Unitron recently conducted a Global Listening Environment Study (GLES) in 10 different countries, acoustically classifying where the “average” hearing aid wearer, by age and other criteria, spends their time in different acoustic environments throughout the course of their daily lives.
A graphic presentation of the plot and characters in Thomas Hardy's novel The Mayor of Casterbridge. It is designed to facilitate the teaching of the novel to high school or community college students.
A graphic presentation of the plot and characters in Thomas Hardy's novel The Mayor of Casterbridge. It is designed to facilitate the teaching of the novel to high school or community college students.
This is a combined presentation done by me and my friends namely Nidhi Singh, Priyanka Pokharel,Swostina Ranjit and Rubina Khadka. Hope you will like this effort of ours.
P.S. The video might not work.If you want to see the video go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXvpDoGrRGU
This is a combined presentation done by me and my friends namely Nidhi Singh, Priyanka Pokharel,Swostina Ranjit and Rubina Khadka. Hope you will like this effort of ours.
P.S. The video might not work.If you want to see the video go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXvpDoGrRGU
Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) has been a perennial occupational hazard in the workplace. This is truly evident in the mining professions. This presentation covers details about hearing loss, its causes and tools developed to educate the workforce regarding its existence.
AJAResearch ArticleA Comparison of Personal SoundAmp.docxsimonlbentley59018
AJA
Research Article
A Comparison of Personal Sound
Amplification Products and Hearing
Aids in Ecologically Relevant
Test Environments
Lisa Brody,a Yu-Hsiang Wu,a and Elizabeth Stangla
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the
benefit of self-adjusted personal sound amplification
products (PSAPs) to audiologist-fitted hearing aids
based on speech recognition, listening effort, and
sound quality in ecologically relevant test conditions to
estimate real-world effectiveness.
Method: Twenty-five older adults with bilateral mild-to-
moderate hearing loss completed the single-blinded,
crossover study. Participants underwent aided testing
using 3 PSAPs and a traditional hearing aid, as well
as unaided testing. PSAPs were adjusted based on
participant preference, whereas the hearing aid was
configured using best-practice verification protocols.
Audibility provided by the devices was quantified using the
Speech Intelligibility Index (American National Standards
Institute, 2012). Outcome measures assessing speech
recognition, listening effort, and sound quality were
administered in ecologically relevant laboratory conditions
designed to represent real-world speech listening situations.
Results: All devices significantly improved Speech
Intelligibility Index compared to unaided listening, with
the hearing aid providing more audibility than all PSAPs.
Results further revealed that, in general, the hearing aid
improved speech recognition performance and reduced
listening effort significantly more than all PSAPs. Few
differences in sound quality were observed between
devices. All PSAPs improved speech recognition and
listening effort compared to unaided testing.
Conclusions: Hearing aids fitted using best-practice
verification protocols were capable of providing more aided
audibility, better speech recognition performance, and lower
listening effort compared to the PSAPs tested in the current
study. Differences in sound quality between the devices were
minimal. However, because all PSAPs tested in the study
significantly improved participants’ speech recognition
performance and reduced listening effort compared to
unaided listening, PSAPs could serve as a budget-friendly
option for those who cannot afford traditional amplification.
H
earing loss affects more than 37 million adults
in America (National Institute on Deafness and
Other Communication Disorders, 2016). Accord-
ing to a survey of American adults, only about 30% of
those with hearing difficulties own hearing aids (Abrams
& Kihm, 2015), though treatments such as amplification
have been shown to reduce negative consequences of living
with untreated hearing loss (Hougaard, Ruf, Egger, &
Abrams, 2016; Mulrow et al., 1990). One primary reason
for the low uptake of hearing aids is their high cost (Abrams
& Kihm, 2015; Kochkin, 2007). The average pair of hear-
ing aids costs approximately $4,700 (President’s Council of
Advisors on Science and Technology, 2015), which can im-
pose a fina.
AJAResearch ArticleA Comparison of Personal SoundAmp.docxdaniahendric
AJA
Research Article
A Comparison of Personal Sound
Amplification Products and Hearing
Aids in Ecologically Relevant
Test Environments
Lisa Brody,a Yu-Hsiang Wu,a and Elizabeth Stangla
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the
benefit of self-adjusted personal sound amplification
products (PSAPs) to audiologist-fitted hearing aids
based on speech recognition, listening effort, and
sound quality in ecologically relevant test conditions to
estimate real-world effectiveness.
Method: Twenty-five older adults with bilateral mild-to-
moderate hearing loss completed the single-blinded,
crossover study. Participants underwent aided testing
using 3 PSAPs and a traditional hearing aid, as well
as unaided testing. PSAPs were adjusted based on
participant preference, whereas the hearing aid was
configured using best-practice verification protocols.
Audibility provided by the devices was quantified using the
Speech Intelligibility Index (American National Standards
Institute, 2012). Outcome measures assessing speech
recognition, listening effort, and sound quality were
administered in ecologically relevant laboratory conditions
designed to represent real-world speech listening situations.
Results: All devices significantly improved Speech
Intelligibility Index compared to unaided listening, with
the hearing aid providing more audibility than all PSAPs.
Results further revealed that, in general, the hearing aid
improved speech recognition performance and reduced
listening effort significantly more than all PSAPs. Few
differences in sound quality were observed between
devices. All PSAPs improved speech recognition and
listening effort compared to unaided testing.
Conclusions: Hearing aids fitted using best-practice
verification protocols were capable of providing more aided
audibility, better speech recognition performance, and lower
listening effort compared to the PSAPs tested in the current
study. Differences in sound quality between the devices were
minimal. However, because all PSAPs tested in the study
significantly improved participants’ speech recognition
performance and reduced listening effort compared to
unaided listening, PSAPs could serve as a budget-friendly
option for those who cannot afford traditional amplification.
H
earing loss affects more than 37 million adults
in America (National Institute on Deafness and
Other Communication Disorders, 2016). Accord-
ing to a survey of American adults, only about 30% of
those with hearing difficulties own hearing aids (Abrams
& Kihm, 2015), though treatments such as amplification
have been shown to reduce negative consequences of living
with untreated hearing loss (Hougaard, Ruf, Egger, &
Abrams, 2016; Mulrow et al., 1990). One primary reason
for the low uptake of hearing aids is their high cost (Abrams
& Kihm, 2015; Kochkin, 2007). The average pair of hear-
ing aids costs approximately $4,700 (President’s Council of
Advisors on Science and Technology, 2015), which can im-
pose a fina ...
Concern is growing about the rising exposure to loud sounds in recreational settings such as nightclubs, discotheques, pubs, bars, cinemas, concerts, sporting events and even fitness classes. With the popularization of technology, devices such as music players are often listened to at unsafe volumes and for prolonged periods of time. Regular participation in such activities poses a serious threat of irreversible hearing loss.
KEY Points of Leicester travel clinic In London doc.docxNX Healthcare
In order to protect visitors' safety and wellbeing, Travel Clinic Leicester offers a wide range of travel-related health treatments, including individualized counseling and vaccines. Our team of medical experts specializes in getting people ready for international travel, with a particular emphasis on vaccines and health consultations to prevent travel-related illnesses. We provide a range of travel-related services, such as health concerns unique to a trip, prevention of malaria, and travel-related medical supplies. Our clinic is dedicated to providing top-notch care, keeping abreast of the most recent recommendations for vaccinations and travel health precautions. The goal of Travel Clinic Leicester is to keep you safe and well-rested no matter what kind of travel you choose—business, pleasure, or adventure.
Navigating Challenges: Mental Health, Legislation, and the Prison System in B...Guillermo Rivera
This conference will delve into the intricate intersections between mental health, legal frameworks, and the prison system in Bolivia. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current challenges faced by mental health professionals working within the legislative and correctional landscapes. Topics of discussion will include the prevalence and impact of mental health issues among the incarcerated population, the effectiveness of existing mental health policies and legislation, and potential reforms to enhance the mental health support system within prisons.
INFECTION OF THE BRAIN -ENCEPHALITIS ( PPT)blessyjannu21
Neurological system includes brain and spinal cord. It plays an important role in functioning of our body. Encephalitis is the inflammation of the brain. Causes include viral infections, infections from insect bites or an autoimmune reaction that affects the brain. It can be life-threatening or cause long-term complications. Treatment varies, but most people require hospitalization so they can receive intensive treatment, including life support.
We are one of the top Massage Spa Ajman Our highly skilled, experienced, and certified massage therapists from different corners of the world are committed to serving you with a soothing and relaxing experience. Luxuriate yourself at our spas in Sharjah and Ajman, which are indeed enriched with an ambiance of relaxation and tranquility. We could confidently claim that we are one of the most affordable Spa Ajman and Sharjah as well, where you can book the massage session of your choice for just 99 AED at any time as we are open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Visit : https://massagespaajman.com/
Call : 052 987 1315
PET CT beginners Guide covers some of the underrepresented topics in PET CTMiadAlsulami
This lecture briefly covers some of the underrepresented topics in Molecular imaging with cases , such as:
- Primary pleural tumors and pleural metastases.
- Distinguishing between MPM and Talc Pleurodesis.
- Urological tumors.
- The role of FDG PET in NET.
Letter to MREC - application to conduct studyAzreen Aj
Application to conduct study on research title 'Awareness and knowledge of oral cancer and precancer among dental outpatient in Klinik Pergigian Merlimau, Melaka'
Trauma Outpatient Center is a comprehensive facility dedicated to addressing mental health challenges and providing medication-assisted treatment. We offer a diverse range of services aimed at assisting individuals in overcoming addiction, mental health disorders, and related obstacles. Our team consists of seasoned professionals who are both experienced and compassionate, committed to delivering the highest standard of care to our clients. By utilizing evidence-based treatment methods, we strive to help our clients achieve their goals and lead healthier, more fulfilling lives.
Our mission is to provide a safe and supportive environment where our clients can receive the highest quality of care. We are dedicated to assisting our clients in reaching their objectives and improving their overall well-being. We prioritize our clients' needs and individualize treatment plans to ensure they receive tailored care. Our approach is rooted in evidence-based practices proven effective in treating addiction and mental health disorders.
This document is designed as an introductory to medical students,nursing students,midwives or other healthcare trainees to improve their understanding about how health system in Sri Lanka cares children health.
ALKAMAGIC PLAN 1350.pdf plan based of door to door delivery of alkaline water...rowala30
Alka magic plan 1350 -we deliver alkaline water at your door step and you can make handsome money by referral programme
we also help and provide systematic guideline to setup 1000 lph alkaline water plant
About this webinar: This talk will introduce what cancer rehabilitation is, where it fits into the cancer trajectory, and who can benefit from it. In addition, the current landscape of cancer rehabilitation in Canada will be discussed and the need for advocacy to increase access to this essential component of cancer care.
2. The Global Listening Environment
Study (GLES) took advantage of
Unitron’s unique Log It All feature to
acoustically map the listening
environments experienced by hearing
aid wearers in 10 countries.
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
3. The findings
Yup, the boring stuff comes first
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
4. How much time do people spend in different
listening environments?
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
5. Seven listening environments
Findings
1. No listening Environment averages to less
than 5%, four are above 10%.
2. The pattern is very consistent across all
countries.
3. Conversation in a Small Group and Quiet
Listening are the two most common
listening situations.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Coverage(%)
Seven Listening Environments
Listening Environment x Country
Germany
Australia
Netherlands
Slovenia
USA
Canada
South Africa
New Zealand
France
Spain
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
6. Seven listening environments
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Conv in Quiet Conv in Small Group Conv in Crowd Conv in Noise Quiet Noise Music
CoverageTime(%)
Listening Environments
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
7. Across Age Group Comparison
Findings
1. Two groups of people who differ in age by
20 – 30 years.
2. Yet, with the exception of a couple of 4%
differences in conversation in noise and
quiet listening they are almost identical.
3. But these are averages. What does the
raw data look like?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percentage
Listening Environment
Listening Environment x Two Age Groups
50-59
70-79
8. It all looks terribly consistent.
Is this result surprising?
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
9. Within Age Group Comparison
Findings
1. The mean values can be very
misleading. The actual data
tells a very different story.
2. Within this group 50-59 there
is far more individual
variability than we see when
comparing across ages.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cnv_In_Qt Cnv_In_Sm_Grp Cnv_In-Crwd Cnv_In-Ns Quiet Noise Music
Usage(%)
Listening Environments
Individuals (50-59)
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
11. Average results are very consistent across
groups. But individual results are highly variable.
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
12. Take home – Age is not a good predictor of
acoustic listening lifestyle.
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
13. How much time is spent in ‘conversation’
Conversation means all forms of verbal communications. In this case, four
conversational listening environments:
• Conversation in quiet (one on one)
• Conversation in a small group
• Conversation in a crowd
• Conversation in noise
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
15. Let’s break it down
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90+
Coverage(%)
Age (decades)
Conversation x Age
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
16. What does this mean?
In the strictly acoustic sense of the word, the time that the
average 40 year old spends in any form of conversation is not
more than 8% higher than the average for any other age
group, up to and including 90+
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
17. How much time is spent ‘functioning in noise’
‘Functioning in noise’ can be interpreted many ways:
• Conversation in a loud environment (consistently >65 dB)
• Conversation in a crowd
• Conversation in noise (think bus ride for example)
• Listening just in noise (any input level)
• Absence of speech + presence of noise.
• Functioning in noise (generically)
• Conversation in a crowd
• Conversation in noise
• Absence of speech + presence of noise
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
19. 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90+
Percentage
Age (decades)
Listening in Noise x Age/Gender
Female
Male
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
20. 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90+
Percentage
Age (decades)
Functioning in noise x Age
Conversing in Crowd
Conversing in Noise
Listen in Noise
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
21. How much time is spent in ‘soft inputs”’
‘Soft inputs’ is interpreted as:
• Conversation in environments consistently <65 dB
• One on one conversation
• Small group conversation
• Quiet listening (no speech or noise)
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
23. In summary
A few key GLES findings:
1. Demonstrated how much time average hearing aid wearers spend in different listening
environments, with time in conversation dominant.
2. Identified how much individual variability there is in each clients’ listening experiences.
3. Regardless of the age of a patient, the average data showed that there is a much smaller
difference than one might expect in the percentage of time they spend in various acoustic
environments as they age.
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
25. Clinics from ten countries participated
Records were collected from multiple clinics in
each participating country.
Data was included from fittings where the hearing
aids were worn for a minimum of two weeks.
Data was collected locally beginning April 1, 2016.
The last records included in this analysis were
accepted July 28, 2016.
Country Records
Australia 134
Canada 87
France 78
Germany 87
Netherlands 141
New Zealand 140
Slovenia 58
South Africa 55
Spain 67
USA 208
Total 1055
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
26. Data collected in each country
Gender Age in Decades Location Population Density
Logged
(Hrs/day) Listening Environments
Male 20 - 29 Rural 0 - 1000 0 Conversation 1 on 1
Female 30 - 39 Small Town 1001 - 10,000 1 Conversation Small Group
40 - 49 Suburban 10,001 - 25,000 2 Conversation Large Group
50 - 59 Urban 25,001 - 100,000 3 Conversation in Noise
60 - 69 100,001 - 500,000 ⸗ Quiet Listening
70 - 79 500,001 - 1,000,000 13 Noise only
80 - 89 1,000,000 - 10,000,000 14 Music
90+ 15
Global Listening Environment Study, Unitron. 2016
27. Author: Donald Hayes, Ph.D., F/AAA
Donald Hayes, Ph.D. is Director of Clinical Research for Unitron
and is responsible for the company’s corporate audiology group.
His group works closely with the organization’s product
management and research & development teams to provide a
clinical perspective during the definition and validation of new
products.
Dr. Hayes holds a Ph.D. in Audiology from the University of
Cincinnati, a Master of Arts in Audiology from State University
of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo, and a Bachelor of Arts in
Communication Disorders and Sciences also from SUNY at
Buffalo.