We have read and watched, in the two You Tube clips from the Judaism and Christianity chapters, that monotheistic proselytizing religions have often been blamed for colonizing or destroying indigenous and foreign religions. Today, most of the world's monotheists live in countries that were once colonized by Portugal, France, Britain, Spain, Germany or other European countries. Because of this history, some critics of monotheism have argued that monotheistic religions are bad neighbors to other religions. Your task in this prompt is to reflect on this critique in light of what we have read about the history, practice, and teachings of Monotheistic faiths. Writing Prompt: Based on the readings and the YouTube clips we have watched explain whether or or not the teachings and practices of  monotheistic faiths are helpful resources for becoming neighbors with the other non-monotheistic faiths we have studied? Explain why or why not. Organizational Guidelines: Introduction: Introduce the position you are taking and clearly explain in a sentence or two why you are taking the position. Paragraph One: Discuss the historical events, practices or teachings that you think make monotheistic religion a good neighbor or a bad neighbor. (Be sure to use information from Brodd text and YouTube clips.) Paragraph Two: Expound on what you have articulated in paragraph one or present other relevant historical, events, or teachings. *Note: You may not see a need to take two paragraphs here if not continue to the next point. Paragraph Two or Three: Discuss what monotheist stand to learn from other religions, which we have read, that could make them better neighbors. Or, if you think Christians are good neighbors discuss what you think the other religions we have read could learn from monotheism.(Expound on this point as you see fit.) *Note: Choose only one or two religions here. You do not need to discuss all of the religions we have read. You also could choose to group the religions if you find they hold one thing in common that is distinct from monotheistic faith. Paragraph Four: Conclusion Restate and summarize your argument. Discuss what you think is the future for monotheism as it is faced with coming to terms with an awareness of religious diversity. Word Processing Guidelines 1. 12pt font 2. 1 inch margins 3. 800 words maximum 4. For referencing please use the parenthetical format Examples: (Brodd, 23); (YouTube, Judaism); or (YouTube, Christianity). Helpful Guiding Questions: What events or concepts in the history and practice of monotheism do you think make it susceptible to dominating the religions of its neighbors? What events or concepts in the history and practice of monotheism make it the ideal neighbor to other religions? What might monotheists learn, from the religions we have read, that might make Christians better neighbors to the world's religions? Or, what can Christians teach practitioners of the religions we have read so far that might make.

1. We have read and watched, in the two You Tube clips from the
Judaism and Christianity chapters, that monotheistic
proselytizing religions have often been blamed for colonizing or
destroying indigenous and foreign religions. Today, most of the
world's monotheists live in countries that were once colonized
by Portugal, France, Britain, Spain, Germany or other European
countries. Because of this history, some critics of monotheism
have argued that monotheistic religions are bad neighbors to
other religions. Your task in this prompt is to reflect on this
critique in light of what we have read about the history,
practice, and teachings of Monotheistic faiths.
Writing Prompt:
Based on the readings and the YouTube clips we have watched
explain whether or or not the teachings and practices of
monotheistic faiths are helpful resources for becoming
neighbors with the other non-monotheistic faiths we have
studied? Explain why or why not.
Organizational Guidelines:
Introduction:
Introduce the position you are taking and clearly explain in a
sentence or two why you are taking the position.
Paragraph One:
Discuss the historical events, practices or teachings that you
think make monotheistic religion a good neighbor or a bad
neighbor. (Be sure to use information from Brodd text and
YouTube clips.)
Paragraph Two:
Expound on what you have articulated in paragraph one or
present other relevant historical, events, or teachings.
*Note: You may not see a need to take two paragraphs here if

2. not continue to the next point.
Paragraph Two or Three:
Discuss what monotheist stand to learn from other religions,
which we have read, that could make them better neighbors. Or,
if you think Christians are good neighbors discuss what you
think the other religions we have read could learn from
monotheism.(Expound on this point as you see fit.)
*Note: Choose only one or two religions here. You do not need
to discuss all of the religions we have read. You also could
choose to group the religions if you find they hold one thing in
common that is distinct from monotheistic faith.
Paragraph Four: Conclusion
Restate and summarize your argument. Discuss what you think
is the future for monotheism as it is faced with coming to terms
with an awareness of religious diversity.
Word Processing Guidelines
1. 12pt font
2. 1 inch margins
3. 800 words maximum
4. For referencing please use the parenthetical format
Examples: (Brodd, 23); (YouTube, Judaism); or (YouTube,
Christianity).
Helpful Guiding Questions:
What events or concepts in the history and practice of
monotheism do you think make it susceptible to dominating the
religions of its neighbors?
What events or concepts in the history and practice of
monotheism make it the ideal neighbor to other religions?
What might monotheists learn, from the religions we have read,
that might make Christians better neighbors to the world's
religions? Or, what can Christians teach practitioners of the
religions we have read so far that might make them better
neighbors?

3. Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Reflection Papers
Criteria
- Paper displays a high command of the ideas and concepts
presented in the source materials
-Offers a high level of creative insight on the paper topic
-Paper displays a good command of the ideas and concepts
presented in the source materials
-Minor mis-interpretation of ideas and concepts
-Offers some creative insight on the paper topic.
-Paper displays some command of the ideas and concepts
presented in the source materials
-Substantial mis-interpretation of ideas and concepts
-Lacks creative insight
-Paper displays little to no command of the ideas and concepts
presented in the source materials
-Severe misunderstanding of ideas and concepts in source
materials
-Does not offer any creative insight
-Structure and organization of the paper serves the purpose of
the argument
-There are smooth logical transitions from paragraph to
paragraph
-Conclusion re-presents and summarizes the argument in a
persuasive way
-Structure and organization of the paper partially serves the
purpose of the argument
-Only some of the transitions from paragraph to paragraph are

4. logical
-Conclusion re-presents and summarizes the argument but is not
especially persuasive
- Structure and organization partially obstruct the argument
-Paragraph transitions are misplaced
-Paper lacks a logical flow
-Conclusion is incomplete and does not fully re-present the
argument
-Poor structure and organization
-Paper is too long or not long enough
- Lacks paragraph structure and transitions
-Unneccessary repitition
-Incomplete arguments
-Paper displays a high level of critical analysis
-Makes excellent use of source materials to support arguments,
claims and positions
-Provides creative insight into problems or issues presented in
the assignment
-Paper displays a good level of critical analysis
-Makes good use of source materials to support arguments,
claims and positions
-Provides some level of creative insight into problems or issues
presented in the assignment
-Paper displays some level of critical analysis
-Some arguments and claims are unsupported and unrelated to
the topic
-Some arguments remain at the level of opinioin and do not
display rigorus reflection on the topic
-Paper only repeats back information from the source materials
without any analysis
-Most if not all arguments and claims are unsupported
- There is no attempt to wrestle or think about the issues or
problems in the text
Overall Score