The document discusses claims that the 1969 moon landing was faked and provides evidence to refute those claims. It notes that NASA would have no motive to fake such a momentous event and that moon rocks brought back match substances that could only be found extraterrestrially. Experiments by MythBusters replicated conditions to prove lighting could account for brightness in shadows and footprints could form in lunar regolith. Photos from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter in 2009 also showed artifacts from the landings, providing strong evidence that the moon landings were, in fact, real.

1. First Men on the Moon: Was it All a Hoax?
In 1969, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were the first men to set foot on the
Moon, but some people are beginning to believe that it was all a hoax. The
questions come up, “How could the footprint stay so perfectly?” and “How is
he not dark in this picture if he is in the shadow?” Well I’m here to prove that
they really did walk on the moon and that NASA didn’t fake it.
First of all, NASA wouldn’t have left the Earth and forged the rest of it—
common sense tells you that. There is no point to leave the Earth’s
atmosphere and then somehow secretly film the rest in a studio because
NASA had no motive for that. Nobody would make up that huge of a lie to
fool the entire country. They also have brought back rocks from the Moon
and scientists have studied them confirming that the particles are made up of
extraterrestrial substances.
The astronauts have been accused of appearing too bright in the shadow of
their spacecraft so it must have been faked in a studio. Hosts of the popular
TV show MythBusters, Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman, replicated the
conditions of multiple hoax claims and gave proof that the moon reflects
sunlight, so the man in the picture must be illuminated from the reflection of
the sunlight off of the moon, not because of a secondary light source.
The photograph of the footprint imprinted on the surface of the moon was
accused as fraud because there is no moisture to hold the mold of the
footprint, however, the two men mentioned earlier have proven that it is
possible to have a clear footprint in the closest material to the Moon’s
powdery surface that we have on the Earth in a vacuum chamber. This is
because lunar regolith is jagged, not rounded like the weathered soil on
earth, so it can hold its shape without collapsing.
Another reason why people believed that landing on the Moon was a
conspiracy is that in a photograph, the shadows are going different directions
off of different objects rather than being parallel. Slopes on the surface of the
moon creates the effect of a shadow going in a different direction verifying
that it isn’t because of studio lighting.
One of the biggest proofs for conspiracy theorists is that the flag planted on
the moon appears to be waving in the breeze but in the vacuum environment
on the moon, there would be no breeze because there is no atmosphere to
create it. Jamie and Adam made an exact replica of the flag on the moon,
placed it inside of a vacuum chamber, and swung it to mimic the motion of
planting it into the Moon’s surface. In the vacuum, the flag swung for much
longer than in regular air, and looked like the footage from the Moon landing.

2. If this isn’t enough evidence to convince
someone that Neil Armstrong and Buzz
Aldrin walked on the Moon, in July of
2009 the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
(LRO) took pictures of the Apollo landing
sites as shown in the picture to the left. I
never believed that this was a
conspiracy, and with all of this proof, I
am fairly positive that we successfully
landed on the Moon on July 20th, 1969.