SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 31
Supplementary Training Modules on
          Good Manufacturing Practice



                                               Validation



                                                            WHO Technical Report Series,
                                                              No. 937, 2006. Annex 4.



Validation   |   Slide 1 of 31   August 2006
Validation

          Part 1. General overview on qualification and validation

          Part 2. Qualification of HVAC and water systems

          Part 3. Cleaning validation

          Part 4. Analytical method validation

          Part 5. Computerized system validation

          Part 6. Qualification of systems and equipment

          Part 7. Non sterile product process validation


Validation   |   Slide 2 of 31   August 2006
Supplementary Training Modules on
                    Good Manufacturing Practice




                 Computerized systems validation
                                               Part 5



                                                          WHO Technical Report Series,
                                                        No. 937, 2006. Annex 4. Appendix 5


Validation   |   Slide 3 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                                Objectives

       To discuss validation of computerized systems including:
        System specifications
        Functional specifications
        Security
        Back-ups
        Validation:
                 – Hardware
                 – Software


Validation   |   Slide 4 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                                 General
        Validated - level appropriate
           – or their use and application.

        Production and quality control.

        Computer systems used in planning, specification,
         programming, testing, commissioning, document operation,
         monitoring and modifying.

        Validation: Evidence and confidence
           – intended use, accuracy, consistency and reliability.
                                                                    1.1 – 1.3

Validation   |   Slide 5 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                                General (2)

        Both the system specifications and functional
         specifications should be validated.

        Periodic (or continuous) evaluation should be performed
         after the initial validation.




                                                              1.4 – 1.5


Validation   |   Slide 6 of 31   August 2006
Validation

        Written procedures for:
           – performance monitoring, change control, programme and
               data security, calibration and maintenance, personnel
               training, emergency recovery and periodic re-evaluation
        During validation, consider:
           – networks
           – manual back-ups
           – input/output checks
           – process documentation, monitoring
           – alarms, and
           – shutdown recovery
                                                                1.6 – 1.7


Validation   |   Slide 7 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                      System specification (Control document)
        In place, stating:
           – objectives of a proposed computer system
           – the data to be entered and stored
           – the flow of data
           – how it interacts with other systems and procedures
           – the information to be produced
           – the limits of any variable
           – the operating programme and test programme

                 (Examples of each document produced by the programme
                    should be included)                                 2.1


Validation   |    Slide 8 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                 System specification (Control document) (2)

        System elements that need to be considered in computer
         validation include:

                 – hardware (equipment)
                 – software (procedures)
                 – people (users)




                                                               2.2


Validation   |   Slide 9 of 31   August 2006
Validation
             Functional specification (Performance specification)

        Provide instructions for:
           – testing, operating, and maintaining the system
           – names of the person(s) (development and operation)
        When using computer systems, consideration:
           – location
           – power supply
           (Fluctuations in the electrical supply can influence computer
              systems and power supply failure can result in loss of
              memory).
           – temperature
                                                                   3.1 – 3.2
           – magnetic disturbances
Validation   |   Slide 10 of 31   August 2006
Validation
       Functional specification (Performance specification) (2)

       GMP requirements for computer systems:
        Verification and revalidation
           – After a suitable period of running a new system
           – Independently reviewed and compared with the system
               specification and functional specification
        Change control
           – Alterations made in accordance with a defined procedure
           – Provision for checking, approving and implementing the
               change
        Checks
           – Data checked periodically
           – Confirm accurate and reliable transfer              3.2 – 3.3

Validation   |   Slide 11 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                                Security

        Production as well as in quality control

        Data entered or amended - authorized persons

        Security systems to prevent unauthorized entry or manipulation
         of data

        SOPs for entering data, changing or amending incorrect entries
         and creating back-ups

        Security procedures in writing
                                                                4.1 – 4.3

Validation   |   Slide 12 of 31   August 2006
Validation
       (continued)

        Traceability is of particular importance

        Audit trail:
           – identify the persons who made entries
           – identify the persons who made changes
           – identify the persons who released material
           – identify the persons who performed other critical steps in
              production or control


                                                                    4.4


Validation   |   Slide 13 of 31   August 2006
Validation
       (continued)
        Entry of critical data by an authorized person

        Independent verification and release for use by a second
         authorized person
            – e.g. for entry of a master processing formula.

        SOPs for certain systems or processes validated
           – e.g. action in case of system failure or breakdown
             including disaster recovery procedure in the event of a
             breakdown


                                                                4.5 – 4.6


Validation   |   Slide 14 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                                Back-ups
        Regular back-ups of all files and data
           – Secure storage (prevent intentional or accidental damage)

                                                Validation
        Validation process should include:
           – Planning
           – Validation policy
           – Project plan and SOPs
                                                                5.1 – 6.1


Validation   |   Slide 15 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                                Validation (2)

        Define computer-related systems and vendors

        Vendor and product evaluated

        System designed and constructed
           – Consider types, testing and quality assurance of the
              software

        Extent of qualification depends on complexity of the system

                                                                       6.2

Validation   |   Slide 16 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                                Validation (3)

       Qualification includes:
        Installation
        Evaluation of the system
        Performance
        Change control, maintenance and calibration, security,
         contingency planning, SOPs, training, performance monitoring
         and periodic re-evaluation
                                                                  6.3


Validation   |   Slide 17 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                    Validation of hardware

        Appropriate tests and challenges to the hardware

        No influence of static, dust, power-feed voltage fluctuations and
         electromagnetic interference

        Hardware is considered to be equipment
           – focus on location, maintenance and calibration as part of
             the qualification


                                                                  7.1.1 – 7.1.2


Validation   |   Slide 18 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                  Validation of hardware (2)
       It should prove:
        Appropriate capacity
        Operational limits
           – e.g. memory, connector ports, input ports
        Performance under worst-case conditions
           – e.g. long hours, temperature extremes
        Reproducibility/consistency
           – e.g. by performing at least three runs under different
              conditions
                                                                      7.1.3

Validation   |   Slide 19 of 31    August 2006
Validation
                                  Validation of hardware (3)
        Written qualification protocols; results in qualification reports
         kept
        Revalidation – in case of significant changes
        Validation may be performed by the vendor – but ultimate
         responsibility remains with the company
        If records kept by supplier, manufacturer still has to have
         sufficient records to allow assessment of the adequacy of the
         validation
        A mere certification of suitability from the vendor, for example,
         will be inadequate
                                                                     7.1.4 – 7.1.7

Validation   |   Slide 20 of 31    August 2006
Validation
     Summary: Validation requirements for Hardware (See table 1 in notes)

                                         Input                       Output
                                        devices                     devices


                 Peripheral                        Hardware types         Signal converter
                  devices


                                                                  Central
                                    Distribution                Processing
                                      system                       Unit



Validation   |     Slide 21 of 31        August 2006
Validation
    Summary: Validation requirements for Hardware (See Table 1 in notes)
                                                  : Location
                                               , environment
                                                  distances


                                                    Key aspects             Signal
             Maintenance                            To consider           conversion



                                  Command                     I/O operation
                                  overrides



Validation   |   Slide 22 of 31       August 2006
Validation
Summary: Validation requirements for Hardware (See Table 1 in notes)


                                  Revalidation                     Function



         Consistency
            and                                      Validation                Limits
        documentation


                           Reproducibility                        Worst case




Validation   |   Slide 23 of 31        August 2006
Validation
                                   Validation of Software
       Software:

        is the term used to describe the complete set of programmes
         used by a computer, and which should be listed in a menu

        Records are considered as software

        Focus should be placed on:
           – accuracy, security, access, retention of records, review,
             double checks, documentation and accuracy of
             reproduction
                                                               7.2.1 – 7.2.2


Validation   |   Slide 24 of 31   August 2006
Validation

        Key computer programmes to be identified:
           – language, name, function (purpose of the programme)
           – input (determine inputs), output (determine outputs)
           – fixed set point (process variable that cannot be changed by
              the operator), variable set point (entered by the operator)
           – edits (reject input/output that does not conform to limits and
              minimize errors, e.g. four- or five-character number entry),
              input manipulation (and equations) and programme
              overrides (e.g. to stop a mixer before time)

        Identification of authorized personnel
            – to write, alter or have access to programmes      7.2.3 – 7.2.4

Validation   |   Slide 25 of 31   August 2006
Validation
                                  Validation of Software (2)
             Points to be considered may include:
               – Consistency in performance: Within pre-established limits)
               – Function: Matching the assigned operational function (e.g.
                  generate batch documentation, different batches of
                  material used in a batch listed)
               – Worst case: Validation under different conditions (e.g.
                  speed, data volume, frequency)
               – Repeats: Sufficient number of times (e.g. replicate data
                  entries)
               – Documentation: Protocols and reports
               – Revalidation: In case of significant changes made      7.2.5

Validation   |   Slide 26 of 31    August 2006
Validation
Summary: Validation requirements for Software (See Table 1 in notes)

                                  Application                Machine
                                   language                 language



                                                    Level




                                  High level                Assembly
                                  language                  language



Validation   |   Slide 27 of 31       August 2006
Validation
Summary: Validation requirements for Software (See Table 1 in notes)

                                   Programme                          Language
                                    overrides


               , Edits                                 Software                   ,Name
                 input                               identification              function
             manipulation

                                   Fixed and                           ,Input
                                    Variable                           output
                                   Set points



Validation    |   Slide 28 of 31       August 2006
Validation
Summary: Validation requirements for Software (See Table 1 in notes)




                                                 Key aspects




                                Software                       Software
                              development                      security



Validation   |   Slide 29 of 31    August 2006
Validation
Summary: Validation requirements for Software (See Table 1 in notes)


                                        Function
                                                              Documentation


                                                Validation
             Worst case


                                                             Revalidation

                                        Repeats



Validation   |   Slide 30 of 31   August 2006
Validation


        Group session




Validation   |   Slide 31 of 31   August 2006

More Related Content

What's hot

Equipment qualification of medical device
Equipment qualification of medical deviceEquipment qualification of medical device
Equipment qualification of medical deviceNahri Musyrif
 
009 what are the systems validation protocol methods at atl 05 28-2015
009 what are the systems validation protocol methods at atl 05 28-2015009 what are the systems validation protocol methods at atl 05 28-2015
009 what are the systems validation protocol methods at atl 05 28-2015atlmarketing
 
Validation in pharmaceutical industry
Validation in pharmaceutical industryValidation in pharmaceutical industry
Validation in pharmaceutical industrydeepakm111
 
Process Validation of API
Process Validation of APIProcess Validation of API
Process Validation of APIsrirao3462
 
Process validation fof Pharmaceutical dosage forms (formulation)
Process validation fof Pharmaceutical dosage forms (formulation)Process validation fof Pharmaceutical dosage forms (formulation)
Process validation fof Pharmaceutical dosage forms (formulation)MD NOUSHAD JAVED
 
Validation, tablet validation
Validation, tablet validationValidation, tablet validation
Validation, tablet validationManish sharma
 
Best Practices to Implement an Effective Change Control Program Company Wide
Best Practices to Implement an Effective Change Control Program Company WideBest Practices to Implement an Effective Change Control Program Company Wide
Best Practices to Implement an Effective Change Control Program Company WideMimi V Syahputri
 
An approach on pharmaceuticals qualification
An approach on pharmaceuticals qualificationAn approach on pharmaceuticals qualification
An approach on pharmaceuticals qualificationDewan Sumsuzzman
 

What's hot (20)

Validation
ValidationValidation
Validation
 
Equipment qualification of medical device
Equipment qualification of medical deviceEquipment qualification of medical device
Equipment qualification of medical device
 
Validation boot camp 2
Validation boot camp 2Validation boot camp 2
Validation boot camp 2
 
Validation ksd
Validation ksdValidation ksd
Validation ksd
 
009 what are the systems validation protocol methods at atl 05 28-2015
009 what are the systems validation protocol methods at atl 05 28-2015009 what are the systems validation protocol methods at atl 05 28-2015
009 what are the systems validation protocol methods at atl 05 28-2015
 
Qualification
QualificationQualification
Qualification
 
Risk-Based Approaches in GMP’s Project Life Cycles
Risk-Based Approaches in GMP’s Project Life CyclesRisk-Based Approaches in GMP’s Project Life Cycles
Risk-Based Approaches in GMP’s Project Life Cycles
 
V Model
V ModelV Model
V Model
 
Keeping up with current regulatory trends
Keeping up with current regulatory trendsKeeping up with current regulatory trends
Keeping up with current regulatory trends
 
Validation in pharmaceutical industry
Validation in pharmaceutical industryValidation in pharmaceutical industry
Validation in pharmaceutical industry
 
Process Validation of API
Process Validation of APIProcess Validation of API
Process Validation of API
 
Process validation fof Pharmaceutical dosage forms (formulation)
Process validation fof Pharmaceutical dosage forms (formulation)Process validation fof Pharmaceutical dosage forms (formulation)
Process validation fof Pharmaceutical dosage forms (formulation)
 
Law down1 6
Law down1 6Law down1 6
Law down1 6
 
Validation, tablet validation
Validation, tablet validationValidation, tablet validation
Validation, tablet validation
 
Jatin validation
Jatin validationJatin validation
Jatin validation
 
Validation part 2
Validation part 2Validation part 2
Validation part 2
 
Qualification for validation
Qualification for validationQualification for validation
Qualification for validation
 
Process validation ppt.
Process validation ppt.Process validation ppt.
Process validation ppt.
 
Best Practices to Implement an Effective Change Control Program Company Wide
Best Practices to Implement an Effective Change Control Program Company WideBest Practices to Implement an Effective Change Control Program Company Wide
Best Practices to Implement an Effective Change Control Program Company Wide
 
An approach on pharmaceuticals qualification
An approach on pharmaceuticals qualificationAn approach on pharmaceuticals qualification
An approach on pharmaceuticals qualification
 

Viewers also liked

Boedeker Bayer BILS 2016
Boedeker Bayer BILS 2016Boedeker Bayer BILS 2016
Boedeker Bayer BILS 2016GBX Events
 
Considering the additional risks of operating bio tech processes in a ball ro...
Considering the additional risks of operating bio tech processes in a ball ro...Considering the additional risks of operating bio tech processes in a ball ro...
Considering the additional risks of operating bio tech processes in a ball ro...BioPhorum Operations Group
 
Gamp Riskbased Approch To Validation
Gamp Riskbased Approch To ValidationGamp Riskbased Approch To Validation
Gamp Riskbased Approch To ValidationRajendra Sadare
 
Qualification & Validation
Qualification & ValidationQualification & Validation
Qualification & ValidationICHAPPS
 
MES - Manufacturing Execution System Explained
MES - Manufacturing Execution System ExplainedMES - Manufacturing Execution System Explained
MES - Manufacturing Execution System ExplainedMRPeasy
 
Principle of Validation and Qualification
Principle of Validation and QualificationPrinciple of Validation and Qualification
Principle of Validation and QualificationPharmaguideline
 
PharmaSuite manufacturing execution system (MES) software, the new EBR solution
PharmaSuite manufacturing execution system (MES) software, the new EBR solutionPharmaSuite manufacturing execution system (MES) software, the new EBR solution
PharmaSuite manufacturing execution system (MES) software, the new EBR solutionXavier Solà
 
Pharmaceutical process validation.pptx
Pharmaceutical process validation.pptxPharmaceutical process validation.pptx
Pharmaceutical process validation.pptxPharmacy
 
Validation of equipments
Validation of equipmentsValidation of equipments
Validation of equipmentssuhasini
 
IT Validation Training
IT Validation TrainingIT Validation Training
IT Validation TrainingRobert Sturm
 
Concept of URS,DQ,IQ,OQ,PQ
Concept of URS,DQ,IQ,OQ,PQConcept of URS,DQ,IQ,OQ,PQ
Concept of URS,DQ,IQ,OQ,PQdhavalrock24
 
Fsts slides itil v3
Fsts   slides itil v3Fsts   slides itil v3
Fsts slides itil v3bader bader
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Boedeker Bayer BILS 2016
Boedeker Bayer BILS 2016Boedeker Bayer BILS 2016
Boedeker Bayer BILS 2016
 
Considering the additional risks of operating bio tech processes in a ball ro...
Considering the additional risks of operating bio tech processes in a ball ro...Considering the additional risks of operating bio tech processes in a ball ro...
Considering the additional risks of operating bio tech processes in a ball ro...
 
Gamp Riskbased Approch To Validation
Gamp Riskbased Approch To ValidationGamp Riskbased Approch To Validation
Gamp Riskbased Approch To Validation
 
Qualification & Validation
Qualification & ValidationQualification & Validation
Qualification & Validation
 
MES - Manufacturing Execution System Explained
MES - Manufacturing Execution System ExplainedMES - Manufacturing Execution System Explained
MES - Manufacturing Execution System Explained
 
Principle of Validation and Qualification
Principle of Validation and QualificationPrinciple of Validation and Qualification
Principle of Validation and Qualification
 
PharmaSuite manufacturing execution system (MES) software, the new EBR solution
PharmaSuite manufacturing execution system (MES) software, the new EBR solutionPharmaSuite manufacturing execution system (MES) software, the new EBR solution
PharmaSuite manufacturing execution system (MES) software, the new EBR solution
 
Pharmaceutical process validation.pptx
Pharmaceutical process validation.pptxPharmaceutical process validation.pptx
Pharmaceutical process validation.pptx
 
Validation of equipments
Validation of equipmentsValidation of equipments
Validation of equipments
 
IT Validation Training
IT Validation TrainingIT Validation Training
IT Validation Training
 
Equipment qualification
Equipment qualificationEquipment qualification
Equipment qualification
 
Concept of URS,DQ,IQ,OQ,PQ
Concept of URS,DQ,IQ,OQ,PQConcept of URS,DQ,IQ,OQ,PQ
Concept of URS,DQ,IQ,OQ,PQ
 
Fsts slides itil v3
Fsts   slides itil v3Fsts   slides itil v3
Fsts slides itil v3
 
Process Validation for Beginners - FDA - EMA Approach
Process Validation for Beginners - FDA - EMA ApproachProcess Validation for Beginners - FDA - EMA Approach
Process Validation for Beginners - FDA - EMA Approach
 

Similar to GMP Computer Systems Validation Guide

Computer System Validation - The Validation Master Plan
Computer System Validation - The Validation Master PlanComputer System Validation - The Validation Master Plan
Computer System Validation - The Validation Master PlanWolfgang Kuchinke
 
Equipment Qualification.pptx
Equipment Qualification.pptxEquipment Qualification.pptx
Equipment Qualification.pptxNeeraj Kumar Rai
 
validationksd-140930004558-phpapp01 (1).pdf
validationksd-140930004558-phpapp01 (1).pdfvalidationksd-140930004558-phpapp01 (1).pdf
validationksd-140930004558-phpapp01 (1).pdfAkashChaudhary749568
 
TRS 937, 2006 ( validation HVAC).pdf
TRS 937, 2006 ( validation HVAC).pdfTRS 937, 2006 ( validation HVAC).pdf
TRS 937, 2006 ( validation HVAC).pdfleminhle2
 
Analytical instrument qualification
Analytical instrument qualificationAnalytical instrument qualification
Analytical instrument qualificationmanusb07
 
Validation : Project Management
Validation : Project ManagementValidation : Project Management
Validation : Project ManagementDipen Shroff
 
Bioprocess Validation
Bioprocess Validation Bioprocess Validation
Bioprocess Validation Pramod Pal
 
Understanding the Risk Management Framework & (ISC)2 CAP Module 4: Life Cycle
Understanding the Risk Management Framework & (ISC)2 CAP Module 4: Life CycleUnderstanding the Risk Management Framework & (ISC)2 CAP Module 4: Life Cycle
Understanding the Risk Management Framework & (ISC)2 CAP Module 4: Life CycleDonald E. Hester
 
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.ppt
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.pptPHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.ppt
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.pptrjshaha58
 
Computerized System Validation Business Intelligence Solutions
Computerized System Validation Business Intelligence SolutionsComputerized System Validation Business Intelligence Solutions
Computerized System Validation Business Intelligence SolutionsDigital-360
 
Facility Qualification & Consideration of Validation Aspects
Facility Qualification & Consideration of Validation Aspects Facility Qualification & Consideration of Validation Aspects
Facility Qualification & Consideration of Validation Aspects Apoorva Bauskar
 

Similar to GMP Computer Systems Validation Guide (20)

Validation Part1
Validation Part1Validation Part1
Validation Part1
 
Validation Part7
Validation Part7Validation Part7
Validation Part7
 
Validation (1).pptx
Validation (1).pptxValidation (1).pptx
Validation (1).pptx
 
Computer System Validation - The Validation Master Plan
Computer System Validation - The Validation Master PlanComputer System Validation - The Validation Master Plan
Computer System Validation - The Validation Master Plan
 
Equipment Qualification.pptx
Equipment Qualification.pptxEquipment Qualification.pptx
Equipment Qualification.pptx
 
validationksd-140930004558-phpapp01 (1).pdf
validationksd-140930004558-phpapp01 (1).pdfvalidationksd-140930004558-phpapp01 (1).pdf
validationksd-140930004558-phpapp01 (1).pdf
 
TRS 937, 2006 ( validation HVAC).pdf
TRS 937, 2006 ( validation HVAC).pdfTRS 937, 2006 ( validation HVAC).pdf
TRS 937, 2006 ( validation HVAC).pdf
 
Analytical instrument qualification
Analytical instrument qualificationAnalytical instrument qualification
Analytical instrument qualification
 
Equipment qualification
Equipment qualificationEquipment qualification
Equipment qualification
 
Validation : Project Management
Validation : Project ManagementValidation : Project Management
Validation : Project Management
 
4 validation jntu pharmacy
4 validation jntu pharmacy4 validation jntu pharmacy
4 validation jntu pharmacy
 
Process validation
Process validationProcess validation
Process validation
 
Bioprocess Validation
Bioprocess Validation Bioprocess Validation
Bioprocess Validation
 
Pharmaceutical validation
Pharmaceutical validation Pharmaceutical validation
Pharmaceutical validation
 
Understanding the Risk Management Framework & (ISC)2 CAP Module 4: Life Cycle
Understanding the Risk Management Framework & (ISC)2 CAP Module 4: Life CycleUnderstanding the Risk Management Framework & (ISC)2 CAP Module 4: Life Cycle
Understanding the Risk Management Framework & (ISC)2 CAP Module 4: Life Cycle
 
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.ppt
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.pptPHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.ppt
PHARMACEUTICAL CALIBRATION & VALIDATION.ppt
 
Computerized System Validation Business Intelligence Solutions
Computerized System Validation Business Intelligence SolutionsComputerized System Validation Business Intelligence Solutions
Computerized System Validation Business Intelligence Solutions
 
Validation
ValidationValidation
Validation
 
Nguyên tắc Thẩm định theo Bộ tiêu chuẩn GMP Nhật Bản
Nguyên tắc Thẩm định theo Bộ tiêu chuẩn GMP Nhật BảnNguyên tắc Thẩm định theo Bộ tiêu chuẩn GMP Nhật Bản
Nguyên tắc Thẩm định theo Bộ tiêu chuẩn GMP Nhật Bản
 
Facility Qualification & Consideration of Validation Aspects
Facility Qualification & Consideration of Validation Aspects Facility Qualification & Consideration of Validation Aspects
Facility Qualification & Consideration of Validation Aspects
 

GMP Computer Systems Validation Guide

  • 1. Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice Validation WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006. Annex 4. Validation | Slide 1 of 31 August 2006
  • 2. Validation  Part 1. General overview on qualification and validation  Part 2. Qualification of HVAC and water systems  Part 3. Cleaning validation  Part 4. Analytical method validation  Part 5. Computerized system validation  Part 6. Qualification of systems and equipment  Part 7. Non sterile product process validation Validation | Slide 2 of 31 August 2006
  • 3. Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice Computerized systems validation Part 5 WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006. Annex 4. Appendix 5 Validation | Slide 3 of 31 August 2006
  • 4. Validation Objectives To discuss validation of computerized systems including:  System specifications  Functional specifications  Security  Back-ups  Validation: – Hardware – Software Validation | Slide 4 of 31 August 2006
  • 5. Validation General  Validated - level appropriate – or their use and application.  Production and quality control.  Computer systems used in planning, specification, programming, testing, commissioning, document operation, monitoring and modifying.  Validation: Evidence and confidence – intended use, accuracy, consistency and reliability. 1.1 – 1.3 Validation | Slide 5 of 31 August 2006
  • 6. Validation General (2)  Both the system specifications and functional specifications should be validated.  Periodic (or continuous) evaluation should be performed after the initial validation. 1.4 – 1.5 Validation | Slide 6 of 31 August 2006
  • 7. Validation  Written procedures for: – performance monitoring, change control, programme and data security, calibration and maintenance, personnel training, emergency recovery and periodic re-evaluation  During validation, consider: – networks – manual back-ups – input/output checks – process documentation, monitoring – alarms, and – shutdown recovery 1.6 – 1.7 Validation | Slide 7 of 31 August 2006
  • 8. Validation System specification (Control document)  In place, stating: – objectives of a proposed computer system – the data to be entered and stored – the flow of data – how it interacts with other systems and procedures – the information to be produced – the limits of any variable – the operating programme and test programme (Examples of each document produced by the programme should be included) 2.1 Validation | Slide 8 of 31 August 2006
  • 9. Validation System specification (Control document) (2)  System elements that need to be considered in computer validation include: – hardware (equipment) – software (procedures) – people (users) 2.2 Validation | Slide 9 of 31 August 2006
  • 10. Validation Functional specification (Performance specification)  Provide instructions for: – testing, operating, and maintaining the system – names of the person(s) (development and operation)  When using computer systems, consideration: – location – power supply (Fluctuations in the electrical supply can influence computer systems and power supply failure can result in loss of memory). – temperature 3.1 – 3.2 – magnetic disturbances Validation | Slide 10 of 31 August 2006
  • 11. Validation Functional specification (Performance specification) (2) GMP requirements for computer systems:  Verification and revalidation – After a suitable period of running a new system – Independently reviewed and compared with the system specification and functional specification  Change control – Alterations made in accordance with a defined procedure – Provision for checking, approving and implementing the change  Checks – Data checked periodically – Confirm accurate and reliable transfer 3.2 – 3.3 Validation | Slide 11 of 31 August 2006
  • 12. Validation Security  Production as well as in quality control  Data entered or amended - authorized persons  Security systems to prevent unauthorized entry or manipulation of data  SOPs for entering data, changing or amending incorrect entries and creating back-ups  Security procedures in writing 4.1 – 4.3 Validation | Slide 12 of 31 August 2006
  • 13. Validation (continued)  Traceability is of particular importance  Audit trail: – identify the persons who made entries – identify the persons who made changes – identify the persons who released material – identify the persons who performed other critical steps in production or control 4.4 Validation | Slide 13 of 31 August 2006
  • 14. Validation (continued)  Entry of critical data by an authorized person  Independent verification and release for use by a second authorized person – e.g. for entry of a master processing formula.  SOPs for certain systems or processes validated – e.g. action in case of system failure or breakdown including disaster recovery procedure in the event of a breakdown 4.5 – 4.6 Validation | Slide 14 of 31 August 2006
  • 15. Validation Back-ups  Regular back-ups of all files and data – Secure storage (prevent intentional or accidental damage) Validation  Validation process should include: – Planning – Validation policy – Project plan and SOPs 5.1 – 6.1 Validation | Slide 15 of 31 August 2006
  • 16. Validation Validation (2)  Define computer-related systems and vendors  Vendor and product evaluated  System designed and constructed – Consider types, testing and quality assurance of the software  Extent of qualification depends on complexity of the system 6.2 Validation | Slide 16 of 31 August 2006
  • 17. Validation Validation (3) Qualification includes:  Installation  Evaluation of the system  Performance  Change control, maintenance and calibration, security, contingency planning, SOPs, training, performance monitoring and periodic re-evaluation 6.3 Validation | Slide 17 of 31 August 2006
  • 18. Validation Validation of hardware  Appropriate tests and challenges to the hardware  No influence of static, dust, power-feed voltage fluctuations and electromagnetic interference  Hardware is considered to be equipment – focus on location, maintenance and calibration as part of the qualification 7.1.1 – 7.1.2 Validation | Slide 18 of 31 August 2006
  • 19. Validation Validation of hardware (2) It should prove:  Appropriate capacity  Operational limits – e.g. memory, connector ports, input ports  Performance under worst-case conditions – e.g. long hours, temperature extremes  Reproducibility/consistency – e.g. by performing at least three runs under different conditions 7.1.3 Validation | Slide 19 of 31 August 2006
  • 20. Validation Validation of hardware (3)  Written qualification protocols; results in qualification reports kept  Revalidation – in case of significant changes  Validation may be performed by the vendor – but ultimate responsibility remains with the company  If records kept by supplier, manufacturer still has to have sufficient records to allow assessment of the adequacy of the validation  A mere certification of suitability from the vendor, for example, will be inadequate 7.1.4 – 7.1.7 Validation | Slide 20 of 31 August 2006
  • 21. Validation Summary: Validation requirements for Hardware (See table 1 in notes) Input Output devices devices Peripheral Hardware types Signal converter devices Central Distribution Processing system Unit Validation | Slide 21 of 31 August 2006
  • 22. Validation Summary: Validation requirements for Hardware (See Table 1 in notes) : Location , environment distances Key aspects Signal Maintenance To consider conversion Command I/O operation overrides Validation | Slide 22 of 31 August 2006
  • 23. Validation Summary: Validation requirements for Hardware (See Table 1 in notes) Revalidation Function Consistency and Validation Limits documentation Reproducibility Worst case Validation | Slide 23 of 31 August 2006
  • 24. Validation Validation of Software Software:  is the term used to describe the complete set of programmes used by a computer, and which should be listed in a menu  Records are considered as software  Focus should be placed on: – accuracy, security, access, retention of records, review, double checks, documentation and accuracy of reproduction 7.2.1 – 7.2.2 Validation | Slide 24 of 31 August 2006
  • 25. Validation  Key computer programmes to be identified: – language, name, function (purpose of the programme) – input (determine inputs), output (determine outputs) – fixed set point (process variable that cannot be changed by the operator), variable set point (entered by the operator) – edits (reject input/output that does not conform to limits and minimize errors, e.g. four- or five-character number entry), input manipulation (and equations) and programme overrides (e.g. to stop a mixer before time)  Identification of authorized personnel – to write, alter or have access to programmes 7.2.3 – 7.2.4 Validation | Slide 25 of 31 August 2006
  • 26. Validation Validation of Software (2) Points to be considered may include: – Consistency in performance: Within pre-established limits) – Function: Matching the assigned operational function (e.g. generate batch documentation, different batches of material used in a batch listed) – Worst case: Validation under different conditions (e.g. speed, data volume, frequency) – Repeats: Sufficient number of times (e.g. replicate data entries) – Documentation: Protocols and reports – Revalidation: In case of significant changes made 7.2.5 Validation | Slide 26 of 31 August 2006
  • 27. Validation Summary: Validation requirements for Software (See Table 1 in notes) Application Machine language language Level High level Assembly language language Validation | Slide 27 of 31 August 2006
  • 28. Validation Summary: Validation requirements for Software (See Table 1 in notes) Programme Language overrides , Edits Software ,Name input identification function manipulation Fixed and ,Input Variable output Set points Validation | Slide 28 of 31 August 2006
  • 29. Validation Summary: Validation requirements for Software (See Table 1 in notes) Key aspects Software Software development security Validation | Slide 29 of 31 August 2006
  • 30. Validation Summary: Validation requirements for Software (See Table 1 in notes) Function Documentation Validation Worst case Revalidation Repeats Validation | Slide 30 of 31 August 2006
  • 31. Validation  Group session Validation | Slide 31 of 31 August 2006

Editor's Notes

  1. दिसंबर 4, 2012 In this supplementary training module, we will be looking at the recommendations by WHO, on Validation and qualification. The module consists of 7 parts: Part 1. General overview on qualification and validation Part 2. Qualification of HVAC and water systems Part 3. Cleaning validation Part 4. Analytical method validation Part 5. Computerized system validation Part 6. Qualification of systems and equipment Part 7. Non sterile product process validation Each part deals with a specific topic, and each part can be presented in about one to one and a half hours time. Presenters should know the topics and add practical examples to the texts taken from the WHO guideline.
  2. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  3. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  4. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  5. दिसंबर 4, 2012 1. General 1.1 Computer systems should be validated at the level appropriate for their use and application. This is of importance in production as well as in quality control. 1.2 The use of a computer system includes different stages. These are planning, specifi cation, programming, testing, commissioning, document operation, monitoring and modifying. 1.3 The purpose of validation of a computer system is to ensure an acceptable degree of evidence (documented, raw data), confi dence (dependability and thorough, rigorous achievement of predetermined specifi cations), intended use, accuracy, consistency and reliability.
  6. दिसंबर 4, 2012 1.4 Both the system specifications and functional specifications should be validated. 1.5 Periodic (or continuous) evaluation should be performed after the initial validation.
  7. दिसंबर 4, 2012 1.6 There should be written procedures for performance monitoring, change control, programme and data security, calibration and maintenance, personnel training, emergency recovery and periodic re-evaluation. 1.7 Aspects of computerized operations that should be considered during validation include: — networks — manual back-ups — input/output checks — process documentation — monitoring — alarms — shutdown recovery.
  8. दिसंबर 4, 2012 2. System specification 2.1 There should be a control document or system specification. The control document should state the objectives of a proposed computer system, the data to be entered and stored, the flow of data, how it interacts with other systems and procedures, the information to be produced, the limits of any variable and the operating programme and test programme. (Examples of each document produced by the programme should be included.)
  9. दिसंबर 4, 2012 2.2 System elements that need to be considered in computer validation include hardware (equipment), software (procedures) and people (users).
  10. दिसंबर 4, 2012 3. Functional specification 3.1 A functional or performance specifi cation should provide instructions for testing, operating, and maintaining the system, as well as names of the person(s) responsible for its development and operation. 3.2 The following general aspects should be kept in mind when using computer systems: — location — power supply — temperature, and — magnetic disturbances. Fluctuations in the electrical supply can infl uence computer systems and power supply failure can result in loss of memory.
  11. दिसंबर 4, 2012 3.2 The following general aspects should be kept in mind when using computer systems: — location — power supply — temperature, and — magnetic disturbances. Fluctuations in the electrical supply can infl uence computer systems and power supply failure can result in loss of memory. 3.3 The following general good manufacturing practice (GMP) requirements are applicable to computer systems. • Verifi cation and revalidation. After a suitable period of running a new system it should be independently reviewed and compared with the system specifi cation and functional specifi cation. • Change control. Alterations should only be made in accordance with a defi ned procedure which should include provision for checking, approving and implementing the change. • Checks. Data should be checked periodically to confi rm that they have been accurately and reliably transferred.
  12. दिसंबर 4, 2012 4. Security 4.1 This is of importance in production as well as in quality control. 4.2 Data should be entered or amended only by persons authorized to do so. Suitable security systems should be in place to prevent unauthorized entry or manipulation of data. The activity of entering data, changing or amending incorrect entries and creating back-ups should all be done in accordance with written, approved standard operating procedures (SOPs). 4.3 The security procedures should be in writing. Security should also extend to devices used to store programmes, such as tapes, disks and magnetic strip cards. Access to these devices should be controlled.
  13. दिसंबर 4, 2012 4.4 Traceability is of particular importance and it should be able to identify the persons who made entries/changes, released material, or performed other critical steps in manufacture or control.
  14. दिसंबर 4, 2012 4.5 The entry of critical data into a computer by an authorized person (e.g. entry of a master processing formula) requires an independent verifi - cation and release for use by a second authorized person. 4.6 SOPs should be validated for certain systems or processes, e.g. the procedures to be followed if the system fails or breaks down should be de- fi ned and tested. Alternative arrangements should be made by the validation team, and a disaster recovery procedure should be available for the systems that need to be operated in the event of a breakdown.
  15. दिसंबर 4, 2012 5. Back-ups 5.1 Regular back-ups of all fi les and data should be made and stored in a secure location to prevent intentional or accidental damage. 6. Validation 6.1 Planning, which should include the validation policy, project plan and SOPs, is one of the steps in the validation process.
  16. दिसंबर 4, 2012 6.2 The computer-related systems and vendors should be defi ned and the vendor and product should be evaluated. The system should be designed and constructed, taking into consideration the types, testing and quality assurance of the software. 6.3 After installation of the system it should be qualifi ed. The extent of the qualifi cation should depend on the complexity of the system. The system should be evaluated and performance qualifi cation, change control, maintenance and calibration, security, contingency planning, SOPs, training, performance monitoring and periodic re-evaluation should be addressed.
  17. दिसंबर 4, 2012 6.3 After installation of the system it should be qualified. The extent of the qualifi cation should depend on the complexity of the system. The system should be evaluated and performance qualifi cation, change control, maintenance and calibration, security, contingency planning, SOPs, training, performance monitoring and periodic re-evaluation should be addressed.
  18. दिसंबर 4, 2012 7.1 Hardware 7.1.1 As part of the validation process appropriate tests and challenges to the hardware should be performed. 7.1.2 Static, dust, power-feed voltage fl uctuations and electromagnetic interference could infl uence the system. The extent of validation should depend on the complexity of the system. Hardware is considered to be equipment, and the focus should be on location, maintenance and calibration of hardware, as well as on validation/qualifi cation.
  19. दिसंबर 4, 2012 7.1.3 The validation/qualifi cation of the hardware should prove: • that the capacity of the hardware matches its assigned function (e.g. foreign language);
  20. दिसंबर 4, 2012 7.1.4 The validation should be done in accordance with written qualifi cation protocols and the results should be recorded in the qualifi cation reports. 7.1.5 Revalidation should be performed when signifi cant changes are made. 7.1.6 Much of the hardware validation may be performed by the computer vendor. However, the ultimate responsibility for the suitability of equipment used remains with the company. 7.1.7 Hardware validation data and protocols should be kept by the company. When validation information is produced by an outside fi rm, e.g. computer vendor, the records maintained by the company need not include all of the voluminous test data; however, such records should be suffi ciently complete (including general results and protocols) to allow the company to assess the adequacy of the validation. A mere certifi cation of suitability from the vendor, for example, will be inadequate.
  21. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  22. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  23. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  24. दिसंबर 4, 2012 7.2 Software 7.2.1 Software is the term used to describe the complete set of programmes used by a computer, and which should be listed in a menu. 7.2.2 Records are considered as software; focus is placed on accuracy, security, access, retention of records, review, double checks, documentation and accuracy of reproduction.
  25. दिसंबर 4, 2012 7.2.3 The company should identify the following key computer programmes: language, name, function (purpose of the programme), input (determine inputs), output (determine outputs), fi xed set point (process variable that cannot be changed by the operator), variable set point (entered by the operator), edits (reject input/output that does not conform to limits and minimize errors, e.g. four- or fi ve-character number entry), input manipulation (and equations) and programme overrides (e.g. to stop a mixer before time). 7.2.4 The personnel who have the ability and/or are authorized to write, alter or have access to programmes should be identifi ed.
  26. दिसंबर 4, 2012 7.2.5 Software validation should provide assurance that computer programmes (especially those that control manufacturing and processing) will consistently perform as they are supposed to, within pre-established limits. When planning the validation, the following points should be considered. • Function: does the programme match the assigned operational function (e.g. generate batch documentation, different batches of material used in a batch listed)? • Worst case: perform validation under different conditions (e.g. speed, data volume, frequency). • Repeats: suffi cient number of times (replicate data entries). • Documentation: protocols and reports. • Revalidation: needed when signifi cant changes are made.
  27. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  28. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  29. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  30. दिसंबर 4, 2012
  31. दिसंबर 4, 2012