1. Change often causes fear and resistance in people due to the uncertainty and instability that comes with change. People fear losing what is familiar and valuable to them and having to develop new skills.
2. There are several reasons why people resist organizational change, including fearing loss of self-interest, misunderstanding the implications of change due to lack of trust, and having different assessments of problems and solutions than those initiating the change.
3. However, change can be managed by acknowledging it, facing it objectively, getting involved in the process, communicating, empowering others, achieving short-term wins, consolidating gains, and institutionalizing new practices. Understanding the sources of resistance and properly implementing change can help people
Coping with Change: Understanding and Adapting to Life's Inevitable Progressions
1. UNDERSTANDING AND COPING WITH CHANGE
UNDERSTANDING AND COPING WITH CHANGE
2
Title
Students Name
Course Name and Number
Instructor
Submission Date
Abstract
Progressions are sure to happen and we are certain to adjust,
else we die. As normally well said: "Adjust or Perish". The
world is always showing signs of change along these lines are
innovation, propensities, and mentalities and so on.
The reality of the matter is that individuals dread progressions.
Actually, it is liberated intelligence to fear as well as oppose
progressions. Whether progressions are, no doubt brought
without anyone else's input, a relative, government officials and
strategy creators or by managers, individuals tend to take a
gander at them with a great deal of concern. There are a ton of
theories which now and again may prompt misgivings,
dissatisfactions and even a great deal of cases.
2. The primary motivation behind why progressions produces
trepidation is on the grounds that they are connected with
instability. While everybody thinks about the changes that will
be achieved, it is regularly truly hard to measure the
suggestions on such changes. On top of that, different varieties
of theories that come about don't generally help in tolerating
such changes effortlessly. A change is more often than not
arranged, in view of specific conditions overarching around
then and these conditions "anticipate" what the change will
bring about. In any case, such conditions might themselves no
more exist when the change is executed, in this way changing
the wanted results.
Notwithstanding the alarm they create, progressions require not
so much be awful. Indeed, changes are inescapable, whether
great or awful. Yet, a great change for somebody may be awful
for another person and the other way around. In all cases, what
truly matters is the route in which one adapts to changes.
Cases of progressions in life
3. Brought without anyone else present: Enrolling for a college
course, accepting work, moving occupations, leaving ones folks'
home, leaving ones nation, getting ready for marriage, getting
hitched, getting to be parent.
Brought by a relative: These incorporate wedding of a relative,
a relative going out for another one, a relative leaving the
nation, leaving the family business, entering governmental
issues, conception or passing of a relative.
Changes in the public eye by government officials and strategy
producers: Changing the expense framework, forcing diverse
sorts of expenses, giving social helps, changes in laws and
regulations, arrangement of clergymen, bans on specific works
on, giving allows and licenses to specific sorts of organizations
to be set up.
Brought by the managers: Changes in the progression, giving
advancements, changing the wages and compensations structure,
changing work conditions, changing administration styles,
developments in items and client administration, new promoting
procedures.
Adapting to changes.
As said prior, what matters the most in progressions is the way
one adapts to them. Give us a chance to see 5 ways that may
help in adapting to changes, however this arrangement of
techniques and approaches to adapt to change is non-exhaustive.
1. Acknowledge changes. Realize that changes are unavoidable.
There is no reason for standing up to. The world is continually
changing and it is common to adjust to it.
2. Face changes. Attempt to perceive how changes will impact
your life. Search for approaches to profit from it instead of
getting disappointed over the conceivable negative impacts.
3. Get included in rolling out the improvement. This permits
you to know all the more about it and helps you adjust all the
more effortlessly.
4. Convey. Converse with different gatherings included. Get
illuminations and arrange where conceivable. Express your
4. apprehensions if need be. This helps others included to
comprehend your apprehensions better. This is the way they will
have the capacity to help you all the while.
5. Be certain. Take a gander at things from alternate points of
view. Positive speculation decreases anxiety and along these
lines builds productivity and benefit.
6. Be target in your dissection. Regularly, we attempt to fall in
the trap of the individuals who theorize a considerable measure
and who, for no reason, cast a ton of questions in individuals'
psyche. All the time, these individuals are cynical yet are
exceptionally gifted in impacting others. Not letting yourself
from being impacted by such individuals and attempt to have a
goal investigation of the circumstances all without anyone else's
input.
The following are situations where one is resistant to change.
Self- Interest
One major reason people resist organizational change is that
they think they will lose something of value as a result. In these
cases, because people focus on their own best interests and not
on those of the total organization, resistance often results in
“politics” or “political behavior. People fear that change will
cause them to lose something they once had. For example,
when a corporate president decided to create a new vice
presidency for product development, the existing vice
presidents for manufacturing and marketing resisted because
they feared losing their right to approve or veto new product
decisions.
Misunderstanding and lack of rust.
People also resist change when they do not understand its
implications and perceive that it might cost them much more
than they will gain. Such situations often occur when trust is
lacking between the person initiating the change and the
employees. A change starts as a vision in the mind of its
sponsor. If people don't trust that individual, they will suspect
that she or he has hidden and harmful motives for proposing the
5. change. For example, a union opposed a company's proposal of
flexible scheduling (flextime) because they didn't trust the
personnel manager who suggested it.
Different assessments
Another common reason people resist organizational change is
that they assess the situation differently from their managers or
those initiating the chant see more costs than benefits resulting
from the change, not only for themselves but for their company
as well.
When people view a problem from different perspectives, they
will perceive different causes and cures for it. Therefore, they
may see a change as tackling the wrong cause and proposing a
fruitless solution. For example, sanitation department
employees felt their pick-up delays were due to equipment
breakdowns so they resented the city replacing their supervisor
– they felt the planned change was inappropriate.
Low tolerance for change. People also resist change because
they fear they will not be able to develop the new skills and
behavior that will be required of them. All human beings are
limited in their ability to change, with some people much more
limited than others. Organizational change can inadvertently
require people to change too much, too quickly.
People sometimes resist change because they fear they will be
unable to handle the new conditions competently. They also
may resist breaking up comfortable social relations with co-
workers. For example, individuals have turned down transfers
and promotions because they weren't sure they could handle
being supervisors and they didn't want to give up the
friendships with co-workers that had developed over the years.
All this factors are caused by internal factors. This is because
managers often deal with resistance coercively. Here they
essentially force people to accept a change by explicitly or
implicitly threatening them or by actually firing or transferring
them. As with manipulation, using coercion is a risky process
6. because inevitably people strongly resent forced change.
Creating a sense of urgency whereby you drive the
stakeholder’s attention to a set of emerging issues such as
decreasing levels of returns on fundraising activities, losses on
provision of service, decline of profits from shops and others.
Forming a guiding coalition to implement changes through
communicating the necessity of changes to organizational
stakeholders by pointing to serious financial issues faced by the
organization.
Developing a vision and strategy as an integral part to
successful implementation of change has been dealt with by
promoting equality in employment and formulating an objective.
Communicating a vision of change in Scope by involving an
effective use of internal and external communication channels
in an integrated manner. Internal communication has to be aided
by word-of-mouth, whereas external communication has to be
done through organizational website and attracting media.
Empowering stakeholders as an important part of the change
process has to be involved and removing obstacles in the way of
implementation of change, and gaining support from various
groups of organizational stakeholders.
Generating short-term wins such as achieving the objectives has
to serve as effective incentive for employees to carry on with
the changes.
Consolidating gains through further empowering employees and
focus on organizational vision.
Institutionalizing new practices has to be recognized as a
critical aspect of ensuring the continuity of changes that have
been introduced, and accordingly.
To summarize, changes have been implemented in Scope in an
effective manner through informing various organizational
stakeholders about the necessity of changes, and taking specific
actions in order to ensure that implemented changes are
institutionalized.
Citations
1. Relevant materials for change and coping with it.
7. http://www.us/webdisk/6141PROFDEV5/stress/coping_and_und
erstanding_change. [Accessed 5 Jan. 2014].
2. Corporate Care Works Building A More Productive
Workforce presentation National Food Service Management
Institute http://intermountainhealthcare.org.
3. Jonathan, A. K. Coping with change, In-text: (Jonathan,
2010)
Jonathan, A. (2010). Coping with change. 2nd ed. Cairo: ISBN
publishers, pp.16-21