The document discusses Plum Analytics, a company that provides tools to measure the impact of scholarly research using altmetrics. It outlines the limitations of traditional citation metrics and describes how Plum aggregates metrics from various sources to provide a more comprehensive view of a researcher's impact through usage, captures, mentions, social media, and citations of their work. Plum builds profiles of individual researchers and groups, associates their research artifacts, and provides visual summaries and comparisons of metrics to measure impact beyond publications.
Practical Uses of Altmetrics - Hear librarians talk about how they use new me...plumanalytics
This webinar features two PlumX customers:
Tim Deliyannides, Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology, University of Pittsburgh - Tim will talk about how the library is a publisher at Pitt and how they use altmetrics to assist their publishing analytics. Additionally, Tim will talk about how Pitt instrumented altmetrics in their institutional repository and the positive results they’ve had from doing that.
Robin Champieux, Scholarly Communication Librarian, Oregon Health & Science University - Robin will talk about how they use altmetrics at OHSU to integrate the library into the research process and to support and interact with the researchers and research institutes.
Andrea Michalek, Co-Founder and President of Plum Analytics, will kick off the session with a brief introduction.
Altmetrics attempts to provide timely measures of an impact through the use of metrics from HTML views and downloads of scholarly articles, blog posts, tweets, bookmarks, etc. Publishers of scientific research have enabled altmetrics on their articles, open source applications are available for platforms to display altmetrics on scientific research and subscription models have been created to measure the use that research articles receive online. This presentation reviews some of the current models for providing altmetrics along with information on a selection the providers that have made altmetrics available for general use.
Practical Uses of Altmetrics - Hear librarians talk about how they use new me...plumanalytics
This webinar features two PlumX customers:
Tim Deliyannides, Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology, University of Pittsburgh - Tim will talk about how the library is a publisher at Pitt and how they use altmetrics to assist their publishing analytics. Additionally, Tim will talk about how Pitt instrumented altmetrics in their institutional repository and the positive results they’ve had from doing that.
Robin Champieux, Scholarly Communication Librarian, Oregon Health & Science University - Robin will talk about how they use altmetrics at OHSU to integrate the library into the research process and to support and interact with the researchers and research institutes.
Andrea Michalek, Co-Founder and President of Plum Analytics, will kick off the session with a brief introduction.
Altmetrics attempts to provide timely measures of an impact through the use of metrics from HTML views and downloads of scholarly articles, blog posts, tweets, bookmarks, etc. Publishers of scientific research have enabled altmetrics on their articles, open source applications are available for platforms to display altmetrics on scientific research and subscription models have been created to measure the use that research articles receive online. This presentation reviews some of the current models for providing altmetrics along with information on a selection the providers that have made altmetrics available for general use.
by Sarah Baughman
This presentation focuses on how to measure your social media activities using both quantitative and qualitative measures. Specific metrics and tools will be discussed to help capture the outcomes and potential impacts of social media activities.
2collab London Online web2.0 after the buzzf kersten
Presentation on 2collab a scientific social media tool to help researchers share and discuss relevant infromation and connect with each other in new and more efficient ways by benefiting from new research collaboration opportunities.
Facilitate Research Communities Adoption of Open Science Publishing Principle...OpenAIRE
Pre-conference Workshop: Facilitate Research Communities Adoption of Open Science Publishing Principles: The Role of Repositories and the OpenAIRE-Connect Services.
COAR Annual Meeting, May 21, 2019 - Lyon, France
Hosted by The Center for Direct Scientific Communication (CCSD).
The academic book is one of the classic types of scientific literature. Although present in all areas of knowledge, its relevance in research communication is highlighted with more emphasis in the areas of social sciences, literature, and arts. In the other fields, communication is almost exclusively dominated by journal articles or conference and congress proceedings. This fact is evidenced by the thematic composition of the collections of books indexed and published by the SciELO Books program, by international bibliographic indexes and by the distribution of citations from SciELO journal articles.
Besides commercial publishing houses, the vast majority of universities and research and development institutes and a minority of scientific societies and professional associations in the SciELO Network countries operate publishers that, in addition to textbooks and popular science books, publish works that communicate research results. At the same time, the national systems of scientific output evaluation rely on books assessment systems or methodologies complementing those of journals. On a smaller scale than journals’, the publication of scholarly books is also an integral part of research infrastructures.
The online publication of academic books and their indexing radically increase their visibility in relation to the paper version, which contributes to increase their use and impact by citations. One of the positive consequences of online publishing and indexing is to enable the insertion and interoperability of academic books into the flow of scientific communication. Particularly, the SciELO Program has as one of its functions to maximize the interoperability between researches, which requires, besides the journals, the online availability of books meeting international standards.
The scope of this working group is to analyze the relevance of the academic book in research communication, the current state and trends of online publication and indexing of academic books in the SciELO Network countries and the challenges for adopting standards that maximize their visibility, use and impact.
This presentation was provided by Camelia Csora of Elsevier during the NISO event "Next Generation Discovery Tools: New Tools, Aging Standards," held March 27 - March 28, 2008.
Nowadays we all have access to online software tools including Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Blogs, etc. that allow us to develop and engage a network of followers. These applications provide the opportunity for scientists to personally share information regarding research activities with the larger more general public. The rich array of tools available now allow for data sharing, distribution of conference presentations with or without narration, enhancing scientific articles post-publication and, ultimately, measuring the alternative metrics impact of sharing this information. The presenter will provide an overview of common social media tools available that he has found to be of value over the past few years of working with the myriad of available applications. He will discuss how to utilize your limited time to get the biggest return in terms of disseminating information about your scientific research, provide access to your data and presentations, as well as develop an overall “alternative metrics” view of your activities. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or products represent endorsement for use.
Altmetrics: the movement, the tools, and the implicationsKR_Barker
The October 2015 iteration of the class created and taught by Andrea Denton and Kimberley R. Barker, both of the UVA Claude Moore Health Sciences Library.
More Related Content
Similar to Using plum to assess research impact -2012-10-30
by Sarah Baughman
This presentation focuses on how to measure your social media activities using both quantitative and qualitative measures. Specific metrics and tools will be discussed to help capture the outcomes and potential impacts of social media activities.
2collab London Online web2.0 after the buzzf kersten
Presentation on 2collab a scientific social media tool to help researchers share and discuss relevant infromation and connect with each other in new and more efficient ways by benefiting from new research collaboration opportunities.
Facilitate Research Communities Adoption of Open Science Publishing Principle...OpenAIRE
Pre-conference Workshop: Facilitate Research Communities Adoption of Open Science Publishing Principles: The Role of Repositories and the OpenAIRE-Connect Services.
COAR Annual Meeting, May 21, 2019 - Lyon, France
Hosted by The Center for Direct Scientific Communication (CCSD).
The academic book is one of the classic types of scientific literature. Although present in all areas of knowledge, its relevance in research communication is highlighted with more emphasis in the areas of social sciences, literature, and arts. In the other fields, communication is almost exclusively dominated by journal articles or conference and congress proceedings. This fact is evidenced by the thematic composition of the collections of books indexed and published by the SciELO Books program, by international bibliographic indexes and by the distribution of citations from SciELO journal articles.
Besides commercial publishing houses, the vast majority of universities and research and development institutes and a minority of scientific societies and professional associations in the SciELO Network countries operate publishers that, in addition to textbooks and popular science books, publish works that communicate research results. At the same time, the national systems of scientific output evaluation rely on books assessment systems or methodologies complementing those of journals. On a smaller scale than journals’, the publication of scholarly books is also an integral part of research infrastructures.
The online publication of academic books and their indexing radically increase their visibility in relation to the paper version, which contributes to increase their use and impact by citations. One of the positive consequences of online publishing and indexing is to enable the insertion and interoperability of academic books into the flow of scientific communication. Particularly, the SciELO Program has as one of its functions to maximize the interoperability between researches, which requires, besides the journals, the online availability of books meeting international standards.
The scope of this working group is to analyze the relevance of the academic book in research communication, the current state and trends of online publication and indexing of academic books in the SciELO Network countries and the challenges for adopting standards that maximize their visibility, use and impact.
This presentation was provided by Camelia Csora of Elsevier during the NISO event "Next Generation Discovery Tools: New Tools, Aging Standards," held March 27 - March 28, 2008.
Nowadays we all have access to online software tools including Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, Blogs, etc. that allow us to develop and engage a network of followers. These applications provide the opportunity for scientists to personally share information regarding research activities with the larger more general public. The rich array of tools available now allow for data sharing, distribution of conference presentations with or without narration, enhancing scientific articles post-publication and, ultimately, measuring the alternative metrics impact of sharing this information. The presenter will provide an overview of common social media tools available that he has found to be of value over the past few years of working with the myriad of available applications. He will discuss how to utilize your limited time to get the biggest return in terms of disseminating information about your scientific research, provide access to your data and presentations, as well as develop an overall “alternative metrics” view of your activities. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or products represent endorsement for use.
Altmetrics: the movement, the tools, and the implicationsKR_Barker
The October 2015 iteration of the class created and taught by Andrea Denton and Kimberley R. Barker, both of the UVA Claude Moore Health Sciences Library.
Similar to Using plum to assess research impact -2012-10-30 (20)
5. Changing the focus on metrics
how much your
COUNTER university uses
Plum Analytics Confidential
the collection
Article-level how much the
metrics and world uses your
research
Plum 5
7. Different categories of impact
• Usage
• Downloads, views, book holdings, ILL, document
delivery
• Captures
• Favorites, bookmarks, saves, readers, groups, watchers
Plum Analytics Confidential
• Mentions
• Blog post, news story, Wikipedia article, comments,
review
• Social Media
• Tweets, Google +1s, likes, shares, ratings
• Citations
• Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Microsoft 7
Academic Search, patents
8. Different versions and links
Institutional Researcher
arxiv.org PLOS repository website
Plum Analytics Confidential
Link Bit.ly DOI Direct
resolver link
8
10. What is Plum building?
• Next generation impact analysis metrics for scholarly research.
• Aggregating artifact and author level metrics into a research
reputation graph.
• Clicks, views, tweets, likes, links, tags, favorites, Google +1’s,
Plum Analytics Confidential
etc. will be captured and correlated.
This graph will power intuitive
research directories and
visualizations at the artifact,
researcher, lab, department,
publication, and institution level.
10
12. Measuring the Modern Researcher
Nicolas Pinto – PhD from MIT in 2010
• Some of his research is published.
Plum Analytics Confidential
• What other research is Pinto doing? How is his
research being used? Promoted? Interacted with?
12
• What is Pinto’s real scientific impact?
13. Comparisons
• He tweets:
• He shares, and it is measurable:
Plum Analytics Confidential
• 1,204 slideshare views
• 26 tweets
• 2 Google +1
• 3 LinkedIn Shares
• 1 Facebook Share, 1 like, 1 comment
• All before his research is “published”
• Web of Science cited-by count = 2 in 3 years 13
• Google Citations does not list him yet
14. Categories of Impact
Plum allows you to drill into the specifics behind each type of impact.
Plum Analytics Confidential
Clicking on any category shows more detailed metrics.
14
15. Fully Customizable Hierarchy
Group researchers
in flexible hierarchy
for your own
purposes
Plum Analytics Confidential
15
16. Create User and Group Profiles
Web-based tools to
create a profile for
each group and
researcher
Plum Analytics Confidential
Plum can also import
profiles from existing 16
systems
17. Associate Artifacts
Artifacts can be associated with
a researcher and/or a group
Plum Analytics Confidential
Each section can be
expanded to fill in details. 17
18. Research Output Summarized
Clear, visual summaries of each researcher’s or group’s output
Plum Analytics Confidential
18
19. Tabular View
Sortable, table-view of full output.
Exportable to spreadsheets or integrated into other applications.
Plum Analytics Confidential
19
20. Visualizations of Output
Sunburst chart
shows the
Plum Analytics Confidential
relative
impact of all
output for a
researcher.
20
21. Thank You!
Mike Buschman
mike@plumanalytics.com
206-331-7297
21
Editor's Notes
Published articles in prominent journals cite other articles in prominent journals = prestige and tenure.This mechanism of using citations in published journals to determine impact of research was built in the 1960’s.
Promotion vs. interactionPeople metrics vs. artifact metricsTweets != citations