the petitioner has not given any representation to the
respondent and straightaway approached this Court, by filing this Writ
Petition, stating that this Court should direct the respondent to accept the
entire amount in 24 equal installments
The petitioner claims ownership in respect of the lands
situated in Survey Nos.34/2, 35/13, 35/1, 35/8, 35/9 and 13/2
situated at Jagirmangalam Village, Thirvalangadu Firka, Tiruttani
Taluk, Thiruvallur District and the properties are ancestral in nature
and he is cultivating the lands. According to the petitioner by playing
fraud the 5th respondent managed to obtain a patta in his name and in
this regard, he has submitted an application to the 2nd respondent who
has called him for an enquiry vide memo dated 11.02.2010 and
according to the petitioner he has also attended the enquiry on
19.02.2010 and since, nothing had happened thereafter, came forward
to file this writ petition.
3. Heard the submissions of Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional
Government Pleader, who accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 4.
3
4. Though, the petitioner has prayed for a larger relief, this
Court in the facts and circumstances of the case, permits the
petitioner to submit one more representation to the 2nd respondent for
early disposal of his petition dated 04.02.2010 and referred to in the
summons vide Na.Ka.No.469/2010/A2 dated 11.02.2010 within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order
and on receipt of the same, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider
the representation on merits and in accordance with law, after putting
the 5th respondent on notice and pass orders as expeditiously as
possible and not later than eight weeks, thereafter and inform the
decision taken to the petitioner as well as the 5th respondent.
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake caseGibran Ashraf
The Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) Justice Mansoor Ali Shah on Saturday slapped a Rs100,000 fine on petitioner for filing an unnecessary and false case and that entangled a citizen for 13 years.
Read the full story here: https://www.samaaenglish.tv/news/40026387/pakistan-sc-judge-fines-petitioner-rs01m-for-wasting-13-years-of-opponent-in-fake-case
Pension fixation with additional increment retired on 30 Jun fell due on 1st July.
Read More
https://virendersinghkadian.com/retired-on-30th-june-is-eligible-for-increment-benefit/
Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...Law Web
Whether it is necessary to make enquiry U/S 202 of crpc in case of dishonour of cheque? http://www.lawweb.in/2016/04/whether-it-is-necessary-to-make-enquiry.html?
The petitioner claims ownership in respect of the lands
situated in Survey Nos.34/2, 35/13, 35/1, 35/8, 35/9 and 13/2
situated at Jagirmangalam Village, Thirvalangadu Firka, Tiruttani
Taluk, Thiruvallur District and the properties are ancestral in nature
and he is cultivating the lands. According to the petitioner by playing
fraud the 5th respondent managed to obtain a patta in his name and in
this regard, he has submitted an application to the 2nd respondent who
has called him for an enquiry vide memo dated 11.02.2010 and
according to the petitioner he has also attended the enquiry on
19.02.2010 and since, nothing had happened thereafter, came forward
to file this writ petition.
3. Heard the submissions of Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vijayakumar, learned Additional
Government Pleader, who accepts notice for the respondents 1 to 4.
3
4. Though, the petitioner has prayed for a larger relief, this
Court in the facts and circumstances of the case, permits the
petitioner to submit one more representation to the 2nd respondent for
early disposal of his petition dated 04.02.2010 and referred to in the
summons vide Na.Ka.No.469/2010/A2 dated 11.02.2010 within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order
and on receipt of the same, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider
the representation on merits and in accordance with law, after putting
the 5th respondent on notice and pass orders as expeditiously as
possible and not later than eight weeks, thereafter and inform the
decision taken to the petitioner as well as the 5th respondent.
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake caseGibran Ashraf
The Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) Justice Mansoor Ali Shah on Saturday slapped a Rs100,000 fine on petitioner for filing an unnecessary and false case and that entangled a citizen for 13 years.
Read the full story here: https://www.samaaenglish.tv/news/40026387/pakistan-sc-judge-fines-petitioner-rs01m-for-wasting-13-years-of-opponent-in-fake-case
Pension fixation with additional increment retired on 30 Jun fell due on 1st July.
Read More
https://virendersinghkadian.com/retired-on-30th-june-is-eligible-for-increment-benefit/
Lawweb.in whether it is necessary to make enquiry us 202 of crpc in case of d...Law Web
Whether it is necessary to make enquiry U/S 202 of crpc in case of dishonour of cheque? http://www.lawweb.in/2016/04/whether-it-is-necessary-to-make-enquiry.html?
The Purchaser purchased Ground Floor alone and while purchasing Ground Floor the Seller agreed not to construct Second Floor. But the First Floor Purchaser, planned to construct Second Floor and the Ground Floor Purchaser success before the Court
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to
direct the respondent to register FIR, investigate and file a final
report on the complaint dated 12.08.2015 given by the petitioner.
2
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
3. On a complaint lodged by one Ramachandran (the first
petitioner herein), a case in Crime No.21 of 2014 has been
registered by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,
Tiruvallulur, against Kannan Iyer (A1), who was working as
Manager in Central Bank of India, Pattaraiperumbudur Branch. The
allegation against the accused is that, he has forged the signature
of Bank customers and had defalcated the amounts. Now these
petitioners have given a complaint dated 12.08.2015 against one
Sathyamurthy, Viswanathan and Emanuel, whom the petitioners
alleged were accomplices of the said Kannan Iyer.
4. In the considered opinion of this Court, no second FIR.,
can be registered for the same transaction. During the course of
investigation, if material surfaces about the involvement of said
accused, it is needless to state that the Police shall make them as
accused and take action in accordance with law.
These writ petitions are filed for issue of a Writ of Mandamus
forbearing the respondents, their men, officers, agents, servants,
representatives and/or anyone claiming through or under them and/or any
other person from in any manner applying the impugned Government Order in
G.O.(2D) No. 59, Labour And Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014
and published in Part II-Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette dated
03.12.2014 on the petitioners, who are differently placed as Hosiery
Manufactory and not as Tailoring Industry.
2. When the writ petitions are taken up, it is brought to the
notice of this Court that a Division Bench of this Court, in similar
circumstances, in W.P. Nos. 36077 & 36078 of 2015, on 17.01.2016, held as
follows:
"4. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents
fairly submits that the aforestated G.O.(2D) No. 59, Labour and
Employment (J1) Department dated 10.10.2014 is not applicable
to the employment in Hosiery Manufactory.
5. In view of the foregoings, it is established that G.O.
(2D) No. 59, Labour and Employment (J1) Department dated
10.10.2014, published in Part II Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu
4
Government Gazette dated 03.12.2014 is not applicable to the
employment in Hosiery Manufactory. Accordingly, these writ
petitions are disposed of. ..."
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952
1. 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE: 04.03.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.8083 of 2016 &
WMP No.7197 of 2016
Royal Yarns Coimbatore Pvt. Ltd.,
Rep. by its Director - Mr.B.Balusamy,
No.04/32, Seventh Cross Street,
College Road, Tirupur,
Tamil Nadu-641 602. .. Petitioner
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organization,
Rep. by its Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
Dr.Balasundaram Road,
Coimbatore-641 018. .. Respondent
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records
in Ref.No.TN/CB/87130/ENF/CC-21/2015, dated 23.12.2015 and quash the
same and consequently direct the respondent to accept the remaining
outstanding determined amount in the impugned order in 24 equal
installments.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ezhil Raj
2. 2
O R D E R
Heard Mr.S.Ezhil Raj, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner.
2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the
Proceedings initiated under Section 7(A) of the Employees Provident Fund
and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952.
3. The petitioner would state that due to certain unavoidable
circumstances, they could not honor the commitment in time and they are
ready to remit the entire amount in 24 equal installments. However, it
appears that the petitioner has not given any representation to the
respondent and straightaway approached this Court, by filing this Writ
Petition, stating that this Court should direct the respondent to accept the
entire amount in 24 equal installments. In this regard, the learned counsel
for the petitioner referred to an earlier order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.2024 of 2015, dated 29.01.2015, (M/s.Tirupur Sri Sentil Cotton Mills
Limited Vs. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Coimbatore). In
the said Writ Petition, the respondent took a stand that the petitioner
therein may be permitted to pay the demand in four equal installments.
Taking note of the said facts, this Court exercised its discretion and stated
3. 3
that the petitioner in the said Writ Petition should pay the entire amount in
six equal installments.
4. In my view, in this Writ Petition, no direction can be issued at
this juncture to direct the respondent to accept the payment in 24 equal
installments. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to submit a
representation to the first respondent, requesting to pay the entire amount
in installments and if the petitioner agrees to remit the same in ten equal
installments, then the respondent shall consider such request.
With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
04.03.2016
Index :Yes/No.
Internet:Yes/No.
Note : Issue order copy on 07.03.2016
r n s
4. 4
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.,
r n s
To
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,
Employees Provident Fund Organization,
Dr.Balasundaram Road,
Coimbatore-641 018.
W.P.No.8083 of 2016 &
WMP No.7197 of 2016
04.03.2016