-end storage management for multiple physical, virtual, and cloud environments from a single interface. It lets you simplify, centralize, and automate storage administration with software tailored to modern datacenters.
12. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 12
Figure 2 - ISE Manager Suite
Login VSI
Login Virtual Session Indexer (Login VSI) is the industry standard load testing tool for virtualized desktop environments. Login VSI can be used to test the performance and scalability of VMware Horizon View, Citrix XenDesktop and XenApp, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services (Terminal Services), or any other Windows-based virtual desktop solution. Login VSI may be used to compare and validate the performance of different software and hardware solutions in an environment. Login VSI provides a method to measure the maximum capacity of an infrastructure. Simulated users work with the same applications as an average employee, such as Word, Excel, Outlook, and Internet Explorer.
For more information, download a trial at www.loginvsi.com
13. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 13
Solution Architecture
This section highlights the hardware and software configurations used to assemble this reference architecture for 500, 1000 and 1500 virtual desktops delivered with VMware Horizon View 5.3 on vSphere 5.5 U1.
This environment was built on top of two Cisco UCS B-Series chassis, Cisco networking components, and X-IO 700 Series hybrid storage arrays.
Figure 2 shows the logical diagram of the solution architecture for 500, 1000, and 1500 virtual desktops. The same infrastructure was used for all three tests.
Figure 3 - Logical Diagram for 500, 1000, and 1500 Desktop Reference Architecture
14. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 14
Hardware Components
The following hardware components were leveraged to support the Login VSI test of 500, 1000, and 1500 VDI desktop loads. Hardware Quantity Configuration Servers Cisco UCS 5100 B-Series Chassis 1 1 500 Desktop Cluster
2208XP Fabric I/O Extenders
2
Cisco UCS B200 M3
1
Two Intel Xeon E5-2680 2.7-GHz CPU (16 cores total) 128 GB RAM
Infrastructure Blade
Cisco UCS B200 M3
7
Two Intel Xeon E5-2680 2.7-GHz CPU (16 cores total) 128 GB RAM
vSphere desktop cluster
VIC 1280
8
Cisco UCS 5100 B-Series Chassis 2 1 1000 Desktop Cluster
2208XP Fabric I/O Extenders
2
Cisco UCS B200 M3
8
Two Intel Xeon E5-2697 2.7-GHz CPU (24 cores total) 256 GB RAM
vSphere desktop cluster
VIC 1280
8
Cisco UCS 5100 B-Series Chassis 3 1 Login VSI Infrastructure
2208XP Fabric I/O Extenders
2
Cisco UCS B440
1
Two Intel Xeon E7-4870 2.4-GHz CPU (24 cores total) 256 GB RAM
Login VSI Server
UCS-VIC-M82-8P
8
Networking
Cisco Nexus 5548
2
Cisco MDS 9148
2
8 GB/s Fibre Channel Switch, 2 ports per ISE 700
Cisco UCS 6248 Fabric Interconnect
2
Storage
X-IO ISE 710 Hybrid Storage Array
1
8Gb/s Fibre Channel – for BfS Array
X-IO ISE 730 Hybrid Storage Array
1
8Gb/s Fibre Channel – for Login VSI Share
X-IO ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array
1
8Gb/s Fibre Channel – for all Horizon View desktop pools
15. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 15
Software Components
See the table below for software details. Software Version vSphere
ESXi
5.5 update 1
vCenter Server
Operating System
Microsoft .NET
Microsoft SQL Server
5.5 update 1
Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit Standard Ed.
3.5 SP1
2008 R2 VMware Horizon View
View Connection Server
Operating System
5.3.1
Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit Standard Ed.
View Composer (installed on vCenter Server)
Operating System
5.3.1
Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit Standard Ed. Microsoft Software Platforms
Active Directory, DNS, DHCP
Windows Server 2012 Login VSI, VSIshare Server
Operating System
Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit Standard Ed.
Microsoft .NET
3.5
Login VSI
4.0 Virtual Desktops: Target Desktop
Operating System
Windows 7 32-bit
Microsoft Office
2010
Adobe Reader
v. 11
Java
SE 7 U13
DoroPDF
VMware View Agent
5.3.1 Virtual Desktop: Launch Desktop
OS
Windows 7 32 bit
Cisco Unified Compute System (UCS)
The Cisco UCS configuration was connected to X-IO ISE 700 storage arrays through dual, redundant paths to the MDS 9148 switches, then connected to the Cisco 6248UP fabric interconnect with dual, redundant, 10 Gbps connections. This architecture provides for a highly available and high-performance architecture.
Each Cisco UCS chassis was connected to each fabric interconnect with four 10-Gbps network connections.
16. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 16
The dual fabric interconnect pairs have primary and subordinate roles in this configuration. For more information about optimizing and configuring the Cisco UCS server service profiles for VDI, please refer to the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/go/unifiedcomputing
VMware vSphere 5
For this test configuration, the VMware vSphere 5.5 Update 1, ESXi hypervisor was deployed. All of the hosts were set up to boot from SAN (optional) using the X-IO ISE 710 hybrid storage array.
Clusters
The environment is organized into three main components: the VDI clusters, management cluster, and Login VSI Launcher cluster. Two VDI clusters encompass a total of 15 UCS blades and are responsible for supporting all target virtual desktops. The first VDI cluster of 7 nodes runs 500 VDI target desktops. The second VDI cluster of 8 nodes runs 1000 target VDI desktops. 1 UCS blade (in its own cluster) is used to run all infrastructure functionality, including a Domain Controller, vCenter, VASA provider, vCenter Operations Manager, and Horizon View servers. The last cluster, the Login VSI Launcher cluster, is a UCS blade that runs 80 Login VSI Launcher desktops.
VDI Clusters
The two clusters under test in this reference architecture are the VDI clusters. They consist of 15 hosts, as described in the “Hardware Components” section above. These work together to support the test loads of 500, 1000, and 1500 virtual desktop machines.
Figure 4 - VDI Cluster for 500 Desktops
17. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 17
Figure 5 - VDI Cluster for 1000 Desktops
Infrastructure
The Infrastructure UCS blade houses all virtual machines to support the vSphere environment, the Horizon View environment, and the Login VSI testing environment.
Figure 6 - Infrastructure VM for Reference Architecture Validation
18. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 18
VMware Horizon View 5 Environment Architecture
The VDI environment in this solution is created and managed in VMware Horizon View v5.3.1. To support this, the vSphere environment runs in a single datacenter with three clusters and a single vCenter instance. All hosts are running ESXi 5.5 U1.
VMware View 5.3.1 was used to construct and manage the desktop virtual machines. This test used a floating pool of non-persistent, linked clone desktop virtual machines. The details of the specific VMware View pool definition are included in the Appendix of this white paper.
In addition to the linked clone method of deploying desktop virtual machines, VMware View 5.3.1 uses VMware VSA technology. This technology allows a small amount of VMware ESXi host RAM to be used as a content-based read cache for the selected desktops’ read I/O operations. VMware VSA was configured at 2 GB for each VMware ESXi host and for each VMware View pool used for this test.
View Pools
The virtual machines in the 500 desktop VDI cluster were stored on four datastores, which are in turn stored on four ISE LUNs. Each LUN is 1 TB in total capacity, configured with RAID-1 protection and housed on a single ISE 740 hybrid storage array, as shown in the following ISE Manager and vSphere Client figures.
Figure 7 - Datastores for 500 Desktop View Pools (vSphere Client)
19. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 19
Figure 8 - LUNs for 500 Desktop View Pools (ISE Manager)
The 1000 desktop VDI cluster is configured in the same manner. Below is a screen shot of the datastores as they are configured.
Figure 9 - Datastores for 1000 Desktop View Pools (vSphere Client)
20. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 20
Multiple desktop pools were configured in VMware Horizon View to accomplish the tests. The first 500 desktop test used 5 pools, each with 100 desktops, as shown in the image below.
Figure 10 - Pools for 500 desktops
The 1000 desktop test was done with 2 pools of 500. The 1500 desktop test was done with 3 pools of 500. Below is a screen shot of the three desktop pools of 500, used in the 1500 desktop test.
Figure 11 - Pools for 1500 desktops
Target VMs
Base Image OS
Windows 7 32bit, Enterprise VM Hardware Version
8 vCPU
1 Memory
1.5 GB HD
16 GB
The target desktop virtual machines are created from a base image. This image was created as a stock Windows 7 32 bit Enterprise operating system. Windows updates were applied to bring it to the current levels. Several applications were then installed, including Microsoft Office, Adobe Acrobat Reader, and FreeMind. The view agent is installed on the gold image, and a snapshot is created.
21. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 21
VMware vCenter Operations Manager
vCenter Operations Manager (vCOPS) is a monitoring, trending, and alerting tool. It gathers metrics on all major components of the vSphere environment and automatically generates alerts if any values go outside of either manually or automatically set thresholds. Because vCenter Operations is extensible, it can learn to monitor application and product specific characteristics.
This reference architecture uses two extensions to vCenter Operations:
vCenter Operations Manager for View
X-IO ISE Management Pack for VMware vCenter Operations
vCenter Operations Manager for View
The vCenter Operations Manager for View extension gathers information on the running Horizon View environment. It automatically sets thresholds for View-related metrics and also adds many dashboards to the vCenter Operations instance.
X-IO ISE Management Pack for VMware vCenter Operations
X-IO technologies has developed a vCenter Operations adapter extension that allows ISE storage units to participate as a full-fledged member of the vSphere ecosystem. All major performance and configuration metrics are captured and custom dashboards are added.
Figure 12 - vCenter Operations with ISE Management Pack
22. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 22
X-IO ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array
The ISE 740 hybrid storage array has 28.8 TB of usable capacity configured from the highest-quality, mission-critical 10K RPM SAS drives and enterprise-grade, MLC SSD into a single pool of flash-enabled storage. The ISE 740 is fully redundant with active-active controllers, each including four 8 Gb Fibre Channel ports. The ISE 700 Series includes patented Continuous Adaptive Data Placement (CADP) software, which analyzes the behavior of host I/O and automatically places hotspot data onto SSD only if measurable performance gains will be achieved. CADP runs continuously and makes data movement decisions every 5 seconds.
In each of the 500, 1000, and 1500 user tests the ISE 740 delivered low-latency read and write transactions for the entire duration of the tests and project.
Figure 13 - The ISE 740 Hybrid Storage Array
23. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 23
Performance Analysis of Tested configurations
Test Methodology
While storage vendors have for years utilized synthetic benchmark tools to simulate performance loads (Iometer, SQLIO, fio, iozone), nothing can provide more insight into performance requirements than a testing tool that performs actual end-user usage. Testing in this “systems view” methodology allows for many different facets of the solution to be evaluated, as different virtual desktop operations have drastically different requirements from storage. Simply using a load generator to show the performance possible from a storage array and somehow relating it to desktop virtualization workloads completely ignores the challenges that are unique to this solution design.
Login VSI was used as the load generation tool, as this is capable of mimicking end-user functions, such as working with Microsoft Office applications, running Java, browsing web pages, and other common user functions. If the console is left open in one of the target desktops, this activity can be watched as the test progresses. Login VSI provides a valuable framework to gather much more information than just the main workload run, as will be detailed in the sections below. Other virtual desktop management operations were also performed as part of the setup and environment maintenance throughout the testing period. Performing these actions proved invaluable to learning about the different workloads involved in the solution.
Testing to determine the scale of the ISE 740 storage array was one of the goals in the testing, and Login VSI test runs were performed with 500, 1000, and 1500 users. The “medium” workload setting was used for this testing series, as per Login VSI this can be considered an average workload for a virtual desktop user. Login VSI measures the end-user desktop experience and produces a metric that is a measure of the amount of desktops that a given solution could support with acceptable performance (VSImax). When VSImax is reached, that is the estimated number of desktops the solution can be expected to support. In all testing performed (500, 1000, and 1500 users), the Cisco UCS CPU utilization was the main limiting factor to achieving higher numbers of desktops. The ISE 740 was able to accommodate all of the tested user levels with no signs of a performance limit being approached.
Workload Analysis
Login VSI 500, 1000, and 1500 user Stead-State Workload
All users in this reference configuration were logged in and simulated by Login VSI. The workload chosen for each of the remote users in all tests was “medium.”
Login VSI produces a metric called VSImax. This is a measure of the number of concurrent virtual desktops that a given solution can support with “acceptable” desktop performance. Test iterations are performed, and the goal is to closely match or exceed the number of desktops that are planned to be concurrently run in production with the VSImax score.
Below are the results from the 3 test iterations (500, 1000, and 1500 desktops). A clear, linear increase in the VSImax score can be seen as the number of users was increased, indicating that the VDI solution was able to accommodate the workload with no signs of encountering a performance bottleneck until 97% or greater concurrency was achieved.
24. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 24
In the graphs above, VSImax is encountered at 492, 998, and 1466 sessions for the 500, 1000, and 1500 user tests respectively. This is due to the high resource utilization of the servers in this configuration. See Figures 12 ad 13 for vCenter Operations Manager views of one of the server’s CPU and memory resources during each of the 500 and 1000 user tests.
Figure 14 - VSImax for 500, 1000, and 1500 Users
25. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 25
Figure 15 - Server Resources During 500 User Test
Figure 16 - Server Resources During 1000 User Test
One of the things that makes the virtual desktop workload so challenging for storage solutions is the high amount of write operations that are required, especially considering the write penalties involved with RAID operations. During the steady state testing, write operations to storage were observed to be 80% of the total IOPS.
26. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 26
Below are graphs of the Total ISE System IO (Write and Read) in the 3x test runs (500, 1000, and 1500). Write IO can be clearly seen dominating the workload mix. Total IOPS values on the 1,500 user test were observed to regularly occur above 10,000 IOPS at the height of the login phase of the run.
It was observed that write IOPS were higher in the login phase of the test run. The steady state Login VSI tests required the least amount of performance (IOPS) from the ISE 740 hybrid storage array.
Figure 17 - Login Phase and Steady State For 500, 1000, And 1500 Users
Figure 18 - Write Latency for 500, 1000, and 1500 User Tests
27. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 27
Figure 17 shows that the ISE 740 array performed all of the write operations under 10ms, with 99% of all operations well under 5ms during the 1500 user tests. There are 3x periodic increases in write latency at the end of the 1000 user test due to Storage vMotion operations, which were included in the 1000 series graph to show the effect of this operation during testing. Values of below 1ms are reported as 0ms, and as such the 500x desktop series can be thought of as having no observable latency over 1ms for the testing period.
Read latency is also an important measure of system performance, and increases in read latency were observed as the system load increased (as would be expected). The highest values were observed in the 1500 desktop series, with 95% of the average values below 10ms. The Storage vMotion operations (1000) had the most impact to the read latency values; however, this did not appear to be enough to impact the VSImax score significantly. The vast majority of the read latency value for the 500 desktop test were below 1ms (0 values).
Figure 19 - Read Latency for 500, 1000, and 1500 User Tests
Read latency is the value that will react first when increasing load on the storage system. However, the amount of read IOPS comprises a small percentage of the overall workload.
The ISE 740 hybrid storage array demonstrated that it was able to satisfy the Login VSI workloads up to the point of saturation (100% utilization) for the Cisco UCS CPU resources of the 15 Blade servers. The Login phase of the test scenario generated up to twice as many IOPS than the main Login VSI “medium” workload. If large volumes of users are logging in/out of the environment concurrently, storage performance will play an important role.
Virtual Desktop Deploy Operations
Deploy operations are something that every environment must go through. Whether performing the initial creation of the desktops or performing a recompose operation, this process replicates copies of the “gold image” to the various datastores that will contain the desktops and prepares the operating system for use.
28. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 28
This operation had the least impact to Cisco UCS server resources and was mainly limited by the rate at which desktops were deployed by Horizon View. CPU utilization rates still reached 40%, and memory utilization stabilized at 80% by the end of the process. Consideration should be given to the CPU and memory increase in the event that this process occurs during “production” hours.
The deploy operation performance requirements are biased towards storage write IOPS, at just over 60% of the workload. Average values for total storage IOPS demand were seen to regularly approach 20,000 IOPS, with high values approaching 25,000 IOPS. This process operates over all of the VM “active” data set size and generates I/O across all of the new desktop capacity.
Figure 20 - ISE 740, Total Read and Write IOPS During Deploy Operation
Response time is also an important measure to examine when performing system “stress testing.” The deploy process is one example of what a virtualization administrator may conduct to proof out storage systems being proposed for VDI deployments. The ISE 740 shows excellent read and write response for this workload, with the majority of the write and read latency values below 2ms and 4ms, respectively.
The reduction in read and write latency seen at the beginning of the test run is due to the ISE management of data to SSD in real time. This is Continuous Adaptive Data Placement (CADP) in action, as it learns the workload and optimizes for best performance—automatically.
Figure 21 - Read and Write Latency During Deploy Operation
Smaller pool sizes would result in less load being placed on the Cisco UCS CPU and memory resources and would have a significant reduction in the amount of storage IOPS. In relation to the main Login VSI workload, the deploy operation required greater than 200% more storage performance than the “medium”
29. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 29
workload. Reduced desktop pools sizes should be considered for smaller environments that do not require deploying or recomposing large numbers of desktops (>500). Over the course of the testing, the desktop creation process was run several times and provided invaluable information on the impact of this operation. The ISE storage array was able to satisfy this workload with excellent response times.
Larger numbers of desktops per pool will result in large numbers of deploy operations happening with maintenance operations. This may be completely acceptable if this entire configuration is viewed as a single “POD,” and there are multiple “PODs” in the solution. Smaller environments, where this configuration would represent the entire solution, should consider using smaller desktop pool sizes to better control the impact of these operations on production users.
Virtual Desktop Boot Storm
The virtual machine boot process was the most taxing on the CPU utilization. The figure below shows the processor and memory utilization of a single blade server during this process. CPU utilization reaches saturation (100%) as the different pools of desktops are booted. Limiting the desktop pool sizes should be considered, as this can limit the impact and duration of the event if an entire desktop pool needs to be booted or rebooted.
The boot process varied from 100% write to 100% read over the duration of the test. Initially, there is a large write workload, which then changes to mostly read, and then another write component resurfaces toward the end of each group of desktops booted. Write IOPS during this period were observed to reach above 30,000 IOPS and read activity past 40,000 IOPS. This increase in performance is due to the adapting caching of the ISE controller hardware and the automatic real-time management of data between SSD and HDD (CADP).
Figure 22 - Total Read and Write IOPS During Boot Storm
In total, the ISE 740 hybrid storage array regularly reached levels over 40,000 IOPS during the boot process and transferred data at over 600 MB/sec.
30. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 30
Figure 23 - Total IOPS and MB/s for Boot Storm
Response times of the ISE 740 were well within what would be considered normal for database operations, proving that the ISE was not approaching any limit in performance for this operation.
Figure 24 - Read and Write Latency During Boot Storm
Boot storms are traditionally extremely difficult for storage systems to keep up with. The broad range of read vs. write requirements, while requiring high-performance IOPS, are usually where most storage systems have significant issues. In this test, the main limiting factor was the Cisco UCS CPU resources as all servers were pushed to 100% CPU utilization. When planning for numbers of consecutive desktops that can be safely started at the same time, careful attention should be paid to the processor utilization of the ESXi servers after high-performance storage is implemented (such as the ISE 740 hybrid storage array).
32. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 32
Appendix
Appendix A: Detailed Analysis of vSphere Performance Graphs, Login VSI
500 User Run
In performing this testing, CPU and RAM limitations of the Cisco UCS equipment was the main limiting factor in almost all operating “modes.” To the right is an image saved from the CPU Performance tab of the vSphere Windows Client (SVR-108). In this case, booting 500x users is being performed as part of the “test reset” process, before starting a Login VSI workload. A spike to 100% utilization can clearly be seen as the desktops are powered on, and all of the other servers (15x) exhibit this same behavior.
As with any Virtual Desktop deployment, memory management is an important role as well when sizing VMs and examining performance limits of a solution. Performing a boot operation consumed virtually 100% of the server’s RAM resources (big drop in the graph to the left). Subsequent optimizations were made to the desktop OS image that reduced the memory requirements to roughly 83% of the server’s capacity.
The Login Storm portion of the testing showed the same response from the blade servers’ CPU utilization. To the right is the VMware CPU performance graphs that include the above mentioned boot storm and the 30-minute login phase of a test run (16.67 logon/sec). Processor resources are clearly stressed to 100% well before the end of the login phase. The constraint to blade server CPU resources over the course of this testing was the single greatest limiting resource in every case, not storage performance. This constraint was the same across all 15x servers used in the testing series and through the Login VSI run phase.
33. X-Pod for Horizon View 5.3 33
Appendix B: EXAMPLE Login VSI Target Desktop Pool Configuration pool
2 pool_id
Floating_Pool_4_LoginVSI description
displayName
Floating_Pool_4_LoginVSI enabled
FALSE folderId
/ deliveryModel
Provisioned multiSessionAllowed
FALSE userResetAllowed
FALSE assignOnFirstLogon
TRUE desktopSource
SVI powerPolicy
RemainOn vc_id
f4e1017d-1986-4124-95d9-04f80ef020cf vcServerName
10.64.64.20 parentVMPath
/XIOUCSVMW/vm/aTarget_Base_3.1_HighPerf parentVMSnapshotPath
/First Snap parentVMSnapshotMOID
snapshot-33101 refreshPolicy
type=Never; persistentDiskSpecs
[DiskSize=4096;DiskUsage=SystemDisposable;UseSparse=true;MountPoint=*;] datastoreSpecs
Pool0;[Aggressive,OS,data]/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool3;[Aggressive,OS,data]/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool2;[Aggressive,OS,data]/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool1;[Aggressive,OS,data]/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- usevSphereMode
TRUE composer_ad_id
d907f262-b37f-47e9-8f51-0a1710b58150 composerDomain
XIOUCSVMW.LAB composerDomainUser
Administrator postSyncScript
logoffScript
organizationalUnit
CN=Computers minprovisioneddesktops
0 networkLabelSpecs
disabled provisionEnabled
FALSE provisionSuspendOnError
TRUE postProvisionState
READY startClone
TRUE calculatedValues
FALSE deletePolicy
Default headroomCount
500 maximumCount
500 minimumCount
500 datastorePaths
/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool3;/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool2;/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool1;/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP-Pool0 datastoreDisplayPaths
/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool3;/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool2;/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP- Pool1;/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/ISEC-HighP-Pool0 customizationSpec
LoginVSI Target Spec 3.x - GOOD resourcePoolPath
/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/Resources resourcePoolDisplayPath
/XIOUCSVMW/host/XIOUCSVMW-VDI Cluster High Perf/Resources vmFolderPath
/XIOUCSVMW/vm/Login VSI/Floating_Pool_4_LoginVSI vmFolderDisplayPath
/XIOUCSVMW/vm/Login VSI/Floating_Pool_4_LoginVSI