Managing sources during high
volume news events
hford@ushahidi.com
@hfordsa
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Understanding_sources
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aude/Egypt
Research questions

How are Wikipedians managing
social media sources?

What verification challenges were
they facing?

How can help editors manage
sources better during high
volume news events?
Ranking

                Variable 1
                Variable 2
                Variable 3
vote
       Source
1. Defining concepts
Sources play 2 important roles

• Verify facts          • Directly represented (sometimes)


• Verify importance     • Summaries require interpretation
                          (and in rapidly evolving news
                          events that interpretation often
                          hasn’t arrived)




                                           xkcd
sources
‘on the books’                   source=



1. Use only reliable sources
2. Use predominantly secondary
sources
3. Ensure verifiability
Social media sources
are allowed!
- Policy doesn’t specify media
but warns to be careful
- WP:Twitter sources can be used
as sources on themselves
- Self-published expert sources
may be considered reliable
sources
Primary sources are
allowed!
- and in fact, are the only sources
available near an event
- but policy states that the
majority of sources should be
secondary
2011 Egyptian revolution article




                                   http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/#|en|2011_Egyptian_Revolution
How did editors verify?

• Avoiding single sources


• “Wait and see”


• Reading/watching the source to see whether
  it has been accurately reflected


• Counting
Suez Jan 26/27
Reports of Army involvements are refuted on Twitter, sometimes quite
strongly; all reliable tweets seem to mention paramilitary riot police only
(using Fahd (armored personnel carrier) which the Army also uses, hence
the apparent confusion).
Suez city center apparently cordoned off, curfew in effect, internet and
phone (mobile and landlines) capped or intermittent at best, possibly
blackout. Watercannons, dozens injured. Best source so far: http://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIfGGo6G-4Q (Arabic) possibly useful
(mainstream media blog) http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/jan/26/
egypt-protests —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.196.206.14 (talk)
01:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
context

Ranking                      independent
                               variable 1
                Variable 1
                             independent
                Variable 2
                               variable 2
                Variable 3
vote
       Source
Indep. variables
Are the majority of sources
secondary?
What is the article about?
How recent is the event being
discussed?
hford@ushahidi.com
@hfordsa
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Understanding_sources

Wikimania presentation on the "Understanding Sources" project

  • 1.
    Managing sources duringhigh volume news events hford@ushahidi.com @hfordsa http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Understanding_sources
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Research questions How areWikipedians managing social media sources? What verification challenges were they facing? How can help editors manage sources better during high volume news events?
  • 4.
    Ranking Variable 1 Variable 2 Variable 3 vote Source
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Sources play 2important roles • Verify facts • Directly represented (sometimes) • Verify importance • Summaries require interpretation (and in rapidly evolving news events that interpretation often hasn’t arrived) xkcd
  • 8.
    sources ‘on the books’ source= 1. Use only reliable sources 2. Use predominantly secondary sources 3. Ensure verifiability
  • 9.
    Social media sources areallowed! - Policy doesn’t specify media but warns to be careful - WP:Twitter sources can be used as sources on themselves - Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable sources
  • 10.
    Primary sources are allowed! -and in fact, are the only sources available near an event - but policy states that the majority of sources should be secondary
  • 11.
    2011 Egyptian revolutionarticle http://sonetlab.fbk.eu/wikitrip/#|en|2011_Egyptian_Revolution
  • 12.
    How did editorsverify? • Avoiding single sources • “Wait and see” • Reading/watching the source to see whether it has been accurately reflected • Counting
  • 14.
    Suez Jan 26/27 Reportsof Army involvements are refuted on Twitter, sometimes quite strongly; all reliable tweets seem to mention paramilitary riot police only (using Fahd (armored personnel carrier) which the Army also uses, hence the apparent confusion). Suez city center apparently cordoned off, curfew in effect, internet and phone (mobile and landlines) capped or intermittent at best, possibly blackout. Watercannons, dozens injured. Best source so far: http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIfGGo6G-4Q (Arabic) possibly useful (mainstream media blog) http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/jan/26/ egypt-protests —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.196.206.14 (talk) 01:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • 17.
    context Ranking independent variable 1 Variable 1 independent Variable 2 variable 2 Variable 3 vote Source
  • 18.
    Indep. variables Are themajority of sources secondary? What is the article about? How recent is the event being discussed?
  • 19.

Editor's Notes