This document discusses the emergence of modern psychology as a formal discipline in the late 19th century. It describes the intellectual climate of the time known as the Zeitgeist and analytical models used to understand the development of new ideas. Physiological and experimental methods developed by scientists like Helmholtz and Broca influenced early approaches. Wilhelm Wundt is credited with formally establishing psychology as an academic field, opening the first psychology laboratory and journal. The document also notes the lack of diversity in early psychology, with minorities and women facing discrimination in the discipline.
Biology and Behavioural Psychology - EdukiteEduKite
The Biology and Behavioural Psychology course covers the two leading theories of learning: Classical conditioning and operating conditioning. The key terms and concepts related to classical conditioning and operating conditioning, the difference between them will be discussed in the course.
See More: https://bit.ly/2TDNmIn
OM: Advanced Bio-Well Practical Hands on Training - Feb.5-6-7/2016Krishna Madappa
OM: As our global and concentrated Bio-Well community grows, so should our dedicated training.
Dr.K.Korotkov & Krishna see this as an essential educational module for creating a next generation of Bio-Well professional users.
As the software platforms continue to amplify the non-linearity and our understanding of our multi dimensional presence, we are here to ennoble a seamless interface to this evolutionary level of Human Development.
Ultimately our singular purpose is to assist all our Bio-Well users globally to be the stewards of the advanced science of Bio-Electrography and inspire a generation towards the "Sciences of Optimal Human Excellence".
Biology and Behavioural Psychology - EdukiteEduKite
The Biology and Behavioural Psychology course covers the two leading theories of learning: Classical conditioning and operating conditioning. The key terms and concepts related to classical conditioning and operating conditioning, the difference between them will be discussed in the course.
See More: https://bit.ly/2TDNmIn
OM: Advanced Bio-Well Practical Hands on Training - Feb.5-6-7/2016Krishna Madappa
OM: As our global and concentrated Bio-Well community grows, so should our dedicated training.
Dr.K.Korotkov & Krishna see this as an essential educational module for creating a next generation of Bio-Well professional users.
As the software platforms continue to amplify the non-linearity and our understanding of our multi dimensional presence, we are here to ennoble a seamless interface to this evolutionary level of Human Development.
Ultimately our singular purpose is to assist all our Bio-Well users globally to be the stewards of the advanced science of Bio-Electrography and inspire a generation towards the "Sciences of Optimal Human Excellence".
The Scientific MethodSteps in the Scientific MethodThere is a .docxssusera34210
The Scientific Method
Steps in the Scientific Method
There is a great deal of variation in the specific techniques scientists use explore the natural world. However, the following steps characterize the majority of scientific investigations:
Step 1: Make observations
Step 2: Propose a hypothesis to explain observations
Step 3: Test the hypothesis with further observations or experiments
Step 4: Analyze data
Step 5: State conclusions about hypothesis based on data analysis
Each of these steps is explained briefly below, and in more detail later in this section.
Step 1: Make observations
A scientific inquiry typically starts with observations. Often, simple observations will trigger a question in the researcher's mind.
Example: A biologist frequently sees monarch caterpillars feeding on milkweed plants, but rarely sees them feeding on other types of plants. She wonders if it is because the caterpillars prefer milkweed over other food choices.
Step 2: Propose a hypothesis
The researcher develops a hypothesis (singular) or hypotheses (plural) to explain these observations. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation of a phenomenon or observation(s) that can be supported or falsified by further observations or experimentation.
Example: The researcher hypothesizes that monarch caterpillars prefer to feed on milkweed compared to other common plants. (Notice how the hypothesis is a statement, not a question as in step 1.)
Step 3: Test the hypothesis
The researcher makes further observations and/or may design an experimentto test the hypothesis. An experiment is a controlled situation created by a researcher to test the validity of a hypothesis. Whether further observations or an experiment is used to test the hypothesis will depend on the nature of the question and the practicality of manipulating the factors involved.
Example: The researcher sets up an experiment in the lab in which a number of monarch caterpillars are given a choice between milkweed and a number of other common plants to feed on.
Step 4: Analyze data
The researchersummarizes and analyzes the information, or data, generated by these further observations or experiments.
Example: In her experiment, milkweed was chosen by caterpillars 9 times out of 10 over all other plant selections.
Step 5: State conclusions
The researcher interprets the results of experiments or observations and forms conclusions about the meaning of these results. These conclusions are generally expressed as probability statements about their hypothesis.
Example: She concludes that when given a choice, 90 percent of monarch caterpillars prefer to feed on milkweed over other common plants.
Often, the results of one scientific study will raise questions that may be addressed in subsequent research. For example, the above study might lead the researcher to wonder why monarchs seem to prefer to feed on milkweed, and she may plan additional experiments to explore this question. For example, perhaps the milkweed has higher ...
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
2. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 2
Overview
Analytical Model of Evaluation or Ouvre
Experimental and Physiological Psychology
to New Psychology
Formal Founding of Psychology as a
Discipline
6. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 6
Zeitgeist
The intellectual climate in existence at a
certain time characterized by shared
culture, experiences, and influences
conscious or unconscious
8. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 8
Analytical Model of Evaluation
The Naturalistic Model
The Zeitgeist (climate of the times) is the
reason new intellectual discoveries are
made.
As long as there is a society people through
their interpersonal relations will progress
and create (Evans, n.d.)
9. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 9
Analytical Model of Evaluation
The Naturalistic Model Continued…
The intellectual discoveries of the Zeitgeist are
not the result of individual Genius but of collective
progress in society.
Evans (nd) says that Naturalistic Models have
determinants ie. Physical, environment may be
the reason fire was discovered so that individuals
could stay warm or Political long term Peace may
result in the founding of democracy
10. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 10
Analytical Model of Evaluation
The Naturalistic Model Continued…
Finally the Naturalistic Model states that
discoveries can be made before their time
but unless the Zeitgeist is ready for the
discoveries they will be ignored.
12. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 12
Analytical Model of Evaluation
The Personalistic Model
Simply States that
Geniuses do exist and
have such an impact
on the spirit of the
times that they
completely change
society by their
contributions.
15. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 15
Physiological and Experimental
Methods to the New Psychology
The Reaction Time Study – measured
differences in observation findings by
observers and found that there was
something called a personal equation in
science that could cause differences in
perception where observations were
necessary .
19. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 19
Experimental
German Zeitgeist
1. Taxonomy
2. Defined almost every human endeavor as
a science and worth of study
3. Reform Movement in Academia
4. Sheer Number of Universities
23. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 23
Psychology Becomes a Formal
Discipline
William Wundt
Founder of Psychology – formalized the process
of and defined the discipline of psychology
Called it a formal discipline and advocated for it
Founded first Psychology Lab
Founded First Journal
25. 09/14/13 WalkerOPSY5102-8-2 25
Minorities and Women in Early
Psychology
Minorities
1920
Women
Discrimination existed
1906 12% of listed
psychologists are
women in American Men
of Science
1941 25% of PhD's were
women
Tichener
Editor's Notes
Good Afternoon my name is Olivia Walker and I am a graduate student at North Central University. I am from Atlanta, Georgia and received my BA Degree from Georgia State University. Today we will be discussing the Emergence of the New Psychology.
Before we start lets discuss an overview of what the lecture will be about today. First of all we will discuss how to analyze the information. We will discuss what lens to use when analyzing the history of Psychology. In addition we will trace the journey of psychology from Experimental to Physiological to the New Psychology. Next, we will discuss the Formal Founding of Psychology as a discipline. We will discuss why it was founded, who founded the discipline and how it was founded as well as what’s necessary to be a discipline. Finally, we will examine the role of women, minorities, and the disabled in the founding of Psychology.
Finally we will discuss the role of women and minorities in psychology.
First of all we will discuss the method for analyzing the History of Psychology. As the slide states the analytical model for evaluating the History of Psychology is determined by point of View. The points of view used in evaluating Psychology are literally like night and day or yin and yang. They are totally opposite but Historians of Psychology find them useful.
Before we move on to discussing the Historical Point of View we have one vocabulary word. Zeitgeist
Now that we know what Zeitgeist is we can now move on to examining the models used for analyzing Historical Psychology.
One theory and model of evaluation of Psychological History is the Naturalistic theory.
The Naturalistic Model states the Zeitgeist (climate of the times) is the reason new intellectual discoveries are made.
The Alternative model used to evaluate Psychological History is the Personalistic Model.
The Personalistic model states that Geniuses do exist and have such an impact on the spirit of the times that they completely change society by their contributions. For example, in the Video Game Sid Meirs Civilization, wherever Ghandi appears in whatever time because of his genius he brings peace. As we begin to study the evolution of psychology into a formal discipline the Naturalistic and Personalistic models are what we will use for evaluating the history of Psychology.
Many people think that Psychology is a discipline of the senses and the emotions and how to treat hurt feelings. The reality is the roots of modern psychology lie in the examination of anatomy and experiments that truly established that the senses really exist and that the brain has a function in how we feel. Early experiments leading to the formal founding of psychology can largely be characterized as a discipline of questioning or experimentation.
First of all we will examine and define historical Physiology. Historical Physiology investigated how sensations and perceptions were processed. It studied how sense information was received by a living subject. During the early years of Physiology, it is very important to remember that any experiment that created a sense reaction was a Physiological experiment. Historical Physiology as a discipline is naturalistic because it uses all physiological experiments to get a greater understanding of the subject matter. The earliest physiologist Johannes Muller created a book detailing all the experiments of physiology within a seven year period. Two examples of very different experiments in physiology that brought greater understanding to the field are
The Reaction Time Study – measured differences in observation findings by observers and found that there was something called a personal equation in science that could cause differences in perception where observations were necessary. This was just a simple study where many times information was gathered to show differences in observation. It was not a complex study.
Another study that fell under the field of Physiology was the study of a deceased persons brain who had speech problems while alive. The physiologist Paul Broca performed an autopsy on the deceased person and found lesions on a portion of the persons brain which he labeled the speech center. This portion of the brain would forever be known as Broca’s Brain and this method of research would be called the Clinical Method. The prior two examples show that the discipline of physiology was broad prior to the finding of psychology.
By the Mid 19 th century the Physiologists had proven the electrical nature of the brain through physiology. They had proven what Descartes had only suspected and that was the brain and the body interacted with each other for voluntary and involuntary functions. Through a concerted effort of group but not formalized study of various experiments the Physiologists had proven the brain body connection, and as an aside created a method of stimulating the brain still used today and that is called Electrical Stimulation.
Even Though Physiology had through various experiments proven the electrical nature of the brain. The hodgepodge of experiments lacked a scientific method. Physiologists were literally like loose cannons doing what they could to find out information about sensory experiences. According to BR Hergenhahn, (2009) There was a need to examine “scientifically” the relationship between sensation and conscious experience. This need ushered in the discipline of Experimental Psychology.
According to Schultz (2012), experimental psychology was driven by the German 19 th century Zeitgeist. Germans were the only Europeans who studied Taxonomy. They also considered almost every human endeavor as worthy of study. German Universities initiated a reform movement in academia that demanded innovation, research, experimentation and discovery, and had numerous universities to produce scholars and researchers. Germany also because of a changing political structure had a huge number of Universities producing scholars. Since Germany placed a high premium on the acquisition of knowledge, it would be the place where the contemplation of knowledge and the inner life would be proven and become a formal science.
The experiment that would make it decisive that psychology should be a science and that living things were more than beings acted on by an outer force would be an experiment by Herman Van Helmholtz that proved that there was a delay between thought and action. This suggested that living beings had control of their actions prior to performing them. This was pivotal to making psychology a discipline.
The next section of the lecture discusses how psychology became a formal discipline.
Some of you may be aware that McDonalds started out as a sole proprietorship and was purchased by a business man who made McDonalds into the successful chain it is now. This can be compared to the story of the founding of Psychology. There were a lot of experiments being done by many different scientists that was Psychology but it took a visionary person to bring the science from one hamburger stand creating great hamburgers to a titan serving 100 million people. William Wundt is known as the father of Psychology.
William Wundt was the founder of Psychology because he formalized a methodology for research in Psychology and defined the discipline of Psychology. He did this by first of all calling it a new science and advocating for it as a field, than he founded a lab and a journal. This is why Psychology was considered to be established as a science in the middle to late 19 th century. Though Psychology was established as a science it still had the same issues of inclusion that all of society had with minorities and women, even though some of the people who participated in the work leading up to the founding of psychology could be considered as a little mentally ill themselves. Next we will discuss minorities and women in early psychology.
It was not until the 1920’s in the U.S. that a non white person would become a researcher in the field of Psychology. According to Schultz (2012), Psychology has presented barriers to women but of all the scientific disciplines has been the most embracive of women. Discrimination towards women did exist but Psychology admitted more women to it’s ranks than any other discipline. By 1906 12% of Psychologists listed in American Men of Science were women. Tichener and his attitude towards women was a big joke. He had one meeting that women were not admitted to ever but seemed to attend occasionally by maybe hiding under the table or just sitting at the door and listening. Despite this bias against women at one meeting, Tichener worked hard to admit women to his PHD program and publish their journal articles. He was an advocate for women.