Introduction to Politcs

1. WHAT IS POLITICS?
ANDREW HEYWOOD: CHAPTER 1, PP. 3-13.
Chapter Outline:
Defining politics
• Politics as the art of government
• Politics as public affairs
• Politics as compromise and consensus
• Politics as power
‘Faces’ (dimensions) of power
power as decision-making;
power as agenda setting;
power as thought control.

2. POLITICS
The Central Issues Examined in this Chapter:
• What are the defining features of politics as an activity?
• How has ‘politics’ been understood by various thinkers
and traditions?
• Does politics take place within all social institutions, or
only in some?

3. INTRO: POLITICS
Politics is exciting because people disagree about many
things. They disagree about:
• how they should live.
• how they should distribute resources.
• how they should make collective decisions.

4. INTRO: WHAT IS POLITICS?
Aristotle says, “Politics is
the ‘master science’”.
Because it is the most
important activity through
which human beings
attempt to improve their
lives and create the Good
Society.

5. INTRO
There are disagreements about the nature of the subject
and how it should be studied.
People disagree about both what it is that makes social
interaction political;
And how political activity can be best analyzed and
explained.

6. DEFINING POLITICS
What is Politics?
Politics can be defined as “the activity through which people
make, preserve and amend the general rules under which
they live.”
It, therefore, by definition, involves both conflict and
cooperation.
On the one hand, the existence of rival opinions, different wants,
competing needs and opposing interests leads to disagreement
about the rules under which people live (CONFLICT).

7. DEFINING POLITICS
On the other hand, people recognize that, in order to
influence these rules or ensure that they are maintained,
they must work with others (COOPERATION).
-Thus politics is often portrayed as a process of conflict
resolution, in which rival views or competing interests are
reconciled with one another.
• But not all conflicts are, or can be, resolved. Thus politics
is a “search for conflict resolution”.

8. DEFINING POLITICS
The inescapable presence of diversity (we’re not all alike)
and scarcity (there is never enough to go around) ensures
that politics is an inevitable feature of the human condition.

9. DEFINING POLITICS
Any attempt to clarify the meaning of ‘politics’ must address
two major problems:
1- The first is about the use of the word “politics” in everyday
language. It is a ‘loaded’ (a biased) term. In other words, it has
an underlying meaning or implication.
• Many find it difficult to believe that the subject can be
approached objectively.
• As importantly, politics is often thought of as a ‘dirty’ word. It
often creates images of trouble, violence, manipulation and
lies.

10. DEFINING POLITICS
Therefore, any attempt to define politics entails trying to
disentangle (separate) it from such associations.
The term needs to be rescued from its negative
reputation by showing that it is a valuable activity.

11. DEFINING POLITICS
2- The second and more intractable difficulty is that even
respected authorities cannot agree what the subject is
about.
Politics is defined in such different ways as:
• The exercise of power,
• The exercise of authority,
• The making of collective decisions,
• The allocation of scarce resources,
• The practice of deception and manipulation, and so on.

12. DEFINING POLITICS
This is to say, politics is essentially a “contested
concept,” in the sense that the term has a number of
acceptable or legitimate meanings.

13. DEFINING POLITICS
We are going to discuss 4 different views of politics:
• Politics as the art of government
• Politics as public affairs
• Politics as compromise and consensus
• Politics as power

14. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT:
“Politics is not a science ...
but an art”.
Chancellor Bismarck told
the German parliament.
He meant the art of
government:
The exercise of control
within society through the
making and enforcement
of collective decisions.

15. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT:
In this light, politics can be understood to refer to the affairs
of the polis – or in its modern sense ‘what concerns the
state’.
To study politics is, then, in essence to study government,
or, more broadly, to study the exercise of authority.

16. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF GOVERNMENT:
This is the traditional view of the discipline, reflected in the
tendency for academic study to focus on the personnel
and machinery of government.
In this view, politics is associated with policy: that is,
with formal decisions that establish a plan of action
for the community.

17. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT
Politics is what takes place within a system of social
organization centred upon the machinery of government.
• It is practiced in cabinet rooms, legislative chambers,
government departments and the like, and it is engaged
in by a limited and specific group of people, notably
politicians, civil servants and lobbyists.
Note that, this definition offers a “highly restricted”
view of politics.

18. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT
This means that most people, most institutions and most
social activities can be regarded as being ‘outside’
politics.
Businesses, schools and other educational institutions,
community groups, families and so on are in this sense
‘nonpolitical’, because they are not “engaged in running
the country”.

19. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT
It is also important to note that portraying politics as an
essentially state-bound activity is to ignore the
increasingly important role of international and global
influences upon modern life, such as the multinational
corporations + private sector actors.

20. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT
The link between politics and the affairs of the state helps to
explain why negative images have been attached to politics:
This is because in the popular mind, politics is closely associated with
the activities of politicians.
Politicians are often seen as power-seeking hypocrites who conceal
personal ambition behind the rhetoric of public service and ideological
conviction.
Indeed, this perception has become more common in the modern
period as intensified media exposure has more effectively brought to
light examples of corruption and dishonesty, giving rise to the
phenomenon of anti-politics.

21. CONCEPT: ANTI-POLITICS
Disappointment with formal
and established political
processes, reflected in
nonparticipation, support for
anti-system parties, or the
use of direct action.

22. CONCEPT: ANTI-POLITICS
US: Occupy Wall Street Germany: Pirate Party

23. CONCEPT: ANTI-POLITICS
5 Star Movement - Italy

24. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT
Such an image of politics is sometimes traced back to the
writings of Niccolo Machiavelli, who, in The Prince (1531),
developed a strictly realistic account of politics that drew
attention to the use by political leaders of cunning, cruelty
and manipulation.

25. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT
Such negative opinions about politics reflects the
essentially liberal perception that, as individuals are self-
interested, political power is corrupting, because it
encourages those “in power” to exploit their position for
personal advantage.

26. ‘Power tends to corrupt,
and absolute power
corrupts absolutely’.
LORD ACTON
(1834–1902)

27. 1. POLITICS AS THE ART OF
GOVERNMENT
All these may be true. However, the proponents of this view see
political activity as an inevitable and permanent feature of social
existence.
Because without some kind of mechanism for allocating
authoritative values, society would simply disintegrate into a
civil war of each against all.
The task is therefore not to abolish politicians and bring politics
to an end, but rather to ensure that politics is conducted within a
framework of checks and constraints that ensure that
governmental power is not abused.

28. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
This broader conception of politics moves it beyond the
narrow realm of government.
Here, the distinction between ‘the political’ and ‘the
nonpolitical’ coincides with the division between an
essentially public sphere of life and what can be thought
of as a private sphere.
Such a view of politics is often traced back to Aristotle.

29. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
In Politics, Aristotle declared that ‘man is by nature a
political animal’, by which he meant that it is only within a
political community that human beings can live ‘the good
life’.
From this viewpoint, then, politics is an ethical activity
concerned with creating a ‘just society’.
Now, we have to define “public” and “private”…

30. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Traditional Distinction
Public Private
The State
Apparatus of
Government
Civil Society
Autonomous
bodies:
businesses, trade
unions, clubs,
families etc.
Alternative Distinction
Public Private
Public Realm
Politics,
Commerce,
Work, Art,
Culture, etc.
Personal Realm
Family and
Domestic Life

31. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Traditional Distinction
The traditional distinction between the public realm and
the private realm is in line with the division between the
state and civil society.

32. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
The institutions of the state (the apparatus of government, the
courts, the police, the army, the social-security system and so
forth) can be regarded as ‘public’ in the sense that they are
responsible for the collective organization of community life.
+ They are funded by taxes i.e. public.
Civil society consists of what Edmund Burke called the ‘little
platoons’, institutions such as the family and kinship groups,
private businesses, trade unions, clubs, community groups and
so on that are ‘private’ in the sense that they are set up and
funded by individual citizens to satisfy their own interests.

33. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Those areas of life that individuals can and do manage for
themselves (the economic, social, domestic, personal,
cultural and artistic spheres, and so on) are therefore
clearly ‘nonpolitical’.

34. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Alternative Distinction
Although civil society can be distinguished from the state,
it contains a range of institutions that are thought of as
“public” in the wider sense that they are open institutions,
operating in public, to which the public has access.
One of the crucial implications of this is that it broadens
our notion of the political, transferring the economy in
particular from the private to the public realm.

35. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Criticism!
This, still, remains a restricted view of politics because
according to this perspective, politics does not, and should
not, infringe upon ‘personal’ affairs and institutions.
(Feminist thinkers in particular have pointed out that this
implies that politics effectively stops at the front door; it
does not take place in the family, in domestic life, or in
personal relationships.)

36. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
This view has generated both positive and negative images.
Positive images:
In a tradition dating back to Aristotle, politics has been seen as a
noble and enlightened activity precisely because of its “public”
character.
Hannah Arendt firmly endorses this position: “politics is the most
important form of human activity because it involves interaction
amongst free and equal citizens. It thus gives meaning to life and
affirms the uniqueness of each individual.”
Rousseau: “Only through the direct and continuous participation of all
citizens in political life can the state be bound to the common good” or
“general will”.

37. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
In J.S. Mill’s view: “Involvement in ‘public’ affairs is educational
in that it promotes the personal, moral and intellectual
development of the individual.”
Negative images:
In sharp contrast, however, politics as public activity has also
been portrayed as a form of unwanted interference.
Liberal theorists in particular have exhibited a preference for
civil society over the state, on the grounds that ‘private’ life is
a realm of choice, personal freedom and individual responsibility.

38. 2- POLITICS AS PUBLIC AFFAIRS
This is most clearly demonstrated by attempts to narrow
the realm of the political, commonly expressed as the wish
to “keep politics out of” private activities such as business,
sport, and family life.

39. 3. POLITICS AS COMPROMISE AND
CONSENSUS
Here, politics is seen as a particular means of resolving conflict:
that is, by compromise, conciliation and negotiation, rather than
through force and naked power.
This is what is implied when politics is portrayed as ‘the art of
the possible’.
The description of a solution to a problem as a ‘political’
solution implies peaceful debate and arbitration, as opposed to
what is often called a ‘military’ solution.

40. 3. POLITICS AS COMPROMISE AND
CONSENSUS
One of the leading modern exponents of this view is
Bernard Crick. Crick offered the following definition:
• “Politics [is] the activity by which differing interests within
a given unit of rule are conciliated by giving them a share
in power in proportion to their importance to the welfare
and the survival of the whole community.”
In this view, the key to politics is therefore a wide
dispersal of power.

41. 3. POLITICS AS COMPROMISE AND
CONSENSUS
This view of politics clearly has a positive character.
Note that, politics is certainly no utopian solution because
compromise means that concessions are made by all
sides, leaving no one perfectly satisfied.
• But, it is definitely preferable to the alternatives:
bloodshed and brutality.
• In this sense, politics can be seen as a civilized and
civilizing force.

42. 3. POLITICS AS COMPROMISE AND
CONSENSUS
People should be encouraged to respect politics as an activity,
and should be prepared to engage in the political life of their
own community.
It is important to understand that this involves listening
carefully to the opinions of others – and this is not so easy.
That’s why there is a growing disappointment with democratic
politics across much of the developed world.
As Stoker put it, “Politics is designed to disappoint;” its
outcomes are “often messy, ambiguous and never final”.

43. 4. POLITICS AS POWER
The fourth definition of politics is both the broadest and the
most radical.
Rather than confining politics to a particular sphere (the
government, the state or the ‘public’ realm) this view sees
politics at work in all social activities and in every corner
of human existence.
‘Politics is at the heart of all collective social activity,
formal and informal, public and private, in all human
groups, institutions and societies’ (Leftwich).

44. 4. POLITICS AS POWER
In this sense, politics takes place at every level of social
interaction; it can be found within families and amongst
small groups of friends just as much as amongst nations.
Politics concerns the production, distribution and use of
resources in the course of social existence. Politics is, in
essence, power: the ability to achieve a desired
outcome, through whatever means.

45. 4. POLITICS AS POWER
This notion was summed up in the title of Harold Laswell’s
book Politics: Who Gets What, When, How? (1936).
From this perspective, politics is about diversity and
conflict, but the essential ingredient is the existence of
scarcity: the simple fact that, while human needs and
desires are infinite, the resources available to satisfy them
are always limited.

46. 4. POLITICS AS POWER
Politics can therefore be seen as a struggle over scarce
resources, and power can be seen as the means through
which this struggle is conducted.

47. 4. POLITICS AS POWER
Advocates of this view of power include Feminists and Marxists.
Kate Millett, a feminist, defines politics as “power-structured
relationships, arrangements whereby one group of persons is
controlled by another”.
Feminists can therefore be said to be concerned with “the politics of
everyday life”.
In their view, relationships within the family, between husbands and
wives, and between parents and children, are every bit as political as
relationships between employers and workers, or between
governments and citizens.

48. 4. POLITICS AS POWER
Marxists
As opposed to believing that politics can be confined to
the state and a narrow public sphere, Marxists believe that
“the economic is political”.
Lenin says “politics is the most concentrated form of
economics”.
Class struggle is the heart of politics.

49. 4. POLITICS AS POWER
In Marxism and Feminism, politics is portrayed in largely
negative terms.
Politics is about oppression and subjugation.
But at the same time, politics is seen as the means through
which injustice and domination can be challenged.
According to Marxists, class exploitation will be overthrown by a
proletarian revolution; Feminists call for a sexual revolution
where gender relations will be re-ordered.

50. 4. POLITICS AS POWER
Finally, it is important to note that when politics is
portrayed as power and domination, it is no longer an
inevitable feature of social existence.
Proletarian/ sexual revolution, will bring politics to an end.

51. ‘FACES’(DIMENSIONS) OF POWER
In politics power is thought of as a relationship: that is, as
the ability to influence the behavior of others in a manner
not of their choosing.
Power, therefore, can be said to be exercised whenever A
gets B to do something that B would not otherwise have
done.
This can be done in various ways:

52. ‘FACES’(DIMENSIONS) OF POWER
1. Power as decision-making:
-Conscious actions that in some way influence the content of
decisions.
The decisions can be influenced in various ways:
In Three Faces of Power (1989), Keith Boulding distinguished between
the use of force or intimidation (the stick), productive exchanges
involving mutual gain (the deal), and the creation of obligations, loyalty
and commitment (the kiss).

53. ‘FACES’(DIMENSIONS) OF POWER
2. Power as agenda setting:
The ability to prevent decisions being made: that is, in effect,
‘non-decision-making’.
-This involves the ability to set or control the political agenda,
thereby preventing issues or proposals from being aired in the
first place.
Example: Private businesses may exert power both by
campaigning to defeat proposed consumer-protection legislation
(first face), and by lobbying politicians to prevent the question of
consumer rights being publicly discussed (second face).

54. ‘FACES’(DIMENSIONS) OF POWER
3. Power as thought control:
The ability to influence another by shaping what he or she
thinks, wants, or needs.
This is power expressed as ideological indoctrination or
psychological control. (the use of propaganda and, more
generally, the impact of ideology).
This is the radical view of power, and it overlaps with the
notion of “soft” power.