An update of the 2003 brief, this new primer provides an introduction to Health Accounts, the framework (System of Health Accounts 2011 or SHA 2011), and key steps involved in conducting Health Accounts exercises using SHA 2011 with particular emphasis on how policymakers can get involved to facilitate the process. The primer also includes country experiences illustrating show how Health Accounts data can be used for policy purposes, with specific attention to the importance of institutionalizing Health Accounts so that it may serve as an ongoing resource to policymakers.
Namibia 2012-13 Health Accounts: Key Findings and Policy ImplicationsHFG Project
Resource Type: Brochure
Authors: Ministry of Health and Social Services, Republic of Namibia
Published: June 30, 2015
Resource Description:
The current exercise (fiscal year 2012/13) is Namibia’s fourth round of Health Accounts and is the first round conducted using the SHA 2011 methodology; the prior three rounds covered 11 years of spending between 1998/99 and 2008/09. These prior rounds have been critical to informing the design and review of the country’s Health Sector Strategic Plan. Health Accounts estimates of spending in priority areas such as reproductive health have informed resource allocation discussions. Further, combined with information from other sources regarding the geographic distribution of health resources, Health Accounts estimates have helped the Ministry of Health and Social Services develop a resource allocation formula that is currently under review for implementation.
This brochure presents health expenditure data by households, public and private institutions for the 2012/13 fiscal year.
Capital Investment in Health Systems: What is the latest thinking?HFG Project
Capital investment in health typically refers to large expenditures in construction of hospitals and other facilities, investment in diagnostic and treatment technologies, and information technology platforms. These investments are characterized by their longevity and they are critical to efforts to improve healthcare quality and efficiency. Contrary to developed countries where there is well documented experience on capital investment in the health sector, including use of public private partnerships for the investment; there is little evidence on capital investment in health from low and middle income countries.
This work was undertaken to add to the HFG’s knowledge and learning strategy by clarifying what good practice guidance exists in capital benchmark in LMICs health sectors, as well as the HFG project’s experience in the area. This brief will be of value to all those interested in the planning and financing the capital investment in the health sector. This includes politicians, planners, managers, health professionals, architects, designers, and researchers in both the public and private sectors.
Improving Efficiency to Achieve Health System Goals in Botswana: Background P...HFG Project
Health outcomes have improved in Botswana over the last few decades. These successes have come at the same time as overall macroeconomic growth, with annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth averaging around 6 percent between 2010 and 2015 (IMF 2015), and Human Development Index ranking above the regional average. These improvements originate in a strong health service delivery system. In 2008, Botswana’s public health system included 338 health posts and 277 health clinics, sufficient to ensure that at least 80 percent of the population has coverage of essential, high-impact services. Management of these services was initially done by the Ministry of Local Government but has been transferred to district health teams under the Ministry of Health (MOH). As of 2008, Botswana’s public health system also had 17 primary hospitals, 14 district hospitals, two referral hospitals, and one mental health hospital; these hospitals are managed by the central government.
Health Trends in the Middle East and North AfricaHFG Project
In the past several decades, countries in the Middle East and North Africa have made significant improvements in developing their health systems and improving the health status of their populations. However, the region continues to face substantial and diverse political, economic, social, and health challenges: a rise in the burden of noncommunicable diseases, ongoing conflicts in several countries, and refugee crises. To inform future USAID health investments in the Middle East and North Africa, the Sustaining Health Outcomes through the Private Sector (SHOPS) Plus project and the Health Financing and Governance (HFG) project conducted an analysis of the private health sector and the health financing landscape from January 2017 to April 2018. The countries included in this analysis are Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, the West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen.
Introduction: We Need Reform; It’s Up To Us!
Health Care Costs
Lack of Insurance
We Have to Cover Everyone to Control Costs!
Politics of Reform
Obstacles to Reform
Reform Proposals: What’s On the Table
Single Payer: Keep Fighting
Keep Fighting: For Affordability, Abortion, Access
Countdown to Health Reform
Congress is close to passing substantial health reform, with important incremental steps to expand coverage, improve quality, and begin to control costs
Many are misinformed or uninformed about the proposals.
This resource presents:
The Problems
Cost, Access, Quality
Financing, Organization, Delivery
Health Care and Health
Why Insurance Doesn’t Work
The Politics of Reform
The Proposals: House and Senate
Keep Fighting for Single Payer
Fix It and Pass It!
This presentation discusses IHME's research in public financing of health in developing countries, including study design, findings, study limitations, and recommendations for governments and future research.
For more information please visit www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org
Haryana 2014/15 State Health Accounts: Main ReportHFG Project
This report presents the findings and policy implications of Haryana’s first Health Accounts (HA) estimation, for fiscal year April 2014 through March 2015. The estimation was conducted using the most recent Systems of Health Accounts (SHA) framework, which was updated in 2011. HA capture spending from all sources: central- and state-level governments, non-governmental organizations, external donors, private employers, insurance companies, and households. The analysis breaks down spending into the standard classifications defined by the SHA 2011 framework, namely, sources of financing, financing schemes, financing agent, type of provider, type of activity, and disease/ health condition.
Health financing within the overall health systemHFG Project
Presented during Day One of the 2016 Nigeria Health Care Financing Training Workshop. Presented by Prof. Tanimola Akande and Dr. Francis Ukwuije. More: https://www.hfgproject.org/hcf-training-nigeria
Follow the Money: Making the Most of Limited Health ResourcesHFG Project
Worldwide, health systems are being asked to do more with less. In many countries, donor funds have stagnated or are declining. This sharp decline could have broad implications for the health sector— particularly Namibia’s HIV and AIDS response which relies heavily on donor resources. New and emerging threats, such as Zika and Ebola, are also testing weak and fragile health systems, such as those in Guinea and Liberia. And costly noncommunicable diseases, like diabetes and cancers, are on the rise in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
With the end of the MDGs and start of the new SDGS, momentum is growing for countries around the world to pursue Universal Health Coverage (UHC) reforms and to expand affordable access to health care services, without risk of financial hardship, while facing real resource constraints in the aftermath of the global economic crisis.
In short, countries need to make their limited health resources go a long way. It is a financing challenge as well as a governance one. Countries cannot manage what they cannot measure. Countries need to measure their health spending – know where the money comes from, how much is spent and where, and how it can be spent more efficiently and equitably.
Policymakers can influence public and private health spending to improve efficiency, quality, equity, and expand access to life-saving health services. To succeed, however, governments need evidence around their health financing landscape. More and more, policymakers are appreciating the value of health resource tracking –that is, a range of methods, data collection initiatives, and estimation tools aimed at measuring the flow of funds to and through the health system.
Follow the Money: Making the Most of Limited Health ResourcesHFG Project
Worldwide, health systems are being asked to do more with less. In many countries, donor funds have stagnated or are declining. This sharp decline could have broad implications for the health sector— particularly Namibia’s HIV and AIDS response which relies heavily on donor resources. New and emerging threats, such as Zika and Ebola, are also testing weak and fragile health systems, such as those in Guinea and Liberia. And costly noncommunicable diseases, like diabetes and cancers, are on the rise in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
With the end of the MDGs and start of the new SDGS, momentum is growing for countries around the world to pursue Universal Health Coverage (UHC) reforms and to expand affordable access to health care services, without risk of financial hardship, while facing real resource constraints in the aftermath of the global economic crisis.
In short, countries need to make their limited health resources go a long way. It is a financing challenge as well as a governance one. Countries cannot manage what they cannot measure. Countries need to measure their health spending – know where the money comes from, how much is spent and where, and how it can be spent more efficiently and equitably.
Namibia 2012-13 Health Accounts: Key Findings and Policy ImplicationsHFG Project
Resource Type: Brochure
Authors: Ministry of Health and Social Services, Republic of Namibia
Published: June 30, 2015
Resource Description:
The current exercise (fiscal year 2012/13) is Namibia’s fourth round of Health Accounts and is the first round conducted using the SHA 2011 methodology; the prior three rounds covered 11 years of spending between 1998/99 and 2008/09. These prior rounds have been critical to informing the design and review of the country’s Health Sector Strategic Plan. Health Accounts estimates of spending in priority areas such as reproductive health have informed resource allocation discussions. Further, combined with information from other sources regarding the geographic distribution of health resources, Health Accounts estimates have helped the Ministry of Health and Social Services develop a resource allocation formula that is currently under review for implementation.
This brochure presents health expenditure data by households, public and private institutions for the 2012/13 fiscal year.
Capital Investment in Health Systems: What is the latest thinking?HFG Project
Capital investment in health typically refers to large expenditures in construction of hospitals and other facilities, investment in diagnostic and treatment technologies, and information technology platforms. These investments are characterized by their longevity and they are critical to efforts to improve healthcare quality and efficiency. Contrary to developed countries where there is well documented experience on capital investment in the health sector, including use of public private partnerships for the investment; there is little evidence on capital investment in health from low and middle income countries.
This work was undertaken to add to the HFG’s knowledge and learning strategy by clarifying what good practice guidance exists in capital benchmark in LMICs health sectors, as well as the HFG project’s experience in the area. This brief will be of value to all those interested in the planning and financing the capital investment in the health sector. This includes politicians, planners, managers, health professionals, architects, designers, and researchers in both the public and private sectors.
Improving Efficiency to Achieve Health System Goals in Botswana: Background P...HFG Project
Health outcomes have improved in Botswana over the last few decades. These successes have come at the same time as overall macroeconomic growth, with annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth averaging around 6 percent between 2010 and 2015 (IMF 2015), and Human Development Index ranking above the regional average. These improvements originate in a strong health service delivery system. In 2008, Botswana’s public health system included 338 health posts and 277 health clinics, sufficient to ensure that at least 80 percent of the population has coverage of essential, high-impact services. Management of these services was initially done by the Ministry of Local Government but has been transferred to district health teams under the Ministry of Health (MOH). As of 2008, Botswana’s public health system also had 17 primary hospitals, 14 district hospitals, two referral hospitals, and one mental health hospital; these hospitals are managed by the central government.
Health Trends in the Middle East and North AfricaHFG Project
In the past several decades, countries in the Middle East and North Africa have made significant improvements in developing their health systems and improving the health status of their populations. However, the region continues to face substantial and diverse political, economic, social, and health challenges: a rise in the burden of noncommunicable diseases, ongoing conflicts in several countries, and refugee crises. To inform future USAID health investments in the Middle East and North Africa, the Sustaining Health Outcomes through the Private Sector (SHOPS) Plus project and the Health Financing and Governance (HFG) project conducted an analysis of the private health sector and the health financing landscape from January 2017 to April 2018. The countries included in this analysis are Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, the West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen.
Introduction: We Need Reform; It’s Up To Us!
Health Care Costs
Lack of Insurance
We Have to Cover Everyone to Control Costs!
Politics of Reform
Obstacles to Reform
Reform Proposals: What’s On the Table
Single Payer: Keep Fighting
Keep Fighting: For Affordability, Abortion, Access
Countdown to Health Reform
Congress is close to passing substantial health reform, with important incremental steps to expand coverage, improve quality, and begin to control costs
Many are misinformed or uninformed about the proposals.
This resource presents:
The Problems
Cost, Access, Quality
Financing, Organization, Delivery
Health Care and Health
Why Insurance Doesn’t Work
The Politics of Reform
The Proposals: House and Senate
Keep Fighting for Single Payer
Fix It and Pass It!
This presentation discusses IHME's research in public financing of health in developing countries, including study design, findings, study limitations, and recommendations for governments and future research.
For more information please visit www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org
Haryana 2014/15 State Health Accounts: Main ReportHFG Project
This report presents the findings and policy implications of Haryana’s first Health Accounts (HA) estimation, for fiscal year April 2014 through March 2015. The estimation was conducted using the most recent Systems of Health Accounts (SHA) framework, which was updated in 2011. HA capture spending from all sources: central- and state-level governments, non-governmental organizations, external donors, private employers, insurance companies, and households. The analysis breaks down spending into the standard classifications defined by the SHA 2011 framework, namely, sources of financing, financing schemes, financing agent, type of provider, type of activity, and disease/ health condition.
Health financing within the overall health systemHFG Project
Presented during Day One of the 2016 Nigeria Health Care Financing Training Workshop. Presented by Prof. Tanimola Akande and Dr. Francis Ukwuije. More: https://www.hfgproject.org/hcf-training-nigeria
Follow the Money: Making the Most of Limited Health ResourcesHFG Project
Worldwide, health systems are being asked to do more with less. In many countries, donor funds have stagnated or are declining. This sharp decline could have broad implications for the health sector— particularly Namibia’s HIV and AIDS response which relies heavily on donor resources. New and emerging threats, such as Zika and Ebola, are also testing weak and fragile health systems, such as those in Guinea and Liberia. And costly noncommunicable diseases, like diabetes and cancers, are on the rise in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
With the end of the MDGs and start of the new SDGS, momentum is growing for countries around the world to pursue Universal Health Coverage (UHC) reforms and to expand affordable access to health care services, without risk of financial hardship, while facing real resource constraints in the aftermath of the global economic crisis.
In short, countries need to make their limited health resources go a long way. It is a financing challenge as well as a governance one. Countries cannot manage what they cannot measure. Countries need to measure their health spending – know where the money comes from, how much is spent and where, and how it can be spent more efficiently and equitably.
Policymakers can influence public and private health spending to improve efficiency, quality, equity, and expand access to life-saving health services. To succeed, however, governments need evidence around their health financing landscape. More and more, policymakers are appreciating the value of health resource tracking –that is, a range of methods, data collection initiatives, and estimation tools aimed at measuring the flow of funds to and through the health system.
Follow the Money: Making the Most of Limited Health ResourcesHFG Project
Worldwide, health systems are being asked to do more with less. In many countries, donor funds have stagnated or are declining. This sharp decline could have broad implications for the health sector— particularly Namibia’s HIV and AIDS response which relies heavily on donor resources. New and emerging threats, such as Zika and Ebola, are also testing weak and fragile health systems, such as those in Guinea and Liberia. And costly noncommunicable diseases, like diabetes and cancers, are on the rise in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
With the end of the MDGs and start of the new SDGS, momentum is growing for countries around the world to pursue Universal Health Coverage (UHC) reforms and to expand affordable access to health care services, without risk of financial hardship, while facing real resource constraints in the aftermath of the global economic crisis.
In short, countries need to make their limited health resources go a long way. It is a financing challenge as well as a governance one. Countries cannot manage what they cannot measure. Countries need to measure their health spending – know where the money comes from, how much is spent and where, and how it can be spent more efficiently and equitably.
Linkages Between the Essential Health Services Package and Government-Sponsor...HFG Project
Priority setting is a key function of health systems that seek to achieve universal health coverage. The Essential Health Services Package (EHSP) explicitly prioritizes certain services; government-sponsored health benefit plans implicitly prioritize others. To gain insights into the purpose, policy objectives, and governance of the EPHS and dominant health benefit plans in Ethiopia, we conducted a case study in 2016. Methods included a desk review of relevant documents and qualitative analysis of 15 key informant interviews of leading health finance experts in Addis Ababa. All data were coded and analyzed using a thematic inductive framework.
Exploring New Sources of Revenue for Health: Filling the GapHFG Project
Resource Type: Brief
Authors: Jose Carlos Gutierrez, Sharon Nakhimovsky, Carlos Avila
Published: 04/01/2015
Resource Description:
In lower middle-income countries, many questions remain around how to scale up health systems to reach Universal Health Coverage. Where will the money come from; what financing mechanisms are available to policymakers; and what are the trade-offs that must be taken into account? This brief highlights the key questions and findings behind HFG’s technical report, “Domestic Innovative Financing for Health: Learning from Country Experience.” The report provides a framework for analyzing innovative options for raising additional revenue for health and reviews different countries’ experiences with each option. In the context of this report, “innovative” options are those that are new for a country and generate additional resources for the health sector. The successes and failures of these approaches provide food for thought as policymakers seek to leverage more resources for health. The full report is also available for download. - https://www.hfgproject.org/brief-exploring-new-sources-of-revenue-for-health/
Essential Package of Health Services Country Snapshot: IndonesiaHFG Project
This country snapshot is one in a series of 24 snapshots as part of an activity looking at the Governance Dimensions of Essential Packages of Health Services in the Ending Preventable Child and Maternal Death priority countries. The snapshot explores several important dimensions of the EPHS in the country, such as how government policies contribute to the service coverage, population coverage, and financial coverage of the package. Each country snapshot includes annexes that contain further information about the EPHS.
Strengthening Primary Care as the Foundation of JKNHFG Project
Central to the vision of JKN and the Government of Indonesia’s commitment to enhancing the health of all of its citizens is strengthening the role of primary care to prevent, treat and manage health conditions. How it is working, what the challenges are, and where might changes to regulations or operationalization of JKN contribute to strengthening the system so that JKN can achieve its goals. This brief focuses on JKN regulations at the primary care level, and shares insights into whether regulations are effective and how they are being implemented in a range of Indonesian contexts.
System of Health Accounts 2011: What is SHA 2011 and How Are SHA 2011 Data Pr...HFG Project
The SHA 2011 statistical manual improves upon the original by strengthening the classifications to support production of more detailed results and by introducing new classifications that expand the scope of the analysis and provide a more comprehensive look at health expenditure flows. The purpose of this brief is to present the main features of the SHA 2011 framework as well as discuss the process of its implementation and, ultimately, institutionalization within routine government operations.
Barbados 2012-13 Health Accounts ReportHFG Project
This report presents the findings and policy implications of Barbados’ first Health Accounts estimation, conducted for the year April 2012 to March 2013. It captures spending from all sources: the government, non-governmental organizations, external donors, private employers, private insurance companies and households. The analysis presented breaks down spending to the standard classifications, as defined by the System of Health Accounts 2011 framework, namely sources of financing, financing schemes, type of provider, type of activity and disease/health condition.
The health of a people to a very large extent determines their productivity and wealth. The 2010
Population and Housing Census indicates that a significant proportion of the Bunkpurugu-Yunyoo District in
Ghana (over 75%) are living below the poverty line of GH¢228.00 per annum (approximately US $120 per
annum). It then implies that approximately the same proportion or even a little above that might not be able to
access health care under the ‘cash and carry’ system. Inability to access health care will lead to poor health
status of the residents and thus lower their productivity.
Developing Haiti’s First Health Financing StrategyHFG Project
The Ministry has an approved National Health Policy, known as the Politique Nationale de Santé, which addresses “what” is to be done. In addition, the Ministry is developing a National Health Plan that lays out “how” the National Health Policy will be made operational. However, the Ministry of Health does not yet have a national health financing strategy that outlines “where” resources will come from and “how” they will be used to achieve the country’s health objectives.
To bridge this important gap, the HFG project is working with the Planning and Evaluation Unit of the Ministry of Health to develop a national health financing strategy that will include an operational plan consisting of specific activities, timelines, and an overall health budget. The strategy will focus on the three core functions of health financing: mobilization of resources; pooling of risks and financial protection; and purchasing and provider payment. A strategy mapping out these core health financing functions will enable Haiti to raise the necessary resources, better protect people from the financial consequences of ill health, and make optimum use of resources to achieve the National Health Plan’s vision.
The health financing strategy will serve as a road map, particularly when it is combined with data from the second National Health Accounts, which the HFG project is also supporting, and a fully costed National Health Plan. Together, they will provide strong evidence and powerful justification for increased health financing in the future to improve Haiti’s health outcomes.
Follow the Money: Choosing the Most Appropriate Health Expenditure Tracking ToolHFG Project
Health spending data answer key questions such as who spends money on health, how resources for health are raised, who provides health goods and services, and which health goods and services are consumed. This data helps countries to understand how their health system is performing e.g. in terms of efficiency and equity. However, many health expenditure tracking tools exist and it can be difficult to know which tool best fits a country’s data needs.
This introductory guide provides information on five commonly used health expenditure tracking tools whose primary objective is to analyze health spending. It explains the similarities and differences between the five tools and clarifies their purposes, so countries are more informed about the tools available and are able to select the tool that best fits their needs. The guide is intended for low- and middle-income country chief planners and ministry of health officials who commission health expenditure tracking exercises. Health financing technicians may also find the guide useful for its explanation of the scopes of health expenditure tracking tools.
Universal Health Coverage: Frequently Asked QuestionsHFG Project
This brief answers several “frequently asked questions” (FAQ) on universal health coverage (UHC):
What is Universal Health Coverage (UHC)?
How does UHC align with USAID’s priorities?
How does UHC relate to broader goals for development, including the Sustainable Development Goals?
How is UHC measured?
What progress has been made towards UHC?
How does USAID support countries’ UHC efforts?
The FAQ accompanies Universal Health Coverage: An Annotated Bibliography, which presents resources that provide an overview of UHC and also delve into specific topics within UHC, such as measurement, health financing, and benefit plans. The bibliography also includes links to relevant websites that can provide additional resources.
Universal health coverage (UHC)—ensuring that everyone has access to quality, affordable health services when needed—can be a vehicle for improved equity, health, financial well-being, and economic development. In its 2013 report, Global Health 2035, the Commission on Investing in Health (CIH) made the case that progressive (“pro-poor”) pathways towards UHC, which target the poor from the outset, are the most efficient way to achieve both improved health outcomes and increased financial protection (FP). Countries worldwide are now embarking on health system changes to move closer to achieving UHC, often with a clear pro-poor intent. While they can draw on guidance related to the technical aspects of UHC (the “what” of UHC), such as on service package design, there is less information on the “how” of UHC—that is, on how to maximize the chances of successful implementation.
Motivated by a shared interest in helping to close this information gap, a diverse international group of 21 practitioners and academics, including ministry of health officials and representatives of global health agencies and foundations, convened at The Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center for a three-day workshop from July 7–9, 2015. The participants shared their experiences of implementing UHC and discussed the limited evidence on how to implement UHC, focusing on a set of seven key “how” questions from across five domains of UHC.
The purpose of this presentation is to equip audiences with the ability to:
Define universal health coverage (UHC) and understand the basic tenets of UHC
Identify how UHC fits in USAID’s health and poverty reduction strategies
Effectively communicate to country stakeholders how USAID can support a country’s progress towards UHC
Identify relevant UHC resources within the Office of Health Systems and USAID
The presentation is part of the “UHC Toolkit” and accompanies Universal Health Coverage: An Annotated Bibliography, and Universal Health Coverage: Frequently Asked Questions.
Similar to Understanding Health Accounts: A Primer for Policymakers (20)
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Understanding Health Accounts: A Primer for Policymakers
1. Understanding Health Accounts:
A Primer for Policymakers
What are Health Accounts?
Health Accounts encompass total health spending in a country – including
public, private, household, and donor expenditures. Health Accounts
carefully track the amount and flow of funds from one health care actor to
another, such as the distribution of funds from the Ministry of Health to each
government health provider and health service. In short, Health Accounts
measures the “financial pulse” of national health systems and answers such
questions as:
`` Who in the country pays for health care? How much do they spend and on
what types of services?
`` How are funds distributed across different health services?
`` Who benefits from health expenditures?
`` What proportion of spending goes to HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, or other
specific disease areas?
The System of Health Accounts (SHA) is an internationally accepted methodology
for summarizing, describing, and analyzing the financing of health systems. By
systematically tracking the flow of expenditures in the health system SHA
is critical for improving governance and accountability at the national and
international levels of policymaking.
First published in 2000 by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD)1
, SHA was then adapted to the developing-country context
in a version of the SHA called National Health Accounts (NHA) by theWorld
Health Organization (WHO).2
Over 100 developing countries have completed
NHA estimations to inform health policy and measure health system performance.
Recently, OECD, Eurostat, andWHO produced an updated version called SHA
20113
that is known simply as “Health Accounts” (HA).
“[Health Accounts] afford
us a better appreciation of
the burden of out-of-pocket
health financing borne
by the general public and
particularly people living
with HIV/AIDS – evidence
critical to the viability of the
health insurance schemes we
are currently developing.”
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus5
2008 Minister of Health
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
2. 2
Why Do I Need Health Accounts?i
As your economy and
population grows, so will
your country’s spending on
health. Countries can spend
more on health compared to
previous years and compared to
their peers, but with the same
or even worse health outcomes
– see Figure 1. Granted there
are many determinants of
health outcomes besides
sector spending, but you as a
policymaker can affect public
and private health spending to
improve efficiency, quality, equity,
and ultimately save lives. Health
Accounts are your basic tool to
determine what to do in terms
of health financing policy and
later determine whether those
policies are working as intended.
Why Should I Have Confidence in
Health Accounts Data?
Health Accounts uses strict criteria to consistently
determine what to include and exclude as a health
expenditureii
in order to collect the best data to measure
health expenditures:
`` Transparency.There should be clear documentation of
the sources of the expenditure data, the classifications
and definitions used, and any adjustments or calculations.
Typically, this requires preparation of a written manual for
Health Accounts estimates in each country.
`` Policy relevance. Health expenditure measures should
be constructed to ensure inclusion of everything that is
relevant to a country’s health policy development efforts.
`` Measurement feasibility. It should be feasible
to compile and validate health expenditure
measures within a reasonable time (less than a
year) and cost.
`` Verification.As part of the Health Accounts
process, the local Health Accounts team identifies
multiple sources of independent data for the
same expenditures to allow for cross-checking
and verification of health expenditures.
Source: http://ucatlas.ucsc.edu/spend.php
Figure 1. Per Capita Health Spending versus Average Life Expectancy
(2000)
i
This primer is an update of the Partners for Health Reformplus NHA primer.4
The document is intended to provide insight on how HA can support
health systems policymakers and managers in their work to improve health system performance and management.
ii
See glossary of health account terms in Annex 1
3. Understanding Health Accounts:A Primer for Policymakers 3
How can Health Accounts Inform Policy?
Health Accounts is a tool specifically designed to inform the health policy process, including policy design
and implementation, policy dialogue, and the monitoring and evaluation of policy changes. Health Accounts
information is useful to the decision-making process because it is an assessment of the current use of resources
and can be used to compare one country’s health system with those of other countries – of particular value when
setting performance objectives and benchmarks. If implemented on a regular basis, Health Accounts can track
health expenditure trends to monitor and evaluate the impact of policy changes. Here are a few examples of policy
impact:
In Kenya, the Ministry of Health used Health Accounts data to mobilize more resources for health. Kenya’s
2001/02 HA revealed that households finance 51 percent of the country’s total health spending (Figure 2).
In comparison, government contributed only 30 percent of total health spending. This high burden of health
payments on households is significant given that over half of all households live in poverty. The Ministry of
Health used the evidence from HA to justify and
secure a 30 percent budget increase in 2006 from
the Ministry of Finance. This represented its biggest
budget increase since 1963.
In the early 1990s, Egypt launched the Health
Insurance Organization for formal sector workers
and later expanded coverage to children and widows.
One of the goals of expanded insurance was to
contain household out-of-pocket spending on health.
Egypt conducted multiple rounds of HAs from
1994 to 2009 that revealed that household out-of-
pocket spending increased as a percentage of total
health spending. Expanding the Health Insurance
Organization was not containing out-of-pocket
spending. The Ministry of Health used the findings to propose a broader health insurance scheme.6
Reproductive health is a priority in Namibia; however, maternal and child mortality rates did not decline between
2000 and 2007. As part of its 2008/09 Health Accounts, Namibia conducted a deeper analysis of spending on
reproductive health. Despite being a priority area, the HA found that reproductive health spending comprised
only 10 percent of Namibia’s total health expenditure (in comparison, HIV/AIDS spending represented 28.5
percent of total health spending), and most of the spending was from private sources (households and NGOs).
Based on these findings, policy makers in Namibia looked for ways to increase the government’s allocation to
reproductive health. The Ministry of Health and Social Services has developed a Resource Allocation Criteria plan
which is currently undergoing review.
Health Accounts is not only useful to ministries of health. Civil society organizations can use HA data to ensure
people bring an informed voice to health policy. Prior to the 2002 HA in Kenya, civil society organizations had
difficulty engaging in national debates because they didn’t have access to the data they needed to substantiate their
concerns. The 2002 HA showed that the government spent most of
HIV/AIDS funding on prevention but did not contribute to ARV
treatment (ART). Instead, households were the primary source of
paying for ART. The Kenya Treatment Access Movement used these
findings to lobby the government for an ART budget line-item to cover ART costs for poor Kenyans.
Figure 2. Households Dominated as the Source
of Health Expenditures in Kenya (2002)
4. 4
How Do Health Accounts
Untangle the Flow of Funds
Through a Health System?
The Health Accounts framework organizes and
tabulates health spending data in a series of
two-dimensional tables that show the flow of funds
from one category of health care entity to another,
that is, how much is spent by each health care
category and to where those funds are transferred.
Each health care category in the tables follows the
International Classification for Health Accounts
(ICHA) in the OECD SHA methodology.
The purpose of showing health fund distributions
within tables and between tables is to understand
the flow of funds through the entire system.As
Figure 3 shows, these flows can be quite complex
– as funds are often not simply channeled from one
financing source to one type of provider, such as
from government to government providers. Rather,
health systems are much more complicated and
entail numerous types of categories and health fund
transfers. Using tables to plot the flow simplifies and
clarifies the picture.
What Can I Do To Ensure That
Health Accounts Serve My
Country?
The best way to ensure that health accounts
address the policy questions and issues that
are a priority for your country is to get involved.
Participate in defining the health system questions
and issues that Health Accounts can shed light
on, support the Health Accounts Team during the
production phase, and make Health Accounts a
routine, annual exercise in your health system.The
first step, defining your health system questions
and issues, is the most important step because
more intense data collection can be planned for
priority questions and issues. Health Accounts
consists of several steps (Figure 4). Involvement
of policymakers is critical at several points in
the process to maximize the use of the data to
improve your country’s health system performance.
Figure 3: Health Accounts Untangle the Complex Flow of Funds through a Health System
Figure 4: Health Accounts Steps
1. Define the health system questions and issues that
Health Accounts can shed light on
2. Collect health expenditure data
3. Organize the data into the Health Accounts tables
4. Analyze the results for health policy
5. Disseminate the information to a wide range of
stakeholders
5. Understanding Health Accounts:A Primer for Policymakers 5
How Can Policymakers Facilitate
Data Collection?
The steering committee’s role is to facilitate access
to all potential data sources and support the Health
Accounts team to substitute official statistics with
more accurate estimates. Here are some data
collection challenges that the Health AccountsTeam
may face and how you can help:
`` Records from national, regional, and
local-level health authorities. These records
tend to be the most comprehensive, reliable,
and accurate. However, they may not be up-to-
date, because government accounts go through
a lengthy auditing process.Auditing may create
another problem, as it tends to generate two or
sometimes three versions of total spending – an
un-audited and audited.
`` Household survey. Household surveys are
undoubtedly the most important, possibly
the only source of information on private
(household) out-of-pocket expenditures.
Household data are key for equity analysis,
as they are linked to socioeconomic and
demographic characteristics. Household surveys
are expensive.The most efficient and sustainable
option is to incorporate health expenditure
questions into existing national household
surveys that are conducted on a regular basis.
`` Donor assistance. Often, annual surveys
and routine reports of all donor assistance
in a country (produced by United Nations
Development Programme,WHO, or Ministry
of Health) provide much of the necessary data.
Nevertheless, issues arise with donor health
expenditures: one is difficulty in determining
the monetary value of in-kind donations
(drugs, clinical supplies, vaccines).Another is
the difference between amounts disbursed
by the donor and the amounts expended
by the recipient who can be the Ministry of
Health or a private organization. Also, when
donors disburse directly to nongovernmental
organizations or other local entities without
going through the ministry, the data are likely to
be missed.
How Can Policymakers get
involved?
Most countries establish two groups to successfully
produce valid and reliable Health Accounts results
that have credibility with decision makers: 1) a
multidisciplinary Health Accounts team to do most
of the detailed technical work, and 2) a more policy-
oriented steering committee.
The Health Accounts team should be composed
of members who work for various government
agencies, both to ensure broad organizational
representation and to access diverse data sources
that otherwise might not be known to other team
members.The team should include members who
are familiar with national economic statistics and
accounting practices, knowledgeable about health
systems and policies, and experienced with data
collection, data analysis and report writing. It is also
very useful to have a health economist on the team
to interpret the Health Accounts results.
The steering committee is for policymakers. It
should include senior leaders from the Ministry of
Health, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Planning,
and other high-level stakeholders from entities such
as the National Statistical Office, academic groups,
provider and consumer organizations, and the Social
Health Insurance Organization.The committee’s
role is to guide and facilitate the work of the Health
AccountsTeam.Tasks include:
`` Communicating policy concerns to the Health
Accounts team before data collection begins
`` Giving feedback to the Health Accounts team
on results and findings
`` Facilitating difficulties the team encounters
while collecting data from different entities
`` Assisting in interpreting the Health Accounts
results and drawing policy implications
`` Assisting the Ministry of Health in translating
the policy implications into policy action
`` Supporting the Health Accounts team in
institutionalizing Health Accounts as a routine
annual exercise.
6. 6
`` Insurer records (social and private).
Insurer records should include premiums paid
by households and companies to the insurer,
and the insurer’s medical and administrative
costs. Private insurance companies may be
reluctant to share some of their information,
particularly their loss ratios and profits.Also,
insurance records may exclude payments
made by households directly to the provider
(co-payments and deductibles). This is why a
household survey is important.
`` Provider records. These can be collected
from the providers themselves or regulatory
and financial agencies, such as tax authorities or
licensing agencies. Often an industry association
also collects routine data for its own purposes.
As with private insurance companies, private
providers are often reluctant to reveal their
financial information for tax and other reasons,
and a legal decree may be needed to mandate
them to do so.Another potential issue is that,
in some countries, it may be difficult to have a
precise count of providers to get an accurate
sample size for a survey. It is especially difficult
to collect data from informal sector providers
(traditional healers).A household survey with
questions about where households seek care
and how much they spend would address this
challenge.
How Can I Ensure that Health
Accounts Are Produced on a
Routine Basis?
Institutionalization is the annual production and
routine use of Health Accounts as an integral and
sustained part of health system governance.
Here is what policymakers can do to institutionalize
Health Accounts:
1. Demand the data. Request and use health
expenditure data.Ask for the data to be
presented in understandable formats, such as
oral presentations and written briefs that stress
policy-relevant aspects of the findings.
2. Determine a location where Health
Accounts is housed. Health Accounts data
should be housed in a location that will promote
the use of the data by policymakers.Traditional
locations include: the Ministry of Health, the
Ministry of Finance, the central statistical bureau,
a local university, or the central bank.
3. Establish standards for data collection and
analysis. Data and reporting mechanisms should
be standardized into a consistent format to
allow for year-to-year comparisons. Incorporate
health expenditure questions into an existing
national household survey that is conducted
on a regular basis.The Health Accounts team
should keep track of the original methodology
and any problems that arose during earlier
rounds of Health Accounts. Maintaining records
offers useful insights for streamlining the Health
Accounts exercise and increasing the utility of
results.
4. Institute data reporting requirements.
Institutionalization of Health Accounts requires
continual replenishment of data. By requiring
the various Health Accounts-relevant groups to
report data to the Health Accounts team, or at
least to a central location, the reporting process
is strengthened and becomes more integrated in
to the Health Accounts structure.
7. Understanding Health Accounts:A Primer for Policymakers 7
What Support is Available for Health Accounts?
1. Tool to streamline production of health accounts
WHO and USAID developed a software application called the Health Accounts Production Tool (HAPT) (Figure 5)
to streamline the production of HA by providing step-by-step guidance to in-country teams and automating much
of the data input and calculations. HAPT is available in English, French, Spanish, Russian, Chinese and Portuguese
at the WHO website (http://who.int/health-accounts/tools/en/). It includes:
zz Step-by-step directions to guide country teams through the Health Accounts estimation process;
zz Platform to manage complex datasets, reducing issues with missing data and version control;
zz Survey creator and import function to streamline data collection and analysis;
zz Built-in auditing feature to facilitate review and correction of double-counting of expenditures;
zz Interactive diagram to help analysts visualize the flow of funding through the health sector; and
zz Automatically generated Health Accounts output tables.
2. Tool to facilitate interpretation and use of health accounts
A second tool, the Health Accounts Analysis Tool (HAAT) complements the HAPT. HAAT assists with health
expenditure data analysis by automatically producing relevant graphs and charts based on data in the HAPT. The
HAAT is available for download from the WHO website (http://who.int/health-accounts/tools/en/).
3. Technical assistance
USAID and WHO have resource tracking consultants that can assist your country in conducting a health accounts
exercise. For more information, contact the WHO Health Accounts team at nha@who.int or the USAID/Health
Finance and Governance Project Learnmore@hfgproject.org.
4. Health Accounts database
WHO maintains a Global Health Expenditure Database of Health Accounts data for countries. This database
contains internationally comparable numbers on national health expenditures and can be accessed on the WHO
website (http://www.who.int/health-accounts/ghed/en/).
Figure 5. The Health Accounts Production Tool’s Interactive Diagram
Helps Analysts Visualize the Flow of Funding Through the Health Sector
8. DISCLAIMER
The author’s views expressed here
do not necessarily reflect the views
of the U.S.Agency for International
Development or the U.S. Government.
Abt Associates Inc.
www.abtassociates.com
4550 Montgomery Avenue,
Suite 800 North, Bethesda, MD 20814
About HFG
A flagship project of USAID’s Office of
Health Systems, the Health Finance and
Governance (HFG) Project supports
its partners in low- and middle-income
countries to strengthen the health
finance and governance functions of
their health systems, expanding access
to life-saving health services.The HFG
project is a five-year (2012-2017) global
health project.To learn more, please visit
www.hfgproject.org.
The HFG project is a five-year
(2012-2017), $209 million global
project funded by the U.S.Agency for
International Development.
The HFG project is led by Abt
Associates Inc. in collaboration with
Avenir Health, Broad Branch Associates,
Development Alternatives Inc., Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health, Results for Development
Institute, RTI International, and Training
Resources Group, Inc.
January 2015
Recommended Citation: Cogswell,
Heather,Tesfaye Dereje. January 2015.
Understanding Health Accounts:A Primer for
Policymakers. Bethesda, MD: Health Finance
& Governance project, Abt Associates
Annex 1: Health Accounts Glossary for
Policy Makers
References
1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2000. A System of Health Accounts 1.0. Paris.
2. World Health Organization (WHO),World Bank, and United States Agency for International Development. Guide to
producing national health accounts, with special applications for low- and middle-income countries. Geneva:WHO.
3. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Eurostat, and World Health Organization. 2011. A System of
Health Accounts, 2011 Edition. OECD Publishing.
4. Partners for Health Reformplus. May 2003. Primer for Policymakers: Understanding National Health Accounts:The Methodology
and Implementation Process. Bethesda, MD: Health Finance & Govern ance project,Abt Associates Inc.
5. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health. April 2010. Ethiopia’s Fourth National Health Accounts,
2007/2008. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
6. World Health Organization. Country Cooperation Strategy for WHO and Egypt 2010-2014. Retrieved on November 11,
2014 from: http://www.who.int/countryfocus/cooperation_strategy/ccs_egy_en.pdf
The Health Accounts methodology helps
countries use consistent definitions and
counting methods, which allows for cross-
country comparability of health expenditure
estimates.
Health Expenditure – all expenditures
for activities whose primary purpose is
to restore, improve, and maintain health
for the nation and for individuals during
a defined period of time. Budgets are not
expenditures. Spending by the Ministry of
Education on medical training and teaching
hospitals is included. Not all activities
conducted by the Ministry of Health are
included, for example the Ministry of Health
might fund the operation of orphanages,
which would be deemed a non-health
expenditure.
National Boundary – Health Accounts
does not use the geographical borders of
a country but rather looks at the health
transactions of that country’s citizens and
residents.Therefore, it includes expenditure
on health care by citizens and residents
who are temporarily abroad and excludes
spending on health care by foreign
nationals within the country. Spending by
international organizations on health and
health-related goods and services for the
residents of the recipient country are also
considered national health expenditure.
Time Boundary – Health Accounts uses
the “accrual” method to define its time
boundary. Expenditures are recorded for
the time period in which the health activity
occurred (and corresponding expense was
incurred) and not when the actual payment
is made. For example, if a hospital stay
occurs during the final month of fiscal year
2013 but payment is made in fiscal year
2014, the expenditure is recorded for fiscal
year 2013.
Classifications Health Accounts has at the
core of its framework three classifications:
1. Financing Schemes, which show
how goods and services consumed and
provided are financed;
2. Providers, which show who delivers
health care services; and
3. Health Care Functions, which show
the types of health care consumed.
In addition to these core classifications,
the SHA 2011 framework proposes
additional classifications that are linked to
the core classifications.These additional
classifications are:
4. Beneficiaries, which show health care
consumption by population groups
(divided by age, disease burden, income
quintile, etc.);
5. Financing Agents, the institutional units
that manage health financing schemes;
6. Factors of Provision, which show the
inputs used by providers to deliver health
care services;
7. Revenues of Financing Schemes,
which show the sources of funding for
each financing scheme; and
8. Capital Formation, which compiles
investments by health care providers, as
part of the extended framework.