This PPT will help you to know economical benefit of video conferencing in different sector. It is on educational level. It will not work as a professional level presentation. this ppt required more facts and figure to actually need that data. MBA, BMS, or any educational level presentation will get much more data from it, This will be sufficient for student level presentation

1. Video-conferencing
Template for Microsoft PowerPoint

2. Video conferencing
Videoconferencing is a medium where two or more
people at different locations can meet face-to-face
in real time.
Dallas Paris

3. Why Video Conferencing
1.Save money and time.
2.Build relationships.
3.Communicate “face to face” where it would otherwise be impossible.
4.Avoid travels.
5.Teach.
6.Collaborate.

4. Contents
1.Company profile
2.Problem
3.Solution
4.Results and benefits
5.Product cost
6.Savings

5. COMPANY DETAIL
• IFFCO is a leading player in the fertilizer industry in India and works
closely with the Indian Government to increase food grain production in
the country.
• They utilizing 40,000 cooperative outlets and 158 Farmers Service
Centers in 29 states for the distribution of its products.
• With a staff base of over 6,700 spread across five mega plants, 80
marketing offices, and the company’s Corporate Headquarters, effective
communication and collaboration is a vital part of how IFFCO conducts its
business.
• Particularly for the efficient management of employee relations and the
execution of vital HR functions, such as the company’s annual employee
appraisals process.

6. PROBLEMS
•Travelling cost was huge as 1000 employees used to travel each year
to Company’s Headquarters at New Delhi.
•Loss in Productivity.
•Everyone had to come at one state for Training purposes.
•Immediate Decision Making was not possible.

7. SOLUTION
A high-definition video-conferencing network operating
from the five main plants across the company and
corporate headquarters to enhance green IT practices &
open the lines of communication between departments
for more effective & streamlined business process.

8. RESULTS & BENEFITS
• Drastic reduction in travel costs saving $ US 4,00,000 per year .
• Achieved 200% ROI in loss than six months.
• More effective communication & streamlined business operations
particularly in the HR dept.
• Enhanced productivity.
• Improved Green IT and Environmentally sustainable practices .

9. •Normally they use for effective communication between officials located at Corporate
headquarters and the company’s five manufacturing plants.
• Annual employee appraisals
• Executing HR processes
• Company meetings
• Marketing and sales updates

10. PRODUCT COST PER CENTRE
•VC equipment: Rs. 200,000
•LCD TV: Rs. 20,000
•Camera: Rs. 10,000
•Room furnishing: Rs. 100,000
•Other charges: Rs. 20,000
Total Cost: Rs. 350,000

11. Savings To Company
 IFFCO has installed its video conferencing equipments at its 5 centers across
India.
 Total cost of installing at 1 center: Rs.3,50,000 ONE TIME
 Total cost across 5 centers: Rs.17,50,000 INVESTMENT
 Other expenses across 5 centers per year: Rs.12,00,000*5=60,00,000
 Savings per year due to video conferencing: Rs.2,00,00,000
 Hence total savings to company in one year: Rs.1,40,00,000

12. Here comes your footer  Page 12

13. COMPANY DETAILS
 Telstra is a leading provider of telecommunication and managed services to large
enterprise and government organizations in Australia and around the globe.
 Telstra serves more than 200 of the world’s top 500 companies through its international
operations that facilitate access to over 240 countries and territories.
 Telstra’s solutions are developed and tested in close co-operation with partners such as
Cisco, Microsoft, Ericsson and Alcatel and designed and deployed for customers by one
of Australia’s largest and most qualified Network Services organization.
 Telstra’s service to enterprise and government customers is internationally recognized for
its high quality, including full International Customer Service Standard (ICSS)
certification.

14. PROBLEMS
 Telstra has an ongoing commitment to improve productivity within both its own
organization and that of its customers.
 Environmental responsibility was also a key focus.
 Managing these far-flung activities required a high level of communication and
collaboration, not just within the organisation but also with suppliers, partners and
customers.
 Telstra staff, in particular its executives and sales teams, need to travel long distances to
conduct business.

15.  Costly, inefficient and not aligned with Telstra’s commitment to sustainability, avoidable
travel hampered the company’s ability to improve business performance .
And also the profitability in an increasingly complex environment was affected.
 Executives round-trip drive many times of six to eight hours or domestic flights for meetings,
the result was high travel costs and lost productive time

16. SOLUTION
Telstra realized that video conferencing would promote both of these aims while delivering
cost efficiencies across a distributed enterprise.
Accordingly, Telstra enlisted the aid of Polycom to deploy its world-leading video
conferencing solutions.
so they replaced all off site meetings with onsite, where basically the 650 people in the
organization now meet by video conferencing.

17. BENEFITS
 $1 million per annum travel savings and an estimated 1100 tonnes carbon
emission reductions through increased productivity across a dispersed workforce of
650 people
 $100,000 per annum travel savings was done by having off site meetings onsite.
 This decision has delivered a rapid return on investment (ROI)through increased
productive output, reduced costs, enhanced work/life flexibility and environmental
sustainability.
The strength of high definition video conferencing is that it facilitates true-to-life
meetings that allow participants to experience the same effect of human interactions as
in live meetings.

18.  They conducted numerous executive briefings that covered the latest trends going in market.
 The first half of 2009/10, Telstra hosted over 1700 meetings in the Executive Briefing Centre
in Melbourne alone, of which over 40% were video conferences.
 As a result, executives would had as many meetings as they did in the past, but they’re much
richer, shorter, sharper.
 The power to do more work in less time.
 video conferencing is not just for large organizations. Telstra is trailing a range of tools
designed to help smaller organizations measure their own productivity benefits.

19. In Health Care
1. Emergency Room/Intensive Care Unit
Support
2. Consultations
3. Health Education

20. By 2001, advancements in video, computer, and robotics
technology led to the first transatlantic tele-surgery, a gall
bladder removal, from 4,300 miles away. The surgical
procedure was conducted by a surgeon in New York City on
a patient who was located in Strasbourg, France. The surgery
was a technological breakthrough in many respects and
marked the beginning of true clinical capabilities for these
types of technologies.

22. ADVANTAGES
Reduction in travel costs.
Time savings.
Reduction in carbon emissions. (green technology)
Services across many different hospitals.
Ill patients often benefit physically and emotionally

23. Improved communications. (ability
to see “body language”, facial
expression, etc.)
Long Distance Expert Advice

24. Other Field
 Pathology
 Radiology
 Cardiology
 Dermatology
 Mental Health
 Rehabilitation
 Ophthalmology

25. Causes Now and Before
 A Veterans Health Administration home telehealth program
for vets with chronic conditions reduced hospital admissions
by 19% and total bed days of care by 25%.
Informatics, Home Telehealth, and Disease Management to Support the Care of Veteran Patients with Chronic Conditions.” Telemedicine and e-Health, Dec. 2008.)
(Source:-“Care Coordination/Home Telehealth: The Systematic Implementation of Health
 A telemedicine burn patient assessment program reduced
patient air transport from 100% of patients to 44% of patients.
(Source:-"Telemedicine Evaluation of Acute Burns Is Accurate and Cost-Effective." The Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Aug. 2009.)
 Telemedicine addresses the growing shortage of physicians
in rural California, where 20% of all Californians live but only
9% of all physicians practice.
 .(Source:-"About Rural—PRIME." University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, 2009)

26. Causes Now and Before
1.
A 2007Survey of health care services in South Los Angeles by the California
Endowment & in a 2009 physicians Merritt Hawkins & Associates found that
Sr.no. Causes Wait time in 2007 before Wait time in 2009 after
Video Conferencing Video Conferencing
1 cardiology 6monts to 1year On an avg. 11days
2 dermatology Approximate 6monts On an avg. 13days
3 orthopedics 6months to 1year On an avg. 12days
(Sources:-"2009 Survey of Physician Appointment Wait Times." Merritt, Hawkins & Associates, 2009. "Critical Condition: Examining the Scope of Medical Services in South Los Angeles." The California Endowment, 2007.)
A 2008 study found that tele-dermatology is cost-effectiveness as well as
2.
quicker access to crucial medical services.
Sr.No. causes Solution Conventional method Telehealth method
1 Skin Cancer Dermatology 48days 4days
2 Removing tissue Biopsies 57days 36days
3 Malignant Neoplasm Cancer Removal 125days 104days
(Cancer) surgery
(Source:-"The Impact of Store-And-Forward Teledermatology on Skin Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment." Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Aug. 2008.)

27. Some other Benefits
 Reduced costs. Transportation, parking, meeting room space, and
wasted wage costs all fall.
 Ability to meet at short notice. Wider involvement becomes possible as
phone based conferencing increases the ability of your people to join key
meetings.
 Choice of location for meetings. e.g. straight after dropping the children
off at school.
 Reduced carbon footprint as travel decreases.
 Freed-up meeting room facilities.
 Record conference calls for those who cannot attend or for keeping a
record of what actions where agreed.

28. Economical Benefits Of VC
 Saving in travelling cost by 70-80%
 Saving in meeting place by 90%
 Saving in allowance by 80%
 Reduce cost of managing chronic patient populations
 $1,600 spent per patient/annum for patients using telehealth
to support their chronic conditions, as compared to $13,121
per patient/annum for those using home-based primary care
services, and $77,745 per patient/annum for those using
market nursing home care services²

29. Review
 “Videoconferencing allows for earlier meetings and therefore quicker
care, it can also improve treatment by permitting more consultations
which, in the past, may have been impossible.”
----Mr. Richard Steyn – Consultant Thoracic Surgeon and National
Clinical Lead Cancer Modernisation.
 “Apart from saving consultants lots of time, the systems have enabled us
to make more timely patient management decisions through improved
liaison. It has meant, for example, better oncology input into management
thereby helping us to meet the Cancer Peer Review Guidelines. In
addition there has been more input from the specialists from other sites
who might ordinarily been unable to attend.” –---Dr. Raji Ganesan –
Consultant Histopathologist at The Women’s Hospital, Birmingham.

30. Video conferencing In Court &
Jail
 A video-conferencing system that links county
courtrooms to the county jail, have reduced inmate
transportation costs and improved courthouse
safety.
 The county also is an affiliate of a video locator
service which pays the county for use of the
equipment, another source of revenue for the county

31. Video conferencing saves Montgomery C
On August 27, 2012, in News, by Tim Hall
•In mid-2001 country saved $1,36,000 in inmate
transportation costs.
•In 2002, during the first full year of implementation,
a total of 1,197 video conference hearings were held,
saving the county just over $186,000 in
transportation costs.

32.  The number of video conference hearings has increased and savings
have grown to a high of $1,123,612 in 2010, officials said. During 2010,
the county scheduled a total of 2,365 video hearings.
 Total savings, comes to $1,416,032, according to the statistics.
 video technology saved the county $359,337 in transportation costs
during 2011, officials said.

33.  In 2011, there were 1,858 video hearings between the jail and the
courthouse, an increase of 162 over 2010. By not having to transport
inmates from the county jail to the courthouse, the use of video
technology saved the county $359,337 in transportation costs during
2011, officials said.

34. Orissa government profile
Orissa is a state in eastern India, about 600km by
400km at its widest points with a population of
around 41 million. It has 30 districts and the state
capital at Bhubaneswar.

35. Problems
 Government officials must engage in discussions on a
whole variety of issues, and this has traditionally been
done by physically moving those decision makers to a
single location.
 Given, India’s rather centralised model of government
decision making, this has meant frequent car journeys for
district officials to the state capital; given that a continuous
source of CO2 emissions given that district headquarters
lie up to 400 km from Bhubaneswar.

36. Every time at least 2 car full of personnel travelled from each district
headquarters to Bhubaneswar.
The potential environmental value of the application has come to be
recognised more over.
time, as concerns about climate change have grown.
Government officials had round-trip drive many times of six to eight
hours or domestic flights for meetings.
Due to this number of meetings held were not sufficient to cope with the
number of issues. Hence regular delays in many issues.
The result was high travel costs loss of productive time in Travelling &
continuous CO2 emissions.

37.  On average, district headquarters are 250km from the state capital, thus
requiring each District Collector to make a 500km roundtrip in a diesel powered,
air conditioned car per meeting .
 Based on the typical fuel consumption of the Ambassador and related cars used
(12 km per liter) and the cost of petrol (Rs.70per liter), then the fuel cost per
roundtrip would be around Rs.3,000. It is the norm to estimate that total
transportation costs (i.e. wear and tear, maintenance, depreciation) add the same
amount again as the fuel costs. To this one can also add the additional costs (not
salary) of the driver for two days of Rs.1,000. This therefore provides a direct cost
figure of around Rs.7,000 per visit. (Of course, there are also the time costs of
having senior officials out of station plus also costs for food and lodging in state
facilities)

38. •Multiplying this up for all 30 District Collectors, the
direct costs per meeting are something like Rs.210,000 =
US$4,200. It is likely that the indirect costs of time,
lodging, etc at least double this figure; with a reasonable
estimate being US$10,000 per meeting.

39. Benefits
They may do so only in a relatively small way but – if the assumptions above
are close to correct then VC in Orissa reduces carbon emissions by the equivalent
of the CO2 produced by a car travelling one million kilometres every year.
Assuming that the cars driven are somewhere around the Euro2 norms for
emissions, that would indicate something like 200g/km of CO2 emissions. Given
each main meeting involves 30 trips averaging 500km each, then the per meeting
saving is 3,000kg of carbon dioxide.

40. Figures provided by one of the District Collectors suggest that the
pre-videoconferencing norm was for two visits per month to be
undertaken to the state capital then the annual saving would be
US$240,000.
Taking the past five years’ data, an average of 25 meetings per
month are held in each of the videoconference facilities. Were those
each to attract the savings attributed to meetings of all District
Collectors, then total cost savings of US$250,000 per month – US$3
million per year would be attributable.

41. Thus, while it is not possible to put an exact financial
figure on videoconferencing, it is highly likely that the
system far more than pays for itself in terms of the
savings generated. (Noting that the financial flow means
the state government is paying NIC typically around
Rs5,000 (.US$100) per meeting.)

42. THANK
YOU
Here comes your footer  Page 42